北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (2): 314-319. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.02.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国社区社会经济地位和成人自评健康的关联研究

王志成,郭岩()   

  1. 北京大学公共卫生学院卫生政策与管理学系,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-24 出版日期:2021-04-18 发布日期:2021-04-21
  • 通讯作者: 郭岩 E-mail:guoyan@bjmu.edu.cn

Association between community socioeconomic status and adults’ self-rated health in China

WANG Zhi-cheng,GUO Yan()   

  1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2019-04-24 Online:2021-04-18 Published:2021-04-21
  • Contact: Yan GUO E-mail:guoyan@bjmu.edu.cn

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 分析社区社会经济地位与城市和农村成年居民自评健康是否存在独立关联,为采用社区层面干预措施,改善社会经济发展落后社区居民健康状况提供政策依据。方法: 基于中国家庭追踪调查(China Family Panel Studies, CFPS)2010年基线数据,对社区人均教育年限、人均收入和人均财富进行主成分分析,提取第一主成分得分,标准化后作为社区社会经济指数(socioeconomic index, SEI)。再合并2012年CFPS成人追访数据,利用多水平Logistic回归模型在控制个体人口和社会经济因素后,分别分析社区SEI对城市居民和农村居民自评健康是否具有独立关联。结果: 纳入最终分析样本分布在577个社区中,共包含31 321名成人居民,其中城市居民8 423人,农村居民22 898人。社区SEI取值范围为-2.41~3.16,其均值为0,方差为1。随着社区SEI增加,不同维度的贫困发生率下降,社区社会经济地位升高。控制个体因素和社区社会经济因素的多水平Logistic模型显示,随着社区SEI增加,自评不健康概率下降,社区社会经济地位对成人自评健康存在情境效应。但是只有社区社会经济地位对农村居民自评不健康的情境效应存在统计学意义(OR=0.84,95%CI:0.76~0.94),对城市居民自评不健康的情境效应不具有统计学意义(OR=0.94,95%CI:0.83~1.06)。结论: 控制个体社会经济因素后,社区经济地位和农村居民自评不健康之间存在独立关联,提高社会经济发展落后农村社区居民健康状况,不仅仅需要采取基于个体的健康干预,同时需要考虑采取基于社区的健康干预。

关键词: 社会经济指数, 自评健康, 模型, 统计学, 中国

Abstract:

Objective: To examine whether community socioeconomic status is associated with self-rated health independent of individual socioeconomic status for urban and rural residents, and to provide policy implications for improving the health status of the socioeconomically underdeveloped communities in China. Methods: Based on the baseline data of China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2010, principal component analysis was used to construct community socioeconomic index (SEI) based on average years of schooling, average income and average wealth at the community level. Community SEI was defined as the standardized first principal component score. In combination with the adult data from CFPS 2012 follow-up data, the multilevel Logistic regression model was used to analyze whether the community socioeconomic status had an independent contextual effect on the self-rated health of urban residents and rural residents after controlling individual-level socioeconomic status. Results: In the final analysis, 31 321 adult residents in 577 communities were included, of whom 8 423 were urban residents and 22 898 were rural residents. Community SEI ranged from -2.41 to 3.16, with a mean of 0 and a stan-dard deviation of 1. As the community SEI increased, the incidence of deprivations in different dimensions decreased, indicating the community socioeconomic status increased. The multilevel Logistic model controlling for both individual sociodemographic factors and community socioeconomic status showed that as the community SEI increased, the probability of poor self-rated health decreased, which indicated community SEI had a contextual effect on poor self-rated health. The contextual effect of community SEI on poor self-rated health was statistically significant for the rural residents (OR=0.84, 95%CI: 0.76-0.94) but not statistically significant for the urban adults (OR=0.94, 95%CI: 0.83-1.06). Conclusion: After controlling for individual socioeconomic status, community socioeconomic status was associa-ted with poor self-rated health for rural residents independent of individual socioeconomic status. Therefore, in order to improve the health status of the rural population, it needs not only individual-based health interventions, but also community-based health interventions.

Key words: Socioeconomic index, Self-rated health, Models, statistical, China

中图分类号: 

  • R19

图1

中国家庭追踪调查数据处理流程"

图2

社区SEI构建流程"

表1

2010年基线样本社区基本情况"

Items n(%)
Region
East 282 (48.87)
Middle 144 (24.96)
West 151 (26.17)
Average years of schooling
0- 249 (43.15)
6- 209 (36.22)
9- 108 (18.72)
12- 11 (1.91)
Average income (yuan)
0- 128 (22.18)
5 000- 236 (40.90)
10 000- 159 (27.56)
20 000- 54 (9.36)
Average wealth (10 000 yuan)
0- 337 (58.41)
5- 125 (21.66)
10- 61 (10.57)
20- 54 (9.36)

表2

2010年按SEI划分的不同社区不同维度贫困发生率(%)"

Items Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
Adult illiteracy 52.46 35.96 24.89 19.43 10.92
Poverty 27.68 13.68 7.83 3.72 0.19
No safe water 71.49 67.90 50.02 16.94 2.87
No flushable toilet 91.29 77.49 77.64 46.74 10.19
No clean fuel 86.20 82.14 71.77 43.85 10.13

表3

社区SEI和成人自评不健康之间的关联"

Variables Urban (n=8 423) Rural (n=22 898)
OR 95%CI OR 95%CI
Community SEI 0.94 0.83-1.06 0.84 0.76-0.94
Gender
Female Reference Reference
Male 0.79 0.68-0.91 0.60 0.56-0.65
Age/years
16-24 Reference Reference
25-34 1.66 0.82-3.37 2.37 1.78-3.16
35-44 7.76 3.87-15.54 6.17 4.67-8.15
45-54 11.12 5.54-22.35 11.79 8.92-15.58
55-64 14.38 7.07-29.25 18.03 13.59-23.92
65- 18.35 8.85-38.07 19.88 14.81-26.70
Marital status
Single Reference Reference
Married 0.60 0.38-0.97 0.79 0.63-0.99
Divorced 0.85 0.46-1.55 1.27 0.84-1.92
Widowed 0.64 0.37-1.08 0.82 0.63-1.07
Education
Illiterate Reference Reference
Elementary school 0.94 0.76-1.17 0.68 0.61-0.75
Junior high school 0.69 0.57-0.85 0.51 0.46-0.57
High school 0.69 0.55-0.87 0.46 0.39-0.55
College and above 0.56 0.42-0.76 0.31 0.20-0.48
Employment
Unemployed Reference Reference
Under education 0.14 0.04-0.49 0.25 0.14-0.45
Employed 0.46 0.38-0.56 0.56 0.50-0.62
Retired 0.71 0.56-0.88 0.74 0.63-0.87
Income (logarithm) 0.83 0.75-0.92 0.90 0.86-0.94
Wealth (logarithm) 0.92 0.89-0.95 0.91 0.89-0.94
ICC 0.06 0.10

图3

社区SEI对成人自评不健康的边际效应"

[1] 中共中央国务院印发《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》. [EB/OL] (2016-10-25) [2019-03-25]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm.
[2] Tang S, Meng Q, Chen L, et al. Tackling the challenges to health equity in China[J]. Lancet, 2008,372(9648):1493-1501.
pmid: 18930531
[3] Xu H, Xie Y. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in China: A reassessment with data from the 2010-2012 China Family Panel Studies[J]. Soc Indic Res, 2017,132(1):219-239.
pmid: 28694561
[4] Zhou M, Wang H, Zhu J, et al. Cause-specific mortality for 240 causes in China during 1990-2013: A systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013[J]. Lancet, 2016,387(10015):251-272.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00551-6 pmid: 26510778
[5] Wang Y, Li X, Zhou M, et al. Under-5 mortality in 2 851 Chinese counties, 1996-2012: A subnational assessment of achieving MDG 4 goals in China[J]. Lancet, 2016,387(10015):273-283.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00554-1 pmid: 26510780
[6] Noble M, Wright G, Smith G, et al. Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level[J]. Environ Plan A, 2006,38(1):169-185.
[7] Pickett KE, Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socio-economic context and health outcomes: A critical review[J]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2001,55(2):111-122.
doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.111 pmid: 11154250
[8] Daponte-Codina A, Bolivar-Munoz J, Toro-Cardenas S, et al. Area deprivation and trends in inequalities in self-rated health in Spain, 1987-2001[J]. Scand J Public Health, 2008,36(5):504-515.
pmid: 18567655
[9] Xiao Q, Berrigan D, Matthews CE. A prospective investigation of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation and self-rated health in a large US cohort[J]. Health Place, 2017(44):70-76.
[10] Rejineveld S. The impact of individual and area characteristics on urban socioeconomic differences in health and smoking[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 1998,27(1):33-40.
pmid: 9563691
[11] Lei L. The impact of community context on children’s health and nutritional status in China[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2017(179):172-181.
[12] 谢宇, 胡婧炜, 张春泥. 中国家庭追踪调查:理念与实践[J]. 社会, 2014(2):1-32.
[13] Xie Y, Lu P. The sampling design of the China family panel stu-dies (CFPS)[J]. Chin J Sociol, 2015,1(4):471-484.
pmid: 29854418
[14] Xu H, Xie Y. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in China: A reassessment with data from the 2010-2012 China family panel studies[J]. Soc Indic Res, 2017,132(1):219-239.
pmid: 28694561
[15] Messer LC, Laraia BA, Kaufman JS, et al. The development of a standardized neighborhood deprivation index[J]. J Urban Health, 2006,83(6):1041-1062.
pmid: 17031568
[16] Desalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, et al. Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2006,21(3):267-275.
pmid: 16336622
[17] Jylha M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2009,69(3):307-316.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.013 pmid: 19520474
[18] Galster GC. The mechanism (s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications[M]// Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer, 2012: 23-56.
[19] Zhang X, Fan S, Zhang L, et al. Local governance and public goods provision in rural China[J]. J Public Econ, 2004,88(12):2857-2871.
[20] Sylvia S, Shi Y, Xue H, et al. Survey using incognito stan-dardized patients shows poor quality care in China’s rural clinics[J]. Health Policy Plan, 2015,30(3):322-333.
pmid: 24653216
[21] Hosseinpoor AR, Bergen N, Schlotheuber A, et al. Measuring health inequalities in the context of sustainable development goals[J]. Bull World Health Organ, 2018,96(9):654-659.
pmid: 30262947
[22] 关于实施健康扶贫工程的指导意见[EB/OL]. (2016-06-21) [2019-03-25]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-06/21/content_5084195.htm.
[1] 金江, 陈雪, 赵琰, 贾军, 张建中. 卵清蛋白诱导的特应性皮炎小鼠模型中白细胞介素-25的作用及其调控意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 756-762.
[2] 柯涵炜, 王起, 许克新. 优化环磷酰胺剂量在间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征啮齿动物模型中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 908-912.
[3] 何海龙,李清,徐涛,张晓威. 构建显微精索手术治疗精索疼痛的术后疼痛缓解预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 646-655.
[4] 刘佐相,陈晓薇,赵厚宇,詹思延,孙凤. 真实世界中2型糖尿病患者二甲双胍联用西格列汀的心血管安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 424-430.
[5] 周恬静,刘秋萍,张明露,刘晓非,康佳丽,沈鹏,林鸿波,唐迅,高培. 基于马尔科夫模型的社区人群启动降压药物治疗预防心血管病的策略比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 441-447.
[6] 靖婷,江华,李婷,申倩倩,叶兰,曾银丹,梁文欣,冯罡,司徒文佑,张玉梅. 中国西部5城市中老年人血清25羟基维生素D与握力的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 448-455.
[7] 王清波,傅虹桥. 中国卫生筹资转型的主要特征与历史沿革[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 462-470.
[8] 苏俊琪,王晓颖,孙志强. 舌鳞状细胞癌根治性切除术后患者预后预测列线图的构建与验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 120-130.
[9] 刘欢锐,彭祥,李森林,苟欣. 基于HER-2相关基因构建风险模型用于膀胱癌生存预后评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 793-801.
[10] 闫晓晋,刘云飞,马宁,党佳佳,张京舒,钟盼亮,胡佩瑾,宋逸,马军. 《中国儿童发展纲要(2011-2020年)》实施期间中小学生营养不良率变化及其政策效应分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 593-599.
[11] 王婷,李乔晟,刘皓冉,简伟研. 人格特征、城乡差异与抑郁症状变化的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 385-391.
[12] 张云静,乔丽颖,祁萌,严颖,亢伟伟,刘国臻,王明远,席云峰,王胜锋. 乳腺癌患者新发心血管疾病预测模型的建立与验证:基于内蒙古区域医疗数据[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 471-479.
[13] 张明露,刘秋萍,巩超,王佳敏,周恬静,刘晓非,沈鹏,林鸿波,唐迅,高培. 阿司匹林用于心血管病一级预防的不同策略比较:一项马尔可夫模型研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 480-487.
[14] 邓佳慧,黄筱琳,刘晓星,孙杰,陆林. 中国睡眠医学的过去、现在和未来[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 567-封三.
[15] 袁婷婷,李燊,吴燕,吴海涛. 长期自由选择饮酒小鼠模型的建立及其行为学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 315-323.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!