北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 964-970. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.029

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

锥度固位结合数字化技术在后牙连续多牙种植即刻修复中的应用

罗佳1,张宇1,(),崔宏燕1,祝宁1,沈惠丹2,邸萍1,林野1   

  1. 1.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,种植科 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081
    2.北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院门诊部,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-10 出版日期:2020-10-18 发布日期:2020-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 张宇 E-mail:zhang76yu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学口腔医院临床新技术新疗法项目(PKUSSNCT-17A05)

Digital workflow coupling conic retention for the immediate restoration of adjacent posterior implants

Jia LUO1,Yu ZHANG1,(),Hong-yan CUI1,Ning ZHU1,Hui-dan SHEN2,Ping DI1,Ye LIN1   

  1. 1. Department of Implantology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2018-10-10 Online:2020-10-18 Published:2020-10-15
  • Contact: Yu ZHANG E-mail:zhang76yu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-17A05)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的:评价口内扫描技术、计算机辅助设计/加工(computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing, CAD/CAM)技术结合锥度固位方式在种植即刻修复连续多牙缺失中的应用。方法: 选取2017年3月至2018年2月于北京大学口腔医院种植科就诊的连续多个后牙缺失的患者,在种植体植入即刻安放预成锥度固位帽,通过口内扫描制取数字化印模,以CAD/CAM技术制作聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯 (polymethyl methacrylate, PMMA) 临时联冠,临时联冠戴入后即刻负重;6个月后更换为CAD/CAM技术制作的氧化锆永久联冠,临时冠及永久冠戴入时分别拍摄平行投照牙片。通过种植体和修复体存留率、种植体颈部边缘骨水平变化、种植体和修复体并发症等指标评价临床效果,永久修复前用视觉模拟评分 (visual analogue score, VAS) 量表评价患者对即刻修复的满意度。结果:共计10例患者(男4例,女6例,平均55.5岁)纳入本研究,共植入34枚种植体,分别制作14件即刻PMMA修复体和14件永久氧化锆修复体,观察时间4~14个月;种植体及修复体存留率100%,种植体颈部骨水平在种植即刻为(1.06±0.97) mm,即刻修复后6个月时为(0.96±0.82) mm,两者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察期内所有种植体和修复体均未发生并发症;患者满意度VAS评分87.2。结论:对于连续多牙缺失,在种植即刻以数字化流程制作,并结合锥度固位方式的联冠修复体,具有良好的临床效果和患者满意度。

关键词: 计算机辅助设计/加工, 口内扫描, 锥度固位, 种植即刻修复

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the digital workflow coupling conic retention for the immediate restoration of adjacent posterior implants. Methods: The patients with adjacent teeth missing in the posterior jaw seeking for implant restoration in the Department of Implantology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology from March, 2017 to February, 2018 were recruited. After implant placement and commercial conic retention coping delivery, the patient had an intraoral scan for digital impression, and the computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology was used for the fabrication of the immediate splinted prosthesis, which was made of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and loaded immediately after delivery. Six months later, all the temporary prostheses were replaced by the permanent ones made of monolithic zirconia with CAD/CAM technology as well. The parallel periapical films were taken for the temporary and permanent prostheses post-delivery. The clinical effect of this workflow was evaluated by indices including the survival rates of implants and prostheses, the change of marginal bone level, and the implant-related and prosthesis-related complications; before the final restoration, the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients. Results: Ten patients (4 males and 6 females, 55.5 years old for average) were recruited. Totally 34 implants were placed; 14 prostheses were fabricated, temporary and permanent, respectively. After an observation period from 4 to 14 months, the survival rate for implants and prostheses were both 100%; the marginal bone level of the implants were (1.06±0.97) mm and (0.96±0.82) mm, immediate post-operation and 6 months later, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Neither implant- nor prostheses- related complications were observed. And the VAS of the patients' satisfaction was 87.2. Conclusion: For the adjacent posterior implants, the immediate prostheses manufactured by digital workflow, coupling conic retention, were clinically feasible and patient-satisfactory.

Key words: Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing, Intraoral scan, Conic retention, Immediate loading

中图分类号: 

  • R783.4

图1

手术过程"

图2

即刻修复程序"

图3

永久氧化锆修复体"

图4

平行投照牙片中测量颈部边缘骨水平"

表1

患者、种植体和修复体一般情况"

Patient No. Gender Age/years FDI site No. Implants Prostheses
1 Female 55 45 A11 1
46 A11
2 Male 62 36 A11 1
37 A9.5
3 Female 55 34 A11 2
35 A11
36 A11
37 A9.5
45 A11
46 A11
47 A9.5
4 Female 49 35 A11 1
36 A11
37 A11
5 Female 64 35 A11 1
36 A11
37 A9.5
6 Male 39 45 A11 1
46 A11
7 Male 62 36 A11 2
37 A9.5
46 A11
47 A9.5
8 Male 49 46 A11 1
47 A9.5
9 Female 67 14 A9.5 2
15 A9.5
24 A9.5
25 A9.5
10 Female 53 15 A9.5 2
16 A11
24 A11
25 A9.5
Total 34 14

表2

患者满意度VAS量表结果"

Patient No. General Comfort Esthetic Cleaning Necessity Average
1 90.0 85.0 85.0 82.0 80.0 84.4
2 90.0 80.0 85.0 75.0 95.0 85.0
3 90.0 90.0 85.0 85.0 90.0 88.0
4 100.0 90.0 85.0 85.0 80.0 88.0
5 90.0 90.0 90.0 88.0 90.0 89.6
6 90.0 90.0 88.0 85.0 90.0 88.6
7 95.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 85.0 90.0
8 85.0 85.0 90.0 85.0 90.0 87.0
9 90.0 85.0 87.0 80.0 90.0 86.4
10 85.0 86.0 80.0 80.0 90.0 84.2
Average 90.5 87.1 86.5 83.5 88.0 87.1
[1] Schrott A, Riggi-Heiniger M, Maruo K, et al. Implant loading protocols for partially edentulous patients with extended edentulous sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014,29(Suppl):239-255.
[2] Romanos GE, Aydin E, Locher K, et al. Immediate vs. delayed loading in the posterior mandible: A split-mouth study with up to 15 years of follow-up?[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016,27(2):e74-e79.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12542 pmid: 25557878
[3] Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Vindasiute E, et al. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2013,24(11):1179-1184.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02570.x pmid: 22882700
[4] Amato F. Immediate functional loading of posterior implants placed in partially edentulous patients: A preliminary report on a prospective clinical study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2015,35(2):239-245.
doi: 10.11607/prd.1981 pmid: 25738344
[5] Cesaretti G, Botticelli D, Renzi A, et al. Radiographic evaluation of immediately loaded implants supporting 2-3 units fixed bridges in the posterior maxilla: A 3-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016,27(4):399-405.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12565 pmid: 25664701
[6] Joda T, Katsoulis J, Brägger U. Clinical fitting and adjustment time for implant-supported crowns comparing digital and conventional workflows[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,18(5):946-954.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12377 pmid: 26395013
[7] Joda T, Brägger U. Time-efficiency analysis comparing digital and conventional workflows for implant crowns: A prospective clinical crossover trial[J]. Int J 0ral Maxillofac Implants, 2015,30(5):1047-1053.
[8] Degidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. The conometric concept: coupling connection for immediately loaded titanium-reinforced provisional fixed partial dentures: A case series[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2016,36(3):347-354.
doi: 10.11607/prd.2428 pmid: 27100804
[9] de la Rosa M, Rodríguez A, Sierra K, et al. Predictors of peri-implant bone loss during long-term maintenance of patients treated with 10-mm implants and single crown restorations[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2013,28(3):798-802.
doi: 10.11607/jomi.3066 pmid: 23748311
[10] Eccellente T, Piombino M, Piattelli A, et al. A new treatment concept for immediate loading of implants inserted in the edentulous mandible[J]. Quintessence Int, 2010,41(6):489-495.
pmid: 20490391
[11] Bressan E, Lops D. Conometric retention for complete fixed prosjournal supported by four implants: 2-years prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014,25(5):546-552.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12121 pmid: 23421447
[12] van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, et al. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology[J]. PloS ONE, 2012,7(8):e43312.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043312 pmid: 22937030
[13] Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, et al. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013,111(3):186-194.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010 pmid: 24210732
[14] Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations[J]. Br Dent J, 2008,204(9):505-5l1.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350 pmid: 18469768
[1] 姜楠,包旭东,岳林. 全冠预备体终止线局部扫描正确度对整体的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 102-108.
[2] 曹悦,陈俊锴,邓珂慧,王勇,孙玉春,赵一姣. 三款口内三维扫描仪获取无牙颌红膏初印模精度的对比评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 129-137.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!