Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 726-729. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.025

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Swanson人工跖趾关节置换术治疗第2~5跖趾关节疾病的疗效评价

刘中砥,芦浩,袁玉松,徐海林()   

  1. 北京大学人民医院创伤骨科,北京大学人民医院创伤救治中心,北京 100044
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-27 出版日期:2020-08-18 发布日期:2020-08-06
  • 通讯作者: 徐海林 E-mail:hailinxu66@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科技计划项目(Z181100001718159);北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RDH20127-01)

Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of arthroplasty with Swanson prosthesis in the surgical treatment of 2-5 metatarsophalangeal joint diseases

Zhong-di LIU,Hao LU,Yu-song YUAN,Hai-lin XU()   

  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Trauma Medical Center, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2019-01-27 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Hai-lin XU E-mail:hailinxu66@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Science and Technology Plan Project(Z181100001718159);Research and Development Fund of Peking University People’s Hospital(RDH20127-01)

RICH HTML

 10   

PDF (PC)

136

摘要：

目的: 探讨使用Swanson双柄硅胶假体行跖趾关节置换治疗骨性关节炎、类风湿关节炎等引起的第2~5跖趾关节病变的中长期临床疗效。方法: 2010年1月至2015年10月应用Swanson双柄硅胶假体实施第2~5跖趾关节置换术21例,成功随访16例,其中,男性2例,女性14例,平均年龄(66.7±5.5)岁,类风湿关节炎9例,严重骨性关节炎5例,跖骨头骨软骨病2例。采用美国足踝外科协会Maryland足部评分系统、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score, VAS)和影像学检查等方法对手术前后行走及跖趾关节活动度、疼痛程度等进行临床评价。结果: 随访时间17个月至5年,平均3.2年。Maryland足部评分:术前为(60.69±6.12)分,术后末次随访时为(88.13±5.84)分。术前跖趾关节活动度:背伸5.4°±3.1°,跖屈4.4°±2.7°;术后:背伸15.7°±4.5°,跖屈12.2°±4.3°,术后跖趾关节活动度较术前有明显改善,数据对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。VAS评分:术前评分为(6.8±0.9)分,术后末次随访为(2.3±0.8)分,术后跖趾关节疼痛症状得到明显改善。根据美国足踝外科协会Maryland足部评分系统,术后评分较术前评分有显著性提高(P<0.01),优良率达到81.3%。结论: Swanson双柄硅胶假体跖趾关节置换术能够较好地缓解疼痛, 增加关节活动范围及稳定性,维持前足正常的行走能力,是重建第2~5跖趾关节结构、恢复关节功能的有效方法,但仍存在一些不良反应的发生概率,需要进一步改进。

关键词: 跖趾关节, 关节置换, 硅胶假体

Abstract:

Objective: Metatarsophalangeal joint is an important joint for daily weight-bearing walking. Osteoarthritis, osteochondrosis of the metatarsal head, rheumatoid arthritis can often cause the destruction of 2-5 metatarsophalangeal joint, leading to pain, limited joint movement and toe deformities, severely affecting the forefoot function. The purpose of this study is to report the results of middle-long term follow-up after performing Swanson double-stem silicon implant arthroplasty in patients with diseases of 2-5 metatarsophalangeal joint. Methods: From January 2010 to October 2015, 21 patients with 2-5 metatarsophalangeal joint replacement were performed with Swanson double-stem silicone prosthesis. In the study, 16 cases were successfully followed up,2 men and 14 women with an average age (66.7±5.5) years. There were 9 cases diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, 5 cases with severe osteoarthritis and 2 cases with osteochondrosis of the metatarsal head. The American Association of foot and ankle surgery Maryland foot scoring system and visual analogue score (VAS) were used to evaluate the walking function, metatarsophalangeal joint mobility and pain degree before and after surgery. Results: The follow-up time ranged from 17 months to 5 years, with an average of 3.2 years. According to Maryland foot scoring system of the American Association of foot and ankle surgery, the preoperative score was (60.69±6.12) points and postoperative score was (88.13±5.84) points. Range of motion of metatarsophalangeal joint: preoperative: back extension 5.4°±3.1°, plantar flexion 4.4°±2.7°; postoperative: back extension 15.7°±4.5°, plantar flexion 12.2°±4.3°, the motion of 2-5 metatarsophalangeal joint after operation was significantly improved compared with that before operation (P<0.01). The preoperative VAS was (6.8±0.9) points and the last follow-up was (2.3±0.8) points, the pain symptom of metatarsophalangeal joint was improved obviously after operation. The postoperative score was significantly higher than the preoperative score according to Maryland foot scoring system (P<0.01), the excellent rate was 81.3%. Conclusion: With the advantages of alleviating pain, preserving the length and alignment of metatarsophalangeal joint, improving the function of walking, and correcting the deformity, Swanson double-stem silicon implant arthroplasty is a reproducible and safe option for the reconstruction of the 2-5 metatarsophalangeal joint. However, there is still some probability of adverse reactions and still room for improvement.

Key words: Metatarsophalangeal joint, Arthroplasty, Silicon implant

中图分类号: 

  • R649.9

图1

病例展示: 60岁男性第二跖趾关节炎行Swanson双柄硅胶人工铰链式假体置换术"

表1

Swanson人工假体置换治疗跖趾关节疾病手术前后数据对比"

Items Preoperation Postoperation t value P value
Range of motion of 2-5 metatarsophalangeal joints, x?±s
Back extension 5.4°±3.1° 15.7°±4.5° -9.68 <0.01
Plantar flexion 4.4°±2.7° 12.2°±4.3° -6.84 <0.01
Maryland foot score, x?±s 60.69±6.12 88.13±5.84 -11.64 <0.01
VAS score, x?±s 6.81±0.91 2.25±0.77 12.92 <0.01
[1] Nery C, Baumfeld D. Lesser metatarsophalangeal joint instability: Treatment with tendon transfers[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2018,23(1):103-126.
pmid: 29362027
[2] Swanson AB, de Groot Swanson G. Use of grommets for flexible hinge implant arthroplasty of the great toe[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1997(340):87-94.
[3] Phisitkul P. Managing complications of lesser toe and metatarsophalangeal joint surgery[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2018,23(1):145-156.
pmid: 29362029
[4] Davies MS, Saxby TS. Metatarsal neck osteotomy with rigid internal fixation for the treatment of lesser toe metatarsophalangeal joint pathology[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 1999,20(10):630-635.
[5] Stevens J, de Bot R, Hermus J, et al. Clinical outcome following total joint replacement and arthrodesis for hallux rigidus: A systematic review[J]. JBJS Rev, 2017,5(11):e2.
pmid: 29135720
[6] Erdil M, Elmadaǧ NM, Polat G, et al. Comparison of arthrodesis, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty, and total joint replacement in the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2013,52(5):588-593.
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.03.014 pmid: 23659913
[7] O'Malley MJ, Basran HS, Gu Y, et al. Treatment of advanced stages of hallux rigidus with cheilectomy and phalangeal osteotomy[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013,95(7):606-610.
[8] Swanson AB, Lumsden RM, Swanson GD. Silicone implant arthroplasty of the great toe. A review of single stem and flexible hinge implants[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1979, (142):30-43.
pmid: 387324
[9] Moeckel BH, Sculco TP, Alexiades MM, et al. The double-stemmed silicone-rubber implant for rheumatoid arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Long-term results[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992,74(4):564-570.
pmid: 1583051
[10] Peace RA, Hamilton GA. End-stage hallux rigidus: cheilectomy, implant, or arthrodesis?[J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2012,29(3):341-353.
pmid: 22727376
[11] Valentini R, de Fabrizio G, Piovan G. First metatarsophalangeal joint replacement with total arthroplasty in the surgical treatment of the hallux rigidus[J]. Acta Biomed, 2014,85(Suppl 2):113-117.
[12] Stone OD, Ray R, Thomson CE, et al. Long-term follow-up of arthrodesis vs total joint arthroplasty for hallux rigidus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2017,38(4):375-380.
doi: 10.1177/1071100716682994 pmid: 28367694
[13] Brewster M. Does total joint replacement or arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint yield better functional results? A syste-matic review of the literature[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2010,49(6):546-552.
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.07.003 pmid: 20833566
[14] Shereff MJ, Jahss MH. Complications of silastic implant arthroplasty in the hallux[J]. Foot Ankle, 1980,1(2):95-101.
pmid: 7274905
[15] Erkocak OF, Senaran H, Altan E, et al. Short-term functional outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal total joint replacement for hallux rigidus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2013,34(11):1569-1579.
doi: 10.1177/1071100713496770 pmid: 23877170
[1] 安思兰,郑群怡,王锴,高姗. 全膝关节置换术后患者早期疼痛的特点及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 167-173.
[2] 王鑫光,耿霄,李杨,吴天晨,李子剑,田华. 便携式导航与计算机导航辅助在全膝关节置换力线对准和手术时间的比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 728-733.
[3] 柯岩,张蔷,马云青,李儒军,陶可,桂先革,李克鹏,张洪,林剑浩. 全髋关节置换术治疗脊柱骨骺发育不良患者Tönnis 3级髋关节骨关节炎的早期疗效[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 175-182.
[4] 李森磊,杨先腾,田晓滨,孙立. 直接前入路和前外侧入路全髋关节置换术后的早期功能恢复对比[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(2): 268-272.
[5] 王军锋, 李沼, 张克石, 袁峰, 李儒军, 钟群杰, 关振鹏. 双膝关节置换术中髌骨置换与否的左右侧随机对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 861-866.
[6] 赵旻暐， 王宁， 曾琳， 李民， 赵中凯， 张菡， 田华. 膝关节置换术后连续收肌管阻滞与股神经阻滞的疗效比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 142-147.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[2] 樊志荣, 卢义侠, 李长龄. 肾病综合征大鼠肾小球血管紧张素Ⅱ受体结合的变化及机制[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2001, 33(6): 565 .
[3] 范蓉, 张成飞, 高岩, 李斌斌, 王晶. 核因子-κB受体活化因子配体和骨保护素在慢性根尖周炎病损组织中的表达[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2008, 40(1): 39 -42 .
[4] 章巍, 王广发, 张红, 牟向东, 金哲. 用内科胸腔镜进行滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液27例临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2008, 40(6): 600 -602 .
[5] 陈磊, 张豪, 冯海兰, 张凤军. 正常受试者单侧咀嚼运动中的牙合接触模式[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2009, 41(1): 90 -94 .
[6] 黄萍, 刘炯, 夏英杰, 仲燕莹, 陈跃国. 两种准分子激光手术治疗超高度近视的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2007, 39(5): 498 -502 .
[7] 马红, 高妍, 杨建梅, 惠岩, 陈澜, 王淑凤. 人血浆瘦素水平与肥胖及血浆胰岛素水平的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2001, 33(6): 559 -561 .
[8] 熊祖应, 黄海长, 李惊子, 王海燕. 活动性肾小球肾炎中过氧化脂质体增殖激活受体γ在肾脏的表达[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2003, 35(5): 499 -502 .
[9] 陈亚红, 姚婉贞, 赵鸣武, 庞永政, 唐朝枢. 哮喘气道重塑中钙调神经磷酸酶与蛋白激酶活性的相互调节[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2005, 37(6): 599 -602 .
[10] 陈世伟, 张立实, 张红敏, 冯晓凡, 彭晓莉. 大豆异黄酮对胰岛素抵抗大鼠胰岛素敏感性及瘦素基因表达的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2006, 38(2): 197 -200 .
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部