北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 897-901. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.017

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

类风湿关节炎不同分类标准的多中心临床比较

罗采南1,李正芳1,武丽君1,(),陈海娟2,杨春梅2,徐文晖3,刘小玲4,唐薇2,乔平3,热娜·白合提亚4   

  1. 1.新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院风湿免疫科,乌鲁木齐 830001
    2.昌吉州人民医院风湿免疫科,新疆昌吉 831100
    3.阿勒泰地区人民医院风湿免疫科,新疆阿勒泰 836500
    4.喀什地区第一人民医院风湿免疫科,新疆喀什 844000
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-10 出版日期:2020-10-18 发布日期:2020-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 武丽君 E-mail:wwlj330@126.com

Multicenter performance of the different classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis

Cai-nan LUO1,Zheng-fang LI1,Li-jun WU1,(),Hai-juan CHEN2,Chun-mei YANG2,Wen-hui XU3,Xiao-ling LIU4,Wei TANG2,Ping QIAO3,Baihetiya Rena4   

  1. 1. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Ugyur Autonomous Region, Urumuqi 830001, China
    2. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, People’s Hospital of Changji, Changji 831100, Xinjiang, China
    3. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, People’s Hospital of Aletai Region, Aletai 836500, Xinjiang, China
    4. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, First People’s Hospital of Kashgar Region, Kashgar 844000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2018-11-10 Online:2020-10-18 Published:2020-10-15
  • Contact: Li-jun WU E-mail:wwlj330@126.com

摘要:

目的:验证并比较早期类风湿关节炎(early rheumatoid arthritis, ERA) 分类标准与1987年美国风湿病学会(American College of Rheumatology, ACR)和2010年ACR/欧洲抗风湿联盟(European League Against Rheumatism, EULAR)制定的分类标准在ERA患者诊断中的敏感性和特异性。方法:在4所医院中入选年龄≥16岁、病程≤1年、存在≥1个关节肿痛的关节炎患者,观察指标包括临床表现、实验室检查及影像学检查。ERA的诊断经2名风湿病专科医师根据临床症状、用药情况、影像学检查进行临床诊断。结果: (1)共纳入关节炎患者325例,男性98例(30.15%), 女性227例(69.85%),平均年龄(47.53±14.44)岁,中位病程5(2, 8)个月。最终诊断为ERA 236例,非ERA 89例 (Non-ERA,包括骨关节炎、反应性关节炎、未分化关节炎、脊柱关节炎等)。(2) ERA标准的敏感性为87.29%,特异性为84.37%,敏感性高于1987年ACR标准 (χ2=43.641,P<0.001), 与2010年ACR/EULAR标准相比差异无统计学意义 (χ2=0.446,P=0.593);特异性低于1987年 ACR年标准 (χ2=4.891, P=0.027),与2010年ACR/EULAR标准比较差异无统计学意义 (χ2=0.044,P=1.000)。(3)在病程≤3个月和病程≤6个月关节炎患者中,ERA分类标准敏感性分别为81.71%、86.79%,均高于1987年ACR标准 (χ2=7.131,P=0.008和χ2=22.015,P<0.001), 与2010年ACR/EULAR标准比较差异无统计学意义 (χ2=0.220,P=0.755和χ2=0.473,P=0.491), 3个标准的特异性比较差异均无统计学意义。(4) 3种分类标准与临床诊断存在一致性,其中ERA标准、2010年ACR/EULAR标准与临床诊断一致性较好(Kappa>0.6)。3种分类标准间一致性比较结果提示,ERA标准与2010年ACR/EULAR标准间一致性较好(Kappa=0.836)。结论:ERA分类标准在ERA诊断中的敏感性高于1987年ACR分类标准,与2010年ACR/EULAR年标准相当,3种标准间特异性比较差异无统计学意义;ERA标准在病程≤3个月的极早期关节炎中仍可识别出RA患者。

关键词: 关节炎, 类风湿关节炎, 早期诊断

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the classification criteria of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) and compare the sensitivity and specificity with the criteria of 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Methods: Patients from 4 hospitals, aged more than 16 years, with arthritis, whose disease duration was ≤1 year, and with ≥1 joint pain and swelling were enrolled in the study. The indicators including clinical manifestations, laboratory tests and imaging examinations were observed. The ERA patients were dignosed by two experienced rheumatologists based on the clinical features, drug therapy information and radiography features. Results: (1) A total of 325 patients with arthritis were enrolled, including 98 males (30.15%) and 227 females (69.85%), The average age was (47.53±14.44) years, and the median disease duration was 5 (2, 8) months. Finally, 236 patients were dignosed with ERA, and 89 patients were dignosed with other diseases (Non-ERA, including osteoarthritis, reactive arthritis, undifferentiated arthritis, spondyloarthritis, etc). (2) The sensitivity of ERA criteria was 87.29%, and the specificity was 84.37%. The sensitivity was higher than that of 1987 ACR criteria (χ 2=43.641, P<0.001), and had no significant difference compared with 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (χ2=0.446, P=0.593). But the specificity of ERA criteria was lower than that of 1987 ACR criteria (χ2=4.891, P=0.027), which was not statistically significant compared with 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (χ2=0.044, P=1.000). (3) In the patients with arthritis whose disease duration was ≤3 months and ≤6 months, the sensitivity of ERA criteria was 81.71% and 86.79%, respectively, both were higher than the 1987 ACR criteria (χ2=7.131, P=0.008; χ2=22.015, P<0.001) and had no statistically difference compared with the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (χ2=0.220,P=0.755; χ2=0.473,P=0.491). The differences of the three criteria in specificity were not statistically significant. (4) The three different classification criteria were consistent with the clinical diagnosis, among which the ERA criteria and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria were slightly higher (Kappa>0.6). The results of the consistency comparison between the three criteria showed that the ERA criteria and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria had a better consistency (Kappa=0.836). Conclusion: The sensitivity of ERA classification criteria in the diagnosis of ERA was higher than that of 1987 ACR criteria, and was equivalent to that of 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. There is no significant difference in specificity between these three criteria. The ERA criteria can also identify patients with RA at a very early stage in arthritis with disease duration ≤3 months.

Key words: Arthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, Early diagnosis

中图分类号: 

  • R593.22

表1

ERA组和非ERA组临床资料比较"

Items ERA(n=236) Non-ERA(n=89) P
Male/female, n 60/176 38/51 0.002
Age/years, x-±s 49.59±13.85 44.89±15.70 0.001
Disease duration/months, median (IQR) 5(2.25, 8.00) 3(1.00,10.00) 0.068
Swollen joint count, median (IQR) 5(2, 10) 2(1, 4) <0.001
Tender joint count, median (IQR) 11(6, 20) 4(2, 10) <0.001
Morning stiffness(>30 min), n(%) 151(63.98) 14(15.73) <0.001
RF positive, n(%) 162(68.64) 8(8.99) <0.001
Anti-CCP positive, n(%) 183(77.54) 6(6.74) <0.001
ESR/(mm/h), median (IQR) 41.50(24.00, 59.75) 27.00(14.00, 54.00) 0.008
CRP/(mg/L), median (IQR) 11.60(4.60, 36.38) 10.11(2.00, 46.48) 0.287

表2

病程≤3月和病程≤6月关节炎患者临床资料比较"

Items Disease duration≤3 months(n=129) Disease duration≤6 months(n=220) P
Male/female, n 43/86 74/146 0.954
Age/years, x-±s 47.09±15.89 49.80±14.16 0.345
Swollen joint count, median (IQR) 4(1, 8) 4(1, 9) 0.688
Tender joint count, median (IQR) 7(3, 14) 8(4, 18) 0.063
Morning stiffness(>30 min), n(%) 66(51.16) 115(52.27) 0.841
RF positive, n(%) 56(43.41) 115(52.27) 0.110
anti-CCP positive, n(%) 62(48.06) 125(56.82) 0.113
ESR, mm/h, median (IQR) 39.00(20.75, 58.00) 40.00(22.00, 58.25) 0.758
CRP, mg/L, median (IQR) 13.26(3.04, 44.79) 11.60(4.17, 42.40) 0.839

表3

关节炎患者中3种分类标准的敏感性和特异性"

Classification criteria Sensitivity/% Specificity/% Positive predictive value/% Negative predictive value/%
ERA 87.29 84.27 93.64 71.43
1987 ACR 60.59 94.38 96.62 47.45
2010 ACR/EULAR 85.17 86.52 94.37 68.75

表4

病程≤3个月关节患者中3种分类标准的敏感性和特异性"

Classification criteria Sensitivity/% Specificity/% Positive predictive value/% Negative predictive value/%
ERA 81.71 91.49 94.37 74.14
1987 ACR 54.88 100.00 100.00 63.51
2010 ACR/EULAR 79.27 93.62 95.59 72.13

表5

病程≤6个月关节炎患者中3种分类标准的敏感性和特异性"

Classification criteria Sensitivity/% Specificity/% Positive predictive value/% Negative predictive value/%
ERA 86.79 90.12 94.52 77.66
1987 ACR 64.15 97.53 98.08 25.00
2010 ACR/EULAR 83.02 91.36 94.96 73.27

表6

临床诊断与3种分类标准的一致性比较"

Items Consistency
rate/%
Kappa P
Clinical diagnosis & ERA 86.46 0.678 <0.001
Clinical diagnosis & 1987 ACR 69.85 0.420 <0.001
Clinical diagnosis & 2010
ACR/EULAR
85.54 0.663 <0.001

表7

3种分类标准间的一致性比较"

Items Consistency
rate/%
Kappa P
ERA & 1987 ACR 78.15 0.577 <0.001
ERA & 2010 ACR/EULAR 92.31 0.836 <0.001
2010 ACR/EULAR & 1987 ACR 75.38 0.521 <0.001
[1] 赵金霞, 苏茵, 刘湘源, 等. 早期类风湿关节炎分类标准及其诊断意义的探讨[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2012,16(10):651-656.
[2] Zhao J, Su Y, Li R, et al. Classification criteria of early rheumatoid arthritis and validation of its performance in a multi-centre cohort[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2014,32(5):667-673.
[3] 李玉翠, 范文强, 陈海英, 等. 2012年早期类风湿关节炎分类标准的国内多中心临床验证[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2017,21(12):807-811.
[4] 叶华, 苏茵, 李茹, 等. 早期类风湿关节炎分类标准的全国多中心临床验证[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2014,18(12):802-805.
[5] Ye H, Su Y, Li R, et al. Comparison of three classification criteria of rheumatoid arthritis in an inception early arthritis cohort[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2016,35(10):2397-2401.
doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3281-2 pmid: 27129710
[6] Radner H, Neogi T, Smolen JS, et al. Performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2014,73(1):114-123.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203284
[7] van der Linden MP, Knevel R, Huizinga TW, et al. Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2011,63(1):37-42.
doi: 10.1002/art.30100 pmid: 20967854
[8] Biliavska I, Stamm TA, Martinez-Avila J, et al. Application of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with very early inflammatory arthritis: analysis of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the SAVE study cohort[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2013,72(8):1335-1341.
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201909
[1] 宋志博,耿研,邓雪蓉,张晓慧,张卓莉. 肌肉骨骼超声在指导银屑病关节炎临床分型中的价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1061-1066.
[2] 张璐,胡小红,陈澄,蔡月明,王庆文,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎初治患者颈椎失稳情况及临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1049-1054.
[3] 邓雪蓉,孙晓莹,张卓莉. 类风湿关节炎患者足踝部体征和超声下病变的一致性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1037-1042.
[4] 罗靓,霍文岗,张钦,李春. 类风湿关节炎合并角膜溃疡的临床特点和相关因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1032-1036.
[5] 钟华,徐丽玲,白明欣,苏茵. 类风湿关节炎患者趋化因子CXCL9和CXCL10在骨侵蚀中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1026-1031.
[6] 娄雪,廖莉,李兴珺,王楠,刘爽,崔若玫,徐健. 类风湿关节炎患者外周血TWEAK基因启动子区甲基化状态及其表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1020-1025.
[7] 李正芳,吴雪,武丽君,罗采南,石亚妹,钟岩,陈晓梅,孟新艳. Rhupus综合征的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 933-937.
[8] 王贵红,左婷,李然,左正才. 瑞巴派特在大鼠痛风性关节炎急性发作中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 716-720.
[9] 吴俊慧,陈泓伯,武轶群,吴瑶,王紫荆,吴涛,王梦莹,王斯悦,王小文,王伽婷,于欢,胡永华. 2015—2017年北京市2型糖尿病患者骨关节炎患病的相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 518-522.
[10] 赵凯,常志芳,王志华,庞春艳,王永福. 基因沉默肽基精氨酸脱亚胺酶4的表达对胶原诱导关节炎小鼠肺间质病变的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 235-239.
[11] 曹迪,王燕,王柳青,孙晓麟,黄妃,孟洋,任丽丽,张学武. 血浆Dickkopf-1在类风湿关节炎患者中的表达及其与外周血T细胞亚群的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 255-260.
[12] 柯岩,张蔷,马云青,李儒军,陶可,桂先革,李克鹏,张洪,林剑浩. 全髋关节置换术治疗脊柱骨骺发育不良患者Tönnis 3级髋关节骨关节炎的早期疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 175-182.
[13] 钟剑球,曾沛英,王庆文. 类风湿关节炎合并淋巴水肿2例及文献回顾[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1157-1161.
[14] 魏士雄,黎苏佳,刘毅. 幼年特发性关节炎成人后的临床特点及生物制剂治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1014-1022.
[15] 张警丰,叶修玲,段萌,周小利,姚中强,赵金霞. 抗核抗体阳性类风湿关节炎的临床和实验室检查特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1023-1028.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[3] 万有, , 韩济生, John E. Pintar. 孤啡肽基因敲除小鼠电针镇痛作用增强[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 376 -379 .
[4] 张燕, 韩志慧, 钟延丰, 王盛兰, 李玲玲, 郑丹枫. 骨骼肌活组织检查病理诊断技术的改进及应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 459 -462 .
[5] 赵奇, 薛世华, 刘志勇, 吴凌云. 同向施压测定自酸蚀与全酸蚀粘接系统粘接强度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 82 -84 .
[6] 林红, 王玉凤, 吴野平. 学校生活技能教育对小学三年级学生行为问题影响的对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 319 -322 .
[7] 丰雷, 程嘉, 王玉凤. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的运动协调功能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 333 -336 .
[8] 李岳玲, 钱秋瑾, 王玉凤. 儿童注意缺陷多动障碍成人期预后及其预测因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 337 -340 .
[9] . 书讯[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(3): 225 -328 .
[10] 牟向东, 王广发, 刁小莉, 阙呈立. 肺黏膜相关淋巴组织型边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤一例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(4): 346 -350 .