北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 63-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同纤维直径聚吡咯通电后对细胞和细菌黏附增殖的影响

杨颖婷1, 卫彦2△, 夏斌1△, 王珍高3   

  1. (1.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院儿科,北京100081;2.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院特诊科,北京100081;3.华南理工大学材料与工程学院,广州510641)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 卫彦, 夏斌, E-mail:kqdxl@bjmu.edu.cn, summerinbeijing@vip.sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划,2012CB93390)、北京市自然科学基金(7144256)和北京市科学技术委员会首都特色应用研究项目(Z141107002514058)资助

Effects of different fibre diameter of polypyrrole after direct current stimulation on adhesion and proliferation of cells and bacteria

YANG Ying-ting1, WEI Yan2△ , XIA Bin1△,WANG Zhen-gao3   

  1. (1.Department of Pediatrics,Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology,Beijing 100081,China; 2.Department of Special Clinic,Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology,Beijing 100081,China; 3.The Materials and Engineering College of South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China)
  • Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18
  • Contact: WEI Yan , XIA Bin E-mail:kqdxl@bjmu.edu.cn, summerinbeijing@vip.sina.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2012CB93390), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7144256) and the Capital Foundation for Clinical Characteristics and Application Research (Z141107002514058)

摘要:

目的:研究不同纤维直径的导电高分子涂层材料聚吡咯通电后对细胞及细菌黏附增殖的影响。方法:含有聚吡咯涂层的钛片分为无电刺激组和加电刺激组,每组都有30~60 nm,70~100 nm,130~170 nm 3种直径的纤维。培养MC3T3细胞和金黄色葡萄球菌(Staphylococcus aureus,S. aureus),分别接种于不同直径的聚吡咯纤维涂层表面,加电刺激组立即给予100 mV 恒电压电刺激,持续时间1 h ,以后每间隔24 h, 给予电刺激1 h,无电刺激组不予处理。测量通电和不通电条件下各组细胞培养的CCK-8值、菌液的光密度(D)值,并用扫描电子显微镜和激光共聚焦显微镜观察培养细胞和细菌的黏附形貌。结果:通电组细胞的CCK-8值高于未通电组(F=12.248,P=0.006),并且纤维直径越小,细胞的黏附和增殖情况越好(F=9.261,P=0.005),通电组金黄色葡萄球菌的菌液D值低于未通电组(F=9.641,P=0.036),纤维直径对细菌生长影响不显著。结论:聚吡咯涂层通电后可以促进细胞增殖,纤维直径小的涂层细胞生长更好;通电后可以抑制细菌增殖,不同纤维直径的材料表面细菌生长差异无统计学意义。

关键词: 聚吡咯, 直流电刺激, 细胞增殖, 细菌黏附

Abstract:

Objective:To study the effects of cells’ and bacteria’s adhesion and proliferation on different fiber diameters of polypyrrole coating with electricity.Methods: Titanium coated with polypyrrole was divided into no electrical stimulation and stimulation groups, each group had 30-60 nm, 70-100 nm, 130-170 nm diameters of the fiber. MC3T3 cells and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were inoculated on different fiber diameters of polypyrrole coating with and without electric stimulation . We gave the electrical stimulation group 100 mV for 1 h and every 24 hours gave it 1 h stimulation, and no electrical stimulation group was not managed. We used scanning electron microscope (SEM) to observe the cells’ and bacteria’s morphology. The cells were given 20 mL CCK8 solutions after 1,3,7 days’cultivation, then incubated for 2 h, the solution was transferred to 96-well plate, we measured the cells’CCK-8 of the 30-60 nm, 70-100 nm, and 130-170 nm groups by Elisa. The cells on different fiber diameters were also stained by livedead cell staining kit, TritonX-100 and DAPI. We used PBS to wash and glycerin to seal them. The live-dead situation and morphology were tested by co focal microscope. The bacterial were stained by Live/dead baclight bacterial viability kits, we detect the suspension’s D of the 30-60 nm, 70-100 nm, and 130-170 nm groups, and also observed the bacteria’s survival situation by co focal microscope.Results:  The CCK-8 of the cells with direct current stimulation was higher than that of the unpowered group (F=12.248, P=0.006). The smaller the fiber diameter, the better was the cell’s adhesion and proliferation (F=9.261, P=0.005). The bacterial suspension’s D of the electric group was lower than that of the unpowered group, and the fiber diameter  had no significant effect on the bacteria’s growth(F=9.641, P=0.036). Conclusion: Polypyrrole coating with electricity can promote the cell’s proliferation and inhibit the bacteria’s proliferation, and the cell growth on small fiber diameter coating is better. There is no difference in the bacterial growth of different fiber diameter coatings.

Key words: Polypyrrole, Direct current stimulation, Cells proliferation, Bacteria adhesion

中图分类号: 

  • R783.1
[1] 张瑶,郭金鑫,战世佳,洪恩宇,杨慧,贾安娜,常艳,郭永丽,张璇. 富含半胱氨酸和甘氨酸蛋白2在神经母细胞瘤恶性进展中的功能和机制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 495-504.
[2] 刘媛,原婉琼,李婷,王平章,吕平,吴利新,阮国瑞,韩文玲,莫晓宁. 敲减CMTM3增加急性B淋巴细胞白血病细胞对伊马替尼敏感性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1238-1243.
[3] 谢静,赵玉鸣,饶南荃,汪晓彤,方滕姣子,李晓霞,翟越,李静芝,葛立宏,王媛媛. 3种口腔颌面部来源的间充质干细胞成血管内皮分化潜能的比较研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 900-906.
[4] 王子成,程立,吕同德,苏黎,林健,周利群. 炎症因子预处理的脂肪干细胞可明显抑制外周血单个核细胞增殖[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 590-594.
[5] 唐旭,赵卫红,宋琴琴,殷华奇,杜依青,盛正祚,王强,张晓威,李清,刘士军,徐涛. SOX10对前列腺癌细胞增殖及侵袭的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 602-606.
[6] 陈玮, 胡凡磊, 刘洪江, 徐丽玲, 李英妮, 栗占国. 类风湿关节炎患者髓系来源的抑制细胞促进自身B细胞增殖[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 819-823.
[7] 蔡燚,郭浩,李汉忠,王文达,张玉石. 结节性硬化症细胞株TSC2-/- MEFs和正常细胞株TSC2+/+ MEFs微小RNA表达谱的差异分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 580-584.
[8] 杨迪,许珺辉,邓芙蓉,郭新彪. 纳米银对皮肤细胞半通道活性的影响及其在细胞增殖抑制中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 371-375.
[9] 高翔,陈香梅,张婷,张静,陈茉,郭正阳,石岩岩,鲁凤民,丁士刚. 巨噬细胞加帽蛋白与胃癌细胞增殖及迁移能力的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 489-494.
[10] 司马梓涵,洪瑛瑛,李铁军. PTCH1基因突变对牙源性角化囊性瘤上皮细胞增殖的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 522-526.
[11] 隋华欣, 吕培军, 王宇光, 王勇, 孙玉春. 低能量激光照射对人脂肪基质细胞增殖分化的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 337-343.
[12] 李静文,殷晓晖,栾庆先. 不同代次诱导多能干细胞增殖及牙周定向分化的能力[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 16-024.
[13] 胡佳,邹晓英,庄姮,高学军. 根管封闭剂对牙周膜细胞生物相容性的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 871-877.
[14] 凌龙,赵玉鸣,葛立宏. 不同炎症状态下犬年轻恒牙牙髓干细胞增殖及成骨分化能力的改变[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 878-883.
[15] 莫珩,高承志,王少杰,李玫,董建强,郁卫东. 口腔鳞癌中CD24的表达、作用和治疗靶点价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 16-22.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!