北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 590-593. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.04.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

MEK/ERK通路蛋白在肾癌骨转移患者的表达

秦彩朋1,2,刘春雷3,赵燕辉3,殷华奇1,杜依青1,胡风战1,盛正祚1,徐涛1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学人民医院泌尿外科, 北京100044; 2. 北京大学国际医院泌尿外科, 北京102206; 3. 青岛市中心医院泌尿外科, 山东青岛266042)
  • 出版日期:2016-08-18 发布日期:2016-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 徐涛 E-mail:xutao@medmail.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    北京市科技计划项目(Z151100003915145)资助

Expression of MEK/ERK signal pathways in renal cell carcinoma with bone metastasis

QIN Cai-peng 1,2, LIU Chun-lei3, ZHAO Yan-hui3, YIN Hua-qi1, DU Yi-qing1, HU Feng-zhan1, SHENG Zheng-zuo1, XU Tao1△   

  1. (1. Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044,China; 2. Department of Urology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China; 3. Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao 266042, Shandong, China)
  • Online:2016-08-18 Published:2016-08-18
  • Contact: XU Tao E-mail:xutao@medmail.com.cn
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project (Z151100003915145)

摘要:

目的:探讨MEK/ERK通路蛋白在肾癌骨转移患者原发灶及转移灶表达的差异及其意义,并探索这种差异的发生机制。方法: 选择北京大学人民医院2009年1月至2010年1月 7例肾癌骨转移患者的原发灶及转移灶组织标本,应用免疫组织化学法分析VEGFR-2、MEK、ERK蛋白在原发灶与转移灶表达的差异,VEGFR-2、MEK、ERK的Ⅰ抗工作浓度(体积比)分别为1 ∶200、1 ∶25、1 ∶250,应用PCR技术检测PDGFRA基因20号外显子,K-ras基因2号外显子,Braf基因15号外显子和MEK1基因2号外显子的相关突变。结果:免疫组织化学结果判读:细胞阳性率≤ 5% 为1分, 6% ~50% 为2分, 51% ~ 100% 为3分; 染色强度: 不着色为1分, 淡黄色细颗粒状为2分, 黄色颗粒状为3分, 棕黄色粗颗粒状为4分,将两个得分数相乘得到其表达强度。本组7例肾癌骨转移患者VEGFR-2在原发灶(2.86±2.27)和骨转移灶(2.67±1.85)表达差异无统计学意义(P=0.901),而MEK(1.33±0.51 vs. 6.10±4.10,P=0.015)和ERK(4.43±2.84 vs.9.10±2.24, P=0.021)表达差异有统计学意义;在原发灶及转移灶标本中并未检测到相关的基因突变。结论:MEK/ERK通路蛋白在肾癌骨转移患者原发灶和转移灶表达的差异可能与其转移过程有关,也可能是影响靶向治疗效果的原因之一。

关键词: 癌, 肾细胞, MAP激酶信号系统, 肿瘤转移, 骨, 突变

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the expression of MEK/ERK signaling pathways in renal cell carcinoma with bone metastasis, and to analyze the differences of expressions of VEGFR-2, MEK, ERK on the primary and metastasis tissue and its mechanism. Methods: The tissue samples were obtained from 7 renal cell carcinoma patients kindly provided by Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2010. The expression of MEK/ERK signaling pathways was detected in the 7 renal cell carcinoma patients` primary and matched metastatic tissues with ICH, The antibody concentrations were 1 ∶200, 1 ∶25, and 1 ∶250, respectively. The mutation of the twentieth exon of the PDGFRA gene, the second exon of the K-ras gene, the fifteenth exon of the Braf gene and the se-cond exon of the MEK1 gene were detected with PCR.  Results: The expression intensities of VEGFR-2, MEK, and ERK were measured by H-score [intensity (1, 2, 3, or 4) multiplied by the distribution (%)]. VEGFR-2, MEK, and ERK expressions were divided into 3 groups according to the positive distribution of the tumor cells: 1, 0-5%; 2, 6%-50%; and 3, >50%, To assess intratumor heterogeneity, three distinct microscopic fields (×200) from each specimen were used to evaluate the expressions, Subsequently, the scores were averaged to obtain a single concatenated score for each tissue. VEGFR-2, MEK, and ERK expressions were assessed by 2 independent pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathological data. The data were expressed as the mean value of the triplicate experiments. The expressions of MEK, and ERK were higher in the metastatic tissues than in the matched RCC tissues (6.10±4.10 vs.  1.33±0.51, P=0.015; 9.10±2.24 vs. 4.43±2.84, P=0.021) while the expression of VEGFR2 was not different between the primary and metastatic tissues (P=0.901). No mutation was detected on the twentieth exon of the PDGFRA gene, the second exon of the K-ras gene, the fifteenth exon of the Braf gene and the second exon of the MEK1 gene. Conclusion: MEK/ERK signaling pathways may play an important role in the metastasis and the resistance of sunitinib in RCC patients with bone metastasis.

Key words: Carcinoma, renal cell, MAP kinase signaling system, Neoplasm metastasis, Bone, Mutation

中图分类号: 

  • R737.1
[1] 步召德, 冯梦宇, 季科. 早期胃癌行前哨淋巴结导航手术的实践与思考[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 239-243.
[2] 王海, 江一舟. 靶向血管治疗在乳腺癌精准治疗中的分子机制与临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 251-256.
[3] 罗必显, 刘洪铭, 谢伟勋, 龚渭华. 产甲胎蛋白胃癌的新临床特征和前沿科学问题[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 257-265.
[4] 付浩, 申潞艳, 黄冰洋, 马少华. 免疫治疗背景下食管鳞状细胞癌围手术期治疗的临床思考[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 266-271.
[5] 李峥, 吕珑薇, 张晓, 夏丹丹, 张萍, 刘云松, 周永胜. 基于干细胞和生物材料调控的口腔颅颌面骨再生的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 272-277.
[6] 张晗, 杨馥嘉, 杨瑞莉. 干细胞功能调控在颅颌面组织再生修复中的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 285-289.
[7] 宋晓欢, 罗桂英, 王婕妤, 贾月迪, 江飞, 朱梦黎, 王丹妮. 辅助生殖人群体脂率和体骨骼肌率与抑郁的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 319-326.
[8] 刘嘉昱, 祝宁, 张育祯, 高贤明, 张宇. 动态导航辅助环钻取骨的准确性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 365-371.
[9] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张孟钧, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子联合引导性组织再生术治疗下颌磨牙根分叉病变的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 372-379.
[10] 殷昊明, 王子杰, 舒帆, 张展奕, 梁会, 张树栋. 肾透明细胞癌FABP6基因长转录本的表达及意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 393-398.
[11] 李嘉临, 陈力侨, 唐家天, 吴艳, 王安强. 胃肝样腺癌转化治疗1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 399-404.
[12] 郭芷均, 俎明, 马超, 张贺军, 张静, 丁士刚. 同时性多发早期胃癌漏诊病灶的临床病理特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 410-415.
[13] 潘子晨, 陈凯, 侯钰坤, 杨博涵, 张继新, 马永蔌, 田孝东, 杨尹默. 胰腺腺鳞癌临床病理特征与分子机制研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 431-435.
[14] 曾立婷, 程凯远, 刘中宁, 李健, 杨静文, 姜婷. miR-488-5p促进大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞成神经、成骨分化及神经化骨再生[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 10-21.
[15] FarinEbrahimi, 冯志强, FarazEbrahimi, 韩玮华, 于子杨, 贾宽宽, 安金刚. 上颌药物相关性颌骨坏死的不同分期手术治疗效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 107-114.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!