北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (4): 651-656. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.04.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

综合止血措施下自体血回输装置对全膝关节置换术失血控制的有效性分析

李杨1*,李邦国2*,赵然1,田华1△,张克1   

  1. (1. 北京大学第三医院骨科, 北京100191;2. 山东省聊城市第二人民医院, 山东聊城252600)
  • 出版日期:2018-08-18 发布日期:2018-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 田华 E-mail:tianhua@bjmu.edu.cn

Effect of autologous blood transfusion device on preventing blood loss in primary total knee arthroplasty using comprehensive hemostatic methods

LI Yang1*, LI Bang-guo2*, ZHAO Ran1, TIAN Hua1△, ZHANG Ke1   

  1. (1. Department of Orthopedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 2. Department of Orthopedics, the People’s Second Hospital of Liaocheng, Liaocheng 252600, Shandong, China)
  • Online:2018-08-18 Published:2018-08-18
  • Contact: TIAN Hua E-mail:tianhua@bjmu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的:分析在围手术期综合性止血措施下,初次全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty, TKA)使用自体血回输(autologous blood transfusion, ABT)装置引流和非负压引流球引流对于术后失血和输血控制的有效性。方法:回顾性收集2014年6月至2015年6月在北京大学第三医院诊断为重度骨性关节炎,并经同一手术医师完成的单侧、初次TKA患者共131例。按照临床中是否在术后使用ABT装置分为两组,其中ABT组于术后应用ABT装置进行引流和自体血回输,对照组于术后应用非负压引流球进行引流。比较两组患者术后的引流量、血红蛋白下降值、总失血量、隐性失血量及输血率的差异。结果:ABT组术后引流量显著高于对照组[515 mL (80~1 610 mL) vs. 260 mL (40~670 mL),P<0.001],ABT组术后自体血回输量的中位数为245 mL (60~1 070 mL)。两组患者在术后1 d血红蛋白下降值(P=0.340)、术后3 d血红蛋白下降值(P=0.524)、术后3 d的总失血量(P=0.101)和隐性失血量(P=0.062)上差异均无统计学意义。131例患者中共9例接受了异体输血(ABT组5/64,7.8%;对照组4/67,6.0%), 两组患者的输血率差异无统计学意义(P=0.943)。结论:在围手术期综合性止血措施的常规应用下,ABT装置对于控制单侧、初次TKA患者术后失血的效果并不明显,也未能有效降低异体血输血率,然而却加大了术后引流量,增加了患者的住院费用,因此,在单侧、初次TKA术后并无必要常规应用ABT装置。

关键词: 关节成形术, 置换, 膝, 输血, 自体, 失血, 手术

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the conventional application of using comprehensive hemostatic methods during the perioperative period, and the effect of autologous blood transfusion (ABT) device compared with non-negative pressure drainage on preventing blood loss and allogenic blood transfusion after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: A total of 131 patients (131 knees) with severe knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral primary TKA by the same surgeon in Peking University Third Hospital from June 2014 to June 2015 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into ABT group (64 patients) and control group (67 patients). ABT devices were used for drainage and blood transfusion in the ABT group while the control group used the non-negative pressure drainage only. The results of the drainage fluid volume, the decrease of hemoglobin, the total blood loss, the hidden blood loss and blood transfusion after TKA were compared between the two groups. Results: The drainage fluid volume in ABT group was significantly higher than that in control group [515 mL (80-1 610 mL) vs. 260 mL (40-670 mL), P<0.001]. The autologous blood transfusion in ABT group was 245 mL (60-1 070 mL). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the value of hemoglobin decrease 1 day after surgery (P=0.340) and 3 days after surgery (P=0.524). There were no significant differences in the total blood loss (P=0.101) and the hidden blood loss (P=0.062) between the two groups either. There were 9 patients in the 131 patients who received allogeneic blood transfusion, of whom 5 in the ABT group (5/64, the blood transfusion rate was 7.8%) and 4 in the control group (4/67, the blood transfusion rate was 6.0%), and no significant differences in the blood transfusion rate between the two groups (P=0.943). Conclusion: With the conventional application of using comprehensive hemostatic methods during perioperative period, the ABT device did not show the effective result of controlling postoperative blood loss and failed to reduce the rate of allogeneic blood transfusion in patients with unilateral primary TKA. However, the ABT device could increase the drainage fluid volume and improve the patient’s hospitalization expenses. Therefore, there is no need for routine application of ABT device in unilateral primary TKA.

Key words: Arthroplasty, replacement, knee, Blood transfusion, autologous, Blood loss, surgical

中图分类号: 

  •  
[1] 张树栋,谢睿扬. 机器人手术时代的肾癌合并腔静脉瘤栓治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 562-564.
[2] 颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[3] 王明瑞,刘军,熊六林,于路平,胡浩,许克新,徐涛. 经皮微通道-微电子肾镜-微超声探针碎石术治疗1.5~2.5 cm肾结石的疗效和安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 605-609.
[4] 应沂岑,杜毅聪,李志华,张一鸣,李新飞,王冰,张鹏,朱宏建,周利群,杨昆霖,李学松. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下颊黏膜补片输尿管成形术治疗复杂输尿管狭窄[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 640-645.
[5] 虞乐,邓绍晖,张帆,颜野,叶剑飞,张树栋. 具有低度恶性潜能的多房囊性肾肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 661-666.
[6] 乔佳佳,田聪,黄晓波,刘军. 肾结石合并系统性红斑狼疮行经皮肾镜碎石取石术的安全性和有效性评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 745-749.
[7] 陈克伟,邓绍晖,刘茁,张洪宪,马潞林,张树栋. 肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤破裂出血的手术时机[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 326-331.
[8] 安思兰,郑群怡,王锴,高姗. 全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的特点及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[9] 徐心雨,吴灵,宋凤岐,李自力,张益,刘筱菁. 基于下颌运动轨迹的正颌外科术中下颌骨髁突定位方法及初步精度验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 57-65.
[10] 蔡安东,王晓霞,周文娟,柳忠豪. 下颌前突畸形患者上颌骨及髁突虚拟位置与术后现实位置的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 74-80.
[11] 毛海,张帆,张展奕,颜野,郝一昌,黄毅,马潞林,褚红玲,张树栋. 基于MRI前列腺腺体相关参数构建腹腔镜前列腺癌术后尿失禁的预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 818-824.
[12] 刘慧丽,吕彦函,王晓晓,李民. 老年患者腹腔镜泌尿系肿瘤根治术后慢性疼痛的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 851-856.
[13] 张心灵,林志禹,陈玉杰,董文芳,杨欣. 脊柱后路内固定术后切口愈合不良的整形外科治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 910-914.
[14] 马建勋,夏有辰,李比,赵红梅,雷玉涛,布希. 乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房重建的方式选择[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 612-618.
[15] 林国中,谢京城,陈晓东,杨军. 成人原发性脊髓拴系综合征的分型及显微外科手术治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 641-645.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!