北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (6): 1057-1062. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.06.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

食管癌术后急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析

徐稼轩,王宏志(),董军,陈小杰,杨勇,陈仁雄,王国栋   

  1. 北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所重症医学科,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室, 北京 100142
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-23 出版日期:2018-12-18 发布日期:2018-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 王宏志 E-mail:doctorwhz@163.com

Analysis of risk factors for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome after esophagectomy

Jia-xuan XU,Hong-zhi WANG(),Jun DONG,Xiao-jie CHEN,Yong YANG,Ren-xiong CHEN,Guo-dong WANG   

  1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing 100142, China
  • Received:2017-06-23 Online:2018-12-18 Published:2018-12-18
  • Contact: Hong-zhi WANG E-mail:doctorwhz@163.com

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 分析食管癌患者手术后急性肺损伤(acute lung injury,ALI)/急性呼吸窘迫综合征(acute respiratory distress syndrome,ARDS)的发生情况及相关危险因素。方法: 回顾性分析北京大学肿瘤医院重症医学科自2010年1月至2016年12月连续收治的422例食管癌手术患者,统计其术后ALI/ARDS的发生情况。以是否发生ALI/ARDS把患者分为ALI/ARDS组和对照组,对比分析两组间临床资料的差异,将差异有统计学意义的因素作为自变量进行Logistic后退法回归分析,探寻ALI/ARDS的独立危险因素。结果: 术后共有41例患者发生ALI/ARDS,占所有患者的9.7%(41/422),ALI/ARDS组与对照组在平均住院天数[(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d,P=0.011]、需要进行机械通气的患者比例[51.2%(21/41) vs. 9.4%(36/381),P<0.001]、院内死亡率[31.7%(13/41) vs. 5.0%(19/381),P<0.001]方面差异有统计学意义。单因素分析结果显示,吸烟史(P=0.064)、术前1秒用力呼气容积/用力肺活量(forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity,FEV1/FVC)(P=0.020)、肺一氧化碳弥散量(diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide,DLCO)(P=0.011)、体重指数(body weight index,BMI)(P=0.044)、美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)麻醉风险分级(P=0.049)及术中单肺通气时间(P=0.008)在ALI/ARDS组与对照组之间差异有统计学意义。进一步行Logistic多因素回归分析显示,术前FEV1/FVC(OR=1.053,95%CI 1.010~1.098,P=0.016)、ASA分级(OR=2.392,95%CI 1.073~5.335,P=0.033)、术中单肺通气时间(min)(OR=0.994,95%CI 0.989~0.999,P=0.028)是食管癌术后发生ALI/ARDS的独立危险因素。结论: ALI/ARDS是食管癌术后不容忽视的严重并发症,一旦发生将明显增加患者的住院时间及死亡率,术前FEV1/FVC、ASA分级、术中单肺通气时间是食管癌术后发生ALI/ARDS的独立危险因素。术前对患者的充分评估和准备,术中控制单肺通气时间是预防食管癌术后ALI/ARDS发生的关键。

关键词: 食管切除术, 呼吸窘迫综合征, 成人, 手术后并发症, 食管肿瘤, 危险因素

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the incidence and risk factors for the acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after resection of esophageal carcinoma.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed 422 consecutive patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine with eso-phageal carcinoma undergoing esophagectomy from January 2010 to December 2016 in Peking University Cancer Hospital. ALI/ARDS were diagnosed, the patients were divided into ALI/ARDS group and control group without ALI/ARDS, the differences of clinical features were contrasted between the two groups, and the multivariate Logistic regression modeling was used to identify the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS.Results:In the study, 41 ALI/ARDS cases were diagnosed, making up 9.7% (41/422) of all the enrolled patients undergoing esophagectomy. Comparisons of the ALI/ARDS group and the control group indicated significant statistical differences in the average length of their hospital stay [(18.9±9.7) d vs. (14.8±3.6) d, P=0.011], the proportion of the patients who needed mechanical ventilation support [51.2% (21/41) vs. 9.4% (36/381), P<0.001] and in-hospital mortality [31.7% (13/41) vs. 5.0% (19/381), P<0.001]. Univariate analysis showed significant differences between the patients with ALI/ARDS and without ALI/ARDS in smoking history (P=0.064), preoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (P=0.020), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (P=0.011), body weight index (BMI) (P=0.044), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification (P=0.049) and one lung ventilation duration (P=0.008), while multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC (OR=1.053, P=0.016, 95%CI 1.010-1.098), ASA physical status classification (OR=2.392, P=0.033, 95%CI 1.073-5.335) and one lung ventilation duration (OR=0.994, P=0.028, 95%CI 0.989-0.999) were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.Conclusion:ALI/ARDS was a serious complication in patients undergoing esophagectomy associated with increment in length of hospital stay and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative FEV1/FVC, ASA classification and one lung ventilation duration were the independent risk factors for ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy. Carefully assessing the patient before operation, shortening one lung ventilation duration were the key points in preventing ALI/ARDS after esophagectomy.

Key words: Esophagectomy, Respiratory distress syndrome, adult, Postoperative complications, Esophageal neoplasms, Risk factors

中图分类号: 

  • R735.1

表1

ALI/ARDS组和对照组相关资料的比较情况"

Factor ALI/ARDS (n=41) Control(n=381) P value
Gender (male/female) 35/6 313/68 0.607
Age/years 64.2±7.5 63.9±7.6 0.839
Pathology (squamous/adenocarcinoma) 36/5 357/24 0.274
Stage 0.483
14 98
15 170
12 113
Chemotherapy (yes/no) 11/30 110/271 0.784
Smoking (yes/no) 29/12 212/169 0.064
FEV1/FVC 69.7%±9.7% 73.4%±7.0% 0.020
MVV/(L/min) 85.6±19.3 89.7±22.0 0.257
Decreased DLCO (yes/no) 8/33 26/355 0.011
BMI/(kg/m2) 23.6±2.4 22.7±2.7 0.044
ASA classification 0.049
Ⅰ/Ⅱ 26 298
15 83
Surgical approach (thoracoscopic/non-thoracoscopic) 8/33 38/343 0.110
Operation duration/min 400.2±98.9 428.4±114.1 0.128
One lung ventilation duration/min 194.4±65.4 168.6±58.1 0.008
Perioperative fluid in first 24 h/mL 5 716.2±2 281.4 5 376.3±1 323.6 0.354
Intra-operative vasopressor infusion (yes/no) 5/36 35/346 0.532
Blood transfusion in first 24 h (yes/no) 16/25 104/277 0.114
PaO2/FiO2 on arrival in Department of Critical Care Medicine 285.6±106.7 291.8±99.4 0.703

表2

ALI/ARDS患者多因素Logistic回归分析"

Factor P value Odds ratio 95%CI
FEV1/FVC 0.016 1.053 1.010-1.098
ASA classification 0.033 2.392 1.073-5.335
One-lung ventilation 0.028 0.994 0.989-0.999
[1] Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A , et al. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer[J]. Anesth Analg, 2003,97(6):1558-1565.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000087799.85495.8A pmid: 14633519
[2] Levitt JE, Matthay MA . Clinical review: Early treatment of acute lung injury-paradigm shift toward prevention and treatment prior to respiratory failure[J]. Crit Care, 2012,16(3):223.
doi: 10.1186/cc11144 pmid: 22713281
[3] Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G , et al. Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units. Results from the ALIVE study[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2004,30(1):51-61.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2022-6
[4] 马晓春, 王辰, 方强 , 等. 急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断和治疗指南(2006)[J]. 中国危重病急救医学, 2006,16(12):1-6.
doi: 10.3760/j.issn:0578-1426.2007.05.037
[5] 赫捷, 邵康 . 中国食管癌流行病学现状、诊疗现状及未来对策[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2011(7):501-504.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2011.07.001
[6] Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M , et al. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 1990,77(8):845-857.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1365-2168
[7] Morita M, Otsu H, Kawano H , et al. Advances in esophageal surgery in elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer[J]. Anticancer Res, 2013,33(4):1641-1647.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.008 pmid: 23564809
[8] Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT , et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition[J]. JAMA, 2012,307(23):2526-2533.
[9] 杜斌 . 急性呼吸窘迫综合征的柏林定义: 究竟改变了什么[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2013,34(2):201-203.
[10] Eichenbaum KD, Neustein SM . Acute lung injury after thoracic surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2010,24(4):681-690.
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.032 pmid: 20060320
[11] Tandon S, Batchelor A, Bullock R , et al. Peri-operative risk factors for acute lung injury after elective oesophagectomy[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2001,86(5):633-638.
doi: 10.1093/bja/86.5.633 pmid: 11878539
[12] Misthos P, Katsaragakis S, Milingos N , et al. Postresectional pulmonary oxidative stress in lung cancer patients. The role of one-lung ventilation[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2005,27(3):379-382.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.12.023 pmid: 15740942
[13] 森山博史, 平田哲, 久保良彦 . 食道癌,肺癌手術周術期における血中エンドトキシン,顆粒球エラスターゼおよび凝固線溶系分子マーカーの変動[J]. 臨床病理, 1995,43(3):233-237.
[14] Hackett NJ, De Oliveira GS, Jain UK , et al. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery[J]. Int J Surg, 2015(18):184-190.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.079 pmid: 25937154
[15] 刘勇恩, 寇瑛琍 . 食管癌术后肺部并发症发生的原因及防治进展[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2008,15(2):138-142.
[16] 刘丽霞, 胡振杰, 赵钗 . 食管癌手术前肺功能试验与术后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的相关性[J]. 癌症, 2006,25(3):335-338.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-467X.2006.03.015
[17] Della RG, Coccia C . Acute lung injury in thoracic surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2013,26(1):40-46.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835c4ea2 pmid: 23235524
[18] Rocker GM, Wiseman MS, Pearson D , et al. Neutrophil degranulation and increased pulmonary capillary permeability following oesophagectomy: a model of early lung injury in man[J]. Br J Surg, 1988,75(9):883-886.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750918 pmid: 3179665
[19] Michelet P , D’Journo XB, Roch A, et al. Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a rando-mized controlled study[J]. Anesthesiology, 2006,105(5):911-919.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00011
[20] Gao Q, Mok HP, Wang WP , et al. Effect of perioperative glucocorticoid administration on postoperative complications following esophagectomy: A meta-analysis[J]. Oncol Lett, 2014,7(2):349-356.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1748 pmid: 24396446
[1] 李志存, 吴天俣, 梁磊, 范宇, 孟一森, 张骞. 穿刺活检单针阳性前列腺癌术后病理升级的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[2] 颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[3] 陈延,李况蒙,洪锴,张树栋,程建星,郑仲杰,唐文豪,赵连明,张海涛,姜辉,林浩成. 阴茎海绵体注射试验对阴茎血管功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 680-686.
[4] 庞博,郭桐君,陈曦,郭华棋,石嘉章,陈娟,王欣梅,李耀妍,单安琪,余恒意,黄婧,汤乃军,王艳,郭新彪,李国星,吴少伟. 天津与上海35岁以上人群氮氧化物个体暴露水平及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 700-707.
[5] 和静,房中则,杨颖,刘静,马文瑶,霍勇,高炜,武阳丰,谢高强. 血浆中脂质代谢分子与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块、传统心血管危险因素及膳食因素的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 722-728.
[6] 蔡珊,张依航,陈子玥,刘云飞,党佳佳,师嫡,李佳欣,黄天彧,马军,宋逸. 北京市中小学生身体活动时间现状及影响因素的路径[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 403-410.
[7] 张祖洪,陈天娇,马军. 中小学生青春发动时相与心血管代谢危险因素的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 418-423.
[8] 林郁婷,王华丽,田宇,巩俐彤,常春. 北京市老年人认知功能的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 456-461.
[9] 费秀文,刘斯,汪波,董爱梅. 成人及儿童组织坏死性淋巴结炎临床特征及治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 533-540.
[10] 朱金荣,赵亚娜,黄巍,赵微微,王悦,王松,苏春燕. 感染新型冠状病毒的血液透析患者的临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 267-272.
[11] 赖展鸿,李嘉辰,贠泽霖,张永刚,张昊,邢晓燕,邵苗,金月波,王乃迪,李依敏,李玉慧,栗占国. 特发性炎性肌病完全临床应答相关因素的单中心真实世界研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 284-292.
[12] 司筱芊,赵秀娟,朱凤雪,王天兵. 创伤出血性休克后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 307-312.
[13] 李洋洋,侯林,马紫君,黄山雅美,刘捷,曾超美,秦炯. 孕期因素与婴儿牛奶蛋白过敏的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 144-149.
[14] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[15] 罗靓,李云,王红彦,相晓红,赵静,孙峰,张晓盈,贾汝琳,李春. 抗内皮细胞抗体检测在早期流产中的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1039-1044.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!