关节镜下盂唇重建治疗髋关节撞击综合征12例

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.05.033

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

To investigate the surgical effect of hip arthroscopic labrum reconstruction. A retrospective study was performed on the clinical data of 12 patients who underwent hip arthroscopic labrum reconstruction in our department from September 2017 to February 2021 and were followed up for 5-46 months, with an average of 21.5 months. All the patients had a hip joint space of more than 2 mm, and Tonnis grade less than level Ⅱ. These 12 patients underwent arthroscopic debridement of hyperplastic synovium, femoral head and neck and/or acetabular osteoplasty, and labrum reconstruction using autograft iliotibial band or gracilis tendon. After the surgery, we conducted follow-up and data collection, recorded the satisfaction of the patients and occurrence of complications, as well as the cartilage lesion of hip joint observed under the arthroscopy. We compared the alpha angle of Dunn X-ray film, center-edge angle (CE angle) of AP X-ray film, modified Harris hip score (mHHS score), hip outcome score (HOS), international hip outcome tool 12 score (iHOT12 Score), and visual analogue scale (VAS scale) before and after the arthroscopic operation, to assess clinical symptom relief and joint function recovery. The 12 patients were followed up for 5-46 (21.5±12.8) months. The VAS scale were (5.3±2.5) and (2.5±1.4) before and after the surgery, showing significant decrease (P=0.018). The mHHS score were (60.6±22.2) and (83.1±5.8) before and after the surgery, showing significant increase (P=0.003). The patient satisfaction was high (7.8±2.0) (range: 0-10). None of the 12 patients had serious complications, revision surgery, or total hip replacement at the end of the last follow-up. Autologous tendon transplantation for reconstruction of acetabular labrum under arthroscopy can improve the clinical symptoms and joint function of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), which is a safe and effective treatment.

Key words: Femoroacetabular impingment, Hip injuries, Arthroscopes, Transplantation, autologous

中图分类号:

R687.4

董寒梅,吴睿麒,高冠英,刘镕阁,徐雁. 关节镜下盂唇重建治疗髋关节撞击综合征12例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 1007-1011.

Han-mei DONG,Rui-qi WU,Guan-ying GAO,Rong-ge LIU,Yan XU. Arthroscopic labrum reconstruction for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: 12 cases report[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(5): 1007-1011.

图/表 6

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

图8

参考文献 25

[1]	Suppauksorn S, Parvaresh KC, Rasio J, et al. The effect of rim preparation, labral augmentation, and labral reconstruction on the suction seal of the hip [J]. Arthroscopy, 2021, 5:S0749-8063(21)00442-4.
[2]	Philippon MJ, Nepple JJ, Campbell KJ, et al. The hip fluid seal: Part I: The effect of an acetabular labral tear, repair, resection, and reconstruction on hip fluid pressurization [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2014, 22(4):722-729. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2874-z
[3]	Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Hay CJ, et al. Arthroscopic labral reconstruction in the hip using iliotibial band autograft: Technique and early outcomes [J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(6):750-756. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.10.016 pmid: 20511032
[4]	Bessa FS, Williams BT, Polce EM, et al. Indications and outcomes for arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction with autografts: A systematic review [J]. Front Surg, 2020, 7:61. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00061
[5]	Cetinkaya S, Toker B, Ozden VE, et al. Arthroscopic labral repair versus labral debridement in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: A minimum 2.5 year follow-up study [J]. Hip Int, 2016, 26(1):20-24. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000290 pmid: 26449334
[6]	Chen AW, Yuen LC, Ortiz-Declet V, et al. Selective debridement with labral preservation using narrow indications in the hip: Minimum 5-year outcomes with a matched-pair labral repair control group [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(2):297-304. doi: 10.1177/0363546517739566
[7]	Domb BG, Hartigan DE, Perets I. Decision making for labral treatment in the hip: Repair versus debridement versus reconstruction [J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2017, 25(3):e53-e62. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00144
[8]	Domb BG, Yuen LC, Ortiz-Declet V, et al. Arthroscopic labral base repair in the hip: 5-year minimum clinical outcomes [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(12):2882-2890. doi: 10.1177/0363546517713731
[9]	Larson CM, Giveans MR, Stone RM. Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoro-acetabular impingement: Mean 3.5-year follow-up [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(5):1015-1021. doi: 10.1177/0363546511434578
[10]	Larson CM, Ross JR, Stone RM, et al. Arthroscopic management of dysplastic hip deformities: Predictors of success and failures with comparison to an arthroscopic FAI cohort [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(2):447-453. doi: 10.1177/0363546515613068
[11]	Maldonado DR, Perets I, Mu BH, et al. Arthroscopic capsular plication in patients with labral tears and borderline dysplasia of the hip: Analysis of risk factors for failure [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(14):3446-3453. doi: 10.1177/0363546518808033 pmid: 30419179
[12]	Perets I, Rybalko D, Mu BH, et al. In revision hip arthroscopy, labral reconstruction can address a deficient labrum, but labral repair retains its role for the reparable labrum: A matched control study [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 46(14):3437-3445. doi: 10.1177/0363546518809063 pmid: 30419171
[13]	White BJ, Patterson J, Herzog MM. Revision arthroscopic acetabular labral treatment: Repair or reconstruct? [J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(12):2513-2520. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.024
[14]	Domb BG, Stake CE, Lindner D, et al. Revision hip preservation surgery with hip arthroscopy: Clinical outcomes [J]. Arthroscopy, 2014, 30(5):581-587. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.005
[15]	Youm T. Editorial commentary: Wanted dead or alive: Primary allograft labral reconstruction of the hip is as successful, if not more successful, than primary labral repair [J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(2):441-443. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.09.011
[16]	Suppauksorn S, Beck EC, Chahla J, et al. Comparison of suction seal and contact pressures between 270 degrees labral reconstruction, labral repair, and the intact labrum [J]. Arthroscopy, 2020, 36(9):2433-2442. doi: S0749-8063(20)30438-2 pmid: 32504714
[17]	张晋, 武永刚, 李旭, 等. 盂唇重建与盂唇部分切除治疗股骨髋臼撞击症合并无法修复盂唇损伤的临床对比研究 [J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2018, 37(11):916-920.
[18]	欧阳侃, 王大平, 熊建义, 等. 关节镜下带血供关节囊移植重建髋臼盂唇疗效的初步研究 [J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2019, 12(4):277-280, 315.
[19]	Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Boykin RE. Results of arthroscopic labral reconstruction of the hip in elite athletes: response [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(10):NP48. doi: 10.1177/0363546514550156
[20]	Maldonado DR, Kyin C, Chen SL, et al. In search of labral restoration function with hip arthroscopy: Outcomes of hip labral reconstruction versus labral repair: A systematic review [J]. Hip Int, 2020, 22:1120700020965162.
[21]	Geyer MR, Philippon MJ, Fagrelius TS, et al. Acetabular labral reconstruction with an iliotibial band autograft: Outcome and survivorship analysis at minimum 3-year follow-up [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2013, 41(8):1750-1756. doi: 10.1177/0363546513487311 pmid: 23644149
[22]	Philippon MJ, Arner JW, Crawford MD, et al. Acetabular labral reconstruction with iliotibial band autograft: Outcome and survivorship at a minimum 10-year follow-up [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2020, 102(18):1581-1587. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01499 pmid: 32675477
[23]	Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT. Labral reconstruction using the ligamentum teres capitis: Report of a new technique [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(3):753-759. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0633-5
[24]	Walker JA, Pagnotto M, Trousdale RT, et al. Preliminary pain and function after labral reconstruction during femoroacetabular impingement surgery [J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(12):3414-3420. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2506-1
[25]	Park SE, Ko Y. Use of the quadriceps tendon in arthroscopic acetabular labral reconstruction: Potential and benefits as an autograft option [J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2013, 2(3):e217-e219. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2013.02.003

相关文章 15

[1]	丁汉东, 王琴, 廖贵益, 郝宗耀. 肾移植术后并发消化道出血的诊治[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 902-907.
[2]	杨文博,余磊,张维宇,徐涛,王强. 带线输尿管支架自排技术在肾移植受者中的效果及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 656-660.
[3]	董佳芸,李雪芬,路瑞芳,胡文杰,孟焕新. 血管化骨瓣重建颌骨种植体周软组织病理学特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 25-31.
[4]	王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[5]	汪大伟,王华东,李利,尹欣,黄伟,郭继东,杨亚锋,刘义灏,郑扬. 自体下关节突骨块应用于骨质疏松患者腰椎椎间融合术的疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(5): 899-909.
[6]	张心灵,林志禹,陈玉杰,董文芳,杨欣. 脊柱后路内固定术后切口愈合不良的整形外科治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(5): 910-914.
[7]	曹乐清,周婧睿,陈育红,陈欢,韩伟,陈瑶,张圆圆,闫晨华,程翼飞,莫晓冬,付海霞,韩婷婷,吕萌,孔军,孙于谦,王昱,许兰平,张晓辉,黄晓军. 异基因造血干细胞移植后晚发重症肺炎患者治疗与预后转归的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 1013-1020.
[8]	张春梅,杨蕊,李蓉,乔杰,王海宁,王颖. 46XX-17α-羟化酶缺乏症助孕成功1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(4): 751-755.
[9]	韩冠鹏,许洋洋,李志华,孟畅,朱宏建,杨昆霖,周利群,李学松. 造血干细胞移植后输尿管狭窄1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(4): 762-765.
[10]	蔡天怡,章文博,于尧,王洋,毛驰,郭传瑸,俞光岩,彭歆. 头颈部游离组织瓣移植术后预防性气管切开的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(2): 363-368.
[11]	蒋青,张雨. 新形势下运动损伤特点及细胞生物治疗的应用前景和挑战[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 828-831.
[12]	任爽,时会娟,张家豪,刘振龙,邵嘉艺,朱敬先,胡晓青,黄红拾,敖英芳. 前交叉韧带重建术后移植物应力的有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 865-870.
[13]	郑佳鹏,肖棋,邓辉云,吴清泉,翟文亮,林达生. 外侧半月板腘肌腱区损伤的关节镜下分型和处理[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 891-895.
[14]	邵振兴,宋庆法,赵宇晴,崔国庆. 一种结合线袢固定的关节镜下“嵌入式”喙突移位术:手术技术及术后影像学分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 896-901.
[15]	洪鹏,田晓军,赵小钰,杨飞龙,刘茁,陆敏,赵磊,马潞林. 肾移植术后双侧乳头状肾癌1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 811-813.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

657

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	10	0	0	647

From	Others	local

Times	359	298
Rate	55%	45%

Abstract

760

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	760

From	Others	local

Times	751	9
Rate	99%	1%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

Discussed

Items	Data
Number of patients, n	12
Mean age at surgery/years	35.7 (22-49)^a
Female ∶Male, n	3 ∶9
Mean body mass index	21.8 (16.5-27.5)^a
Side affected (left ∶right), n	5 ∶7
Symptom onset/months	44.2 (8-100)^a
Follow-up/months	21.5 (5-46)^a
Follow-up/%	100

Items	Preoperative, $x ?$ ±s	Postoperative, $x ?$ ±s	P value
α angle/(°)	71.7±9.8	50.2±6.1	0.002
CE angle/(°)	37.5±5.2	35.9±3.6	0.099
mHHS	60.6±22.2	83.1±5.8	0.003
HOS-ADL	87.0±6.6	91.8±4.6	0.018
HOS-SS	80.1±14.0	88.7±4.0	0.009
iHOT-12	77.2±11.3	88.8±6.1	0.012
VAS	5.3±2.5	2.5±1.4	0.018

Items	n (%)
Labral lesions	12 (100.0)
Cam-type impingement	3 (25.0)
Pincer-type impingement	0
Mixed-type impingement	9 (75.0)
Acetabular cartilage damage (Outerbridge classification)
0	4 (33.3)
1	0
2	1 (8.3)
3	1 (8.3)
4	6 (50.0)
Femoral cartilage damage (Outerbridge classification)
0	12 (100.0)
1-4	0