北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 85-89.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度

杨鑫1,孙一飞2,田雷2,司文捷3,冯海兰1,刘亦洪4,5△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科,北京100081; 2. 深圳爱尔创科技股份有限公司,广东深圳518000; 3. 清华大学材料科学与工程系,北京100083; 4. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院综合科,北京100081; 5. 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2015-02-18 发布日期:2015-02-18

Precision of digital impressions with TRIOS under simulated intraoral impression taking conditions

YANG Xin1, SUN Yi-fei2, TIAN Lei2, SI Wen-jie3, FENG Hai-lan1, LIU Yi-hong4△   

  1. (1.Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Shenzhen Upcera Co. LTD, Guangdong Shenzhen 518000, China; 3.Department of Material Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083, China; 4. Department of General Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 5. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2015-02-18 Published:2015-02-18

摘要: 目的:研究模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度,并与口外模型扫描的精密度比较。方法:制作6个#14~#17树脂牙列,其中#16为离体牙的全瓷冠预备体。对树脂牙列分别进行:(1)硅橡胶取印模,灌注石膏模型,3Shape D700模型扫描仪重复扫描10次;(2)固定于仿头模内,3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪重复扫描10次。Geomagic Qualify12.0对重复扫描数据两两进行最佳拟合对齐和3D比较,分别输出配准数据间的平均偏差(averaged errors,AE)和差异分布彩图。秩和检验定量分析数字印模组与模型组AE的差异,根据差异分布彩图定性描述偏差分布特征。结果: 数字印模组AE均数为7.058 281 μm,高于模型组4.092 363 μm,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但是数字印模组AE的均数和中位数均小于10 μm,表明扫描数据间一致性良好。模型组偏差分布均匀,数字印模组偏差较大区域主要分布于肩台及邻面区域。结论:TRIOS数字印模精密度良好,可达到临床应用要求,预备体肩台及邻面区域为扫描的难点。

关键词: 牙科印模技术, 成像, 三维, 牙修复体设计

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the precision of digital impressions taken under simulated clinical impression taking conditions with TRIOS and to compare with the precision of extraoral digitalizations. Methods: Six #14-#17 epoxy resin dentitions with extracted #16 tooth preparations embedded were made. For each artificial dentition, (1)a silicone rubber impression was taken with individual tray, poured with type IV plaster,and digitalized with 3Shape D700 model scanner for 10 times; (2) fastened to a dental simulator, 10 digital impressions for each were taken with 3Shape TRIOS intraoral scanner. To assess the precision, best-fit algorithm and 3D comparison were conducted between repeated scan models pairwise by Geomagic Qualify 12.0, exported as averaged errors (AE) and color-coded diagrams. Non-parametric analysis was performed to compare the precisions of digital impressions and model images. The color-coded diagrams were used to show the deviations distributions. Results: The mean of AE for digital impressions was 7.058 281 μm, which was greater than that of 4.092 363 μm for the model images (P<0.05). However, the means and medians of AE for digital impressions were no more than 10 μm, which meant that the consistency between the digital impressions was good. The deviations distribution was uniform in the model images,while nonuniform in the digital impressions with greater deviations lay mainly around the shoulders and interproximal surfaces. Conclusion: Digital impressions with TRIOS are of good precision and up to the clinical standard. Shoulders and interproximal surfaces scanning are more difficult.

Key words: Dental impression technique, Imaging, three-dimensional, Dental prosthesis design

[1] 邢念增,王明帅,杨飞亚,尹路,韩苏军. 前列腺免活检创新理念的临床实践及其应用前景[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 565-566.
[2] 田宇轩,阮明健,刘毅,李德润,吴静云,沈棋,范宇,金杰. 双参数MRI改良PI-RADS评分4分和5分病灶的最大径对临床有意义前列腺癌的预测效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 567-574.
[3] 唐祖南,胡耒豪,陈震,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 增强现实技术在口腔颌面颈部解剖识别中的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 541-545.
[4] 吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[5] 毛渤淳,田雅婧,王雪东,李晶,周彦恒. 骨性Ⅱ类高角患者拔牙矫治前后的面部软硬组织变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 111-119.
[6] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[7] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[8] 刘毅,袁昌巍,吴静云,沈棋,肖江喜,赵峥,王霄英,李学松,何志嵩,周利群. 靶向穿刺+6针系统穿刺对PI-RADS 5分患者的前列腺癌诊断效能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 812-817.
[9] 袁昌巍,李德润,李志华,刘毅,山刚志,李学松,周利群. 多参数磁共振成像中动态对比增强状态在诊断PI-RADS 4分前列腺癌中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 838-842.
[10] 刘颖,霍然,徐慧敏,王筝,王涛,袁慧书. 磁共振血管壁成像评估颈动脉中重度狭窄患者斑块特征与脑血流灌注的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 646-651.
[11] 傅强,高冠英,徐雁,林卓华,孙由静,崔立刚. 无症状髋关节前上盂唇撕裂超声与磁共振检查的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 665-669.
[12] 刘想,谢辉辉,许玉峰,张晓东,陶晓峰,柳林,王霄英. 人工智能对提高放射科住院医生诊断胸部肋骨骨折一致性的价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 670-675.
[13] 黄莹,吴志远,周行红,蔡志刚,张杰. 股前外侧皮瓣修复上颌骨缺损术后面部软组织对称性感观分级[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 708-715.
[14] 张雯,刘筱菁,李自力,张益. 基于解剖标志的鼻翼基底缩窄缝合术对正颌患者术后鼻唇部形态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 736-742.
[15] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!