抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎一线护理人员防护暴露风险事件调查

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 调查抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎(corona virus disease 2019,COVID-19)一线护士防护暴露风险事件现状,为管理者做好护理人员防护提供依据。方法: 便利选取支援武汉的308名护理人员,采用研究团队自行编制的网络问卷进行调查,通过事件回顾的方式对护理人员在防护状态下的7种防护暴露风险事件进行调查。结果: 共有304人填写了有效问卷,88.8%的护理人员接受了防护暴露风险事件预防与应对的培训。7种防护暴露风险事件中,鞋套污染、脱落的发生率相对较高,为53.6%;由于有手套的保护,手部或皮肤污染发生率相对较低,为14.1%;护士心理负担最重的防护暴露风险事件是N95口罩污染、脱落或移位,分值达8.2±2.3。单因素分析发现,支援武汉天数不同,防护风险事件发生的种类数量不同(χ²=14.562,P=0.024);多元有序Logistic回归发现,男性是防护暴露风险事件发生的种类数量的独立保护因素(P=0.019)。结论: 支援武汉的一线护理人员工作中会出现防护暴露风险事件,在工作中既要指导护士防止风险事件的发生,又要指导其有效应对,从而减轻心理负担。

关键词: 冠状病毒感染, 肺炎, 病毒性, 护士, 个人防护装备, COVID-19

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the current situation of virus exposure risk incidents of nurses against corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, and to provide reference evidence for nursing managers to protect nursing staff who were working in the isolation ward. Methods: In the study, 308 nursing staff against COVID-19 working in the isolation ward in Wuhan were conveniently selected to participate in the investigation. The designed questionnaires including 7 kinds of protective exposure risk events were made by the team of researchers on the basis of literature review and interview with the nurses in Wuhan. All the participants recalled their working experience in the status of dressing in personal protective equipment and filled in the questionnaires online by WeChat according to the same instruction. Results: The questionnaires were filled in validly by a total of 304 nursing staff, of whom 88.8% received emergency training on the prevention and dealing measurement of exposure risk events. The incidence of shoe cover contamination, falling off or torn was relatively high, about 53.6%. Due to the protection of gloves, the incidence of hand or skin contamination was relatively low, about 14.1%. The most nervousness of protective exposure risk event for nurses was N95 mask contamination, falling off or shifting, with a score of 8.2±2.3, showing a higher psychiatric burden. Single factor analysis found that the number of days in Wuhan was different, the number of the types of protective risk events occurred was different (χ²=14.562, P=0.024), orderly multivariate Logistic regression found that men were the independent protective factor for the number of the types of protective exposure risk events that occurred (P=0.019). Conclusion: Protective exposure risk events may occur in the work of nursing staff working in the isolation ward in Wuhan. It is necessary to guide nurses to prevent the occurrence of protective exposure risk events and effectively deal with them, so as to prevent virus exposure and reduce psycholo-gical burden.

Key words: Coronavirus infections, Pneumonia, Viral, Nurses, Personal protective equipment, COVID-19

中图分类号:

R563.1

王秋,郭金玉,孙红,王泠,应菊素,刘慧鑫. 抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎一线护理人员防护暴露风险事件调查[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 711-714.

Qiu WANG,Jin-yu GUO,Hong SUN,Ling WANG,Ju-su YING,Hui-xin LIU. Investigation of protective exposure risk events in nurses against corona virus disease 2019 in Wuhan[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(4): 711-714.

图/表 4

表1

表2

防护暴露风险事件发生后的紧张程度"

Items	Higher nervoursness (score of nervousness≥6), n (%)	The degree of nervousness, $x ?$ ±s
Contamination of hand and skin (n=42)	23 (54.8)	5.8±3.0
Contamination, falling off, or torn of shoe cover (n=160)	71 (45.5)	5.0±2.5
Contamination, falling off or torn of isolation gown (n=84)	55 (65.5)	6.1±2.6
Falling off or shifting of N95 mask (n=62)	55 (88.7)	8.2±2.3
Falling off or shifting of surgical mask (n=38)	29 (78.4)	6.4±2.4
Contamination, falling off or shifting of goggles (n=13)	9 (69.2)	6.6±2.4
Contamination, falling off or shifting of splash screen (n=81)	49 (60.5)	6.1±2.8

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 4

[1]	国家卫生健康委员会. 医疗机构内新型冠状病毒感染预防与控制技术指南(第一版)[EB/OL]. (2020-01-22)[2020-3-8]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202001/b91fdab7c3044-31eb082d67847d27e14.shtml.
[2]	付强. 基于COVID-19疫情应对的医疗机构内感染防控实践思考[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020,30(8):1121-1124.
[3]	国家卫生健康委员会. 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗标准(第七版)[EB/OL]. [2020-3-4]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zheng-ceku/2020-02/22/content_5482010.htm.
[4]	赵红, 谢少清, 杨会志, 等. 新冠肺炎医疗队医务人员感染防控相关需求调查[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2020,19(5):398-403.

相关文章 15

[1]	朱金荣,赵亚娜,黄巍,赵微微,王悦,王松,苏春燕. 感染新型冠状病毒的血液透析患者的临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 267-272.
[2]	刘鑫,石雪迎,李军. 新型冠状病毒感染相关缺血性结肠炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 362-365.
[3]	李建斌,吕梦娜,池强,彭一琳,刘鹏程,吴锐. 干燥综合征患者发生重症新型冠状病毒肺炎的早期预测[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1007-1012.
[4]	赖金惠,王起,姬家祥,王明瑞,唐鑫伟,许克新,徐涛,胡浩. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间延迟拔除输尿管支架对泌尿系结石术后患者生活质量和心理状态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(5): 857-864.
[5]	曹乐清,周婧睿,陈育红,陈欢,韩伟,陈瑶,张圆圆,闫晨华,程翼飞,莫晓冬,付海霞,韩婷婷,吕萌,孔军,孙于谦,王昱,许兰平,张晓辉,黄晓军. 异基因造血干细胞移植后晚发重症肺炎患者治疗与预后转归的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 1013-1020.
[6]	康志宇,王磊磊,韩永正,郭向阳. 北京冬季奥林匹克运动会运动员手术的麻醉管理[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(4): 770-773.
[7]	陈明隆,刘笑晗,郭静. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下儿童父母社会支持与养育倦怠的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(3): 520-525.
[8]	钱婧,魏友加,程毅菁,张奕,彭博,朱春梅. 儿童坏死性肺炎临床特征及危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(3): 541-547.
[9]	李佳,徐钰,王优雅,高占成. 老年流感肺炎的临床特征及D-二聚体与疾病严重程度的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 153-160.
[10]	王飞,朱翔,贺蓓,朱红,沈宁. 自发缓解的滤泡性细支气管炎伴非特异性间质性肺炎1例报道并文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(6): 1196-1200.
[11]	孟洪,季丽娜,黄静,晁爽,周佳雯,李学军,尹小梅,樊丽容. COVID-19疫情前后北京市某综合医院儿科门诊患儿就诊量变化分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 952-956.
[12]	黄冰, 王洪源. 全球新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情发展趋势及严重程度[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 536-542.
[13]	杨群智,张舸,费雅楠,付爽,闫冰. 沙利度胺治疗原发性干燥综合征合并轻中度非特异性间质性肺炎疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 413-416.
[14]	包芳,史尉利,胡静,张娣,高东晗,夏云霞,景红梅,克晓燕,葛庆岗,沈宁. 新型冠状病毒肺炎淋巴细胞亚群与严重程度的相关分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(6): 1075-1081.
[15]	袁晓宁,孟庆阳,沈宁,李宇轩,梁超,崔曼,葛庆岗,李晓光,谭昆,陈茜,王晶,曾晓勇. 新型冠状病毒肺炎病区环境及医务人员防护设备表面SARS-CoV-2核酸污染的检测与评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 803-808.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Items	0 time	1 time	2 times	3 times	≥4 times
Contamination of hand and skin	261 (85.9)	17 (5.6)	9 (3.0)	5 (1.6)	12 (3.9)
Contamination, falling off, or torn of shoe cover	144 (47.4)	62 (20.4)	60 (19.7)	15 (4.9)	23 (7.6)
Contamination, falling off or torn of isolation gown	215 (70.7)	33 (10.9)	25 (8.2)	14 (4.6)	17 (5.6)
Falling off or shifting of N95 mask	241 (79.3)	29 (9.5)	24 (7.9)	6 (2.0)	4 (1.3)
Falling off or shifting of surgical mask	266 (87.5)	19 (6.3)	10 (3.3)	8 (2.6)	1 (0.3)
Contamination, falling off or shifting of goggles	290 (95.4)	4 (1.3)	7 (2.3)	3 (1.0)	0
Contamination, falling off or shifting of splash screen	222 (73.0)	51 (16.8)	19 (6.3)	7 (2.3)	5 (1.6)

Days in Wuhan	≤1 kind	2-4 kinds	≥5 kinds
10-20 d	11 (61.1)	6 (33.3)	1 (5.6)
21-30 d	110 (52.4)	94 (44.8)	6 (2.9)
31-40 d	32 (53.3)	27 (45.0)	1 (1.7)
≥41 d	10 (62.5)	3(18.8)	3 (18.8)

Items	n (%)	B	SE	Wald	P	OR	95%CI
Age		-0.009	0.094	0.008	0.927	1.022	1.201-0.871
Working years		0.041	0.083	0.244	0.621	0.937	1.079-0.813
Gender
Male	41 (16.0)	1.053	0.450	5.480	0.019	0.349	0.843-0.144
Female	216 (84.0)
Days in Wuhan
10-20 d	18 (5.9)	-1.050	0.904	1.348	0.246	2.858	16.827-0.485
21-30 d	210 (69.1)	-0.890	0.722	1.517	0.218	2.435	10.024-0.591
31-40 d	60 (19.7)	-0.849	0.762	1.241	0.265	2.337	10.412-0.525
≥41 d	16 (5.3)
Shifts of one week
≤5	204 (79.4)	-0.440	0.390	1.272	0.259	1.552	3.333-0.723
≥6	53 (20.6)
Working hours for one shift
≤4 h	140 (54.5)	1.513	1.121	1.822	0.177	0.220	1.982-0.025
5-8 h	113 (44.0)	1.266	1.102	1.319	0.251	0.282	2.445-0.033
≥9 h	4 (1.6)