北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 279-282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.02.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

截骨形态评估股骨前倾角的准确性

柳剑1,吕明1,吴坚1,郭盛杰1,韩娜2,周一新1△   

  1. (1. 北京积水潭医院矫形骨科, 北京100035;2. 北京大学人民医院创伤骨科, 北京100044)
  • 出版日期:2016-04-18 发布日期:2016-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 周一新 E-mail:orthyixin@yahoo.com

Estimation of femoral version based on broach geometry after femoral-neck osteotomy

LIU Jian1, LV Ming1, WU Jian1, GUO Sheng-jie1, HAN Na2, ZHOU Yi-xin1△   

  1. (1. Department of Adult Reconstruction, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100035, China; 2. Department of Traumatic Orthopedics, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China)
  • Online:2016-04-18 Published:2016-04-18
  • Contact: ZHOU Yi-xin1 E-mail:orthyixin@yahoo.com

摘要:

目的:研究应用CT扫描模拟的股骨颈截骨面形态判别股骨假体前倾角的准确性。方法:采用前瞻性自身对照研究,于髋关节置换术前及术后分别对32例患者行CT扫描。应用术前CT选取股骨小粗隆水平及小粗隆上方5 mm、10 mm、15 mm四个可能的截骨平面,根据股骨后髁连线分别计算这四个截面的前倾角;应用术后CT计算股骨假体前倾角。分别比较术前四个截面前倾角以及股骨前倾角与术后假体前倾角的关系。结果:小粗隆及小粗隆上方5 mm水平的截面前倾角分别为37.0°±11.0°和34.3°±10.6°,明显大于术后假体前倾角(26.1°±11.0°,P<0.001);小粗隆上方10 mm及15 mm水平的截面前倾角分别为28.1°±10.9°和22.4°±13.7°,与术后假体前倾角差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术前股骨前倾角(12.9°±13.8°)小于术后假体前倾角(P<0.001)。结论:根据股骨截骨的开口形态来判断股骨假体前倾角要根据截骨平面来决定:截骨平面低于小粗隆上方5 mm时,截面前倾角大于假体前倾角;截骨平面高于小粗隆上方10 mm时,截面前倾角与假体前倾角无显著差异。

关键词: 假体设计, 股骨颈, 髋臼, 关节成形术, 置换, 髋, 体层摄影术, X线计算机

Abstract:

Objective:To find out whether it is accurate to estimate femoral version based on femoral broach after femoral neck osteotomy using computed tomography scans. Methods: In 32 total hip arthroplasty (THA), we performed CT scans before and after operation. Four possible levels (lesser trochanter, 5 mm above, 10 mm above and 15 mm above the lesser trochanter) of broach version were calculated based on the pre-operative CT scan. Stem versions were measured on the post-operative CT scan. We determined the difference between the preoperative broach version and the postoperative stem version using the Student’s t-test for paired samples assuming equal variance. Results: For the operated hips, pre-operative hip version differed according to the level of measurement. Our findings showed that the average femoral version was 37.0°±11.0° at the level of the lesser trochanter (section 1), 34.3°±10.6° at 5 mm above the lesser trochanter (section 2), 28.1°±10.9° at 10 mm above the lesser trochanter (section 3), and 22.4°±13.7° at 15 mm above the lesser trochanter (section 4), and that the average version for the femoral neck (FNV) was 12.9°±13.8°. The postoperative hip version was the stem version (FSV), which we found to be an average of 26.1°±11.0°. The mean femoral version for section 1 and 2 was larger than the mean postoperative stem version (P<0.01); the mean version for sections 3 and 4 did not differ from the mean postoperative stem version (P>0.05). The mean femoral neck version was less than the mean postoperative stem version (P<0.01); the difference was 13.2°±11.1° of the increased anteversion on average for the FSV compared with FNV. Conclusion: The accuracy of estimated femoral version after arthroplasty depends on broach level. When it is 10 mm above the lesser trochanter, stem version estimation is accurate, but below that level, there is a tendency to overestimate.

Key words: Prosthesis design, Femur neck, Acetabulum, Arthroplasty, replacement, hip, Tomography, X-ray computed

中图分类号: 

  • R687.3
[1] 钟华, 李原, 徐丽玲, 白明欣, 苏茵. 18F-FDG PET/CT在风湿免疫病中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 853-859.
[2] 刘园梅, 傅义程, 郝靖欣, 张福春, 刘慧琳. 老年髋部骨折患者住院期间发生术后心力衰竭的列线图预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 874-883.
[3] 汪琪伟, 包鹏宇, 洪士皓, 杨昕, 王宇, 曹永平. 改良股骨颈截骨术在伴严重屈曲畸形强直性脊柱炎患者手术治疗过程中的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 884-889.
[4] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[5] 安思兰,郑群怡,王锴,高姗. 全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的特点及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[6] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[7] 赵然,刘延青,田华. 应用累积和控制图分析全膝关节置换术中电子压力垫片指导软组织平衡的学习曲线[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 658-664.
[8] 傅强,高冠英,徐雁,林卓华,孙由静,崔立刚. 无症状髋关节前上盂唇撕裂超声与磁共振检查的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 665-669.
[9] 叶一林,刘恒,潘利平,柴卫兵. 全膝关节置换术后假体周围痛风发作误诊1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 362-365.
[10] 付玉,胡鑫浓,崔圣洁,施捷. 骨性Ⅱ类高角错患者术前正畸下前牙去代偿效果及牙槽骨改建分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 62-69.
[11] 王梓,张军军,左力,王悦,李文歌,程虹,蔡广研,裴华颖,王利华,周绪杰,师素芳,刘立军,吕继成,张宏. 血浆置换治疗新月体型IgA肾病的有效性分析: 多中心队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1038-1046.
[12] 姜保国,张培训. 老年髋部骨折的围手术期风险评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 803-809.
[13] 贾金凤,梁菲,黄建伟,王昊,韩璞青. 双重血浆分子吸附系统模式人工肝治疗对血小板的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 548-551.
[14] 王书磊,高阳旭,张宏武,杨海波,李辉,李宇,沈笠雪,姚红新. 儿童基底节区生殖细胞瘤30例临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 222-226.
[15] 李志昌,侯云飞,周之伟,姜龙,张舒,林剑浩. 影响全膝关节置换术患者术前预期的患者因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 170-176.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!