Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 165-169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.01.028

• Article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodiumorally in extraction of impacted teeth

MENG Tian, ZHANG Zhi-yong, ZHANG Xiao△, CHEN Yu-huan, LI Jing-qi, CHENG Quan, LIU Wen-shu, GAO Wei   

  1. (First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digi-tal and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100034,China)
  • Online:2018-02-18 Published:2018-02-18
  • Contact: ZHANG Xiao E-mail:zhangxiao1965@vip.sina.com

Abstract: Objective:To investigate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodium orally, which was a kind of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, in extractions of mandibular impacted third teeth. Methods: There were questionnaires about postoperative pain for patients whose mandibular impacted third teeth were extracted from July 2017 to August 2017 in First Clinical Division of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. All the patients did their routine clinical examinations and imaging examinations. After their mandibular impacted third teeth were extracted, the questionnaires were sent to them. The questionnaires were filled in by the patients on their own and returned one week later. There were 120 questionnaires that were sent and 105 questionnaires returned, of which 98 questionnaires were filled in completely. According to the inclusive criteria and exclusion criteria, 66 questionnaires were totally selected in this study. According to the time when the patients took their loxoprofen sodium orally firstly, the patients were divided into 3 groups. The first group was for patients who didn’t take loxoprofen sodium during their extractions (non-medicine group). The second group was for patients who took 60 mg loxoprofen sodium 30 min before their extractions (preoperative group). The third group was for patients who took 60 mg loxoprofen sodium 30 min after their extractions (postoperative group). The operation time among the 3 groups was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis method. The postoperative time points were 2, 4, 12,24 and 48 h after operation. The scores of visual analogue scales (VAS) for postoperative pain in each group at different postoperative time points were analyzed by Friedman method. At each postoperative time point, VAS scores in the different groups were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis me-thod. The numbers of the patients taking loxoprofen sodium home and drug adverse reactions were also analyzed. Results: The operation time of the 3 groups was 15.0 (5.0,30.0) min and had no significant differences (P=0.848).VAS scores of non-medicine group 2,4, 12,24 and 48 h after operation were 1.75 (0.1,10.0), 6.25 (1.5,10.0), 2.00 (0.1,8.0), 2.00 (0.1,6.0) and 0.5 (0.1,5.5) separately and had significant differences (P<0.001).The VAS score at 4 h after operation was higher than the VAS scores at other time points after operation (P<0.005). Four hours after the operations, the VAS scores of preoperative group [2.0 (0.1,10.0)] and postoperative group [2.0 (0.1,5.0)] were lower significantly than those of non-medicine group [6.25 (1.5,10.0)] (P<0.001).The numbers of the patients taking loxoprofen sodium home were 9(40.9%) in non-medicine group,5(21.8%) in preoperative group and 7(33.3%) in postoperative group. The number of the patients who had drug adverse reactions in preoperative group (n=3,13.0%) and in postoperative group (n=4,19.0%) was less than the number of the patients who had drug adverse reactions in non-medicine group (n=8,36.4%). Conclusion: There were two protocols of preemptive analgesia with loxoprofen sodium orally in extractions of mandibular impacted third teeth, which were taking 60 mg loxoprofen sodium orally 30 min before the extractions and taking 60 mg loxoprofen sodium orally 30 min after the extractions. Both of the two preemptive analgesia protocols could decrease the postoperative pain significantly.

Key words: Impacted tooth, Preemptive analgesia, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

CLC Number: 

  • R782.1
[1] Sui LI,Wenjie MA,Shimin WANG,Qian DING,Yao SUN,Lei ZHANG. Trueness of different digital design methods for incisal guidance of maxillary anterior implant-supported single crowns [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[2] Xiaoqiang LIU,Yin ZHOU. Risk factors of perioperative hypertension in dental implant surgeries with bone augmentation [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[3] Deng-hui DUAN,Hom-Lay WANG,En-bo WANG. Role of collagen membrane in modified guided bone regeneration surgery using buccal punch flap approach: A retrospective and radiographical cohort study [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[4] Min ZHEN,Huan-xin MENG,Wen-jie HU,Deng-cheng WU,Yi-ping WEI. Healing of the dento-gingival junction following modified crown lengthening procedure in beagle dogs [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(5): 927-935.
[5] JIANG You-sheng,FENG Lin,GAO Xue-jun. Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(4): 764-769.
[6] HUANG Li-dong,GONG Wei-yu,DONG Yan-mei. Effects of bioactive glass on proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 371-377.
[7] WANG Si-wen,YOU Peng-yue,LIU Yu-hua,WANG Xin-zhi,TANG Lin,WANG Mei. Efficacy of two barrier membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration in extraction sockets: A microcomputed tomographic study in dogs [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[8] JIANG Nan,BAO Xu-dong,YUE Lin. Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2021, 53(1): 102-108.
[9] . [J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(2): 395-403.
[10] Chang CAO,Fei WANG,En-bo WANG,Yu LIU. Application of β-TCP for bone defect restore after the mandibular third molars extraction: A split-mouth clinical trial [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 97-102.
[11] Qian WANG,Dan LI,Zhi-hui TANG. Sinus floor elevation and simultaneous dental implantation: A long term retrospective study of sinus bone gain [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 925-930.
[12] Wei QI,Jian-nan LI,Jing-ren ZHAO,Hai-xia XING,Jie PAN. Effect of triangular flap design and healing procedure on the sequelae after extraction of impacted lower third molars [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(5): 949-953.
[13] Li-ping ZHAO,Wen-jie HU,Tao XU,Ya-lin ZHAN,Yi-ping WEI,Min ZHEN,Cui WANG. Two procedures for ridge preservation of molar extraction sites affected by severe bone defect due to advanced periodontitis [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 579-585.
[14] Jing WANG,Jun-peng CHEN,Yang WANG,Xiang-liang XU,Chuan-bin GUO. Application of digital mandibular movement record and masticatory muscle electromyography in the evaluation of stomatognathic function in patients with mandibular tumor [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(3): 571-578.
[15] Zhi-yong△ ZHANG,Tian MENG,Quan CHEN,Wen-shu LIU,Yu-huan CHEN. Retrospective analysis of early dental implant failure [J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2018, 50(6): 1088-1091.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!