Email Alert | RSS

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (3): 479-484. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

育儿胜任感量表在学龄前儿童母亲中应用的信效度评价

李雪莹1,*,毛康娜2,*,弭小艺1,高玲玲3,杨晓3,陶惠芬4,张迎武4,陈敬1,王行1,沈丽娟1,袁洁铃1,苗淼5,Δ(),周虹1,Δ()   

  1. 1.北京大学公共卫生学院妇幼卫生学系, 北京 100191
    2.海淀区妇幼保健院科教科, 北京 100080
    3.中山大学护理学院, 广州 510080
    4.延庆区妇幼保健院保健科, 北京 102100
    5.北京大学医学人文学院, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-14 出版日期:2021-06-18 发布日期:2021-06-16
  • 通讯作者: 苗淼,周虹 E-mail:miaomiao@bjmu.edu.cn;hongzhou@bjmu.edu.cn

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of parenting sense of competence scale in mothers of preschool children

LI Xue-ying1,*,MAO Kang-na2,*,MI Xiao-yi1,GAO Ling-ling3,YANG Xiao3,TAO Hui-fen4,ZHANG Ying-wu4,CHEN Jing1,WANG Xing1,SHEN Li-juan1,YUAN Jie-ling1,MIAO Miao5,Δ(),ZHOU Hong1,Δ()   

  1. 1. Department of Maternal and Child Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
    2. Department of Science and Education, Haidian Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    3. School of Nursing, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
    4. Department of Health Care, Yanqing Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Beijing 102100, China
    5. Peking University School of Health Humanities, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2021-02-14 Online:2021-06-18 Published:2021-06-16
  • Contact: Miao MIAO,Hong ZHOU E-mail:miaomiao@bjmu.edu.cn;hongzhou@bjmu.edu.cn

RICH HTML

 34   

PDF (PC)

813

摘要：

目的: 对育儿胜任感量表在中国学龄前儿童母亲中应用的信效度进行检验,探究北京市延庆区学龄前儿童母亲的育儿胜任感现状。方法: 采用方便样本对1 384名学龄前儿童母亲进行调查,运用SPSS 21.0和Mplus 7.4软件进行统计分析,检验量表的结构效度、效标关联效度、内部一致性和分半信度,分析量表使用的得分情况及其影响因素。结果: 探索性因子分析显示,量表的各条目在效能或满意度维度上的载荷均大于0.4,且无双载荷现象。验证性因子分析显示,效能分量表和满意度分量表的因子负荷为0.212~0.843(P<0.05),模型拟合优度检验显示各拟合指数均在可接受范围内。总量表、效能分量表、满意度分量表均与抑郁自评呈显著负相关,与一般自尊呈显著正相关。总量表、效能分量表和满意度分量表的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.872、0.802和0.874,总量表的Spearman-Brown系数为0.851。总量表、效能分量表、满意度分量表的平均得分分别为(72.33±11.31)分、(35.54±5.91)分、(36.79±7.11)分,得分受母亲文化程度、家庭年收入的影响。结论: 育儿胜任感量表在中国学龄前儿童母亲中具有良好的信效度,可以作为衡量中国学龄前儿童母亲育儿胜任感、自我感知效能及满意度的测评工具。北京市延庆地区学龄前儿童母亲的育儿胜任感较好,可能与纳入本研究的母亲的文化程度、家庭年收入较高有关。

关键词: 育儿胜任感, 母亲, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of parenting sense of competence scale (PSOC) in Chinese mothers of preschool children, and to explore the perception of preschool children’s mothers on their own parenting skills and their comfort of being a parent in Yanqing District of Beijing. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a convenience sample in 1 384 preschool children’s mothers in Yanqing District of Beijing. SPSS 21.0 and Mplus 7.4 software were used for statistical analysis to test the structural validity, criterion related validity, internal consistency and split half reliability of the scale, and to analyze the score of the scale and its influencing factors. Results: The PSOC had good reliability and validity. Exploratory factor analysis showed that each item of the PSOC had more than 0.4 factor loading in efficacy factor or satisfaction factor, and there was no double load phenomenon. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the factor loadings ranged from 0.212 to 0.843 in efficacy factor and satisfaction factor, respectively. The goodness of fit test showed that all the fitting indexes were within the acceptable range, and the correlation between the effectiveness subscale and the satisfaction subscale was high. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the whole scale, the efficacy subscale and the satisfaction subscale were 0.872, 0.802, and 0.874, respectively. The Spearman-Brown coefficient of PSOC was 0.851. The average score of the whole scale, the efficacy subscale, and the satisfaction subscale were 72.33±11.31, 35.54±5.91, and 36.79±7.11, respectively, and the score of parenting competence in Chinese mothers of preschool children was influenced by the mother’s educational level and the annual income of her family. Conclusion: The PSOC has satisfactory reliability and validity in Chinese mothers of preschool children. It can be used as an evaluation instrument for measuring the parenting competency, self perceived efficacy and satisfaction in the mainland Chinese mothers of preschool children. The competency of preschool children’s mothers in Yanqing District of Beijing is very good, which may be related to the higher education level of the mothers and the higher annual income of their families in this study.

Key words: Parenting sense of competence, Mothers, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号: 

  • R173

表1

PSOC量表在学龄前儿童母亲中的探索性因子分析结果"

Entries Efficacy Satisfaction
1. The problems of taking care of a child are easy to solve once you know how your actions affect your child, an understanding
I have acquired		 0.803 0.208
2. Even though being a parent could be rewarding, I am frustrated now while my child is at his/her present age* 0.220 0.669
3. I go to bed the same way I wake up in the morning, feeling I have not accomplished a whole lot* 0.183 0.712
4. I do not know why it is, but sometimes when I’m supposed to be in control, I feel more like the one being
manipulated*		 0.100 0.772
5. My mother/father was better prepared to be a good mother/father than I am* 0.288 0.656
6. I would make a fine model for a new mother/father to follow in order to learn what she/he would need to know in order to be
a good parent		 0.641 0.237
7. Being a parent is manageable, and any problems are easily solved 0.714 0.342
8. A difficult problem in being a parent is not knowing whether you’re doing a good job or a bad one* 0.307 0.565
9. Sometimes I feel like I’m not getting anything done* 0.251 0.690
10. I meet my own personal expectations for expertise in caring for my child 0.723 0.263
11. If anyone can find the answer to what is troubling my child, I am the one 0.711 0.154
12. My talents and interests are in other areas, not in being a parent* 0.225 0.459
13. Considering how long I’ve been a mother/father, I feel thoroughly familiar with this role 0.775 0.193
14. If being a mother/father of a child were only more interesting,I would be motivated to do a better job as a parent* 0.162 0.642
15. I honestly believe I have all the skills necessary to be a good mother/father to my child 0.803 0.208
16. Being a parent makes me tense and anxious* 0.309 0.698
17. Being a good mother/father is a reward in itself 0.570 0.182

表2

PSOC量表在学龄前儿童母亲中的验证性因子分析结果"

Entries Efficacy Satisfaction
1. The problems of taking care of a child are easy to solve once you know how your actions affect your child, an understanding
I have acquired		 0.447
2. Even though being a parent could be rewarding, I am frustrated now while my child is at his/her present age* 0.632
3. I go to bed the same way I wake up in the morning, feeling I have not accomplished a whole lot* 0.714
4. I do not know why it is, but sometimes when I’m supposed to be in control, I feel more like the one being
manipulated*		 0.654
5. My mother/father was better prepared to be a good mother/father than I am* 0.701
6. I would make a fine model for a new mother/father to follow in order to learn what she/he would need to know in order to be
a good parent		 0.610
7. Being a parent is manageable, and any problems are easily solved 0.770
8. A difficult problem in being a parent is not knowing whether you’re doing a good job or a bad one* 0.604
9. Sometimes I feel like I’m not getting anything done* 0.713
10. I meet my own personal expectations for expertise in caring for my child 0.774
11. If anyone can find the answer to what is troubling my child, I am the one 0.725
12. My talents and interests are in other areas, not in being a parent* 0.252
13. Considering how long I’ve been a mother/father, I feel thoroughly familiar with this role 0.794
14. If being a mother/father of a child were only more interesting,I would be motivated to do a better job as a parent* 0.212
15. I honestly believe I have all the skills necessary to be a good mother/father to my child 0.843
16. Being a parent makes me tense and anxious* 0.722
17. Being a good mother/father is a reward in itself 0.630

表3

学龄前儿童母亲人口学资料对育儿胜任感的影响"

Influence factor n Total score, x¯±s Efficacy score, x¯±s Satisfaction score, x¯±s
Age/years
21-30 159 72.12±11.03 35.87±5.94 36.25±6.92
31-40 1 089 72.17±11.37 35.41±5.93 36.75±7.14
41-50 136 73.85±11.16 36.17±5.73 37.68±7.06
F value 1.372 1.265 1.545
P value 0.254 0.283 0.214
Education
Primary school and below 2 68.00±11.31 29.00±7.07 39.00±4.24
Junior high school 35 68.29±10.65 34.29±5.03 34.00±7.73
Technical secondary school or high school 159 68.90±10.59 34.28±5.91 34.62±7.09
College or bachelor degree 1 113 72.67±11.32 35.67±5.92 37.00±7.05
Master degree or above 75 76.48±11.06 37.04±5.64 39.44±6.40
F value 7.774 4.179 8.131
P value <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Annual household income/Yuan
≤50 000 117 68.84±11.53 34.33±6.26 34.50±7.54
50 001-200 000 837 71.71±10.89 35.29±5.75 36.42±6.90
200 001-500 000 392 74.63±11.58 36.45±6.03 38.18±7.07
≥500 001 38 73.00±12.83 35.47±6.32 37.53±8.22
F value 10.175 5.278 10.066
P value <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

表4

育儿胜任感影响因素赋值说明"

Variable Assignment description
Education (X1) Primary school and below=1, Junior high school=2, Technical secondary school or high school=3, Master degree or above=4
Annual household income (X2) ≤50 000=1, 50 001-200 000=2, 200 001-500 000=3, ≥500 001=4
Parenting competence (Y) Original value

表5

多元线性逐步回归分析"

Independent variable B SE Beta t P
Constant 58.363 2.311 25.253 <0.01
Education 2.525 0.597 0.116 4.226 <0.01
Annual household income 1.845 0.483 0.105 3.822 <0.01
[1] Zuckerman B, Elansary M, Needlman R. Book sharing: In-home strategy to advance early child development globally[J]. Pediatrics, 2019,143(3):1-3.
[2] Knudsen EI. Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior[J]. J Cogn Neurosci, 2004,16(8):1412-1425.
doi: 10.1162/0898929042304796
[3] Jones TL, Prinz RJ. Potential roles of parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review[J]. Clin Psychol Rev, 2005,25(3):341-363.
doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.12.004
[4] Gibaud-Wallston J, Wandersman LP. Development and utility of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale: proceedings of the American Psychological Association in American Psychological Association[C]. Toronto: the American Psychological Association in American Psychological Association, 1978.
[5] Ngai FW, Wai-Chi Chan S, Holroyd E. Translation and validation of a chinese version of the parenting sense of competence scale in Chinese mothers[J]. Nurs Res, 2007,56(5):348-354.
doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000289499.99542.94
[6] 杨晓, 高玲玲, 张振香, 等. 中文版育儿胜任感量表在产妇中应用的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014,49(7):881-885.
[7] 张洪. 拉萨市学龄前儿童父母育儿胜任感现状及影响因素的研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2017.
[8] Johnston C, Mash EJ. A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy[J]. J Clin Child Psychol, 1989,18(2):167-175.
doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8
[9] Chou KL, Chi I. Social comparison in Chinese older adults[J]. Aging Ment Health, 2001,5(3):242-252.
pmid: 11575063
[10] 杨芳, 刘烁, 杨冰香, 等. 抑郁情绪自我管理量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 护理研究, 2020,34(19):3413-3417.
[11] 田银娣, 王怡恺, 李静, 等. 焦虑和抑郁量表在肝硬化患者临床应用中的信效度评价[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2019,22(1):105-107.
[12] 茅亦馨, 张子君, 潘姝丞, 等. 威斯康星州肾结石生活质量量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理与康复, 2019,18(10):12-17.
[13] 李牧玲, 王晓艳, 白雪洁, 等. 脑卒中患者病耻感量表结构效度的验证研究[J]. 现代临床护理, 2020,19(5):1-6.
[14] 朱荷燕, 葛丽娜, 陈丹铃. 脑卒中患者保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理与康复, 2020,19(4):1-4.
[15] Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications[M]. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2004.
[16] 程慧慧. 湖南省醴陵地区产褥期女性育儿胜任感现状及其影响因素研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南师范大学, 2019.
[1] 弭小艺,侯杉杉,付子苑,周末,李昕璇,孟召学,蒋华芳,周虹. 中文版童年不良经历问卷在学龄前儿童父母中应用的信效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(3): 408-414.
[2] 谢晓炜,李芬,凌光辉,谢希,许素清,陈谊月. 痛风患者健康教育知识知晓度测量问卷的研制及临床应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(4): 699-704.
[3] 秦东亮，金宪宁，王世娟，王菁菁，娜扎开提·买买提，王富江，王莹，申梓安，盛立刚，Mikael Forsman，杨丽云，王生，张忠彬，何丽华. 作业人员姿势负荷评价信效度分析及与肌肉骨骼疾患关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(3): 488-494.
[4] 高明月, 杨珉, 况伟宏, 邱培媛. 简易精神状态量表得分的影响因素和正常值的筛查效度评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2015, 47(3): 443-449.
[5] 郑迎东, 石建辉, 曹若湘. 中国居民健康素养调查问卷的验证性因子分析及其应用初探[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2010, 42(3): 314-317.
Viewed
Full text
847
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 34 0 0 813

  From Others local
  Times 390 457
  Rate 46% 54%

Abstract
1164
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 1164
  From Others local
  Times 1156 8
  Rate 99% 1%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
ISSN 1671-167X
CN 11-4691/R
主管单位：中华人民共和国教育部
主办单位：北京大学
地址： 北京市海淀区学院路38号 北京大学医学部 《北京大学学报（医学版）》
邮编：100191
电话：010-82801551
Email： xbbjb2@bjmu.edu.cn

《北京大学学报（医学版）》
微信公众号
版权所有 © 2018 《北京大学学报（医学版）》编辑部