北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 1185-1189. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.06.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆管引流联合胆总管探查取石术治疗复杂胆管结石的临床效果

张铃福,侯纯升*(),徐智,王立新,凌晓锋,王港,崔龙,修典荣   

  1. 北京大学第三医院普通外科,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-22 出版日期:2022-12-18 发布日期:2022-12-19
  • 通讯作者: 侯纯升 E-mail:chunshenghou@126.com

Clinical effect of laparoscopic transcystic drainage combined with common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones

Ling-fu ZHANG,Chun-sheng HOU*(),Zhi XU,Li-xin WANG,Xiao-feng LING,Gang WANG,Long CUI,Dian-rong XIU   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2022-02-22 Online:2022-12-18 Published:2022-12-19
  • Contact: Chun-sheng HOU E-mail:chunshenghou@126.com

RICH HTML

11   

摘要:

目的: 探讨腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆管引流联合胆总管探查取石术治疗复杂胆管结石的可行性及效果。方法: 回顾性分析2020年4月至2021年12月因复杂胆管结石采用腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆管引流(C管技术)联合胆总管探查取石术治疗的18例患者的临床资料,分析此种治疗方式的安全性及有效性。结果: 18例患者中,13例采用传统C管技术,5例采用改良C管技术,手术时间(161±59) min(82~279 min),术后经C管造影均无结石残留及胆道狭窄,C管最大引流量为(500±163) mL/d(180~820 mL/d),3例C管脱落患者早期拔除C管,其余15例患者拔除C管的中位时间为8 d(5~12 d),18例患者术后住院时间为(12±3) d(7~21 d)。5例患者出现C管相关不良事件,均发生在采用传统C管技术的患者中,包括C管位置异常2例、早期脱落3例,均未出现并发症。1例患者出现1级并发症,该例患者采用的是改良C管技术,患者拔管后出现一过性发热,拔管后保留的腹腔引流管无胆汁,进一步行CT检查亦无明显胆漏,保守观察后第2天平稳出院。患者的术后中位随访时间为9个月(1~20个月),所有患者的肝功能均于术后1个月恢复正常,彩超或磁共振胰胆管造影(magnetic resonance cholangiopan-creatography, MRCP)检查未见结石复发征象。结论: 腹腔镜下C管引流联合胆总管探查取石术在复杂胆总管结石患者的治疗上安全可行,近期效果良好,改良C管技术可能会减少C管脱落及胆漏的风险。

关键词: 胆总管结石, 胆道外科手术, 腹腔镜检查, 胰胆管造影

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. Methods: Between April 2020 and December 2021, eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones received laparoscopic transcystic drainage (C-tube technique) and common bile duct exploration. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were retrospectively collected. The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic transcystic drainage and common bile duct exploration were analyzed. Results: Among the eighteen patients with difficult biliary stones, thirteen patients received traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, and the remaining five received modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The mean surgical duration were (161±59) min (82-279 min), no bile duct stenosis or residual stone was observed in the patients receiving postoperative cholangiography via C-tube. The maximum volume of C-tube drainage was (500±163) mL/d (180-820 mL/d). Excluding three patients with early dislodgement of C-tube, among the fifteen patients with C-tube maintained, the median time of C-tube removal was 8 d (5-12 d). The duration of hospital stay was (12±3) d (7-21 d) for the 18 patients. Five C-tube related adverse events were observed, all of which occurred in the patients with traditional laparoscopic transcystic drainage, including two abnormal position of the C-tube, and three early dislocation of the C-tube. All the 5 adverse events caused no complications. Only one grade one complication occurred, which was in a patient with modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage. The patient demonstrated transient fever after C-tube removal, but there was no bile in the drainage tube and the subsequent CT examination confirmed no bile leakage. The fever spontaneously relieved with conservative observation, and the patient recovered uneventfully with discharge the next day. All the 18 patients were followed up for 1-20 months (median: 9 months). Normal liver function and no recurrence of stone were detected with ultrasonography or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Conclusion: Laparoscopic transcystic drainage combined with common bile duct exploration is safe and feasible in the treatment of patients with difficult biliary stones. The short-term effect is good. Modified laparoscopic transcystic drainage approach may reduce the incidence of C-tube dislocation and bile leak.

Key words: Choledocholithiasis, Biliary tract surgical procedures, Laparoscopy, Cholangiopancreatography

中图分类号: 

  • R657.4

图1

改良C管的缝合固定方法及引流路径"

1 Vu AN , Eskander J , Chan STF , et al. Impact of single-stage laparoscopic trans-cystic exploration on hospital procedures, admissions and length-of-stay in common bile duct stone clearance[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91 (12): 2695- 2700.
doi: 10.1111/ans.17255
2 Ma Z , Zhou J , Yao L , et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for the patients with difficult biliary stones: 8 years of experiences at a single institution and literature review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36 (1): 718- 727.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08340-1
3 Jin Z , Wei Y , Tang X , et al. Single-operator peroral cholangioscope in treating difficult biliary stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Dig Endosc, 2019, 31 (3): 256- 269.
doi: 10.1111/den.13307
4 Panaro F , Glaise A , Miggino M , et al. Rubber transcystic drai-nage reduces the post-removal biliary complications in liver transplantation: A matched case-control study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2013, 398 (1): 169- 176.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0970-4
5 Guan H , Jiang G , Mao X . Primary duct closure combined with transcystic drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2019, 89 (7/8): 885- 888.
6 Dindo D , Demartines N , Clavien PA . Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240 (2): 205- 213.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
7 Al-Ardah M , Barnett RE , Morris S , et al. Lessons learnt from the first 200 unselected consecutive cases of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct stones at a district general hospital[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35 (11): 6268- 6277.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08127-w
8 Ali N , Nadeem M , Nauyan F , et al. Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: Stratifying risks, a district hospital experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2022, 32 (2): 165- 170.
doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0022
9 Maghsoudi H , Garadaghi A , Jafary GA . Biliary peritonitis requiring reoperation after removal of T-tubes from the common bile duct[J]. Am J Surg, 2005, 190 (3): 430- 433.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.04.015
10 Parra-Membrives P , Martinez-Baena D , Marquez-Munoz M , et al. Does laparoscopic approach impair T-tube-related sinus-tract formation?[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2013, 23 (1): 55- 60.
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182747b19
11 管辉球, 景岚, 徐锁青. 胆总管一期缝合经胆囊管胆管引流与鼻胆管引流的对比研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56 (2): 130- 134.
12 de Araujo TB , Jotz GP , Zaki CH , et al. Intraoperative cholangiography with filling defects: Comparative complication analysis of postoperative transcystic duct (TCD) catheter maintenance[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35 (12): 6438- 6448.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08133-y
[1] 邱敏,宗有龙,王滨帅,杨斌,徐楚潇,孙争辉,陆敏,赵磊,卢剑,刘承,田晓军,马潞林. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中高复杂程度肾肿瘤的效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[2] 刘慧丽,吕彦函,王晓晓,李民. 老年患者腹腔镜泌尿系肿瘤根治术后慢性疼痛的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 851-856.
[3] 郑炜,黄永辉,常虹,姚炜,李柯,闫秀娥,张耀朋,王迎春,刘文正. 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影在胆肠吻合术后患者中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1178-1184.
[4] 安立哲,熊六林,陈亮,王焕瑞,陈伟男,黄晓波. 腹腔镜肾盂成形术联合肾盂镜超声碎石取石术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻合并肾结石[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 746-750.
[5] 张帆,陈曲,郝一昌,颜野,刘承,黄毅,马潞林. 术前及术后膜性尿道长度与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后控尿功能恢复的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 299-303.
[6] 张帆,黄晓娟,杨斌,颜野,刘承,张树栋,黄毅,马潞林. 前列腺尖部深度与腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后早期控尿功能恢复的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 692-696.
[7] 赵海岳,叶雄俊,陈伟男,安立哲,刘军,熊六林,黄晓波. 腹腔镜肾盂成型术中异位血管的处理方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 660-664.
[8] 黄海文,闫兵,尚美霞,刘漓波,郝瀚,席志军. 女性膀胱癌患者腹腔镜膀胱全切术与开放膀胱全切术的倾向性评分匹配比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 698-705.
[9] 张铃福,侯纯升,黄永辉,徐智,王立新,凌晓锋,王港,崔龙,修典荣. 胃空肠吻合术后胆总管结石腹腔镜手术取石和内镜取石的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(2): 345-348.
[10] 徐奔,张喆楠,罗程,宋海峰,张骞. 后腹腔镜下肿瘤吸除术与肾部分切除术治疗肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的安全性与有效性对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 700-704.
[11] 王国良,叶剑飞,马潞林,黄毅,侯小飞,肖春雷,卢剑,洪锴,张树栋,赵磊,田晓军,. 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:无结技术与单结技术的回顾性对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 361-364.
[12] 李涛,崔龙,王港,凌晓锋,侯纯升,王立新,徐智. 全腹腔镜胆囊肝管型皮下通道治疗肝内胆管结石11例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 915-918.
[13] 叶雄俊,钟文龙,熊六林,马凯,徐涛,黄晓波,王晓峰. 后腹腔镜肾脂肪囊外肾蒂淋巴管结扎术治疗乳糜尿的疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 618-621.
[14] 张洪宪,赵磊,马潞林,侯小飞,刘磊,邓绍辉. 后腹腔镜供肾切取自体肾移植术治疗复杂医源性输尿管损伤[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 622-626.
[15] 杨昆霖, 李学松, 周利群. 经腹腹腔镜输尿管体外裁剪、乳头再植术治疗成人梗阻性巨输尿管症的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(4): 511-514.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!