北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 400-405. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671167X.2015.03.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会生态模式在儿童青少年肥胖防控中对体格指标的干预效果

崔馨月1,2, 陈天娇2△, 马军2   

  1. (1.北京大学公共卫生学院,北京100191;2.北京大学儿童青少年卫生研究所,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2015-06-18 发布日期:2015-06-18

Effect of obesity intervention with socio-ecological model on anthropometric measurements of children and adolescents

CUI Xin-yue1,2, CHEN Tian-jiao2△, MA Jun2   

  1. (1. Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China; 2.Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2015-06-18 Published:2015-06-18

摘要: 目的:探索利用社会生态模型,从“学生-学校-家庭”三个层面对学生肥胖进行干预是否有效。方法:利用分层整群抽样方法选择北京市房山区城市小学、乡村小学、城市中学和乡村中学各4所,共16所学校7~18岁学生共得到有效样本3 175人,每层4所学校各选取2所学校共1 661人,另2所学校作对照组,利用社会生态模型从“学生-学校-家庭”三个层面进行为期3个月的肥胖干预。干预方式包括健康教育、环境改善等,干预内容涉及肥胖相关知识、健康饮食与运动等。检测干预前后身体形态指标。结果:干预可以整体改善超重肥胖(OR=1.12,P<0.05),降低腰围、腰臀比(waist-hip ratio,WHR)等中心性肥胖指标(adjusted difference=0.63、0.02,P<0.05);女生腰围和WHR降低(adjusted difference=0.52、0.02,P<0.05)并改善了超重肥胖(OR=1.18,P<0.05),男生腰围和WHR降低(adjusted difference=0.73、0.01,P<0.05),女生效果优于男生;城市地区WHR降低(adjusted difference=0.01,P<0.05),乡村地区腰围和WHR降低(adjusted difference=1.05、0.02,P<0.05)并改善了超重肥胖(OR=1.43,P<0.05),乡村效果优于城市;小学WHR降低(adjusted difference=0.02,P<0.05)并改善了超重肥胖(OR=1.21,P<0.05),中学WHR降低(adjusted difference=0.02,P<0.05), 小学效果优于中学;干预措施有效降低超重肥胖学生的超重肥胖率(χ2=11.01,P<0.01)。结论:“学生-学校-家庭”社会生态模式干预方法短期内可改善腰围、WHR等中心性肥胖指标,可以作为一种有效干预手段推广使用。

关键词: 肥胖, 腹型, 早期干预(教育), 学生, 腰围, 腰臀比

Abstract: Objective: To study whether the socio-ecological model based on “student-school-family” three-level strategy is effective in obesity prevention.Methods: A total of 3 175 students aged 7 to 18 from 16 schools (4 urban primary schools, 4 rural primary schools, 4 urban secondary schools and 4 rural secondary schools, of which 2 intervention schools were selected, respectively ) were recruited by stratified cluster sampling method. A threemonth intervention using “student-school-family” socio-ecological model was conducted through health education and environment improvement. The intervention contents included knowledge on obesity, healthy diet and physical activities. Their anthropometric indexes were recorded. Results: The intervention prevented obesity(OR=1.12, P<0.05), and was effective in waist circumference (WC) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) (adjusted difference=0.63, 0.02, P<0.05). WC and WHR were reduced in girls (adjusted difference=0.52 & 0.02, P<0.05), and obesity was prevented in girls (OR=1.18, P<0.05). WC and WHR were reduced in boys (adjusted difference=0.73, 0.01, P<0.05). WHR were reduced in urban areas (adjusted difference=0.01, P<0.05). WC and WHR were reduced (adjusted difference=1.05, 0.02,P<0.05) and obesity was prevented (OR=1.18, P<0.05) in rural areas. WHR were reduced (adjusted difference=0.01, P<0.05) and obesity was prevented (OR=1.21, P<0.05) in primary schools. WHR were reduced in secondary schools (adjusted difference=0.02, P<0.05).The intervention effect was better in girls than in boys, in rural areas than in urban areas, and in primary schools than in secondary schools. The overweight and obesity prevalence went down after the intervention (χ2=11.01,P<0.01).   Conclusion:Intervention strategy is effective in central obesity indexes such as WC and WHR, and it can be used widely.

Key words: Obesity, abdominal, Early intervention(education), Students, Waist circumference, Waist-hip ratio

中图分类号: 

  • R179

[1] 陈敬,单蕊,肖伍才,张晓蕊,刘峥. 青春期和成年早期自制力与抑郁症状和超重肥胖共病风险的关联:基于全国调查的十年前瞻性队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 397-402.
[2] 蔡珊,张依航,陈子玥,刘云飞,党佳佳,师嫡,李佳欣,黄天彧,马军,宋逸. 北京市中小学生身体活动时间现状及影响因素的路径[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 403-410.
[3] 李卫民,祖菲娅·吐尔地. 维吾尔族、哈萨克族和汉族大学生体重指数与体能指数的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 411-417.
[4] 张祖洪,陈天娇,马军. 中小学生青春发动时相与心血管代谢危险因素的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 418-423.
[5] 吴一凡,玉应香,谢岚,张志达,常翠青. 不同体重指数青年男性的静息能量消耗特点及预测方程评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 247-252.
[6] 陈楚云,孙蓬飞,赵静,贾佳,范芳芳,王春燕,李建平,姜一梦,霍勇,张岩. 北京社区人群促红细胞生成素相关因素及其与10年心血管疾病风险的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1068-1073.
[7] 闫晓晋,刘云飞,马宁,党佳佳,张京舒,钟盼亮,胡佩瑾,宋逸,马军. 《中国儿童发展纲要(2011-2020年)》实施期间中小学生营养不良率变化及其政策效应分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 593-599.
[8] 党佳佳,蔡珊,钟盼亮,王雅琪,刘云飞,师嫡,陈子玥,张依航,胡佩瑾,李晶,马军,宋逸. 室外夜间人工光暴露与中国9~18岁儿童青少年超重肥胖的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 421-428.
[9] 陈敬,肖伍才,单蕊,宋洁云,刘峥. DRD2基因rs2587552多态性对儿童肥胖干预效果的影响:一项前瞻性、平行对照试验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 436-441.
[10] 马涛,李艳辉,陈曼曼,马莹,高迪,陈力,马奇,张奕,刘婕妤,王鑫鑫,董彦会,马军. 青春期启动提前与儿童肥胖类型的关联研究: 基于横断面调查和队列调查[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 961-970.
[11] 朱忆颖,闵赛南,俞光岩. 局部注射环孢素A对非肥胖糖尿病小鼠下颌下腺分泌功能及炎症的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 750-757.
[12] 董彦会,陈曼曼,王丽萍,星一,宋逸,邹志勇,董彬,李中杰,马军. 中国6~22岁学生群体甲乙丙类传染病流行趋势[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 498-505.
[13] 李远骋, 崔闻心, 郭雪儿, 朱璠, 刘思辰, 贾碧波, 汪培, 马迎华. 青年学生男男性行为人群中人类免疫缺陷病毒阳性与阴性者获得性免疫缺陷综合征(艾滋病)相关知识与行为比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 511-517.
[14] 那晓娜,朱珠,陈阳阳,王东平,王浩杰,宋阳,马晓川,王培玉,刘爱萍. 身体活动、静坐行为的时间分布与肥胖的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 486-491.
[15] 张晓圆,郭成成,玉应香,谢岚,常翠青. 高脂饲料诱导肥胖胰岛素抵抗大鼠模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 557-563.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!