北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 699-703. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.04.027

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

锥形束CT分析下颌无牙颌患者前部颌弓形态对“All-on-4”种植设计的影响

李世赢1,李刚2,冯海兰1,潘韶霞1△   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院, 1. 修复科,2. 放射科, 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2017-08-18 发布日期:2017-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 潘韶霞 E-mail: panshaoxia@vip.163.com
  • 基金资助:
     教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金(2012-940)资助

Influence of the interforaminal arch form of edentulous mandibles on design of “All-on-4”: preliminary research based on conebeam computed tomography

LI Shi-ying1, LI Gang2, FENG Hai-lan1, PAN Shao-xia1△   

  1. (1. Department of Prosthodontics, 2. Department of Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2017-08-18 Published:2017-08-18
  • Contact: PAN Shao-xia E-mail: panshaoxia@vip.163.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry(2012-940)

摘要: 目的:通过测量分析下颌无牙颌患者的锥形束CT(conebeam computed tomography, CBCT)图像,测量可能植入种植体的A-P距离(anterior-posterior distance),分类前部颌弓形态,探究颌弓形态对“All-on-4”远中倾斜种植体临床设计的影响。方法:收集下颌无牙颌患者的CBCT图像共74例,其中男性35例,女性39例,拟行“All-on-4”种植固定义齿修复。在经颏孔并平行于牙合平面的平面上测量可能植入种植体的A-P距离,分类前部颌弓形态,测量由颏孔往近中方向7.5 mm的颌骨段所跨过的颌弓弧度,探究A-P距离与该弧度的相关性。结果:74例患者测得可植入的颏孔间区种植体的A-P距离为(8.5±1.5) mm(最小为4.5 mm,最大为11.8 mm),其中≤7 mm者占12.2%(男性3例,女性6例),颌弓为方圆形;>7 mm、≤9 mm者占54.0%(男性20例,女性20例), 颌弓为卵圆形;>9 mm者占33.8%(男性12例,女性13例),颌弓为尖圆形。测量患者颏孔前方7.5 mm颌弓段转角弧度,左、右两侧共测得148个数据,平均为15.9°±5.5°(最小为5.6°,最大为35.2°)。统计分析发现,AP距离与转角弧度呈显著负相关。结论:本研究中下颌无牙颌患者的前部颌弓形态中,卵圆形所占百分比最多,尖圆形次之,方圆形最少。女性方圆形颌弓者多于男性,卵圆形和尖圆形颌弓与性别无明显相关。颌弓越方,A-P距离越小,颏孔前区颌弓弧度就越大,远中斜行种植体所需要的骨宽度就越大。下颌无牙颌患者的“All-on-4”种植固定修复采用远中斜行种植体,术前应评估颌弓形态,设计远中种植体的合理倾角,远中种植位点的骨宽度应在常规要求外留有余量。方圆形颌弓是“All-on-4”种植固定修复的不利因素。

关键词: 下颌骨, 颌, 无牙, 牙种植, 牙弓

Abstract: Objective:To classify the interforaminal arch form of edentulous mandibles by measuring the anterior-posterior distance (A-P distance) of implants planned to be inserted in “All-on-4” protocol using conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) data, and to investigate the influence of the arch form on the “All-on-4” distally tilted implants. Methods: Seventy-four CBCT images of edentulous mandibles were collected, including 35 males and 39 females respectively. “All-on4”implant supported fixed prostheses were designed for these patients based on the CBCT data. The A-P distance was measured in the plane which crossed bilateral mental foramens and was parallel to the occlusal plane. The interforaminal arch form of edentulous mandibles were classified according to the A-P distance. The radian of the jaw arch 7.5 mm mesially to the mental foramen was measured bilaterally, and its correlation with the A-P distance was studied. Results: The average A-P distance of implant supported fixed prostheses planned in the interforaminal region was (8.5±1.5) mm (minimum 4.5 mm, maximum 11.8 mm). In the study, 12.2% of the subjects’ mandibles were classified as square arch form with A-P distances ≤7 mm, 54.0% were classified as ovoid with A-P distances >7 mm and ≤9 mm,  33.8% were classified as tapered with A-P distances >9 mm. Bilaterally, 148 results of the radian of the jaw arch 7.5 mm mesially to the mental foramen were obtained, and the average radian was 15.9°±5.5° (minimum 5.6°, maximum 35.2°). The radian and the AP distance showed a negative correlation with statistical significance. Conclusion: In this research, the ovoid arch form was the most common type in edentulous mandibles, followed by tapered arch form. The square arch form showed the lowest percentage. As the arch form went squarer, the A-P distance became shorter, the radian of the jaw arch mesially to the mental foramen went greater, and the bone width that distally tilted implants need became bigger. The interforaminal arch form of the edentulous mandible should be analyzed before an implant supported fixed restoration is designed in the interforaminal region. The angle of inclination of distal implants should be reasonable. The bone width of the distal implant site must be adequate. The square arch form contributes negatively to the structure of implant supported fixed prostheses with distal cantilever design.

Key words: Mandible, Jaw, edentulous, Dental implantation, Dental arch

中图分类号: 

  • R783.4
[1] 李峥, 吕珑薇, 张晓, 夏丹丹, 张萍, 刘云松, 周永胜. 基于干细胞和生物材料调控的口腔颅颌面骨再生的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 272-277.
[2] 杜文, 章文博, 于尧, 刘硕, 苏惠裕, 胡耒豪, 唐祖南, 吴彬彰, 陈震, 李家琦, 王昊, 彭歆. 口腔颌面部肿瘤"数智化外科"诊疗流程探索与临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 278-284.
[3] 刘嘉昱, 祝宁, 张育祯, 高贤明, 张宇. 动态导航辅助环钻取骨的准确性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 365-371.
[4] 王昕莹, 程雪原, 张孟钧, 李菲, 段晋瑜, 乔静. 浓缩生长因子联合引导性组织再生术治疗下颌磨牙根分叉病变的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 372-379.
[5] FarinEbrahimi, 冯志强, FarazEbrahimi, 韩玮华, 于子杨, 贾宽宽, 安金刚. 上颌药物相关性颌骨坏死的不同分期手术治疗效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 107-114.
[6] 单珅瑶, 杨咏涛, 李文博, 温奥楠, 高梓翔, 商相宜, 王勇, 赵一姣. 基于下颌运动轨迹的𬌗架关键参数计算方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 115-125.
[7] 杨咏涛, 田淯文, 单珅瑶, 李文博, 商相宜, 王艺蓁, 郭殊玮, 高梓翔, 温奥楠, 赵一姣, 王勇. 基于多视图立体视觉的无牙颌种植固定修复软组织数字印模的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 126-132.
[8] 于录, 吴灵, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 基于数据库相似性检索的正颌外科手术规划技术流程可行性研究: 随机对照试验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 145-152.
[9] 杨雨婷, 屈留洋, 郑丹妮, 凌晓彤, 许晓韵, 柳登高. 1 812例唾液腺结石患者的人口学特征和临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 153-159.
[10] 王月, 梁宇红. 繁茂型牙骨质-骨结构不良1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 220-224.
[11] 李文博, 沈玉凤, 杨咏涛, 单珅瑶, 高梓翔, 温奥楠, 商相宜, 田淯文, 郭殊玮, 王艺蓁, 王勇, 赵一姣. 单侧磨牙咬合干扰的口颌肌表面肌电指标体系构建与判别模型验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 89-98.
[12] 王宇蓝, 曾浩, 张玉峰. 口腔种植中血浆基质的临床转化现状与前沿探索[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 836-840.
[13] 于子杨, 郭厚佐, 蒋析, 韩玮华, 林野. 穿颧种植体上颌窦段成骨的影像学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 967-974.
[14] 宋凤岐, 徐心雨, 刘筱菁, 李自力. 上颌骨前部和整体顺时针旋转改善骨性Ⅲ类牙颌面畸形患者鼻旁凹陷的对比[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 980-988.
[15] 杨源源, 张珊珊, 俞光岩, 杨辉俊, 杨宏宇. 部分下颌下腺切除术治疗下颌下腺良性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 334-339.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!