北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 124-128.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

复合树脂间粘接的微拉伸强度研究

林斐1,刘伟2,闫鹏3,岳林1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙体牙髓科,北京100081;2. 北京大学第三医院口腔科,北京 100191;3. 天津市口腔医院牙体牙髓二科,天津200041)
  • 出版日期:2015-02-18 发布日期:2015-02-18

Microtensile strength of composite-composite bonding: an in vitro study

LIN Fei1, LIU Wei2, YAN Peng3, YUE Lin1△   

  1. (1. Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Department of Stomatology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 3. Department 2 of Endodontics, Tianjin Stomatology Hospital, Tianjin 200041, China)
  • Online:2015-02-18 Published:2015-02-18

摘要: 目的:了解不同复合树脂间粘接后的强度。方法:选用甲基丙烯酸基复合树脂Clearfil APX(APX)及其配套粘接剂Clearfil SE Bond(SE)和环氧基复合树脂Filtek P90(P90)及其配套粘接剂Filtek P90 System Adhesive(SA)。实验分为3组:(1)整块组,将树脂分层固化制成完整一体的树脂块;(2)直接充填组,将树脂固化成块后,表面打磨,再直接填充新树脂,光固化;(3)粘接组,树脂固化成块后打磨,涂布粘接剂,再填充新树脂,光固化。将上述树脂试样切成数条1 mm×1 mm×14 mm的样品,检测微拉伸强度,以One-Way ANOVA和LSD法对数据进行统计分析。结果:(1)整块组的微拉伸强度最高,APX为(81.11±1.79) MPa,P90为(82.07±1.42) MPa,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(2)直接充填组中,APX-APX为(43.54±2.99) MPa,P90-APX为(42.74±2.49) MPa,APX-P90为(41.28±1.96) MPa,P90-P90为(42.39±3.24) MPa,各亚组间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。(3)粘接组中,比较上层树脂的种类显示,用APX修复的微拉伸强度均显著高于用P90修复;比较底层树脂的种类显示,当上层树脂粘接相同种类的底层树脂时,其微拉伸强度要高于其对异种树脂的粘接(P<0.05);比较粘接剂的种类系显示,用SE粘接两树脂的微拉伸强度均显著高于用SA粘接。(4)微拉伸强度排序为:整块>SE粘接APX>SA粘接APX>SE粘接P90=直接充填>SA粘接P90。结论:底层树脂表面经打磨后,使用APX粘接修复的强度高于使用P90修复,SE粘接两树脂的强度高于SA,底层树脂的类型对粘接强度影响不大。

关键词: 复合树脂类, 牙黏合, 牙应力分析

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the bonding strength of different resin composites.  Methods: Methacrylate-based resin APX and silorane-based resin composite P90 were chosen in this study, with their corresponding adhesives Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and Filtek P90 System Adhesive (SA). The specimens were divided into three groups: (1) bulk group, filling each block with the same composite, then curing; (2) direct filling group, curing and polishing one composite, then filling a new composite directly; (3) bonding group, after curing and polishing one composite, conditioning the surface with adhesives, then filling a new composite. Cut each resin blocks into 1 mm×1 mm×14 mm each piece, detecting the microtensile strength, and analyzing by One-Way ANOVA and LSD. Results: (1) The microtensile strength of the bulk group was the highest. (2) In direct filling group, the microtensile strength of 4 subgroups showed no statistical significance with each other but lower than that of the bulk group. (3) In bonding group, the microtensile strength of repairing with APX was higher than that with P90. When repairing with same composite, the microtensile strength was higher if the resin type of substrates was same with restorations than that was different. The microtensile strength of adhesives SE was higher than that of SA. (4) The sorting of the microtensile strength: bulk>SE bonding APX>SA bonding APX>SE bonding P90=direct filling>SA bonding P90. Conclusion: Retention force is higher when substrates are repaired with methacrylate-based resins and corresponding adhesives. Retention force is lower when repaired with silorane-based composites and corresponding adhesives. Types of the substrate composites show no influence on the bonding strength.

Key words: Composite resins, Dental bonding, Dental stress analysis

[1] 穆海丽,田福聪,王晓燕,高学军. 玻璃体和通用型复合树脂耐磨性的临床对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 120-125.
[2] 林春平,卢松鹤,朱浚鑫,胡洪成,岳兆国,唐志辉. 个性化根形种植体的螺纹形态对周围牙槽骨应力分布影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1130-1137.
[3] 杨殷杰,侯本祥,侯晓玫. 高压蒸汽灭菌对R-相镍钛锉表面形态及疲劳折断性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(5): 882-886.
[4] 郭惠杰,高承志, 林斐,刘伟,岳林. 唾液污染对复合树脂间粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 96-100.
[5] 傅昭然,田福聪,张路,韩冰,王晓燕. 通用型粘接剂对双固化树脂水门汀牙本质粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(1): 101-104.
[6] 朱曚曚, 王国敏, 孙科, 李应龙, 潘洁. 低温等离子体用于牙齿外漂白后对牙釉质粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 116-120.
[7] 张一,刘玉华,周永胜, 钟国雄. 碳化二亚胺乙醇溶液表面处理对牙本质微拉伸粘接强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(5): 825-828.
[8] 徐明明, 阎旭, 邓旭亮. PGMA预浸润石英纤维增强PMMA基托树脂的抗折性能和界面结合性能[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 62-66.
[9] 蔡雪, 聂杰, 王祖华, 田洪琰, 赵莹, 王晓燕. 洞缘形态对复合树脂颜色匹配的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 120-123.
[10] 白伟, 林红, 郑刚. 一步法粘接剂对金属、陶瓷材料粘接性能的研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(2): 336-338.
[11] 周团锋,张相皞,王新知. 计算机辅助设计与制作的一体化氧化锆全瓷桩核抗折力的体外对比实验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(1): 81-85.
[12] 刘亦洪,王勇,张庆辉,高原,冯海兰. 基底冠设计对氧化锆全瓷冠抗力的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(1): 71-75.
[13] 田福聪,王晓燕,高学军. 不同粘接系统用于楔状缺损直接修复的临床观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2014, 46(1): 58-61.
[14] 刘诗铭, 刘玉华, 徐军. 牙槽骨高度对上颌前磨牙桩核冠修复后应力分布的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(1): 44-49.
[15] 袁慎坡, 林红, 潘硕, 娄丽丽, 徐永祥. Polident义齿清洁剂对义齿基托树脂性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(6): 946-949.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!