北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 210-214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.02.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

椎管扩大成形术后颈椎后纵韧带骨化进展的再手术治疗

周华,孙宇△,王少波,张凤山,张立,潘胜发,周非非   

  1. (北京大学第三医院骨科, 北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2016-04-18 发布日期:2016-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 孙宇 E-mail:sunyuor@vip.sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    教育部长江学者与创新团队发展计划(IRT0703)和高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20130001120091)资助

Reoperation for cervical myelopathy duo to progressing ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments in patients with expansive laminoplasty

ZHOU Hua, SUN Yu△, WANG Shao-bo, ZHANG Feng-shan, ZHANG Li, PAN Sheng-fa, ZHOU Fei-fei   

  1. (Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2016-04-18 Published:2016-04-18
  • Contact: SUN Yu E-mail:sunyuor@vip.sina.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Program for Changjiang Scholar and Innovation Team Development, Ministry of Education of China (IRT0703) and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20130001120091)

摘要:

目的:回顾分析北京大学第三医院骨科颈椎后纵韧带骨化后路手术后,后纵韧带骨化进展导致颈脊髓病需再次手术的患者资料,通过总结颈椎后纵韧带骨化进展的再次手术治疗策略及其疗效,为颈椎后纵韧带骨化术后进展的再次外科治疗提供一定的临床参考。方法:在2006年5月至2012年7月住院的颈椎后纵韧带骨化患者中,选取既往因后纵韧带骨化行单开门椎管扩大成形术的17例患者作为研究对象。再次手术依据患者的临床表现结合影像学检查确定责任节段及手术入路,采用前方入路减压者12例,采用后方入路扩大减压者5例。采取日本骨科协会(Japanese Orthopedic Association, JOA)评分评价患者术前及术后的脊髓功能。将患者年龄,性别,术前症状持续时间,脊髓高信号,是否伴随高血压、糖尿病等临床因素与术前JOA评分及术后JOA改善率进行相关性分析;手术前、后的JOA评分比较采用重复测量ANOVA方差分析;手术前、后的JOA改善率比较采用配对t检验。结果:随访时间60~348个月,平均137.5个月。手术均顺利完成,首次手术和再次后路手术各发生C5神经根麻痹1例。再次手术时,前路手术有2例、后路有1例发生硬膜撕裂致脑脊液漏,无感染发生。不同临床因素与术前JOA评分及JOA改善率无显著相关性。首次椎管扩大椎板成形术后,患者的JOA评分从术前9.4±4.1升高到12.8±2.8,有显著改善(P<0.01),后纵韧带骨化进展导致颈脊髓病后又出现下降,再次手术后较术前神经功能显著改善(P<0.05)。再次手术的远期改善率较第一次术后的首次改善率和再次手术后6个月的改善率差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:根据后纵韧带骨化进展后的临床表现及影像学的改变制定的再次手术减压策略,能显著改善后纵韧带骨化进展导致的脊髓功能损害。

关键词: 骨化, 异位性, 纵韧带, 再手术, 颈椎, 椎管成形术

Abstract:

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of the patients with reoperation for cervical myelopathy due to progressing ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments, with previous open-door expansive laminoplasty, and to evaluate the outcomes. Methods: From May 2006 to July 2012, a retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of 17 patients with previous open-door expansive laminoplasty, who had received the reoperation for cervical myelopathy due to progressing ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments. The reoperation was performed based on the clinical manifestations and segments of responsibility. The anterior approaches were performed in 12 cases, and the posterior approaches in 5 cases. The correlation between the clinical factors and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores or the JOA recovery rate was evaluated by Pearson or Spearman correlation test. The pre-and post-operative JOA scores were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA and the JOA recovery rates were compared with paired t test. Results: The mean follow-up was 137.5 months (range 60-348 months). There were no serious complications after surgical procedures. There was one case that had C5 palsy in the first operation and had recovery after one week. Another case had C5 palsy in the reoperation with posterior approach, which had recovery at the end of 6 months post-operation. Three cases had the cerebrospinal fluid leakage of the reoperation, with two cases in the anterior approaches and one case in the posterior approach. There was no significant correlation between the clinical variables and JOA scores or JOA recovery rates. The JOA scores of the patients in the first operation were improved from 9.4±4.1 to 12.8±2.8 (P<0.01), and the JOA recovery rate was 45.6%. The JOA scores of the reoperation were improved from 10.2±2.8 to 12.7±2.4 (P<0.05) at the end of  6 months and 14.3±1.9 (P<0.01) by the last follow-up. There were significant differences between the JOA recovery rates by the last follow-up (63.2%) and at the end of 6 months (39.3%) of the reoperation or 45.6% of the first operation (P<0.01). Conclusion: The reoperation for cervical myelopathy duo to progressing ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligaments can significantly promote the recovery of the spinal cord, based on the clinical manifestations combined with segments of responsibility of the imaging.

Key words: Ossification, heterotopic, Longitudinal ligaments, Reoperation, Cervical vertebrae, Laminoplasty

中图分类号: 

  • R681.531
[1] 林国中,马长城,吴超,司雨,杨军. 微通道技术在颈椎管肿瘤微创切除术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 318-321.
[2] 胡攀攀,李彦,刘啸,唐彦超,李梓赫,刘忠军. 自稳式人工椎体在颈椎前路手术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 161-166.
[3] 周华,王仁吉,刘忠军,刘晓光,吴奉梁,党礌,韦峰. 3D打印人工椎体在颈椎脊索瘤全脊椎切除术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 144-148.
[4] 翟书珩,胡攀攀,刘晓光. 术中超声辅助下环形减压术治疗多节段胸椎后纵韧带骨化症[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1021-1027.
[5] 唐彦超,赵文奎,于淼,刘晓光. 无症状中国年轻人颈椎矢状位曲度正常值及其与全脊柱平衡的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 712-718.
[6] 张璐,胡小红,陈澄,蔡月明,王庆文,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎初治患者颈椎失稳情况及临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1049-1054.
[7] 蒋艳芳,王健,王永健,刘佳,裴殷,刘晓鹏,敖英芳,马勇. 前交叉韧带翻修重建术后中长期临床疗效及影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 857-863.
[8] 林国中, 马长城, 王振宇, 谢京城, 刘彬, 陈晓东. 1~2硬膜外神经鞘瘤的显微微创治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 586-589.
[9] 张璐,胡小红,王庆文,蔡月明,赵金霞,刘湘源. 类风湿关节炎合并颈椎失稳的人群分布及临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1034-1039.
[10] 洪洪,钱宇婷,付磊,王武,李成辉,尹毅青. 困难气道中运用CT 三维重建技术指导硬质纤维气管镜行气管插管[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 870-874.
[11] 韩永正,井凤云,徐懋,郭向阳. 颈椎脊索瘤行肿瘤切除术的麻醉管理1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 981-983.
[12] 吴超,王振宇,林国中,于涛,刘彬,司雨,张一博,李元超. 单侧半椎板及不同程度小关节切除术对羊颈椎生物力学的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(4): 728-732.
[13] 杨泽川,刘朝旭,林阳,胡伟华,陈文坚,李锋,曾恒. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术全钛板与交替钛板、缝线固定治疗颈椎病的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
[14] 李彦,姜亮,刘忠军,刘晓光,韦峰,于淼,陶立元. 超声骨刀在颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术中应用的安全性和有效性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 1092-1097.
[15] 王永强,刘晓光,姜亮,韦峰,于淼,吴奉梁,党礌,周华,刘忠军. 胸椎管狭窄症术后脑脊液漏继发皮下积液的治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(4): 657-661.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!