模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 85-89.

模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度

杨鑫1，孙一飞2，田雷2，司文捷3，冯海兰1，刘亦洪4，5△

（1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院修复科，北京100081； 2. 深圳爱尔创科技股份有限公司，广东深圳518000； 3. 清华大学材料科学与工程系，北京100083； 4. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院综合科，北京100081； 5. 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室，北京100081）

出版日期:2015-02-18 发布日期:2015-02-18

Precision of digital impressions with TRIOS under simulated intraoral impression taking conditions

YANG Xin1, SUN Yi-fei2, TIAN Lei2, SI Wen-jie3, FENG Hai-lan1, LIU Yi-hong4△

(1.Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Shenzhen Upcera Co. LTD, Guangdong Shenzhen 518000, China; 3.Department of Material Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100083, China; 4. Department of General Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 5. National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)

Online:2015-02-18 Published:2015-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度，并与口外模型扫描的精密度比较。方法:制作6个#14~#17树脂牙列，其中#16为离体牙的全瓷冠预备体。对树脂牙列分别进行：（1）硅橡胶取印模，灌注石膏模型，3Shape D700模型扫描仪重复扫描10次；（2）固定于仿头模内，3Shape TRIOS口内扫描仪重复扫描10次。Geomagic Qualify12.0对重复扫描数据两两进行最佳拟合对齐和3D比较，分别输出配准数据间的平均偏差（averaged errors，AE）和差异分布彩图。秩和检验定量分析数字印模组与模型组AE的差异，根据差异分布彩图定性描述偏差分布特征。结果: 数字印模组AE均数为7.058 281 μm，高于模型组4.092 363 μm，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05），但是数字印模组AE的均数和中位数均小于10 μm，表明扫描数据间一致性良好。模型组偏差分布均匀，数字印模组偏差较大区域主要分布于肩台及邻面区域。结论:TRIOS数字印模精密度良好，可达到临床应用要求，预备体肩台及邻面区域为扫描的难点。

关键词: 牙科印模技术, 成像, 三维, 牙修复体设计

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the precision of digital impressions taken under simulated clinical impression taking conditions with TRIOS and to compare with the precision of extraoral digitalizations. Methods: Six #14-#17 epoxy resin dentitions with extracted #16 tooth preparations embedded were made. For each artificial dentition, (1)a silicone rubber impression was taken with individual tray, poured with type IV plaster，and digitalized with 3Shape D700 model scanner for 10 times; (2) fastened to a dental simulator, 10 digital impressions for each were taken with 3Shape TRIOS intraoral scanner. To assess the precision, best-fit algorithm and 3D comparison were conducted between repeated scan models pairwise by Geomagic Qualify 12.0, exported as averaged errors (AE) and color-coded diagrams. Non-parametric analysis was performed to compare the precisions of digital impressions and model images. The color-coded diagrams were used to show the deviations distributions. Results: The mean of AE for digital impressions was 7.058 281 μm, which was greater than that of 4.092 363 μm for the model images (P<0.05). However, the means and medians of AE for digital impressions were no more than 10 μm, which meant that the consistency between the digital impressions was good. The deviations distribution was uniform in the model images,while nonuniform in the digital impressions with greater deviations lay mainly around the shoulders and interproximal surfaces. Conclusion: Digital impressions with TRIOS are of good precision and up to the clinical standard. Shoulders and interproximal surfaces scanning are more difficult.

Key words: Dental impression technique, Imaging, three-dimensional, Dental prosthesis design

杨鑫, 孙一飞, 田雷, 司文捷, 冯海兰, 刘亦洪. 模拟口腔取模环境下TRIOS数字印模的精密度[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 47(1): 85-89.

YANG Xin, SUN Yi-Fei, TIAN Lei, SI Wen-Jie, FENG Hai-Lan, LIU Yi-Hong. Precision of digital impressions with TRIOS under simulated intraoral impression taking conditions[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2015, 47(1): 85-89.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘思民,赵一姣,王晓燕,王祖华. 动态导航下不同深度环钻定位精确度的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 146-152.
[2]	邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[3]	王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[4]	任国勇,吴雪梅,李颖,李婕妤,孙伟平,黄一宁. 大血管闭塞性脑卒中亚急性期磁敏感血管征的表现[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1133-1138.
[5]	李媛,林红,张铁军. 对比传统成像与数字成像对牙科复合树脂X射线阻射性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 995-1001.
[6]	杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[7]	邵振兴,宋庆法,赵宇晴,崔国庆. 一种结合线袢固定的关节镜下“嵌入式”喙突移位术:手术技术及术后影像学分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 896-901.
[8]	吴一凡,张晓圆,任爽,玉应香,常翠青. 基于磁共振的青年男性股四头肌的测量和评估[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 843-849.
[9]	李新飞, 彭意吉, 余霄腾, 熊盛炜, 程嗣达, 丁光璞, 杨昆霖, 唐琦, 米悦, 吴静云, 张鹏, 谢家馨, 郝瀚, 王鹤, 邱建星, 杨建, 李学松, 周利群. 肾部分切除术前CT三维可视化评估标准的初步探究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 613-622.
[10]	胡迪,张苗,康惠颖,彭芸. 0~2岁婴幼儿磁共振脑白质模板的建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 341-347.
[11]	陈迪,徐翔宇,汪明睿,李芮,臧根奥,张悦,钱浩楠,闫光荣,范田园. 熔融沉积成型3D打印盐酸维拉帕米胃漂浮制剂的制备与体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 348-354.
[12]	黄新瑞,李莎,高嵩. 冷冻电镜成像中噪声的滤波方法进展[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 425-433.
[13]	穆海丽,田福聪,王晓燕,高学军. 玻璃体和通用型复合树脂耐磨性的临床对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 120-125.
[14]	岳兆国,张海东,杨静文,侯建霞. 数字化评估CAD/CAM个性化基台与成品基台影响粘接剂残留的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 69-75.
[15]	徐啸翔,曹烨,赵一姣,贾璐,谢秋菲. 数字化个齿托盘制取下颌全牙列全冠预备体印模的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 54-61.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed