北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (3): 490-497. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.03.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

久坐行为与体育锻炼行为对职业人群焦虑倾向的联合作用

刘熠华,云青萍,张蓝超,张晓悦,林郁婷,刘芳静,郑志杰,常春*()   

  1. 北京大学公共卫生学院社会医学与健康教育系, 北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2022-02-10 出版日期:2022-06-18 发布日期:2022-06-14
  • 通讯作者: 常春 E-mail:changchun@bjmu.edu.cn

Joint association of sedentary behavior and physical activity on anxiety tendency among occupational population in China

Yi-hua LIU,Qing-ping YUN,Lan-chao ZHANG,Xiao-yue ZHANG,Yu-ting LIN,Fang-jing LIU,Zhi-jie ZHENG,Chun CHANG*()   

  1. Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2022-02-10 Online:2022-06-18 Published:2022-06-14
  • Contact: Chun CHANG E-mail:changchun@bjmu.edu.cn

摘要:

目的: 探讨国内职业人群焦虑倾向现况,分析久坐行为和体育锻炼行为二者联合作用对焦虑倾向的影响。方法: 基于2021年亚洲最佳职场(中国大陆地区)的调查数据,使用广泛性焦虑障碍量表评估员工的焦虑倾向,采用Logistic回归方程分析久坐和体育锻炼对焦虑倾向的联合影响并计算不同组别之间的优势比(odds ratio, OR)。结果: 共纳入11 903名企业员工,平均年龄32.9岁;其中3 562名员工存在焦虑倾向,检出率为29.9%;40岁以下人群焦虑倾向率(30.6%)高于40岁以上人群(26.7%),两者差异有统计学意义。过去一周平均每日静坐时间为9.4 h,静坐时间超过8 h界定为久坐,久坐的比例达到76.3%。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,吸烟(OR=1.24,95%CI:1.23~1.39)、更长的静坐时间和更低的体育锻炼水平是员工出现焦虑倾向的危险因素,平均每日更久的睡眠时间(OR=0.56,95%CI:0.51~0.61)是其保护因素。将体育锻炼行为和静坐行为分别进行联合相关性分析和分层分析,结果显示静坐时间增加与体育锻炼水平减少相结合会导致焦虑倾向风险的显著增加,随着体育锻炼水平的增加,静坐时间作为焦虑倾向危险因素的阈值逐渐下降。结论: 本次调查职业人群焦虑倾向的检出率较高且久坐行为严重,缺乏体育锻炼与久坐行为均是焦虑倾向的独立危险因素,加强体育锻炼可以在一定程度上弥补久坐行为对焦虑倾向带来的危害。

关键词: 焦虑, 职业群体, 久坐生活方式, 体育运动

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the status and influencing factors of anxiety tendency among occupational population in China and to examine the joint association between sedentary behavior and physical activity with anxiety tendency. Methods: The data were from the 2021 Asia Best Workplace (Chinese mainland) program. The Generalized Anxiety Tendency scale was used to assess employees' anxiety status, and Logistic regression was used to analyze the factors influencing anxiety tendency and calculate the odds ratio (OR) within different groups. The OR of sitting for each sitting-physical activity (PA) combination group and within PA strata were calculated to explore the joint association. Results: A total of 11 903 workers with an average age of 32.9 years were included in this study. Among them, 3 562 workers had anxiety tendency (29.9%) and the prevalence of those under 40 years old (30.6%) was significantly higher than the other age group (26.7%). 41.0% of the respondents had the moderated to vigorous physical activity. Their average daily sitting time was 9.4 h, and the percentage of those who exceeded 8 h sitting reached 73.9% in the past week. The analysis of Logistic regression showed that smoking (OR=1.24, 95%CI: 1.23-1.39), longer sedentary time and lower physical activity level were risk factors for anxiety tendency, and longer average daily sleep time (OR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.51-0.61) was a protective factor. The joint association analysis and stratified analysis of physical activity and sedentary behavior with anxiety tendency showed that increased sedentary time combined with decreased physical activity intensity was significantly associated with increased risk of anxiety tendency (range of OR: 1.64-3.14). The threshold for sedentary time in total as a risk factor for anxiety tendency gradually decreased as physical activity intensity increased. Conclusion: The anxiety tendency and sedentary behavior among the occupational population should recieve more attention. Lack of physical activity and sedentary behavior are both risk factors for anxiety tendency, and strengthening the intensity of physical activity can attenuate the harmful effects of sedentary behavior on anxiety tendency.

Key words: Anxiety, Occupational groups, Sedentary lifestyle, Physical activity

中图分类号: 

  • R131

表1

员工基本情况与焦虑倾向现况"

Items n (%) Anxiety
n (%) P
Gender
  Male 5 643 (47.4) 1 662 (29.5)
  Female 6 260 (52.6) 1 900 (30.4)
Age/years
  ≥40 2 071 (17.4) 522 (26.7) < 0.01
   < 40 8 832 (82.6) 3 010 (30.6)
Education level
  College degree and below 3 637 (30.6) 1 008 (27.7)
  Undergraduate and above 8 266 (69.4) 2 554 (30.9)
Occupation
  Office workers 6 746 (56.7) 2 074 (30.7)
  Production operator 1 632 (13.7) 419 (25.7) < 0.01
  Technical workers 1 923 (16.2) 536 (27.9) < 0.05
  Others 1 602 (13.5) 533 (33.3) < 0.05
Positions
  General staff 8 464 (71.1) 2 517 (29.7)
  Management 3 439 (28.9) 1 045 (30.4)
BMI
  Normal 8 477 (71.3) 2 503 (29.5)
  Overweight 2 706 (22.7) 840 (31.0)
  Obesity 714 (6.0) 217 (30.4)
Average daily sitting time
  ≥8 h 9 083 (76.3) 2 839 (25.6) < 0.01
   < 8 h 2 820 (23.7) 723 (31.3)
Average daily sleep time
  ≤7 h 3 616 (30.4) 1 414 (39.1) < 0.01
  >7 h 8 287 (69.6) 2 148 (25.9)
Physical exercise
  Low 7 025 (59.0) 2 399 (34.1)
  Moderate 2 799 (23.5) 702 (25.1) < 0.01
  High 2 079 (17.5) 461 (22.2) < 0.01
Smoking
  No 9 682 (81.3) 2 829 (29.2) < 0.01
  Yes 2 221 (18.7) 733 (33.0)
Total 11 903 (100.0) 3 562 (29.9)

表2

不同特征职业人群静坐时间比较"

Items Work sitting time/h, ${\bar x}$±s Leisure sitting time/h, ${\bar x}$±s Transportation time/h, ${\bar x}$±s Percentage of SB (≥8 h in total), n (%)
Gender
  Male 5.21±3.13 2.01±1.48 1.24±1.15 3 492 (61.9)**
  Female 6.95±2.33 2.16±1.57 1.16±0.96 5 303 (84.7)
Age/years
  ≥40 6.14±2.91 2.12±1.56 1.19±1.05 8 233 (74.1)
   < 40 6.06±2.70 1.97±1.38 1.26±1.06 562 (71.4)
Education level
  College degree and below 4.14±3.22 1.82±1.49 1.06±1.22 1 696 (46.6)**
  Undergraduate and above 7.00±2.20 2.21±1.53 1.26±0.97 7 099 (85.9)
Occupation
  Office workers 7.24±1.91 2.26±1.58 1.18±0.94 6 029 (89.4)
  Production operator 2.54±2.98 1.62±1.43 0.97±1.33 424 (26.0)**
  Technical workers 6.39±2.73 1.99±1.40 1.23±1.01 1 431 (74.4)**
  Others 4.77±2.81 1.98±1.42 1.45±1.19 911 (56.9)**
Positions
  General staff 6.08±3.00 2.13±1.56 1.18±1.09 6 199 (73.2)
  Management 6.25±2.53 2.00±1.45 1.23±0.98 2 596 (75.5)
BMI
  Normal 6.34±2.76 2.12±1.54 1.17±1.02 6 501 (76.7)
  Overweight 5.66±3.03 2.01±1.47 1.26±1.13 1 834 (67.8)**
  Obesity 5.35±3.19 2.09±1.61 1.34±1.21 456 (63.9)**
Average daily sleep time
  ≥8 h 6.15±2.80 2.07±1.53* 1.12±1.02* 6 182 (74.6)
   < 8 h 6.08±3.05 2.15±1.53 1.37±1.12 2 613 (72.3)
Physical exercise
  Low 6.15±3.03 2.08±1.57 1.22±1.08 5 143 (73.2)
  Moderate 6.21±2.63 2.09±1.46 1.19±1.02 2 141 (76.5)
  High 5.93±2.63 2.11±1.49 1.14±1.01 1 511 (72.7)
Smoking
  No 6.49±2.67 2.12±1.53 1.18±1.00 7 614 (78.6)**
  Yes 4.54±3.16 1.97±1.51 1.29±1.26 1 181 (53.2)
Total 6.13±2.87 2.09±1.53 1.20±1.06 8 795 (73.9)

表3

焦虑倾向影响因素的Logistic回归分析"

Variables β OR (95%CI) P
Age -0.01 0.99 (0.99-1.00) < 0.01
Occupation
  Production operator -0.18 0.84 (0.72-0.97) < 0.05
  Technical workers -0.10 0.90 (0.80-1.01)
  Others 0.12 1.13 (0.99-1.28)
  Office workers
Smoking
  Yes 0.22 1.24 (1.23-1.39) < 0.001
  No
Average daily sleep time
  ≥8 h -0.56 0.56 (0.51-0.61) < 0.001
   < 8 h
Average daily sitting time
  >12 h 0.80 2.22 (1.88-2.62) < 0.001
  >8 h 0.47 1.60 (1.36-1.90) < 0.001
  >4 h 0.34 1.41 (1.19-1.68) < 0.001
  ≤4 h
Physical exercise
  Low 0.54 1.77 (1.58-1.99) < 0.001
  Moderate 0.15 1.17 (1.02-1.33) 0.03
  High

图1

体育锻炼和总静坐时间与焦虑倾向的联合(A)和分层(B)相关性分析"

图2

体育锻炼和工作静坐时间与焦虑倾向的联合(A)和分层(B)相关性分析"

1 Charlson FJ , Baxter AJ , Cheng HG , et al. The burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in China and India: A systematic analysis of community representative epidemiological studies[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388 (10042): 376- 389.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30590-6
2 健康中国行动推进委员会. 健康中国行动(2019—2030年)[EB/OL]. (2019-07-15)[2020-11-20]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-07/15/content_5409694.htm.
3 Dewa C , Lesage A , Goering P , et al. Nature and prevalence of mental illness in the workplace[J]. Healthc Pap, 2004, 5 (2): 12- 25.
doi: 10.12927/hcpap..16820
4 Schuch FB , Vancampfort D , Firth J , et al. Physical activity and incident depression: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2018, 175 (7): 631- 648.
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17111194
5 Kandola A , Ashdown-franks G , Stubbs B , et al. The association between cardiorespiratory fitness and the incidence of common mental health disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Affect Disord, 2019, 257, 748- 757.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.088
6 Clemes SA , Oconnell SE , Edwardson CL . Office workers' objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity during and outside working hours[J]. J Occup Environ Med, 2014, 56 (3): 298- 303.
doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000101
7 Kroenke K , Spitzer RL , Williams JB , et al. Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2007, 146 (5): 317- 325.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004
8 Sedentary Behaviour Research Network . Standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours"[J]. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2012, 37 (3): 540- 542.
doi: 10.1139/h2012-024
9 Bartholomew LK , Markham CM , Ruiter RAC , et al. Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2016.
10 吕燕宇, 姜红如, 张兵, 等. 中国四省18~60岁职业人群抑郁情绪现状及其影响因素[J]. 环境与职业医学, 2020, 37 (5): 427- 432.
11 Richardson S , Mcneill A , Brose LS . Smoking and quitting beha-viours by mental health conditions in Great Britain (1993-2014)[J]. Addict Behav, 2019, 90, 14- 19.
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.10.011
12 姜学文, 鞠巍, 常春. 职业人群焦虑和抑郁状况与工作环境的通径分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33 (5): 375- 380.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.05.012
13 Patterson R , Mcnamara E , Tainio M , et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and dose response meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2018, 33 (9): 811- 829.
doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1
14 Park JH , Moon JH , Kim HJ , et al. Sedentary lifestyle: Overview of updated evidence of potential health risks[J]. Korean J Fam Med, 2020, 41 (6): 365- 373.
doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0165
15 艾磊, 罗维, 鹿琦, 等. 不同体型成年人在平躺、久坐、睡眠和运动状态下代谢当量与能耗的比较研究[J]. 成都体育学院学报, 2021, 47 (3): 106- 112.
16 Zhai L , Zhang Y , Zhang D . Sedentary behaviour and the risk of depression: A meta-analysis[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2015, 49 (11): 705- 709.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093613
17 Kraut R , Patterson M , Lundmark V , et al. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?[J]. Am Psychol, 1998, 53 (9): 1017- 1031.
doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
18 Spittaels H , Cauwenberghe EV , Verbestel V , et al. Objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity time across the lifespan: A cross-sectional study in four age groups[J]. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2012, 9, 149.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-149
19 Colley RC , Garriguet D , Janssen I , et al. The association between accelerometer-measured patterns of sedentary time and health risk in children and youth: Results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey[J]. BMC Public Health, 2013, 13, 200.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-200
20 Stamatakis E , Gale J , Bauman A , et al. Sitting time, physical activity, and risk of mortality in adults[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73 (16): 2062- 2072.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.031
[1] 王一帆,范稹,成姚斌,金月波,霍阳,何菁. 原发性干燥综合征患者睡眠障碍的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1063-1068.
[2] 耿研,宋志博,张晓慧,邓雪蓉,王昱,张卓莉. 银屑病关节炎抑郁和焦虑患病情况及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(6): 1048-1055.
[3] 易端,朱薇,孟秀丽,刘晓光,李水清,祝斌,贾东林. 慢性腰腿痛患者微创术前焦虑,抑郁状态及相关影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(2): 285-289.
[4] 王天骄,刘宇,关明. 咪达唑仑联合丙泊酚靶控输注静脉镇静对拔除下颌第三磨牙患者焦虑水平的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(6): 1044-1049.
[5] 雷杰,刘木清,傅开元. 睡眠问题、焦虑及压力是颞下颌关节紊乱病肌筋膜疼痛发病的风险指标[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(4): 692-696.
[6] 程兰,李钦,宋逸,马军,王海俊. 中国9~11岁小学生体育锻炼、静态行为和#br# 超重与肥胖的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(3): 436-441.
[7] 韦冬梅, 吴丽晶, 高爱钰, 李钦, 程兰, 王海俊. 儿童视屏行为和家庭相关因素与儿童体重指数的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(3): 390-394.
[8] 张红梅, 夏斌, 王建红, 陈小贤, 葛立宏. 全身麻醉和束缚牙科治疗对不合作患儿牙科焦虑水平的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 134-139.
[9] 张凯, 贺利军, 虞巍,王弋, 白文俊, 王晓峰, 朱积川, 金杰, 那彦群 . 22~50岁中国人精神心理健康状况与下尿路症状及阴茎勃起功能障碍的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(4): 609-.
[10] 汤淑女, 简伟研. 中国就业人群慢性病的社会决定因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2013, 45(03): 443-447.
[11] 宋逸, 张芯, 杨土保, 张冰, 董彬, 马军. 2010年全国中小学生体育锻炼行为现状及原因分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(3): 347-354.
[12] 刘童童, 王生, 何丽华, 叶康平, 许迎春, 张菲若 . 工频磁场慢性暴露对大鼠神经行为的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(3): 351-355.
[13] 葛立宏. 儿童口腔科治疗中的焦虑和疼痛控制[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(1): 6-9.
[14] 韩雪莲, 徐民, 许德义. 胸腺五肽减轻慢性乙醇摄取小鼠的戒断症状[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2005, 37(6): 641-644.
[15] 郑瑞茂, 邹长江, 祝世功. 中枢IL-1β参与新奇应激大鼠的运动行为调控[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2004, 36(3): 244-247.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张三. 中文标题测试[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2010, 42(1): 1 -10 .
[2] 田增民, 陈涛, Nanbert ZHONG, 李志超, 尹丰, 刘爽. 神经干细胞移植治疗遗传性小脑萎缩的临床研究(英文稿)[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(4): 456 -458 .
[3] 郭岩, 谢铮. 用一代人时间弥合差距——健康社会决定因素理论及其国际经验[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 125 -128 .
[4] 成刚, 钱振华, 胡军. 艾滋病项目自愿咨询检测的技术效率分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 135 -140 .
[5] 卢恬, 朱晓辉, 柳世庆, 郑杰, 邱晓彦. 白细胞介素2促进宫颈癌细胞系HeLaS3免疫球蛋白G的表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 158 -161 .
[6] 赵磊, 王天龙 . 右心室舒张末期容量监测用于肝移植术中容量管理的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 188 -191 .
[7] 袁惠燕, 张苑, 范田园. 离子交换型栓塞微球及其载平阳霉素的制备与性质研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(2): 217 -220 .
[8] 徐莉, 孟焕新, 张立, 陈智滨, 冯向辉, 释栋. 侵袭性牙周炎患者血清中抗牙龈卟啉单胞菌的IgG抗体水平的研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(1): 52 -55 .
[9] 董稳, 刘瑞昌, 刘克英, 关明, 杨旭东. 氯诺昔康和舒芬太尼用于颌面外科术后自控静脉镇痛的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(1): 109 -111 .
[10] 祁琨, 邓芙蓉, 郭新彪. 纳米二氧化钛颗粒对人肺成纤维细胞缝隙连接通讯的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2009, 41(3): 297 -301 .