北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 704-708. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.04.028

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

3D打印间接粘接托槽精度

张达*,王林川,周彦恒,刘晓默,李晶△   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院正畸科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2017-08-18 发布日期:2017-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 李晶 E-mail: lijing1101@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学口腔医院青年基金(PKUSS20150208)资助

Precision of three-dimensional printed brackets#br#

ZHANG Da, WANG Lin-chuan, ZHOU Yan-heng, LIU Xiao-mo, LI Jing△   

  1. (Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2017-08-18 Published:2017-08-18
  • Contact: LI Jing E-mail: lijing1101@hotmail.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Youth Fund of Peking University Hospital of Stomatology

摘要: 目的:基于数字化正畸诊断设计流程进行间接粘接转移托盘模型的设计和3D打印,对关键性的托槽打印精度进行检验,以期对数字化正畸的临床应用有所帮助。方法: 从2014年至2015年于北京大学口腔医院正畸科就诊的错牙合畸形患者中选取14例为研究对象,其中拔牙8例,不拔牙6例。所有患者牙周洁治后进行口内牙列扫描和锥形束CT(cone-beam computed tomography,CBCT)拍摄,所得STL数据与DICOM数据在自编软件中进行数据分割融合和配准、数字化矫治设计和计算机软件自动排牙、托槽虚拟定位、错牙合模型坐标还原,最终输出3D打印模型数据用于间接粘接转移定位托盘的制作。3D打印输出模型,经过后处理由水枪及超声震荡去除周围支撑材料,使用数字游标卡尺对所有样本牙颌模型上的左侧上下颌托槽及颊面管进行长度和宽度的测量,检验测量结果。测量值比较采用独立样本t检验,与托槽及颊面管设计尺寸进行比较。结果: 在19个测量分析项目中有13个项目的测量均值与检验标准值间的差异有统计学意义,差异范围在0.04~0.17 mm,且除左下第二前磨牙的托槽长度外均大于检验值。结论: 虽然托槽的宽度和颊面管的长度和宽度上大多稍大于检验值,但这不一定对临床上间接粘接转移托盘的制作造成影响,0.04~0.17 mm的差异是否会影响托槽实际的固位和定位有待进一步的研究证实。

关键词: 3D打印, 托槽, 正畸, 间接粘接

Abstract: Objective:This study was based on digital orthodontic diagnosis work flow for indirect bonding transfer tray model design and three-dimensional (3D) printing, and the aim of this paper was to inspect the dimensional accuracyof 3D printed brackets, which is the foundation of the follow up work and hoped that will illuminate the clinical application of the digital orthodontics work flow. Methods: The samples which consisted of 14 cases of patients with malocclusion from Department of Orthodontics Peking University were selected, including 8 cases with tooth extraction and 6 cases without tooth extraction.All the 14 patients were taken intra-oral scan (Trios 3Shape,Denmark)and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT, NewTom 3G volumetric scanner, Aperio Service,Italy)shooting after periodontal treatment. STL data and DICOM data were obtained from intraoral scans and CBCT images.Data segmentation, registration, fusion, automatic tooth arrangement, virtual positioning of orthodontic appliance and conversion the coordinates of malocclusion model were all done with self-programming software. The data of 3D printing model with brackets on it were output finally and printed out with EDEN260V (Objet Geometries, Israel) to make indirect bonding transfer tray. Digital vernier caliper was used to measure the length and width of upper and lower left brackets and buccal tubes on those 3D models after removal of surrounding supporting material by ultrasonic vibration and water-spray. Intra-examiner reliability was assessed by using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), and one-sample T test was used to compare the measurements with the standard dimensional data of the brackets. Results: There were significant differences which range in 0.04-0.17 mm between the 13 items out of the 19 measurement items. Except for the length of the lower left premolars’brackets, mean values of the other items were greater than the test value.Conclusion: Although the measurement results in the width of brackets and the width and length of the buccal tubes obtained experimentally were slightly larger than the test value,this may not reduce the accuracy of indirect bonding procedure in clinic necessarily. Whether the differences which range in 0.04-0.17 mm would actually affect the retention and positioning of brackets needs to be confirmed by further studies.

Key words: 3D printing, Bracket, Orthodontics, Indirect bonding

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5
[1] 展新新,曹露露,项东,汤皓,夏丹丹,林红. 成型方向对3D打印口腔义齿基托树脂材料物理性能及力学性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 345-351.
[2] 毛渤淳,田雅婧,王雪东,李晶,周彦恒. 骨性Ⅱ类高角患者拔牙矫治前后的面部软硬组织变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 111-119.
[3] 胡攀攀,李彦,刘啸,唐彦超,李梓赫,刘忠军. 自稳式人工椎体在颈椎前路手术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 161-166.
[4] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[5] 周华,王仁吉,刘忠军,刘晓光,吴奉梁,党礌,韦峰. 3D打印人工椎体在颈椎脊索瘤全脊椎切除术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 144-148.
[6] 开地尔娅·阿不都热合曼,张荣赓,钱浩楠,邹振洋,丹尼娅·叶斯涛,范田园. 个性化剂量熔融沉积成型3D打印茶碱片剂的制备和体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1202-1207.
[7] 高娟,吕航苗,马慧敏,赵一姣,李小彤. 锥形束CT三维体积测量评估骨性Ⅲ类错正畸正颌治疗后的牙根吸收[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 719-726.
[8] 孙玉春,郭雨晴,陈虎,邓珂慧,李伟伟. 口腔精准仿生修复技术的自主创新研发与转化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 7-12.
[9] 杨雨卉,黄一平,李巍然. 骨皮质切开加速正畸牙齿移动对牙根吸收的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 434-437.
[10] 王高南,焦剑,周彦恒,施捷. 正畸牙齿位置的移动对角化龈宽度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 931-936.
[11] 戴帆帆,刘怡,许天民,陈贵. 探索成人正畸前后下颌三维数字化模型的重叠方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 271-278.
[12] 张又文,辛天艺,焦剑,周彦恒,施捷. 慢性牙周炎的减数正畸治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(2): 308-313.
[13] 柳玉树,李峥,赵一姣,叶红强,周彦秋,胡文杰,刘云松,寻春雷,周永胜. 数字化正畸修复联合治疗设计在前牙美学重建中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 78-84.
[14] 柳大为,李晶,郭亮,荣起国,周彦恒. 舌侧矫治器关闭间隙上前牙牙周膜应力变化的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 141-147.
[15] 郭福新,姜玉良,吉喆,彭冉,孙海涛,王俊杰. 3D打印非共面模板辅助CT引导125Ⅰ粒子植入治疗锁骨上复发转移癌的剂量学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 506-511.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!