北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 1057-1062. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.06.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

食管癌术后急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析

徐稼轩,王宏志(),董军,陈小杰,杨勇,陈仁雄,王国栋   

  1. 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所重症医学科,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室, 北京 100142
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-23 出版日期:2018-12-18 发布日期:2018-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 王宏志 E-mail:doctorwhz@163.com

Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy

Jia-xuan XU,Hong-zhi WANG(),Jun DONG,Xiao-jie CHEN,Yong YANG,Ren-xiong CHEN,Guo-dong WANG   

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing 100142, China
  • Received:2017-06-23 Online:2018-12-18 Published:2018-12-18
  • Contact: Hong-zhi WANG E-mail:doctorwhz@163.com

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 分析食管癌患者手术后急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)/急性呼吸窘迫综合征(acute respiratory distress syndrome,ARDS)的发生情况及相关危险因素。方法: 回顾性分析北京大学肿瘤医院重症医学科自2010年1月至2016年12月连续收治的422例食管癌手术患者,统计其术后ALI/ARDS的发生情况。以是否发生ALI/ARDS把患者分为ALI/ARDS组和对照组,对比分析两组间临床资料的差异,将差异有统计学意义的因素作为自变量进行Logistic后退法回归分析,探寻ALI/ARDS的独立危险因素。结果: 术后共有41例患者发生ALI/ARDS,占所有患者的9.7%(41/422),ALI/ARDS组与对照组在平均住院天数[(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d,P=0.011]、需要进行机械通气的患者比例[51.2%(21/41) vs. 9.4%(36/381),P<0.001]、院内死亡率[31.7%(13/41) vs. 5.0%(19/381),P<0.001]方面差异有统计学意义。单因素分析结果显示,吸烟史(P=0.064)、术前1秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity,FEV1/FVC)(P=0.020)、肺一氧化碳弥散量(diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide,DLCO)(P=0.011)、体重指数(body weight index,BMI)(P=0.044)、美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)麻醉风险分级(P=0.049)及术中单肺通气时间(P=0.008)在ALI/ARDS组与对照组之间差异有统计学意义。进一步行Logistic多因素回归分析显示,术前FEV1/FVC(OR=1.053,95%CI 1.010~1.098,P=0.016)、ASA分级(OR=2.392,95%CI 1.073~5.335,P=0.033)、术中单肺通气时间(min)(OR=0.994,95%CI 0.989~0.999,P=0.028)是食管癌术后发生ALI/ARDS的独立危险因素。结论: ALI/ARDS是食管癌术后不容忽视的严重并发症,一旦发生将明显增加患者的住院时间及死亡率,术前FEV1/FVC、ASA分级、术中单肺通气时间是食管癌术后发生ALI/ARDS的独立危险因素。术前对患者的充分评估和准备,术中控制单肺通气时间是预防食管癌术后ALI/ARDS发生的关键。

关键词: 食管切除术, 呼吸窘迫综合征, 成人, 手术后并发症, 食管肿瘤, 危险因素

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the incidence and risk factors for the acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after resection of esophageal carcinoma.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed 422 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine with eso-phageal carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2016 in Peking University Cancer Hospital. ALI/ARDS were diagnosed, the patients were divided into ALI/ARDS group and control group without ALI/ARDS, the differences of clinical features were contrasted between the two groups, and the multivariate Logistic regression modeling was used to identify the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS.Results:In the study, 41 ALI/ARDS cases were diagnosed, making up 9.7% (41/422) of all the enrolled patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparisons of the ALI/ARDS group and the control group indicated significant statistical differences in the average length of their hospital stay [(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d, P=0.011], the proportion of the patients who needed mechanical ventilation support [51.2% (21/41) vs. 9.4% (36/381), P<0.001] and in-hospital mortality [31.7% (13/41) vs. 5.0% (19/381), P<0.001]. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the patients with ALI/ARDS and without ALI/ARDS in smoking history (P=0.064), preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (P=0.020), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P=0.011), body weight index (BMI) (P=0.044), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification (P=0.049) and one lung ventilation duration (P=0.008), while multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC (OR=1.053, P=0.016, 95%CI 1.010-1.098), ASA physical status classification (OR=2.392, P=0.033, 95%CI 1.073-5.335) and one lung ventilation duration (OR=0.994, P=0.028, 95%CI 0.989-0.999) were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.Conclusion:ALI/ARDS was a serious complication in patients undergoing esophagectomy associated with increment in length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC, ASA classification and one lung ventilation duration were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy. Carefully assessing the patient before operation, shortening one lung ventilation duration were the key points in preventing ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.

Key words: Esophagectomy, Respiratory distress syndrome, adult, Postoperative complications, Esophageal neoplasms, Risk factors

中图分类号: 

  • R735.1

表1

ALI/ARDS组和对照组相关资料的比较情况"

Factor ALI/ARDS (n=41) Control(n=381) P value
Gender (male/female) 35/6 313/68 0.607
Age/years 64.2±7.5 63.9±7.6 0.839
Pathology (squamous/adenocarcinoma) 36/5 357/24 0.274
Stage 0.483
14 98
15 170
12 113
Chemotherapy (yes/no) 11/30 110/271 0.784
Smoking (yes/no) 29/12 212/169 0.064
FEV1/FVC 69.7%±9.7% 73.4%±7.0% 0.020
MVV/(L/min) 85.6±19.3 89.7±22.0 0.257
Decreased DLCO (yes/no) 8/33 26/355 0.011
BMI/(kg/m2) 23.6±2.4 22.7±2.7 0.044
ASA classification 0.049
Ⅰ/Ⅱ 26 298
15 83
Surgical approach (thoracoscopic/non-thoracoscopic) 8/33 38/343 0.110
Operation duration/min 400.2±98.9 428.4±114.1 0.128
One lung ventilation duration/min 194.4±65.4 168.6±58.1 0.008
Perioperative fluid in first 24 h/mL 5 716.2±2 281.4 5 376.3±1 323.6 0.354
Intra-operative vasopressor infusion (yes/no) 5/36 35/346 0.532
Blood transfusion in first 24 h (yes/no) 16/25 104/277 0.114
PaO2/FiO2 on arrival in Department of Critical Care Medicine 285.6±106.7 291.8±99.4 0.703

表2

ALI/ARDS患者多因素Logistic回归分析"

Factor P value Odds ratio 95%CI
FEV1/FVC 0.016 1.053 1.010-1.098
ASA classification 0.033 2.392 1.073-5.335
One-lung ventilation 0.028 0.994 0.989-0.999
[1] Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A , et al. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003,97(6):1558-1565.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000087799.85495.8A pmid: 14633519
[2] Levitt JE, Matthay MA . Clinical review: Early treatment of acute lung injury-paradigm shift toward prevention and treatment prior to respiratory failure[J]. Crit Care, 2012,16(3):223.
doi: 10.1186/cc11144 pmid: 22713281
[3] Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G , et al. Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units. Results from the ALIVE study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2004,30(1):51-61.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2022-6
[4] 马晓春, 王辰, 方强 , 等. 急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2006,16(12):1-6.
doi: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2007.05.037
[5] 赫捷, 邵康 . 中国食管癌流行病学现状、诊疗现状及未来对策[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2011(7):501-504.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2011.07.001
[6] Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M , et al. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 1990,77(8):845-857.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1365-2168
[7] Morita M, Otsu H, Kawano H , et al. Advances in esophageal surgery in elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2013,33(4):1641-1647.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.008 pmid: 23564809
[8] Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT , et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition[J]. JAMA, 2012,307(23):2526-2533.
[9] 杜斌 . 急性呼吸窘迫综合征的柏林定义: 究竟改变了什么[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013,34(2):201-203.
[10] Eichenbaum KD, Neustein SM . Acute lung injury after thoracic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2010,24(4):681-690.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.032 pmid: 20060320
[11] Tandon S, Batchelor A, Bullock R , et al. Peri-operative risk factors for acute lung injury after elective oesophagectomy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2001,86(5):633-638.
doi: 10.1093/bja/86.5.633 pmid: 11878539
[12] Misthos P, Katsaragakis S, Milingos N , et al. Postresectional pulmonary oxidative stress in lung cancer patients. The role of one-lung ventilation[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005,27(3):379-382.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.023 pmid: 15740942
[13] 森山博史, 平田哲, 久保良彦 . 食道癌,肺癌手術周術期における血中エンドトキシン,顆粒球エラスターゼおよび凝固線溶系分子マーカーの変動[J]. 臨床病理, 1995,43(3):233-237.
[14] Hackett NJ, De Oliveira GS, Jain UK , et al. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery[J]. Int J Surg, 2015(18):184-190.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.079 pmid: 25937154
[15] 刘勇恩, 寇瑛琍 . 食管癌术后肺部并发症发生的原因及防治进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2008,15(2):138-142.
[16] 刘丽霞, 胡振杰, 赵钗 . 食管癌手术前肺功能试验与术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的相关性[J]. 癌症, 2006,25(3):335-338.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-467X.2006.03.015
[17] Della RG, Coccia C . Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2013,26(1):40-46.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835c4ea2 pmid: 23235524
[18] Rocker GM, Wiseman MS, Pearson D , et al. Neutrophil degranulation and increased pulmonary capillary permeability following oesophagectomy: a model of early lung injury in man[J]. Br J Surg, 1988,75(9):883-886.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750918 pmid: 3179665
[19] Michelet P , D’Journo XB, Roch A, et al. Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a rando-mized controlled study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006,105(5):911-919.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00011
[20] Gao Q, Mok HP, Wang WP , et al. Effect of perioperative glucocorticoid administration on postoperative complications following esophagectomy: A meta-analysis[J]. Oncol Lett, 2014,7(2):349-356.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1748 pmid: 24396446
[1] 魏慧, 张警丰, 姚中强, 赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎合并慢性病贫血患者的临床特征及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 307-312.
[2] 赵杰, 付春, 赵秀娟, 薛海岩, 李纾, 王振洲, 朱凤雪. 胸部创伤患者在重症监护病房内发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 351-358.
[3] 郭芷均, 俎明, 马超, 张贺军, 张静, 丁士刚. 同时性多发早期胃癌漏诊病灶的临床病理特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 410-415.
[4] 王晓林, 郭邵逸, 陈大召, 温锡杰, 华勇, 张亮, 张秦. 全髋关节置换术治疗系统性红斑狼疮继发股骨头缺血性坏死的随访研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(6): 1081-1088.
[5] 李博闻, 张强, 孙益鑫. 儿童及青年漏斗胸患者Nuss术后发生脊柱侧弯的风险预测模型建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 941-946.
[6] 杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[7] 左超, 王国立, 杨昆霖, 车新艳, 孟一森, 张凯. 前列腺体积不同的患者经尿道光纤铥激光前列腺剜除术的有效性及安全性比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 711-716.
[8] 刘伟, 郭稳, 过哲, 李春艳, 李云龙, 刘思奇, 张亮, 宋慧. 痛风患者放射学阴性骨侵蚀的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 735-739.
[9] 赵兆, 张维宇, 杨文博, 张勇杰, 张晓鹏, 赵慧颖, 周刚, 王强. 低龄、低体重儿童肾移植2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 803-807.
[10] 陆梦溪, 刘秋萍, 周恬静, 刘晓非, 孙烨祥, 沈鹏, 林鸿波, 唐迅, 高培. 基于社区人群队列的甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管病发病和死亡的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 430-435.
[11] 杨龙傲, 金旭, 黄文初, 何丽华, 陈娟. 视屏作业人员视疲劳及干眼的流行病学调查[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 554-561.
[12] 郭华秋, 王哲, 杨雪, 白洁. 口腔急诊出血患者的临床特征与危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 142-147.
[13] 邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[14] 李钰锴, 王红彦, 罗靓, 李云, 李春. 抗磷脂抗体在白塞病合并血栓中的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1036-1040.
[15] 田杨, 韩永正, 李娇, 王明亚, 曲音音, 房景超, 金辉, 李民, 王军, 徐懋, 王圣林, 郭向阳. 颈椎前路手术后硬膜外血肿的发生率和危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1058-1064.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!