直接前入路和前外侧入路全髋关节置换术后的早期功能恢复对比

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.02.013

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (2): 268-272. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.02.013

直接前入路和前外侧入路全髋关节置换术后的早期功能恢复对比

李森磊,杨先腾,田晓滨,孙立()

贵州省人民医院骨科, 贵阳 550002

收稿日期:2017-03-28 出版日期:2019-04-18 发布日期:2019-04-26
通讯作者: 孙立 E-mail:sunly999@qq.com
基金资助:
贵州省科技计划(黔科合SY字[2015]3044;贵州省人民医院国家自然科学基金补助基金项目 (黔科合平台人才[2017]5724)

Early functional recovery of direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty

Sen-lei LI,Xian-teng YANG,Xiao-bin TIAN,Li SUN()

Department of Orthopaedics, Guizhou Provincial people's Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China

Received:2017-03-28 Online:2019-04-18 Published:2019-04-26
Contact: Li SUN E-mail:sunly999@qq.com
Supported by:
the Science Foundation of Guizhou Province[No. (2015) 3044];the Subsidy Fundation of National Natural Science Fundation of Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital (Guizhou Science and Technology Platform [2017]5724])

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 对比直接前入路(direct anterior approach,DAA)与前外侧入路(anterolateral approach, ALA)行全髋关节置换术的早期临床疗效,了解两种手术方式的安全性及术后功能恢复情况。方法: 选择2015年1月至2016年5月贵州省人民医院骨科行人工髋关节置换术(total hip arthroplasty, THA)治疗的50例患者,随机分成2组,25例 25髋行直接前入路人工全髋关节置换术(DAA-THA), 其中男16例 16髋,女9例 9 髋,平均年龄(62±2)岁(48~76岁), 疾病组成为髋关节骨关节炎11 例 11 髋、股骨头缺血性坏死(Ⅲ~Ⅳ期)10 例 10 髋和髋臼发育不良(Crowe 2型)4例4髋,体重指数(body mass index, BMI)(23.26 ±4.95) kg/m ²(19.6~29.5 kg/m ²),术前 Harris 评分 (33.4 ±15.5)分 (17.9~48.9分);同期 25例 25 髋行前外侧入路人工全髋关节置换术(ALA-THA),其中男 18例 18髋,女7例7髋,平均年龄(59±3)岁(43~72岁),疾病组成为髋关节骨关节炎 10 例 10 髋、股骨头缺血性坏死(Ⅲ~Ⅳ期)12 例 12 髋和髋臼发育不良(Crowe 2型)3例3髋, BMI 为(25.35±5.8) kg/m ² (18.2~29.8 kg/m ²),术前 Harris 评分 (38.6±16.7)分(23.1~56.5分)。分别对两组的手术时间、切口长度、术中出血量、术后关节功能恢复情况进行评估。 结果: 手术时间:DAA组(108.33±18.5) min(98~135 min),ALA组(103.26±15.5) min,(85~116 min),两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);手术切口:DAA组平均手术切口长度(10.3±1.75) cm(8.7~12.2 cm),ALA 组平均切口长度(9.6±1.65) cm(7.9~11.2 cm), 两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);出血量:DAA 组(210±135) mL(130~400 mL),ALA 组(230±145) mL(160~450 mL),两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组患者随访平均时间 6 个月(6~12个月),术后 3 个月 Harris 评分,DAA组(88.7±9.05)分(79.1~97.2)分,ALA 组(86.5±7.75)分(77.9~93.4分),两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后6个月,Harris 评分,DAA 组(93.5±5.85)分(87.4~99.1分),ALA 组(90.9±5.15)分(86.9~97.2分),两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ALA组术后早期随访患者髋关节的外展肌力、步态较 DAA 组差。结论: 直接前入路髋关节置换术与前外侧常规入路髋关节置换术均可取得较好的早期疗效,但直接前入路早期步态更优于前外侧常规入路。

关键词: 人工全髋关节置换术, 直接前入路, 前外侧入路

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the early clinical effects of direct anterior approach (DAA) versus anterolateral approach (ALA) on safety and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty (THA).Methods: Between January 2015 and May 2016, a randomized clinical trial was performed at Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital. A total of 50 patients who underwent THA were allocated for either the DAA (n=25) or ALA (n=25). DDA group had 25 patients (25 hips), including 16 males and 9 females, with the mean age of (62±2) years, BMI of (23.26 ±4.95) kg/m ²(range: 19.6 to 29.5), and preoperative Harris score of (33.4 ±15.5) (range: 17.9 to 48.9). Eleven cases were diagnosed as primarily hip osteoarthritis, 4 were developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH, Crowe 2) and 10 were hip avascular necrosis (AVN, Stages 3 to 4). ALA group had 25 patients (25 hips), including 18 males and 7 females, with the mean age of (59±3) years, BMI of (25.35 ±5.8) kg/m ²(range: 18.2 to 29.8), and preoperative Harris score of (38.6 ± 16.7) (range: 23.1 to 56.5). Ten cases were diagnosed as primarily hip osteoarthritis, 3 were developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH, Crowe 2) and 12 were hip avascular necrosis (AVN, Stages 3 to 4). Operation time, incision length, intra-operative blood loss and functional recovery of hip postoperatively were compared between the two groups.Results: The surgical incision of both groups were stageⅠhealing. The mean follow-up was 6 months. There was no significant difference regarding operation time, incision length, and intra-operative blood loss between the two groups. However, we also found that there was no significant difference in the Harris score 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. In addition, two patients in ALA group suffered claudication (physical examination: abduction dysfunction of hip). We also found that DAA group resulted in better recovery of abductor strength and gait than ALA group during early follow-up.Conclusion: Both DAA and ALA could obtain good results of early curative effect following THA. Moreover, DAA resulted in better gait than ALA during early follow-up.

Key words: Total hip arthroplasty, Direct anterior approach, Anterolateral approach

中图分类号:

R687.4

李森磊,杨先腾,田晓滨,孙立. 直接前入路和前外侧入路全髋关节置换术后的早期功能恢复对比[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(2): 268-272.

Sen-lei LI,Xian-teng YANG,Xiao-bin TIAN,Li SUN. Early functional recovery of direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(2): 268-272.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

DAA组与ALA组手术时间、切口长度及出血量对比"

Items	DAA				ALA			t	P
Items	$x ?$ ±s	Range		$x ?$ ±s		Range		t	P
Operation time/min	108.3±18.5		98-135		103.3±15.5		85-116	3.741	0.306
Incision length/cm	10.3±1.8		8.7-12.2		9.6±1.7		7.9-11.2	-1.581	0.092
Blood loss/mL	210±135		130-400		230±145		160-450	-6.072	0.178

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 17

[1]	Mccrory JL, White SC, Lifeso RM . Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty[J]. Gait Posture, 2001,14(2):104-109. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00140-0
[2]	Morrey BF . Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Dislocation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1997(344):179.
[3]	Brennan SA, Khan F, Kiernan C , et al. Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty and the risk of redislocation[J]. Hip Int, 2012,22(5):500-504. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9747
[4]	Van Warmerdam JM, Mcgann WA, Donnelly JR , et al. Achilles allograft reconstruction for recurrent dislocation in total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2011,26(6):941-948. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.12.014
[5]	White RE, Forness TJ, Allman JK , et al. Effect of posterior capsular repair on early dislocation in primary total hip replacement[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001(393):163-167.
[6]	Goldstein WM, Gleason TF, Kopplin M , et al. Prevalence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty through a posterolateral approach with partial capsulotomy and capsulorrhaphy[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001,83(A Suppl):2-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200100021-00002
[7]	Pellicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R .Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998(355):224-228.
[8]	张先龙, 蒋垚, 陈云苏 . 人工髋关节外科学 [M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2009: 431-432.
[9]	吕厚山 . 现代人工关节外科学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2006: 520.
[10]	Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B . Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004(426):164-173.
[11]	Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T . Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005(441):115-124.
[12]	Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K , et al. A Clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2009,24(5):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012
[13]	Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE , et al. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2010,25(5):671-679. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002
[14]	沈军, 邹天明, 王东来 , 等. 改良外侧小切口全髋关节置换术的疗效分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2012,27(10):876-878.
[15]	Lachiewicz PF . Abductor tendon tears of the hip: evaluation and management[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2011,19(7):385-391. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201107000-00001
[16]	Van Oldenrijk J, Hoogervorst P, Schaap GR , et al. Two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty-results and complications[J]. Hip Int, 2011,21(1):81-86. doi: 10.5301/hip.2011.6302
[17]	桑伟林, 朱力波, 马金忠 , 等. 微创直接前入路全髋关节置换术[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2010,31(5):266-267.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Group	Harris score of pre-operation	Harris score of post-operation	t	P
DAA	33.4 ±15.5	88.7	-18.215	<0.01
ALA	38.6 ± 16.7	86.5	-17.831	<0.01

Time point	DAA	ALA	t	P
3-months	88.7±10.8	86.5±10.2	1.601	0.137
6-months	93.5±11.6	90.9±11.1	0.352	0.527

直接前入路和前外侧入路全髋关节置换术后的早期功能恢复对比

Early functional recovery of direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 17

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	唐竞,吕明，周一新，张纪. 直接前入路双髋关节同时置换22例临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 221-225.
[2]	徐杰，庄伟达，李新炜，俞国雨，林院，罗奋棋，肖毓华. 直接前入路和后外侧保留梨状肌入路全髋关节置换术的疗效对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 214-220.
[3]	王浩洋，康鹏德，聂涌，赵海燕，杨周源，裴福兴. 直接前入路全髋关节置换后早期三维步态分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 196-200.
[4]	张洪，马云青. 直接前入路人工全髋关节置换术[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(2): 185-187.