北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 320-323. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.02.026

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

数字图像分析技术定量分析牙菌斑的效果评价

黄振,栾庆先△   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙周科,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2016-04-18 发布日期:2016-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 栾庆先 E-mail:kqluanqx@126.com

Evaluation of dental plaque by quantitative digital image analysis system

HUANG Zhen, LUAN Qing-xian△   

  1. (Department of Periodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2016-04-18 Published:2016-04-18
  • Contact: LUAN Qing-xian E-mail:kqluanqx@126.com

摘要:

目的:使用图像分析软件对牙菌斑染色图像进行分析,验证该技术的可操作性和实用性,考察该方法的可重复性,并评价不同菌斑染色方式对结果的影响。方法:从北京大学医学部口腔医学专业新入校学生中招募符合纳入标准的志愿者30人,菌斑染色后拍摄标准化口内前牙区数字图像,用Image Pro Plus 7.0软件进行图像分析,同时评价前牙区的Quigley-Hein菌斑指数。结果:图像分析计算所得菌斑染色面积百分比与临床检查记录的相应牙齿菌斑指数有较高的相关一致性,Spearman相关系数为0.776(P<0.01)。两名研究者用软件计算牙齿面积和菌斑面积的同类相关系数分别为0.956和0.930(P<0.01),Bland-Altman分析图显示仅有极个别的点在95%一致性界限以外。不同菌斑染色的图像分析结果显示,牙齿面积在两组间差异无统计学意义,但菌斑面积差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:该方法较易于操作掌握,所计算的菌斑百分比与传统的菌斑指数有较高的一致性,且重复性好,不同菌斑染色方法对图像分割结果影响不大,宜选用对菌斑敏感的菌斑染色剂进行图像分析。

关键词: 牙菌斑, 牙菌斑指数, 图像处理, 计算机辅助, 菌斑染色

Abstract:

Objective:To analyze the plaque staining image by using image analysis software, to verify the maneuverability, practicability and repeatability of this technique, and to evaluate the influence of different plaque stains. Methods:In the study, 30 volunteers were enrolled from the new dental students of Peking University Health Science Center in accordance with the inclusion criteria. The digital images of the anterior teeth were acquired after plaque stained according to filming standardization.The image analysis was performed using Image Pro Plus 7.0, and the Quigley-Hein plaque indexes of the anterior teeth were evaluated. Results:The plaque stain area percentage and the corresponding dental plaque index were highly correlated,and the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.776 (P<0.01). Intraclass correlation coefficients of the tooth area and plaque area which two researchers used the software to calculate were 0.956 and 0.930 (P<0.01).The Bland-Altman analysis chart showed only a few spots outside the 95% consistency boundaries. The different plaque stains image analysis results showed that the diffe-rence of the tooth area measurements was not significant, while the difference of the plaque area measurements significant (P<0.01). Conclusion:This method is easy in operation and control,highly related to the calculated percentage of plaque area and traditional plaque index, and has good reproducibility.The different plaque staining method has little effect on image segmentation results.The sensitive plaque stain for image analysis is suggested.

Key words: Dental plaque, Dental plaque index, Image processing, computer-assisted, Plaque stain

中图分类号: 

  • R780.2
[1] 徐心雨,吴灵,宋凤岐,李自力,张益,刘筱菁. 基于下颌运动轨迹的正颌外科术中下颌骨髁突定位方法及初步精度验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 57-65.
[2] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[3] 温奥楠,刘微,柳大为,朱玉佳,萧宁,王勇,赵一姣. 5种椅旁三维颜面扫描技术正确度的初步评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 343-350.
[4] 周利群,徐纯如. 机器人时代中央型肾肿瘤的手术治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 587-591.
[5] 罗昊,田福聪,王晓燕. 不同椅旁可切削修复材料序列抛光时间及表面粗糙度与光泽度的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 565-571.
[6] 冯莎蔚,国慧,王勇,赵一姣,刘鹤. 乳牙数字化参考牙冠模型的初步构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 327-334.
[7] 李怡,王丽瑜,刘晓强,周倜,吕季喆,谭建国. 不同材料及厚度椅旁CAD/CAM瓷贴面的边缘特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 140-145.
[8] 邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[9] 李新飞, 彭意吉, 余霄腾, 熊盛炜, 程嗣达, 丁光璞, 杨昆霖, 唐琦, 米悦, 吴静云, 张鹏, 谢家馨, 郝瀚, 王鹤, 邱建星, 杨建, 李学松, 周利群. 肾部分切除术前CT三维可视化评估标准的初步探究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 613-622.
[10] 黄新瑞,李莎,高嵩. 冷冻电镜成像中噪声的滤波方法进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 425-433.
[11] 徐啸翔,曹烨,赵一姣,贾璐,谢秋菲. 数字化个齿托盘制取下颌全牙列全冠预备体印模的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 54-61.
[12] 岳兆国,张海东,杨静文,侯建霞. 数字化评估CAD/CAM个性化基台与成品基台影响粘接剂残留的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 69-75.
[13] 李峥,柳玉树,王时敏,张瑞,贾璐,叶红强,胡文杰,赵文艳,刘云松,周永胜. 数字化方法复制暂时修复体牙合面形态在重度磨耗病例中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 62-68.
[14] 房硕博,杨广聚,康艳凤,孙玉春,谢秋菲. 数字化辅助确定再定位牙合垫颌位方法的探索和精度评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(1): 76-82.
[15] 郝柯屹,罗佳,邸萍,郭厚佐,沈惠丹,刘焱萍,张宇,林野. 三维图像融合技术评价上颌全牙列种植固定修复前后的鼻唇软组织形态变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 924-930.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!