抗内皮细胞抗体检测在早期流产中的预测价值

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.06.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 探讨抗内皮细胞抗体(anti-endothelial cell antibodies, AECA)预测早期流产的临床意义。方法: 选取2020年1月至2022年12月于北京大学人民医院进行产检并完善AECA的无自身免疫病史孕妇122例。根据早期流产史(流产时孕周＜12周)，将研究对象分为早期流产组和对照组，采用t检验、非参数Wilcoxon检验、Chi-square检验、Fisher确切概率法比较两组一般资料和实验室指标，多因素Logistic回归模型分析早期流产的相关因素。随访孕妇的自然流产情况，Kaplan-Meier生存分析比较AECA阳性和AECA阴性孕妇的自然流产率。结果: (1) 共纳入122例孕妇，其中早期流产组35例(28.7%)，平均年龄(32.1±6.1)岁；对照组87例(71.3%)，平均年龄(30.7±5.1)岁。早期流产组有更多的妊娠次数[3 (2, 4) vs. 1 (1, 2), Z=-6.402, P < 0.001]和高血压合并症(11.4% vs.1.1%, P=0.024)。早期流产组AECA的阳性率(34.3% vs. 8.0%, χ²=13.070, P < 0.001)和免疫球蛋白G升高的比例(17.1% vs. 4.6%, P=0.032)显著高于对照组。(2)多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示，妊娠次数增加(OR=4.149, 95%CI: 2.287~7.529, P < 0.001)、AECA阳性(OR=4.288, 95%CI: 1.157~15.893, P=0.029)、免疫球蛋白G升高(OR=6.177, 95%CI: 1.156~33.015, P=0.033)是早期流产的危险因素。(3)将122例孕妇分为AECA阳性组(19例)和AECA阴性组(103例)，生存分析显示，孕12周时AECA阳性组的胎儿生存率显著低于AECA阴性组(84.2% vs. 96.1%, P=0.035)。结论: 妊娠次数增加、AECA阳性及免疫球蛋白G升高是导致早期流产的显著危险因素；AECA的检测有助于预测早期流产，可以为改善妊娠结局提供依据。

关键词: 抗内皮细胞抗体, 早期流产, 危险因素

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the clinical significance of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) in predicting early miscarriage. Methods: A total of 122 pregnant women with no history of autoimmune diseases who underwent prenatal examination at Peking University People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected, and they were tested for AECA. Based on the history of early miscarriage (gestational age at miscarriage < 12 weeks), the participants were divided into an early miscarriage group and a control group. t-tests, non-parametric Wilcoxon tests, Chi-square tests, and Fisher's exact probability method were used to compare general information and laboratory indicators between the two groups. A multivariate Logistic regression model was used to analyze the factors associated with early miscarriage. The natural miscarriage rates were assessed through follow-up with pregnant women, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to compare the natural miscarriage rates between AECA-positive and AECA-negative pregnant women. Results: (1) A total of 122 pregnant women were enrolled, comprising 35 cases (28.7%) in the early miscarriage group, with an average age of (32.1±6.1) years, and 87 cases (71.3%) in the control group, with an average age of (30.7±5.1) years. The early miscarriage group had higher gravidity [3 (2, 4) vs. 1 (1, 2), Z=-6.402, P < 0.001] and a higher prevalence of hypertension (11.4% vs.1.1%, P=0.024). The positive rate of AECA in the early miscarriage group (34.3% vs. 8.0%, χ²=13.070, P < 0.001) and the proportion of elevated immunoglobulin G (17.1% vs. 4.6%, P=0.032) were significantly higher than that in the control group. (2) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher gravidity (OR=4.149, 95%CI: 2.287-7.529, P < 0.001), AECA positivity (OR= 4.288, 95% CI: 1.157-15.893, P=0.029), and elevated immunoglobulin G levels (OR =6.177, 95%CI: 1.156-33.015, P=0.033) were risk factors for early miscarriage. (3) The 122 pregnant women were categorized into two groups: the AECA-positive group (19 cases) and the AECA-negative group (103 cases). Survival analysis demonstrated that at the end of 12 weeks of gestation, the fetal survival rate in the AECA-positive group was significantly lower than that in the AECA-negative group (84.2% vs. 96.1%, P= 0.035). Conclusion: Higher gravidity, AECA positivity, and elevated immunoglobulin G levels are significant risk factors for early miscarriage. The results demonstrate that AECA is a novel predicting test in early miscarriage.

Key words: Anti-endothelial cell antibodies, Early miscarriage, Risk factors

中图分类号:

R593.2

罗靓,李云,王红彦,相晓红,赵静,孙峰,张晓盈,贾汝琳,李春. 抗内皮细胞抗体检测在早期流产中的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1039-1044.

Liang LUO,Yun LI,Hong-yan WANG,Xiao-hong XIANG,Jing ZHAO,Feng SUN,Xiao-ying ZHANG,Ru-lin JIA,Chun LI. Anti-endothelial cell antibodies in predicting early miscarriage[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2023, 55(6): 1039-1044.

图/表 4

表1

表2

表3

图1

参考文献 26

1	Madendag IC , Sahin ME , Madendag Y , et al. Evaluation of the levels of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor in the cervical mucus of women with unexplained infertility[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46 (7): 1128- 1132. doi: 10.1111/jog.14299
2	Yang XL , Chen F , Yang XY , et al. Efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin on the outcomes of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy in non-thrombophilic women: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2018, 97 (9): 1061- 1072. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13359
3	Quenby S , Gallos ID , Dhillon-Smith RK , et al. Miscarriage matters: The epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397 (10285): 1658- 1667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6
4	Jiang L , Xu X , Cao Z , et al. Comparison of frozen embryo transfer outcomes between uterine infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and growth hormone application in patients with thin endometrium: A retrospective study[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12, 725202. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.725202
5	Qu P , Yan M , Zhao D , et al. Association between pre-pregnancy body mass index and miscarriage in an assisted reproductive technology population: A 10-year cohort study[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12, 646162. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.646162
6	Shankarkumar U , Pradhan VD , Patwardhan MM , et al. Autoantibody profile and other immunological parameters in recurrent spontaneous abortion patients[J]. Niger Med J, 2011, 52 (3): 163- 166. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.86126
7	Lindqvist KJ , Osterland CK . Human antibodies to vascular endothelium[J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 1971, 9 (6): 753- 760.
8	Alessandri C , Bombardieri M , Valesini G . Pathogenic mechanisms of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA): Their prevalence and clinical relevance[J]. Adv Clin Chem, 2006, 42, 297- 326.
9	杜欣莹, 管立学, 王美, 等. 血清抗内皮细胞抗体定量分析与复发性自然流产相关性研究[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2009, 17 (6): 23- 25.
10	Cacciola R , Gentilini Cacciola E , Vecchio V , et al. Impact of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) in patients with polycythemia vera and thrombosis[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2022, 12 (5): 1077. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051077
11	Roussev RG , Stern JJ , Kaider BD . Anti-endothelial cell antibo-dies: Another cause for pregnancy loss?[J]. Am J Reprod Immunol, 1998, 39 (2): 89- 95. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1998.tb00340.x
12	蒋莎, 李娜, 张杨, 等. Toll样受体4通过调节性T细胞引起不明原因复发性流产的机制研究进展[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2018, 38 (10): 6.
13	Zilla P , von Oppell U , Deutsch M . The endothelium: A key to the future[J]. J Card Surg, 1993, 8 (1): 32- 60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.1993.tb00574.x
14	Youinou P , Le Dantec C , Bendaoud B , et al. Endothelium, a target for immune-mediated assault in connective tissue disease[J]. Autoimmun Rev, 2006, 5 (3): 222- 228. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2005.06.012
15	张梦莹, 李志, 吕坤, 等. 系统性红斑狼疮患者血清抗内皮细胞抗体和抗β2糖蛋白Ⅰ抗体水平及其对人脐静脉内皮细胞增殖的影响[J]. 中国临床药理学与治疗学, 2013, 18 (2): 142- 146.
16	Hussain M , Chen P , Zhang Y , et al. Moesin expression is correlated with its involvement in patients with Behcet' s disease[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2020, 16 (4): 924- 930.
17	Mutoh T , Shirai T , Ishii T , et al. Identification of two major autoantigens negatively regulating endothelial activation in Takayasu arteritis[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11 (1): 1253.
18	Meyer O , Kaiser P , Haim T , et al. Anti-vascular endothelial cell antibodies (AECA): Comparison of two assay methods and clinical applications[J]. Rev Rhum Engl Ed, 1995, 62 (11): 737- 747.
19	Blank M , Krause I , Goldkorn T , et al. Monoclonal anti-endothe-lial cell antibodies from a patient with Takayasu arteritis activate endothelial cells from large vessels[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 1999, 42 (7): 1421- 1432.
20	Thomas AM , Gerogianni A , McAdam MB , et al. Complement component C5 and TLR molecule CD14 mediate heme-induced thromboinflammation in human blood[J]. J Immunol, 2019, 203 (6): 1571- 1578.
21	Belizna C , Duijvestijn A , Hamidou M , et al. Antiendothelial cell antibodies in vasculitis and connective tissue disease[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2006, 65 (12): 1545- 1550.
22	母洪洪, 张湘燕, 张程. 抗内皮细胞抗体检测临床应用研究进展[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2020, 36 (30): 374- 376.
23	Akhtar MA , Agrawal R , Brown J , et al. Thyroxine replacement for subfertile women with euthyroid autoimmune thyroid disease or subclinical hypothyroidism[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2019, 6 (6): CD011009.
24	Arachchillage D , Pericleous C . Evolution of antiphospholipid syndrome[J]. Semin Thromb Hemost, 2023, 49 (3): 295- 304.
25	Poorolajal J , Cheraghi P , Cheraghi Z , et al. Predictors of miscarriage: A matched case-control study[J]. Epidemiol Health, 2014, 36, e2014031.
26	Walter K . Early pregnancy loss[J]. JAMA, 2023, 329 (16): 1426.

相关文章 15

[1]	魏慧, 张警丰, 姚中强, 赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎合并慢性病贫血患者的临床特征及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 307-312.
[2]	赵杰, 付春, 赵秀娟, 薛海岩, 李纾, 王振洲, 朱凤雪. 胸部创伤患者在重症监护病房内发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 351-358.
[3]	郭芷均, 俎明, 马超, 张贺军, 张静, 丁士刚. 同时性多发早期胃癌漏诊病灶的临床病理特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 410-415.
[4]	李博闻, 张强, 孙益鑫. 儿童及青年漏斗胸患者Nuss术后发生脊柱侧弯的风险预测模型建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 941-946.
[5]	杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[6]	刘伟, 郭稳, 过哲, 李春艳, 李云龙, 刘思奇, 张亮, 宋慧. 痛风患者放射学阴性骨侵蚀的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(4): 735-739.
[7]	陆梦溪, 刘秋萍, 周恬静, 刘晓非, 孙烨祥, 沈鹏, 林鸿波, 唐迅, 高培. 基于社区人群队列的甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管病发病和死亡的关联[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 430-435.
[8]	杨龙傲, 金旭, 黄文初, 何丽华, 陈娟. 视屏作业人员视疲劳及干眼的流行病学调查[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 554-561.
[9]	郭华秋, 王哲, 杨雪, 白洁. 口腔急诊出血患者的临床特征与危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 142-147.
[10]	邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[11]	李钰锴, 王红彦, 罗靓, 李云, 李春. 抗磷脂抗体在白塞病合并血栓中的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1036-1040.
[12]	田杨, 韩永正, 李娇, 王明亚, 曲音音, 房景超, 金辉, 李民, 王军, 徐懋, 王圣林, 郭向阳. 颈椎前路手术后硬膜外血肿的发生率和危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1058-1064.
[13]	王明瑞, 赖金惠, 姬家祥, 唐鑫伟, 胡浩浦, 王起, 许克新, 徐涛, 胡浩. 使用中文版威斯康星结石生活质量问卷预测肾结石患者生活质量降低的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1069-1074.
[14]	李志存, 吴天俣, 梁磊, 范宇, 孟一森, 张骞. 穿刺活检单针阳性前列腺癌术后病理升级的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[15]	颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 589-593.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Variables	Early miscarriage group (n=35)	Control group (n=87)	Z/t/χ²	P
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s	32.1±6.1	30.7±5.1	-1.129	0.264
Age at first conception/years, ${\bar x}$±s	26.9±5.1	28.0±4.6	1.125	0.265
Number of pregnancies, M (P₂₅，P₇₅)	3 (2, 4)	1 (1, 2)	-6.402	< 0.001
Artificial insemination, n (%)	8 (22.9)	12 (13.8)	1.496	0.221
Hyperthyroidism, n (%)	0 (0)	1 (1.1)	N/A	>0.999
Hypothyroidism, n (%)	6 (17.1)	7 (8.0)	1.319	0.251
Hypertension, n (%)	4 (11.4)	1 (1.1)	N/A	0.024
Diabetes, n (%)	2 (5.7)	1 (1.1)	N/A	0.198
Hyperlipidemia, n (%)	0 (0)	2 (2.3)	N/A	>0.999
Uterine fibroids, n (%)	2 (5.7)	12 (13.8)	N/A	0.346
Malignant tumor, n (%)	4 (11.4)	2 (2.3)	N/A	0.056

Variables	Early miscarriage group (n=35)	Control group (n=87)	Z/t/χ²	P
WBC/(×10⁹/L), ${\bar x}$±s	8.3 ± 4.5	8.9 ± 4.2	0.663	0.510
HGB/(g/L), ${\bar x}$±s	108.7 ± 24.2	110.3± 23.1	0.339	0.736
PLT/ (×10⁹/L), ${\bar x}$±s	136.6 ± 89.3	171.3 ± 95.5	1.898	0.062
TG/(mmol/L)，${\bar x}$±s	2.7 ± 1.2	2.8 ± 1.9	0.384	0.702
HDL-C/(mmol/L), ${\bar x}$±s	1.6 ± 0.4	1.7 ± 0.5	1.383	0.171
LDL-C/(mmol/L), ${\bar x}$±s	3.1 ± 1.3	3.2 ± 1.0	0.211	0.834
T3/(μg/dL), ${\bar x}$±s	96.6 ± 48.4	121.0 ± 38.2	1.351	0.196
T4/(μg/dL), ${\bar x}$±s	8.6 ± 3.1	10.7 ± 3.7	1.582	0.128
ANA positive, n (%)	2 (5.7)	3 (3.4)	N/A	0.624
AECA positive, n (%)	12 (34.3)	7 (8.0)	13.070	< 0.001
Anti-SSA antibody positive, n (%)	3 (8.6)	2 (2.3)	N/A	0.142
Anti-SSB antibody positive, n (%)	2 (5.7)	0 (0)	N/A	0.081
Anti-dsDNA antibody positive, n (%)	0 (0)	1 (1.1)	N/A	>0.999
Anti-U1-RNP antibody positive, n (%)	1 (2.9)	0 (0)	N/A	0.287
Low C3, n (%)	4 (11.4)	8 (9.2)	N/A	0.741
Low C4, n (%)	7 (20.0)	17 (19.5)	0.003	0.954
Elevated IgA, n (%)	0 (0)	2 (2.3)	N/A	>0.999
Elevated IgG, n (%)	6 (17.1)	4 (4.6)	N/A	0.032
Elevated IgM, n (%)	1 (2.9)	3 (3.4)	N/A	>0.999
D-dimer/(μg/L), M (P₂₅，P₇₅)	412.5 (207.5, 791.0)	588.0 (346.0, 1138.8)	-0.726	0.468

Variables	Univariate					Multivariate
Variables	B	Wald	P	OR	95%CI	B	Wald	P	OR	95%CI
Number of pregnancies	1.432	25.573	< 0.001	4.188	2.404-7.295	1.423	21.906	< 0.001	4.149	2.287-7.529
Hypertension	2.407	4.476	0.034	11.097	1.194-103.141
PLT/(×10⁹/L)	-0.004	3.288	0.070	0.996	0.992-1.000
AECA positive	1.786	11.292	0.001	5.963	2.105-16.889	1.456	4.743	0.029	4.288	1.157-15.893
Elevated IgG	1.457	4.583	0.032	4.293	1.131-16.296	1.821	4.534	0.033	6.177	1.156-33.015