北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (6): 982-986. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.06.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗collectin 11抗体在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的意义

邓晓莉1,钟丽君2,孙琳1,李常虹1,刘湘源1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学第三医院风湿免疫科,北京100191;2. 北京大学医药卫生分析中心,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2016-12-18 发布日期:2016-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 刘湘源 E-mail:13683657545@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(81501390)资助

Diagnostic significance of anti-collectin 11 in systemic lupus erythematosus

DENG Xiao-li1, ZHONG Li-jun2, SUN Lin1, LI Chang-hong1, LIU Xiang-yuan1△   

  1. (1. Department of Rheumatolgoy and Immunology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; 2.Medical and Health Analytical Center, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2016-12-18 Published:2016-12-18
  • Contact: LIU Xiang-yuan E-mail:13683657545@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81501390)

摘要:

目的:评价抗collectin 11抗体在系统性红斑狼疮(systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE)的诊断和病情活动性判断中的作用。方法: 本研究为横断面研究,同时纳入SLE活动组、SLE缓解组、类风湿关节炎(rheumatoid arthritis,RA)组、原发性干燥综合征(Sj-gren syndrome,SS)组以及健康对照(healthy control,HC)组5组患者,应用ELISA方法检测血清抗collectin 11抗体水平,比较各组差异并进行受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析。结果: 5组各纳入30例患者,SLE活动组和SLE缓解组之间抗collectin 11抗体水平差异无统计学意义(88.8±16.8 vs. 89.7±24.7,P=0.896)。SLE组作为一个整体,其抗collectin 11抗体水平(89.1±19.4)显著高于RA组(49.1±22.0)、SS组(56.9±30.1)以及HC组(72.7±24.6)(P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.007)。抗collectin 11抗体诊断SLE的ROC曲线下面积为0.806,提示具有一定的诊断价值,并且与其他SLE特异性自身抗体有一定的互补作用。结论: 血清抗collectin 11抗体在SLE组中显著高于RA组、SS组以及HC组,并具有一定的诊断价值,有可能成为SLE新的特异性自身抗体之一。

关键词: 红斑狼疮, 系统性, 胶原凝集素, 诊断

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the role of anti-collectin 11 in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in the evaluation of disease activity. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Five groups of patients were enrolled: SLE active (SLE disease activity index-2000,SLEDAI-2000≥9), SLE remission (SLEDAI-2000≤4 and there was no organ involvement), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), primary Sj-gren Syndrome (SS) and healthy control (HC). Serum anticollectin 11 was detected in all the groups by ELISA. One-way ANOVA analysis and LSD-t test as post-hoc analysis were used to compare the levels of anticollectin 11 among all the groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under curve (AUC) were used to analyze the value of anticollectin 11 in the diagnosis of SLE. Results: In the study, 30 patients were enrolled in each group, including 13 males and 137 females with an average age of (34±14) years (18-77 years). The age and gender of the other three groups were comparable to the two SLE groups. The difference of serum anti-collectin 11 between the SLE active group and SLE remission group was not statistically significant (88.8±16.8 vs. 89.7±24.7, P=0.896). The level of serum anti-collectin 11 was significantly higher in SLE group (as a whole) (89.1±19.4) than in RA group (49.1±22.0), SS group (56.9±30.1) and HC group (72.7±24.6) (P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.007, respectively). The AUC was 0.806 for the diagnosis of SLE by serum anti-collectin 11. Further descriptive analysis showed that the positive rate of anti-collectin 11 was very high in the patients of SLE in whom both anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and Sm antibody were negative. The nervous system and gastrointestinal system involvement were the most common in the patients with positive anti-collectin 11. Conclusion: The level of serum anti-collectin 11 was significantly higher in SLE than in RA, SS and HC. Anti-collectin 11 antibody had a relatively high value in the diagnosis of SLE and it might have some complementary function in the diagnosis of SLE. It might be a relatively specific autoantibody for SLE.

Key words: Lupus erythematosus, systemic, Collectins, Diagnosis

中图分类号: 

  • R593.241
[1] 陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[2] 钟华, 李原, 徐丽玲, 白明欣, 苏茵. 18F-FDG PET/CT在风湿免疫病中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 853-859.
[3] 武志慧, 胡明智, 赵巧英, 吕凤凤, 张晶莹, 张伟, 王永福, 孙晓林, 王慧. miR-125b-5p修饰脐带间充质干细胞对系统性红斑狼疮的免疫调控机制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 860-867.
[4] 李正芳,罗采南,武丽君,吴雪,孟新艳,陈晓梅,石亚妹,钟岩. 抗氨基甲酰化蛋白抗体在诊断类风湿关节炎中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 729-734.
[5] 乔佳佳,田聪,黄晓波,刘军. 肾结石合并系统性红斑狼疮行经皮肾镜碎石取石术的安全性和有效性评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 745-749.
[6] 任立敏,赵楚楚,赵义,周惠琼,张莉芸,王友莲,沈凌汛,范文强,李洋,厉小梅,王吉波,程永静,彭嘉婧,赵晓珍,邵苗,李茹. 系统性红斑狼疮低疾病活动度及缓解状况的真实世界研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 273-278.
[7] 李文根,古晓东,翁锐强,刘苏东,陈超. 血浆外泌体miR-34-5p和miR-142-3p在系统性硬化症中的表达及临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1022-1027.
[8] 罗芷筠,吴佳佳,宋优,梅春丽,杜戎. 伴神经精神系统病变的系统性红斑狼疮相关巨噬细胞活化综合征2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1111-1117.
[9] 姚海红,杨帆,唐素玫,张霞,何菁,贾园. 系统性红斑狼疮及成人Still病合并巨噬细胞活化综合征的临床特点及诊断指标[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 966-974.
[10] 赵祥格,刘佳庆,黄会娜,陆智敏,白自然,李霞,祁荆荆. 干扰素-α介导系统性红斑狼疮外周血CD56dimCD57+自然杀伤细胞功能的损伤[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 975-981.
[11] 林卓华,蔡如意,孙洋,穆荣,崔立刚. 超微血流显像评价系统性硬化症指端血流的方法学与临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 636-640.
[12] 熊焰,李鑫,梁丽,李东,鄢丽敏,李雪迎,邸吉廷,李挺. 甲状腺粗针穿刺活检病理诊断的准确性评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 234-242.
[13] 哈雪梅,姚永正,孙莉华,辛春杨,熊焰. 实性肺胎盘样变形1例及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 357-361.
[14] 宁博涵,张青霞,杨慧,董颖. 伴间质细胞增生、玻璃样变性及索状结构的子宫内膜样腺癌1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 366-369.
[15] 赵亚楠,范慧芸,王翔宇,罗雅楠,张嵘,郑晓瑛. 孤独症患者过早死亡风险及死亡原因[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 375-383.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!