北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4): 590-593. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.04.004

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

MEK/ERK通路蛋白在肾癌骨转移患者的表达

秦彩朋1,2,刘春雷3,赵燕辉3,殷华奇1,杜依青1,胡风战1,盛正祚1,徐涛1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学人民医院泌尿外科, 北京100044; 2. 北京大学国际医院泌尿外科, 北京102206; 3. 青岛市中心医院泌尿外科, 山东青岛266042)
  • 出版日期:2016-08-18 发布日期:2016-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 徐涛 E-mail:xutao@medmail.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    北京市科技计划项目(Z151100003915145)资助

Expression of MEK/ERK signal pathways in renal cell carcinoma with bone metastasis

QIN Cai-peng 1,2, LIU Chun-lei3, ZHAO Yan-hui3, YIN Hua-qi1, DU Yi-qing1, HU Feng-zhan1, SHENG Zheng-zuo1, XU Tao1△   

  1. (1. Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing 100044,China; 2. Department of Urology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing 102206, China; 3. Department of Urology, Central Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao 266042, Shandong, China)
  • Online:2016-08-18 Published:2016-08-18
  • Contact: XU Tao E-mail:xutao@medmail.com.cn
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project (Z151100003915145)

摘要:

目的:探讨MEK/ERK通路蛋白在肾癌骨转移患者原发灶及转移灶表达的差异及其意义,并探索这种差异的发生机制。方法: 选择北京大学人民医院2009年1月至2010年1月 7例肾癌骨转移患者的原发灶及转移灶组织标本,应用免疫组织化学法分析VEGFR-2、MEK、ERK蛋白在原发灶与转移灶表达的差异,VEGFR-2、MEK、ERK的Ⅰ抗工作浓度(体积比)分别为1 ∶200、1 ∶25、1 ∶250,应用PCR技术检测PDGFRA基因20号外显子,K-ras基因2号外显子,Braf基因15号外显子和MEK1基因2号外显子的相关突变。结果:免疫组织化学结果判读:细胞阳性率≤ 5% 为1分, 6% ~50% 为2分, 51% ~ 100% 为3分; 染色强度: 不着色为1分, 淡黄色细颗粒状为2分, 黄色颗粒状为3分, 棕黄色粗颗粒状为4分,将两个得分数相乘得到其表达强度。本组7例肾癌骨转移患者VEGFR-2在原发灶(2.86±2.27)和骨转移灶(2.67±1.85)表达差异无统计学意义(P=0.901),而MEK(1.33±0.51 vs. 6.10±4.10,P=0.015)和ERK(4.43±2.84 vs.9.10±2.24, P=0.021)表达差异有统计学意义;在原发灶及转移灶标本中并未检测到相关的基因突变。结论:MEK/ERK通路蛋白在肾癌骨转移患者原发灶和转移灶表达的差异可能与其转移过程有关,也可能是影响靶向治疗效果的原因之一。

关键词: 癌, 肾细胞, MAP激酶信号系统, 肿瘤转移, 骨, 突变

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the expression of MEK/ERK signaling pathways in renal cell carcinoma with bone metastasis, and to analyze the differences of expressions of VEGFR-2, MEK, ERK on the primary and metastasis tissue and its mechanism. Methods: The tissue samples were obtained from 7 renal cell carcinoma patients kindly provided by Department of Urology, Peking University People’s Hospital from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2010. The expression of MEK/ERK signaling pathways was detected in the 7 renal cell carcinoma patients` primary and matched metastatic tissues with ICH, The antibody concentrations were 1 ∶200, 1 ∶25, and 1 ∶250, respectively. The mutation of the twentieth exon of the PDGFRA gene, the second exon of the K-ras gene, the fifteenth exon of the Braf gene and the se-cond exon of the MEK1 gene were detected with PCR.  Results: The expression intensities of VEGFR-2, MEK, and ERK were measured by H-score [intensity (1, 2, 3, or 4) multiplied by the distribution (%)]. VEGFR-2, MEK, and ERK expressions were divided into 3 groups according to the positive distribution of the tumor cells: 1, 0-5%; 2, 6%-50%; and 3, >50%, To assess intratumor heterogeneity, three distinct microscopic fields (×200) from each specimen were used to evaluate the expressions, Subsequently, the scores were averaged to obtain a single concatenated score for each tissue. VEGFR-2, MEK, and ERK expressions were assessed by 2 independent pathologists who were blinded to the clinicopathological data. The data were expressed as the mean value of the triplicate experiments. The expressions of MEK, and ERK were higher in the metastatic tissues than in the matched RCC tissues (6.10±4.10 vs.  1.33±0.51, P=0.015; 9.10±2.24 vs. 4.43±2.84, P=0.021) while the expression of VEGFR2 was not different between the primary and metastatic tissues (P=0.901). No mutation was detected on the twentieth exon of the PDGFRA gene, the second exon of the K-ras gene, the fifteenth exon of the Braf gene and the second exon of the MEK1 gene. Conclusion: MEK/ERK signaling pathways may play an important role in the metastasis and the resistance of sunitinib in RCC patients with bone metastasis.

Key words: Carcinoma, renal cell, MAP kinase signaling system, Neoplasm metastasis, Bone, Mutation

中图分类号: 

  • R737.1
[1] 刘园梅, 傅义程, 郝靖欣, 张福春, 刘慧琳. 老年髋部骨折患者住院期间发生术后心力衰竭的列线图预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 874-883.
[2] 汪琪伟, 包鹏宇, 洪士皓, 杨昕, 王宇, 曹永平. 改良股骨颈截骨术在伴严重屈曲畸形强直性脊柱炎患者手术治疗过程中的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 884-889.
[3] 黄教悌,胡菁,韩博. 治疗相关神经内分泌前列腺癌机制研究与靶向治疗新进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 557-561.
[4] 张树栋,谢睿扬. 机器人手术时代的肾癌合并腔静脉瘤栓治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 562-564.
[5] 邢念增,王明帅,杨飞亚,尹路,韩苏军. 前列腺免活检创新理念的临床实践及其应用前景[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 565-566.
[6] 颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[7] 于书慧,韩佳凝,钟丽君,陈聪语,肖云翔,黄燕波,杨洋,车新艳. 术前盆底肌电生理参数对前列腺癌根治性切除术后早期尿失禁的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 594-599.
[8] 刘帅,刘磊,刘茁,张帆,马潞林,田晓军,侯小飞,王国良,赵磊,张树栋. 伴静脉癌栓的肾上腺皮质癌的临床治疗及预后[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 624-630.
[9] 舒帆,郝一昌,张展奕,邓绍晖,张洪宪,刘磊,王国良,田晓军,赵磊,马潞林,张树栋. 肾部分切除术治疗囊性肾癌的功能学和肿瘤学结果:单中心回顾性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 667-672.
[10] 周泽臻,邓绍晖,颜野,张帆,郝一昌,葛力源,张洪宪,王国良,张树栋. 非转移性T3a肾细胞癌患者3年肿瘤特异性生存期预测[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 673-679.
[11] 李红光,韩玮华,吴训,冯继玲,李刚,孟娟红. 关节腔冲洗联合液态浓缩生长因子注射治疗单侧颞下颌关节骨关节炎的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 338-344.
[12] 周颖,赵宁,黄竑远,李庆祥,郭传瑸,郭玉兴. 左侧三叉神经第三支带状疱疹并发左侧下颌骨骨坏死1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 366-370.
[13] 白心竹,何金徽,陆松松,李春,王依林,熊建. 椎体骨折合并活化部分凝血活酶时间延长1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 371-374.
[14] 毛渤淳,田雅婧,王雪东,李晶,周彦恒. 骨性Ⅱ类高角患者拔牙矫治前后的面部软硬组织变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 111-119.
[15] 苏俊琪,王晓颖,孙志强. 舌鳞状细胞癌根治性切除术后患者预后预测列线图的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 120-130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!