北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 436-442. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.03.008

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

2014年全国汉族中小学生身体素质现况分析

宋逸,雷园婷,胡佩瑾,张冰,马军△   

  1. (北京大学公共卫生学院,北京大学儿童青少年卫生研究所, 北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2018-06-18 发布日期:2018-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 马军 E-mail:majunt@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家体育总局(2017B025)和北京大学公共卫生学院青年人才支持计划资助

Situation analysis of physical fitness among Chinese Han students in 2014

SONG Yi,LEI Yuan-ting, HU Pei-jin, ZHANG Bing, MA Jun△   

  1. (Peking University School of Public Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health of Peking University, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2018-06-18 Published:2018-06-18
  • Contact: MA Jun E-mail:majunt@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
     Supported by the State General Administration of Sport of People’s Republic of China (2017B025) and the Youth Talent Support Program by Peking University School of Public Health

摘要: 目的:分析2014年全国汉族中小学生身体素质情况,为开发制定有针对性的学生体育锻炼指导方案、提高学生体质健康水平提供依据。方法:选取2014年全国学生体质与健康调研中7~18岁汉族学生212 401名,测量身体素质相关指标,各项素质指标合格率依据《国家学生体质健康标准》(2014年修订)进行评价。应用多因素Logistic回归分析对男生引体向上和男、女生耐力跑指标进行影响因素分析。结果:2014年男生身体素质弱势项目为引体向上(合格率仅为18.7%)和耐力跑(合格率为76.6%),女生身体素质弱势项目为耐力跑(合格率为80.6%)。身体素质合格率地区间差异明显,浙江、江苏学生身体素质合格率相对较好。Logistic回归发现,城市学生(OR=0.67)、营养不良(OR=0.76)、超重(OR=0.32)和肥胖(OR=0.12)学生引体向上合格率更低,每天体育锻炼时间1 h及以上的学生引体向上合格率更高(OR=1.31)。耐力跑合格率影响因素与引体向上表现一致,此外,体育课设置充足的学生耐力跑合格率更高,而体育课经常或偶尔被“挤占”或“不上”的学生耐力跑合格率更低。结论:引体向上和耐力跑已经成为我国国家及省级层面中小学生身体素质弱势项目,在确保体育锻炼时间、保障体育课程设置和课时、改善学生营养的基础上,还应强化体育锻炼的合理设计,确保各个项目均衡发展,以促进学生身体素质全面发展。

关键词: 身体素质, 体育锻炼, 营养状况, 学生

Abstract: Objective: To analyze the situation of physical fitness among Chinese Han students in 2014, so as to develop the guideline of physical activity regarding to the targeted students and to provide bases for the improvements of students’ physical fitness. Methods: Subjects were from 2014 Chinese National Surveys on Students’ Constitution and Health (CNSSCH). In this survey, 212 401 Han students aged 7-18 years participated and the measurement of physical fitness completed. The qualified rates of indicators regarding to physical fitness were evaluated based on “National Students Constitutional Health Standards” (2014 revised edition). Logistic regression was used to assess the association between the indicators of pull ups (boys) and endurance run (boys and girls) and influencing factors. Results: In 2014, among the boys, the qualified rates of pull ups and endurance run were 18.7% and 76.6% respectively, while the qualified rate of endurance run was 80.6% among the girls. These two indicators were the weak items of physical fitness among the Chinese Han students. There was regional difference in the qualified rates of physical fitness, and the students in Zhejiang and Jiangsu provinces had higher qualified rates. Logistic regression showed that the urban students (OR=0.67), the students with malnutrition (OR=0.76), overweight (OR=0.32) or obesity (OR=0.12) were less likely to be qualified to pull ups; the students who had physical activity more than 1 h per day (OR=1.31) was more likely to be qualified to pull ups. The influencing factors of endurance run showed the similar pattern, in addition, the students with enough physical education (PE) were more likely to be qualified to endurance run, while the students with “Squeeze” or “no” PE class were less likely to be qualified to endurance run. Conclusion: The pull ups and endurance run have become the weak items of the physical fitness among primary and secondary school students in our national and provincial levels. Based on ensuring physical exercise time and PE curriculum and class hours, as well as improving students’ nutrition, we should also strengthen the rational design of physical exercise and ensure the balanced development of various items so as to improve the overall development of students’ physical fitness.

Key words: Physical fitness, Physical activity, Nutrition status, Students

中图分类号: 

  •  
[1] 李成跃, 王浩, 阿力木江·依米提·塔尔肯. 1985——2019年新疆维吾尔族中小学生生长发育的长期趋势[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 802-808.
[2] 蔡珊,张依航,陈子玥,刘云飞,党佳佳,师嫡,李佳欣,黄天彧,马军,宋逸. 北京市中小学生身体活动时间现状及影响因素的路径[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 403-410.
[3] 李卫民,祖菲娅·吐尔地. 维吾尔族、哈萨克族和汉族大学生体重指数与体能指数的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 411-417.
[4] 张祖洪,陈天娇,马军. 中小学生青春发动时相与心血管代谢危险因素的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 418-423.
[5] 闫晓晋,刘云飞,马宁,党佳佳,张京舒,钟盼亮,胡佩瑾,宋逸,马军. 《中国儿童发展纲要(2011-2020年)》实施期间中小学生营养不良率变化及其政策效应分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 593-599.
[6] 董彦会,陈曼曼,王丽萍,星一,宋逸,邹志勇,董彬,李中杰,马军. 中国6~22岁学生群体甲乙丙类传染病流行趋势[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 498-505.
[7] 李远骋, 崔闻心, 郭雪儿, 朱璠, 刘思辰, 贾碧波, 汪培, 马迎华. 青年学生男男性行为人群中人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性与阴性者获得性免疫缺陷综合征(艾滋病)相关知识与行为比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 511-517.
[8] 王双佳,王婷婷,王军波. 北京某高校医学院师生营养知信行水平及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 881-885.
[9] 宋逸,罗冬梅,胡佩瑾,闫晓晋,张京舒,雷园婷,张冰,马军. 1985--2014年中国汉族13~18岁中学生体质健康达标优秀率趋势分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 317-322.
[10] 董彦会,宋逸,董彬,邹志勇,王政和,杨招庚,王西婕,李艳辉,马军. 2014年中国7~18岁学生血压状况与营养状况的关联分析——基于中国儿童青少年血压评价标准[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 422-428.
[11] 程吟楚,潘勇平,张洋,潘昱廷,丁呈怡,曹宇,卓琳,方任飞,高爱钰,郭晶,李爱军,付强,马军,詹思延. 北京市中学生药品安全认知与行为调查[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(6): 1038-1043.
[12] 宋逸,胡佩瑾,董彦会,张冰,马军. 2014年全国各省、自治区、直辖市汉族学生视力不良现况分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 433-438.
[13] 张欣,娜荷芽,叶墨,王梦楠,魏少明,孙亚慧,张复兵,孙昕霙,常春,史宇晖. 北京大学生艾滋病相关知识、态度、行为的变化特点及影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 462-468.
[14] 王怡欣,马迎华,李恬静,胡翼飞,彭华参. 同性交友平台上青年学生的艾滋病知识和艾滋病相关行为现状[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 469-475.
[15] 宋逸,张冰,胡佩瑾,马军. 中国少数民族学生贫血现况及其与营养状况的关联研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(3): 429-435.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!