痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷的研制及临床应用

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.04.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 编制痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷并检测其信效度，调查痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度。方法: 选择2019年1—6月入住中南大学湘雅二医院风湿免疫科的痛风患者150例，根据文献回顾及痛风患者健康教育需求调查初步形成健康教育知识体系框架，通过2轮的德尔菲(Delphi)专家函询得到预试问卷，对150名痛风患者进行测量，问卷项目的分析与筛选采用变异系数法、决断值分析、条目与总分的相关系数法、探索性因素分析法。信度采用内部一致性信度、分半信度进行评价。效度检验主要包括内容效度、建构效度。另选择2019年6—12月中南大学湘雅二医院住院及门诊痛风患者150例调查痛风患者健康教育知识知晓情况。结果: 问卷一级指标的指标重要性为3.83~5.00，二级指标的指标重要性为3.00~4.83，各条目的变异系数为0.31~1.23，问卷各条目决断值(critical ratio, CR)为3.168~8.333。研究各条目与总分的Pearson相关系数为0.319~0.544。经探索性因素分析后，4个维度均有题目删除，最后问卷共有16个条目。问卷的Cronbach’ s α系数为0.715，分半信度Spearman-Brown系数为0.785。问卷各因素与总问卷之间的相关系数为0.300~0.701，问卷各条目与各因素之间的相关系数为0.402~0.732，结果具有统计学意义(P均＜0.05)。经问卷调查，痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷总得分为(6.85±3.22)分，痛风相关知识得分为(2.03±1.24)分，饮食指导得分为(1.53±1.06)分，运动指导得分为(2.19±1.24)分，药物指导得分为(1.24±1.22)分。结论: 痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷对于测量相关内容方面具有较好的信度及效度，编制过程较科学，涉及内容较全面，可进一步应用于临床。痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度较低，对痛风药物相关知识尤为缺乏。

关键词: 痛风, 健康教育, 问卷, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective: To develop and test the health education knowledge assessment questionnaire for gout and to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge in patients with gout. Methods: From June 2019 to June 2019, 150 cases of gout patients were enrolled.According to the literature review and the healthy education requirements of gout patients, the framework of education knowledge system was preliminarily formed.The pre-test questionnaire was obtained through two rounds of he Delphi technique.A survey of 150 patients with gout was carried out.The analysis and selection of the questionnaire were based on the coefficient of variation, the analysis of determination value, the correlation coefficient of the items and the total scores, and the exploratory factor analysis.In this study, we evaluated the reliability of internal consistency, semi-reliability.Validity test mainly included content validity and construct validity.In addition, a total of 150 patients with gout in our hospital and outpatient gout were selected to investigate the understanding degree of health education knowledge from June 2019 to December 2019. Results: The significance of the first level index of the questionnaire was 3.83-5.00, the secondary index was 3.00-4.83, and the variation coefficient of each item was 0.31-1.23, and the critical ratio(CR) value of each item in this questionnaire was 3.168-8.333.The Pearson correlation coefficient of each item and the total score of this study was 0.319-0.544.After exploratory factor analysis, some topics were deleted in four dimensions, and there were 16 entries in the final questionnaire.Cronbach' s α coefficient of this questionnaire was 0.715, split-half reliability Spearman-Brown coefficient was 0.785, and retest reliability coefficient was 0.729. The correlation coefficient between each factor of this questionnaire and the total questionnaire was 0.300-0.701, and the correlation coefficient between each item of the questionnaire and each factor was 0.402-0.732, all P < 0.05. The results were statistically significant. By questionnaire investigation, the total score of questionnaire was (6.85±3.22), the score of disease-related knowledge was (2.03±1.24), the score of dietary guidance was (1.53± 1.06), the score of exercise guidance was (2.19±1.24), the score of medication guide was (1.24±1.22). Conclusion: The Health Education Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire For Gout has a good reliability and validity for measuring related content, the compilation process is scientific and the content is comprehensive, which can be further applied in clinic.The understanding degree of health education knowledge is low in Chinese patients with gout, and knowledge of gout medicine is lacking especially.

Key words: Gout, Health education, Questionnaire, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号:

R169.1

谢晓炜,李芬,凌光辉,谢希,许素清,陈谊月. 痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷的研制及临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(4): 699-704.

Xiao-wei XIE,Fen LI,Guang-hui LING,Xi XIE,Su-qing XU,Yi-yue CHEN. Development and clinical application of the health education knowledge assessment questionnaire for gout[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(4): 699-704.

图/表 2

表1

表2

参考文献 17

1	Sun M , Vazquez AI , Reynolds RJ , et al. Untangling the complex relationships between incident gout risk, serum urate, and its comorbidities[J]. Arthritis Res Ther, 2018, 20 (1): 90. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1558-3
2	Kuo CF , Grainge MJ , Zhang W , et al. Global epidemiology of gout: Prevalence, incidence and risk factors[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2015, 11 (11): 649- 662. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.91
3	Neogi T , Jansen TL , Dalbeth N , et al. 2015 gout classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2015, 74 (10): 1789- 1798. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208237
4	曾学军. 《2015年美国风湿病学会/欧洲抗风湿联盟痛风分类标准》解读[J]. 中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志, 2015, 9 (4): 235- 238.
5	Hirsch JD , Lee SJ , Terkeltaub R , et al. Evaluation of an instrument assessing influence of gout on health-related quality of life[J]. J Rheumatol, 2008, 35 (12): 2406- 2414. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080506
6	Spaetgens B , Pustjens T , Scheepers LEJM , et al. Knowledge, illness perceptions and stated clinical practice behaviour in management of gout: A mixed methods study in general practice[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2016, 35 (8): 2053- 2061. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3212-2
7	Zhang LY , Schumacher HR , Su HH , et al. Development and evaluation of a survey of gout patients concerning their knowledge about gout[J]. J Clin Rheumatol, 2011, 17 (5): 242- 248. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e318228b4e2
8	Harrold LR , Mazor KM , Peterson D , et al. Patients'knowledge and beliefs concerning gout and its treatment: A population based study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2012, 13, 180. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-180
9	卢丽琴, 卢洪敏. 痛风患者的健康教育及康复护理干预[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2010, 25 (16): 1527- 1528. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6975.2010.16.045
10	Day RO , Frensham LJ , Nguyen AD , et al. Effectiveness of an electronic patient-centred self-management tool for gout sufferers: A cluster randomised controlled trial protocol[J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7 (10): e017281.
11	徐小青, 郑国华. 授权教育在痛风患者健康教育中的应用[J]. 全科护理, 2015, 13 (35): 3628- 3629. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4748.2015.35.046
12	闫冬菊. 痛风患者的社区健康教育效果评价[J]. 中国社区医师(医学专业), 2012, 14 (311): 402.
13	FitzGerald JD , Dalbeth N , Mikuls T , et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the management of gout[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2020, 72 (6): 744- 760. doi: 10.1002/acr.24180
14	Fu T , Cao H , Yin R , et al. Depression and anxiety correlate with disease-related characteristics and quality of life in Chinese patients with gout: A case-control study[J]. Psychol Health Med, 2018, 23 (4): 400- 410.
15	Rogenmoser S , Arnold MH . Chronic gout: Barriers to effective management[J]. Aust J Gen Pract, 2018, 47 (6): 351- 356. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-11-17-4384
16	Li QH , Dai L , Li ZX , et al. Questionnaire survey evaluating disease-related knowledge for 149 primary gout patients and 184 doctors in South China[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2013, 32 (11): 1633- 1640.
17	风湿免疫疾病慢病管理全国护理协作组. 强直性脊柱炎患者慢性病管理护理专家建议(2019版)[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2020, 24 (5): 292- 296.

相关文章 15

[1]	董泓,王丽敏,王志强,刘彦卿,张晓刚,张明明,刘娟,李振彬. 急性痛风发作的昼夜差异: 一项男性痛风患者的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(5): 915-922.
[2]	弭小艺,侯杉杉,付子苑,周末,李昕璇,孟召学,蒋华芳,周虹. 中文版童年不良经历问卷在学龄前儿童父母中应用的信效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(3): 408-414.
[3]	叶一林,刘恒,潘利平,柴卫兵. 全膝关节置换术后假体周围痛风发作误诊1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(2): 362-365.
[4]	王昱,张慧敏,邓雪蓉,刘伟伟,陈璐,赵宁,张晓慧,宋志博,耿研,季兰岚,王玉,张卓莉. 尿枸橼酸定量检测在原发性痛风患者肾结石诊断中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1134-1140.
[5]	徐菱忆,惠淼,朱树宏,杨照,李梦蕊,杨宏宇,郑茜子,吕继成,杨莉. 社区慢性肾脏病的筛查与管理现状[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 1056-封三.
[6]	闵鹤葳,吴一波,孙昕霙. 我国18岁及以上人群家庭健康功能、大五人格与吸烟的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(3): 483-489.
[7]	张学武. 痛风关节炎治疗中几个备受关注的问题[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1017-1019.
[8]	彭喆,丁亚敏,裴林,姚海红,张学武,唐素玫. 痛风患者发生关节及肌腱内晶体沉积的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1067-1071.
[9]	王贵红,左婷,李然,左正才. 瑞巴派特在大鼠痛风性关节炎急性发作中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(4): 716-720.
[10]	李雪莹, 毛康娜, 弭小艺, 高玲玲, 杨晓, 陶惠芬, 张迎武, 陈敬, 王行, 沈丽娟, 袁洁铃, 苗淼, 周虹. 育儿胜任感量表在学龄前儿童母亲中应用的信效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 479-484.
[11]	谢一帆,王昱,邓雪蓉,耿研,季兰岚,张卓莉. 影响双能CT尿酸盐结晶检出率的因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 261-265.
[12]	王昱,邓雪蓉,季兰岚,张晓慧,耿研,张卓莉. 超声检测痛风患者肌腱受累的危险因素和诊断价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 143-149.
[13]	周行红,黄莹,袁超,郑树国,张杰,张建国. 1 483名北京市居民对口腔癌及相关知识的认知情况调查[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(2): 323-331.
[14]	季兰岚,郝燕捷,张卓莉. 原发性骨髓纤维化引起的继发性痛风1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2018, 50(6): 1117-1119.
[15]	吴双胜，杨鹏，李海月，马春娜，王全意. 传染病健康素养水平与传染病症状发生之间的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 937-940.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Items	Disease-related knowledge	Items	Dietary guidance	Items	Exercise guidance	Items	Medication guide
3	0.513^#	12	0.402^#	18	0.599^#	22	0.571^#
5	0.608^#	15	0.651^#	19	0.729^#	25	0.605^#
7	0.732^#	16	0.677^#	20	0.692^#	26	0.624^#
8	0.655^#	17	0.611^#	21	0.632^#	27	0.606^#

Factors	Disease-related knowledge	Dietary guidance	Exercise guidance	Medication guide	Total questionnaire
Disease-related knowledge	1
Dietary guidance	0.379^#	1
Exercise guidance	0.321^#	0.300^#	1
Medication guide	0.302^#	0.393^#	0.362^#	1
Total questionnaire	0.701^#	0.697^#	0.692^#	0.685^#	1