类风湿关节炎不同分类标准的多中心临床比较

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.05.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的:验证并比较早期类风湿关节炎(early rheumatoid arthritis, ERA) 分类标准与1987年美国风湿病学会(American College of Rheumatology, ACR)和2010年ACR/欧洲抗风湿联盟(European League Against Rheumatism, EULAR)制定的分类标准在ERA患者诊断中的敏感性和特异性。方法:在4所医院中入选年龄≥16岁、病程≤1年、存在≥1个关节肿痛的关节炎患者,观察指标包括临床表现、实验室检查及影像学检查。ERA的诊断经2名风湿病专科医师根据临床症状、用药情况、影像学检查进行临床诊断。结果: (1)共纳入关节炎患者325例,男性98例(30.15%), 女性227例(69.85%),平均年龄(47.53±14.44)岁,中位病程5(2, 8)个月。最终诊断为ERA 236例,非ERA 89例 (Non-ERA,包括骨关节炎、反应性关节炎、未分化关节炎、脊柱关节炎等)。(2) ERA标准的敏感性为87.29%,特异性为84.37%,敏感性高于1987年ACR标准 (χ²=43.641,P<0.001), 与2010年ACR/EULAR标准相比差异无统计学意义 (χ²=0.446,P=0.593);特异性低于1987年 ACR年标准 (χ²=4.891, P=0.027),与2010年ACR/EULAR标准比较差异无统计学意义 (χ²=0.044,P=1.000)。(3)在病程≤3个月和病程≤6个月关节炎患者中,ERA分类标准敏感性分别为81.71%、86.79%,均高于1987年ACR标准 (χ²=7.131,P=0.008和χ²=22.015,P<0.001), 与2010年ACR/EULAR标准比较差异无统计学意义 (χ²=0.220,P=0.755和χ²=0.473,P=0.491), 3个标准的特异性比较差异均无统计学意义。(4) 3种分类标准与临床诊断存在一致性,其中ERA标准、2010年ACR/EULAR标准与临床诊断一致性较好(Kappa>0.6)。3种分类标准间一致性比较结果提示,ERA标准与2010年ACR/EULAR标准间一致性较好(Kappa=0.836)。结论:ERA分类标准在ERA诊断中的敏感性高于1987年ACR分类标准,与2010年ACR/EULAR年标准相当,3种标准间特异性比较差异无统计学意义;ERA标准在病程≤3个月的极早期关节炎中仍可识别出RA患者。

关键词: 关节炎, 类风湿关节炎, 早期诊断

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the classification criteria of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) and compare the sensitivity and specificity with the criteria of 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). Methods: Patients from 4 hospitals, aged more than 16 years, with arthritis, whose disease duration was ≤1 year, and with ≥1 joint pain and swelling were enrolled in the study. The indicators including clinical manifestations, laboratory tests and imaging examinations were observed. The ERA patients were dignosed by two experienced rheumatologists based on the clinical features, drug therapy information and radiography features. Results: (1) A total of 325 patients with arthritis were enrolled, including 98 males (30.15%) and 227 females (69.85%), The average age was (47.53±14.44) years, and the median disease duration was 5 (2, 8) months. Finally, 236 patients were dignosed with ERA, and 89 patients were dignosed with other diseases (Non-ERA, including osteoarthritis, reactive arthritis, undifferentiated arthritis, spondyloarthritis, etc). (2) The sensitivity of ERA criteria was 87.29%, and the specificity was 84.37%. The sensitivity was higher than that of 1987 ACR criteria (χ ²=43.641, P<0.001), and had no significant difference compared with 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (χ²=0.446, P=0.593). But the specificity of ERA criteria was lower than that of 1987 ACR criteria (χ²=4.891, P=0.027), which was not statistically significant compared with 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (χ²=0.044, P=1.000). (3) In the patients with arthritis whose disease duration was ≤3 months and ≤6 months, the sensitivity of ERA criteria was 81.71% and 86.79%, respectively, both were higher than the 1987 ACR criteria (χ²=7.131, P=0.008; χ²=22.015, P<0.001) and had no statistically difference compared with the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (χ²=0.220,P=0.755; χ²=0.473,P=0.491). The differences of the three criteria in specificity were not statistically significant. (4) The three different classification criteria were consistent with the clinical diagnosis, among which the ERA criteria and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria were slightly higher (Kappa>0.6). The results of the consistency comparison between the three criteria showed that the ERA criteria and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria had a better consistency (Kappa=0.836). Conclusion: The sensitivity of ERA classification criteria in the diagnosis of ERA was higher than that of 1987 ACR criteria, and was equivalent to that of 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. There is no significant difference in specificity between these three criteria. The ERA criteria can also identify patients with RA at a very early stage in arthritis with disease duration ≤3 months.

Key words: Arthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, Early diagnosis

中图分类号:

R593.22

罗采南,李正芳,武丽君,陈海娟,杨春梅,徐文晖,刘小玲,唐薇,乔平,热娜·白合提亚. 类风湿关节炎不同分类标准的多中心临床比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(5): 897-901.

Cai-nan LUO,Zheng-fang LI,Li-jun WU,Hai-juan CHEN,Chun-mei YANG,Wen-hui XU,Xiao-ling LIU,Wei TANG,Ping QIAO,Baihetiya Rena. Multicenter performance of the different classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2020, 52(5): 897-901.

图/表 7

表1

ERA组和非ERA组临床资料比较"

Items	ERA(n=236)	Non-ERA(n=89)	P
Male/female, n	60/176	38/51	0.002
Age/years, $x -$ ±s	49.59±13.85	44.89±15.70	0.001
Disease duration/months, median (IQR)	5(2.25, 8.00)	3(1.00,10.00)	0.068
Swollen joint count, median (IQR)	5(2, 10)	2(1, 4)	<0.001
Tender joint count, median (IQR)	11(6, 20)	4(2, 10)	<0.001
Morning stiffness(>30 min), n(%)	151(63.98)	14(15.73)	<0.001
RF positive, n(%)	162(68.64)	8(8.99)	<0.001
Anti-CCP positive, n(%)	183(77.54)	6(6.74)	<0.001
ESR/(mm/h), median (IQR)	41.50(24.00, 59.75)	27.00(14.00, 54.00)	0.008
CRP/(mg/L), median (IQR)	11.60(4.60, 36.38)	10.11(2.00, 46.48)	0.287

表1

表2

病程≤3月和病程≤6月关节炎患者临床资料比较"

Items	Disease duration≤3 months(n=129)	Disease duration≤6 months(n=220)	P
Male/female, n	43/86	74/146	0.954
Age/years, $x -$ ±s	47.09±15.89	49.80±14.16	0.345
Swollen joint count, median (IQR)	4(1, 8)	4(1, 9)	0.688
Tender joint count, median (IQR)	7(3, 14)	8(4, 18)	0.063
Morning stiffness(>30 min), n(%)	66(51.16)	115(52.27)	0.841
RF positive, n(%)	56(43.41)	115(52.27)	0.110
anti-CCP positive, n(%)	62(48.06)	125(56.82)	0.113
ESR, mm/h, median (IQR)	39.00(20.75, 58.00)	40.00(22.00, 58.25)	0.758
CRP, mg/L, median (IQR)	13.26(3.04, 44.79)	11.60(4.17, 42.40)	0.839

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

参考文献 8

[1]	赵金霞, 苏茵, 刘湘源, 等. 早期类风湿关节炎分类标准及其诊断意义的探讨[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2012,16(10):651-656.
[2]	Zhao J, Su Y, Li R, et al. Classification criteria of early rheumatoid arthritis and validation of its performance in a multi-centre cohort[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2014,32(5):667-673.
[3]	李玉翠, 范文强, 陈海英, 等. 2012年早期类风湿关节炎分类标准的国内多中心临床验证[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2017,21(12):807-811.
[4]	叶华, 苏茵, 李茹, 等. 早期类风湿关节炎分类标准的全国多中心临床验证[J]. 中华风湿病学杂志, 2014,18(12):802-805.
[5]	Ye H, Su Y, Li R, et al. Comparison of three classification criteria of rheumatoid arthritis in an inception early arthritis cohort[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2016,35(10):2397-2401. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3281-2 pmid: 27129710
[6]	Radner H, Neogi T, Smolen JS, et al. Performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature review[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2014,73(1):114-123. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203284
[7]	van der Linden MP, Knevel R, Huizinga TW, et al. Classification of rheumatoid arthritis: Comparison of the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2011,63(1):37-42. doi: 10.1002/art.30100 pmid: 20967854
[8]	Biliavska I, Stamm TA, Martinez-Avila J, et al. Application of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with very early inflammatory arthritis: analysis of sensitivity, specificity and predictive values in the SAVE study cohort[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2013,72(8):1335-1341. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201909

相关文章 15

[1]	刘东武, 陈杰, 高明利, 于静. 类风湿关节炎伴发淋巴结Castleman样病理改变1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 928-931.
[2]	李正芳,罗采南,武丽君,吴雪,孟新艳,陈晓梅,石亚妹,钟岩. 抗氨基甲酰化蛋白抗体在诊断类风湿关节炎中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 729-734.
[3]	黄会娜,赵静,赵祥格,白自然,李霞,王冠. 乳酸对类风湿关节炎患者外周血CD4⁺T细胞亚群的调控作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 519-525.
[4]	汤晓菲,李永红,丁秋玲,孙卓,张阳,王育梅,田美伊,刘坚. 类风湿关节炎患者下肢深静脉血栓发病率及危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 279-283.
[5]	李红光,韩玮华,吴训,冯继玲,李刚,孟娟红. 关节腔冲洗联合液态浓缩生长因子注射治疗单侧颞下颌关节骨关节炎的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 338-344.
[6]	邹雪,白小娟,张丽卿. 艾拉莫德联合托法替布治疗难治性中重度类风湿关节炎的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[7]	吴琦,蔡月明,何娟,黄文蒂,王庆文. 血脂异常与类风湿关节炎肺间质病变的相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 982-992.
[8]	张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 体重指数与类风湿关节炎临床特征的相关性分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 993-999.
[9]	金银姬,孙琳,赵金霞,刘湘源. 血清IgA型抗鼠科肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B1抗体在类风湿关节炎中的意义[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 631-635.
[10]	蔡文心,李仕成,刘一鸣,梁如玉,李静,郭建萍,胡凡磊,孙晓麟,李春,刘栩,叶华,邓立宗,李茹,栗占国. 类风湿关节炎临床分层及其特征的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1068-1073.
[11]	程昉,杨邵英,房星星,王璇,赵福涛. CCL28-CCR10通路在类风湿关节炎单核细胞迁移中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1074-1078.
[12]	刘蕊,赵金霞,闫良. 类风湿关节炎合并下肢静脉血栓患者的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1079-1085.
[13]	张警丰,金银姬,魏慧,姚中强,赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎患者生活质量与疾病活动度的横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1086-1093.
[14]	徐朝焰,林长艺,叶达梅,吴培埕,宋明辉,刘有添,邓琼,黄雪艳,范忠晓,游雪兰. 感染性关节炎诊断分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1234-1237.
[15]	栗占国,任立敏. 侵蚀性骨关节炎：一种值得关注的疾病[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 829-831.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Classification criteria	Sensitivity/%	Specificity/%	Positive predictive value/%	Negative predictive value/%
ERA	87.29	84.27	93.64	71.43
1987 ACR	60.59	94.38	96.62	47.45
2010 ACR/EULAR	85.17	86.52	94.37	68.75

Classification criteria	Sensitivity/%	Specificity/%	Positive predictive value/%	Negative predictive value/%
ERA	81.71	91.49	94.37	74.14
1987 ACR	54.88	100.00	100.00	63.51
2010 ACR/EULAR	79.27	93.62	95.59	72.13

Classification criteria	Sensitivity/%	Specificity/%	Positive predictive value/%	Negative predictive value/%
ERA	86.79	90.12	94.52	77.66
1987 ACR	64.15	97.53	98.08	25.00
2010 ACR/EULAR	83.02	91.36	94.96	73.27

Items	Consistency rate/%	Kappa	P
Clinical diagnosis & ERA	86.46	0.678	<0.001
Clinical diagnosis & 1987 ACR	69.85	0.420	<0.001
Clinical diagnosis & 2010 ACR/EULAR	85.54	0.663	<0.001

Items	Consistency rate/%	Kappa	P
ERA & 1987 ACR	78.15	0.577	<0.001
ERA & 2010 ACR/EULAR	92.31	0.836	<0.001
2010 ACR/EULAR & 1987 ACR	75.38	0.521	<0.001