无牙颌患者鼻唇角变化侧面观的视觉敏感阈值

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.017

北京大学学报（医学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 107-112. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.017

无牙颌患者鼻唇角变化侧面观的视觉敏感阈值

游浪¹,邓珂慧²,李伟伟²,赵一姣^2,^△(),孙玉春^2,^△(),周永胜¹

1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院, 修复科, 北京　100081
2. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,口腔医学数字化研究中心　国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京　100081

收稿日期:2019-10-09 出版日期:2020-02-18 发布日期:2020-02-20
通讯作者: 赵一姣,孙玉春 E-mail:kqcadcs@bjmu.edu.cn;polarshining@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFP1106900);北京大学口腔医院临床新技术新疗法(PKUSSNCT-18G01);首都卫生发展科研专项(2018-2-4103)

Visual sensitivity threshold of lateral view of nasolabial Angle changes in edentulous jaw patients

Lang YOU¹,Ke-hui DENG²,Wei-wei LI²,Yi-jiao ZHAO^2,^△(),Yu-chun SUN^2,^△(),Yong-sheng ZHOU¹

1. Center of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & Department of Prosthodontics, Beijing 100081, China
2. Center of Digital Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2019-10-09 Online:2020-02-18 Published:2020-02-20
Contact: Yi-jiao ZHAO,Yu-chun SUN E-mail:kqcadcs@bjmu.edu.cn;polarshining@163.com
Supported by:
Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2018YFP1106900);the Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-18G01);the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research(2018-2-4103)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的:研究医师肉眼对无牙颌患者鼻唇角差异侧面观的视觉敏感阈值,明确人眼可有效识别的鼻唇角差异大小,以期为软组织侧貌审美评价相关研究提供人眼可识别的鼻唇角差异的参考值。方法:获取3名无牙颌患者戴入不同唇部支撑诊断义齿的面部三维数据,对患者的面部三维数据进行同比例侧面截图,以口腔修复科医师(主任医师)和患者肉眼观察双重确认的合适唇丰满度时的侧面截图为参照图片,将其他侧面截图分别与之组合成组,由受试者以随机顺序观察。选择15名口腔医师作为受试者观察每组图片的鼻唇角差异情况,测量计算每组两张图片的鼻唇角差值。实验结果绘制成受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,使用SPSS 20.0统计软件及约登(Youden)指数计算最佳截断值作为医师肉眼对无牙颌患者鼻唇角差异侧面观的视觉敏感阈值。结果:15名受试者数据分别绘制ROC曲线,其中最佳截断值最大者为5.55°,最小者为3.12°。数据汇总后绘制整体受试者工作特征曲线,其最佳截断值为5.36°(AUC=0.84>0.5, P=0.000<0.05)。当图片的鼻唇角差异在5.36°以上时,受试者能够有效识别。结论:人对鼻唇角变化量的视觉感知存在极限,研究得出了5.36°的鼻唇角差异侧面观的视觉敏感阈值。低于此值的鼻唇角差异可能无临床意义,此结果为软组织侧貌审美评价提供了人眼可识别的鼻唇角变化量阈值的参考值,可应用于软组织侧貌的美学评估,以及作为以鼻唇角为指标进行精度评价的相关研究的误差等级。

关键词: 无牙颌, 打印, 三维, 美学, 计算机辅助设计, 图像, 三维

Abstract:

Objective: To study the visual sensitivity threshold of physician’s naked eye to the difference of nasolabial angle in edentulous jaw patients, and to provide a reference value for the study of aesthetic evaluation of soft tissue profile for the difference of nasolabial angle that can be recognized by human eyes. Methods: Three-dimensional facial images of three edentulous patients with different diagnostic dentures intro-oral were obtained.Lateral screenshots of each patient’s three-dimensional facial image with the same scale were obtained by using reverse engineering software (Geomagic studio 2014).The screenshot of the patient’s three-dimensional facial image with suitable lip support (The suitable lip support was confirmed by both patients and prosthodontists who had clinical experience for more than 20 years) was taken as the reference picture, and the remaining pictures were grouped with it respectively. All the pictures were observed in random order by the subjects. Fifteen dentists were asked to judge the difference of nasolabial angle between the two pictures of each group on the computer screen. The difference of nasolabial angle between the two pictures in each group was measured and calculated. The ROC curve was drawn, and the best cut-off value was calculated as the visual sensitivity threshold. Results: The data of the 15 subjects were used to draw ROC curves separately. The maximum and minimum best cut-off values were 5.55 degrees and 3.12 degrees respectively. The ROC curve of the whole 15 subjects was drawn after data aggregation, and the best cut-off value was 5.36 degrees (AUC=0.84>0.5, P=0.000<0.05).When the difference of nasolabial angle was above 5.36 degrees, the subjects could recognize it effectively. Conclusion: There is a visual limit in the observation of the nasolabial angle with the naked eye. In this study, a visual sensitivity threshold of 5.36 degrees for the difference of the nasolabial angle was obtained. The difference of nasolabial angle below this value can be regarded as no clinical significance. This result provides a reference value for human eyes to recognize the difference of nasolabial angle in soft tissue profile aesthetic evaluation. It can be applied to the aesthetic evaluation of soft tissue profile and can be used as the error level of related research with nasolabial angle as an index for accuracy evaluation.

Key words: Jaw,edentulous, Printing, three-dimensional, Esthetics, Computer-aided design, Imaging, three-dimensional

中图分类号:

R783

游浪,邓珂慧,李伟伟,赵一姣,孙玉春,周永胜. 无牙颌患者鼻唇角变化侧面观的视觉敏感阈值[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(1): 107-112.

Lang YOU,Ke-hui DENG,Wei-wei LI,Yi-jiao ZHAO,Yu-chun SUN,Yong-sheng ZHOU. Visual sensitivity threshold of lateral view of nasolabial Angle changes in edentulous jaw patients[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2020, 52(1): 107-112.

图/表 4

图1

图2

图3

图4

参考文献 23

[1]	Harris R, Nagarkar P, Amirlak B . Varied definitions of nasolabial angle[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2016,4(6):e752.
[2]	徐安秀, 邓锋, 王芬芬 , 等. 鼻唇角改变对骨性Ⅰ类软组织侧貌影响的审美评价[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2015,33(5):492-496.
[3]	马玥, 任嫒姝, 付钢 , 等. 鼻唇角、颏唇角改变对骨性Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类患者面容影响的三维美学评价[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2017,33(5):647-652.
[4]	Desesa CR, Metzler P, Sawh-Martinez R , et al. Three-dimensional nasolabial morphologic alterations following Le Fort I[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open, 2016,4(8):e848.
[5]	Aniruddh YV, Ravi K, Edeinton A. Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class Ⅰ borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities[J]. Dental Press J Orthod, 2016,21(4):50-59.
[6]	Kamashita Y, Kamada Y, Kawahata N , et al. Influence of lip support on the soft-tissue profile of complete denture wearers[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2006,33(2):102-109.
[7]	Kaipatur NR, Flores-Mir C . Accuracy of computer programs in predicting orthognathic surgery soft tissue response[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009,67(4):751-759.
[8]	Raschke GF, Rieger UM, Bader RD , et al. Perioral aging: an anthropometric appraisal[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2014,42(5):e312-e317.
[9]	Sierpinska T, Golebiewska M, Kuc J , et al. The influence of the occlusal vertical dimension on masticatory muscle activities and hyoid bone position in complete denture wearers[J]. Adv Med Sci, 2009,54(1):104-108.
[10]	Krajicek DD . Guides for natural facial appearance as related to complete denture construction[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1969,21(6):654-662.
[11]	Coleman SR, Grover R . The anatomy of the aging face: volume loss and changes in 3-dimensional topography[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2006,26(Suppl 1):S4-S9.
[12]	Owens EG, Goodacre CJ, Loh PL , et al. A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: A comparison of extraoral parameters[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2002,15(3):273-282.
[13]	Yuan F, Cheng C, Dai N , et al. Prediction of aesthetic reconstruction effects in edentulous patients[J]. Sci Rep, 2017,7(1):18077.
[14]	Denes BJ, Bolton C, Illsley CS , et al. Notch coordinates periodontal ligament maturation through regulating lamin A[J]. J Dent Res, 2019,98(12):1357-1366.
[15]	Katase H, Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M , et al. Face simulation system for complete dentures by applying rapid prototyping[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013,109(6):353-360.
[16]	Schweiger J, Güth JF, Edelhoff D , et al. Virtual evaluation for cad-cam-fabricated complete dentures[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017,117(1):28-33.
[17]	Franco SGC, Libdy MR, Normando D . Scan time, reliability and accuracy of craniofacial measurements using a 3D light scanner[J]. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res, 2019,9(4):331-335.
[18]	Modabber A, Peters F, Kniha K , et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2016,44(10):1719-1724.
[19]	Grant CA, Johnston M, Adam CJ , et al. Accuracy of 3D surface scanners for clinical torso and spinal deformity assessment[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2019,63:63-71.
[20]	Li H, Lyu P, Sun Y , et al. A quantitative study of 3D-scanning frequency and Δd of tracking points on the tooth surface[J]. Sci Rep, 2015,5(2):14350.
[21]	萧宁, 王勇, 赵一姣 . 三维颜面部软组织正中矢状面确定方法的研究进展[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2018,53(7):495-499.
[22]	Lee JK, Jung PK, Moon CH . Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis[J]. Angle Orthod, 2014,84(1):38-47.
[23]	Nur RB, Çakan DG, Arun T . Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2016,149(2):225-237.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

无牙颌患者鼻唇角变化侧面观的视觉敏感阈值

Visual sensitivity threshold of lateral view of nasolabial Angle changes in edentulous jaw patients

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 23

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘云松,周倜,叶红强. 前牙美学修复的整体策略及细节剖析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 1-6.
[2]	刘思民,赵一姣,王晓燕,王祖华. 动态导航下不同深度环钻定位精确度的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 146-152.
[3]	李怡,王丽瑜,刘晓强,周倜,吕季喆,谭建国. 不同材料及厚度椅旁CAD/CAM瓷贴面的边缘特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 140-145.
[4]	邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[5]	孙玉春,郭雨晴,陈虎,邓珂慧,李伟伟. 口腔精准仿生修复技术的自主创新研发与转化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 7-12.
[6]	杨刚,胡文杰,曹洁,柳登高. 牙周健康的上颌前牙唇侧嵴顶上牙龈的三维形态分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 990-994.
[7]	邵振兴,宋庆法,赵宇晴,崔国庆. 一种结合线袢固定的关节镜下“嵌入式”喙突移位术:手术技术及术后影像学分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(5): 896-901.
[8]	李新飞, 彭意吉, 余霄腾, 熊盛炜, 程嗣达, 丁光璞, 杨昆霖, 唐琦, 米悦, 吴静云, 张鹏, 谢家馨, 郝瀚, 王鹤, 邱建星, 杨建, 李学松, 周利群. 肾部分切除术前CT三维可视化评估标准的初步探究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(3): 613-622.
[9]	陈迪,徐翔宇,汪明睿,李芮,臧根奥,张悦,钱浩楠,闫光荣,范田园. 熔融沉积成型3D打印盐酸维拉帕米胃漂浮制剂的制备与体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 348-354.
[10]	黄新瑞,李莎,高嵩. 冷冻电镜成像中噪声的滤波方法进展[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(2): 425-433.
[11]	穆海丽,田福聪,王晓燕,高学军. 玻璃体和通用型复合树脂耐磨性的临床对照研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 120-125.
[12]	岳兆国,张海东,杨静文,侯建霞. 数字化评估CAD/CAM个性化基台与成品基台影响粘接剂残留的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 69-75.
[13]	徐啸翔,曹烨,赵一姣,贾璐,谢秋菲. 数字化个齿托盘制取下颌全牙列全冠预备体印模的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 54-61.
[14]	国丹妮,潘韶霞,衡墨笛,屈健,魏秀霞,周永胜. 应用于无牙颌种植修复设计的三维面部扫描配准方法的对比[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 83-87.
[15]	李思雨,段雪飞,曹烨. 应用超声器械改善预备体肩台的效果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2021, 53(1): 88-94.