6D治疗床辅助影像引导下放射治疗头颈部肿瘤摆位误差分析

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.06.024

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 评估锥形束CT (cone-beam CT, CBCT)引导下头颈部肿瘤调强放射治疗(intensity-modulated radiation therapy, IMRT)的分次内和分次间摆位偏差, 以及6D治疗床(HexaPOD evo RT 6D)对这些偏差的纠正能力和稳定性。方法: 选择北京大学第三医院肿瘤放疗科2019年5月至2022年4月头颈部肿瘤患者的病例资料进行回顾性分析, 利用医科达公司AXESSE医用直线加速器进行前置CBCT扫描, 通过骨窗模式与计划参考影像进行配准, 自动或手动调整6D治疗床以校准偏差, 随后进行第二次CBCT扫描以确认偏差校正。通过比较校正前后的配准结果, 记录患者在平移(X、Y、Z方向)和旋转(Rx、Ry、Rz方向)上的摆位误差, 并对分次间及分次内的摆位误差进行分析。结果: 在连续入组59例患者的506次CBCT扫描中, 成功获取并在线校正了6D治疗床的摆位误差数据, 校正前后摆位误差的最大值分别为0.90 cm与0.04 cm (X方向)、1.74 cm与0.09 cm (Y方向)、1.80 cm与0.09 cm (Z方向), 以及2.90°与0.14°(Rx方向)、3.00°与0.15°(Ry方向)、3.00°与0.15°(Rz方向)。在线校正明显减小了各方向上的平均摆位误差, 平移误差(X、Y、Z方向)和旋转误差(Rx、Ry、Rz方向)的平均值分别从0.18 cm、0.22 cm、0.25 cm和0.82°、1.11°、0.73°减少至0.01 cm、0.01 cm、0.01 cm和0.04°、0.06°、0.04°(P均 < 0.001)。校正后, 在X、Y、Z方向上平移误差小于0.10 cm的频率分别达到99.60%、98.62%、95.45%, 旋转误差小于0.20°的频率均达到或超过99.80%。结论: 结合CBCT和6D治疗床的在线校正显著降低了头颈部放疗患者的平移和旋转摆位误差, 极大提高了治疗的精准度。

关键词: 放射治疗, 头颈部肿瘤, 影像引导, 摆位误差, 6D治疗床

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the intra-fraction and inter-fraction positional deviations in head and neck tumor patients undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) guided by cone-beam CT (CBCT), as well as the correction capability and stability of the HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch in addressing these deviations. Methods: From May 2019 to April 2022, 59 consecutive patients with head and neck tumors were enrolled at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital.Using the Elekta AXESSE image-guided stereotactic treatment system, a pre-treatment CBCT scan was performed, followed by bone window mode registration with the planning reference images.Deviations were corrected automatically or manually on the 6D couch, followed by a second CBCT scan for confirmation of the deviation correction.Positional errors in translation (X, Y, Z directions) and rotation (Rx, Ry, Rz directions) were recorded before and after correction, and intra-fraction and inter-fraction positional errors were analyzed. Results: Positional error data before and after correction of the 6D couch were successfully obtained and corrected online in 506 CBCT scans.The maximum positional errors before and after correction were 0.90 cm to 0.04 cm (X direction), 1.74 cm to 0.09 cm (Y direction), 1.80 cm to 0.09 cm (Z direction), and 2.90° to 0.14°(Rx direction), 3.00° to 0.15°(Ry direction), 3.00° to 0.15°(Rz direction), respectively.The mean absolute values of translational (X, Y, Z directions) and rotational (Rx, Ry, Rz directions) errors significantly decreased after online correction, from 0.18 cm, 0.22 cm, 0.25 cm, and 0.82°, 1.11°, 0.73° to 0.01 cm, 0.01 cm, 0.01 cm, and 0.04°, 0.06°, 0.04°(all P values < 0.001).After correction, the frequencies of translational errors less than 0.10 cm in the X, Y, Z directions were 99.60%, 98.62%, and 95.45%, respectively, and the frequencies of rotational errors less than 0.2° were all above 99.80%. Conclusion: Online correction combined with CBCT and the 6D couch significantly reduces both translational and rotational positional errors in patients undergoing head and neck radiation therapy, greatly enhancing the precision of treatment.

Key words: Radiation therapy, Head and neck tumors, Image guidance, Positional error, Six-dimensional couch

中图分类号:

R730.55

田素青, 孙海涛, 赵田地, 王巍. 6D治疗床辅助影像引导下放射治疗头颈部肿瘤摆位误差分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1097-1100.

Suqing TIAN, Haitao SUN, Tiandi ZHAO, Wei WANG. Analysis of positioning errors in head and neck cancers during radiotherapy assisted by the 6D treatment couch and image-guided radiation therapy[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2024, 56(6): 1097-1100.

图/表 4

表1

图1

图2

图3

参考文献 14

1	中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会, 中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会. 中国头颈部肿瘤放射治疗指南(2021年版)[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49 (2): 65- 72.
2	Alfouzan AF . Radiation therapy in head and neck cancer[J]. Saudi Med J, 2021, 42 (3): 247- 254. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.3.20210660
3	Abshire D , Lang MK . The evolution of radiation therapy in treating cancer[J]. Semin Oncol Nurs, 2018, 34 (2): 151- 157. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2018.03.006
4	Zhou J , Li S , Ye C , et al. Analysis of local setup errors of sub-regions in cone-beam CT-guided post-mastectomy radiation therapy[J]. Radiat Res, 2020, 61 (3): 457- 463. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraa007
5	Park J , Yea JW , Park JW , et al. Evaluation of the setup discrepancy between 6D ExacTrac and cone beam computed tomography in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16 (5): e0252234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252234
6	Hadj Henni A , Gensanne D , Roge M , et al. Evaluation of inter- and intra-fraction 6D motion for stereotactic body radiation therapy of spinal metastases: Influence of treatment time[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2021, 16 (1): 168. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01892-5
7	Fu W , Yang Y , Yue NJ , et al. Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments[J]. Med Dosim, 2013, 38 (2): 125- 132. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.09.003
8	曹倩倩, 朱丽红, 王俊杰, 等. 6D治疗床对原发宫颈癌放疗摆位误差及靶区边界的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, 95 (9): 689- 692.
9	姚丽红, 朱丽红, 王俊杰, 等. 6D治疗床联合锥形束CT引导下妇科肿瘤摆位误差及计划靶区外放边界研究[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2015, 35 (3): 206- 209.
10	江萍, 周舜, 王俊杰, 等. 影像引导下放射治疗脊柱肿瘤六自由度摆位误差分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47 (6): 952- 956. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.06.011
11	Zeidan OA , Langen KM , Meeks SL , et al. Evaluation of image-guidance protocols in the treatment of head and neck cancers[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007, 67 (3): 670- 677. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.040
12	Ohira S , Ueda Y , Nishiyama K , et al. Couch height-based patient setup for abdominal radiation therapy[J]. Med Dosim, 2016, 41 (1): 59- 63. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2015.08.003
13	Aristophanous M , Chi PM , Kao J , et al. Deep-inspiration breath-hold intensity modulated radiation therapy to the mediastinum for lymphoma patients: Setup uncertainties and margins[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2018, 100 (1): 254- 262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.036
14	Islam MK , Purdie TG , Norrlinger BD , et al. Patient dose from kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography imaging in radiation therapy[J]. Med Phys, 2006, 33 (6): 1573- 1582.

相关文章 15

[1]	彭圣嘉,祁雨,孙丽杰,李丹,王新宇,韩江莉,陈宝霞,张媛. 传入压力反射衰竭合并低钠血症1例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 357-361.
[2]	姜海红,李小凡,王建六. 宫颈癌慢性放射性肠炎与肠道微生物的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 619-624.
[3]	王皓,姜树坤,彭冉,黄毅,王明清,王俊杰,刘承,张帆,马潞林. 个体化尿量控制提高泌尿肿瘤放疗期间膀胱稳定性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2020, 52(4): 688-691.
[4]	王晶,陈俊鹏,王洋,许向亮,郭传瑸. 数字化下颌运动记录及咀嚼肌肌电图在下颌骨肿瘤患者口颌功能评价中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(3): 571-578.
[5]	李健男，冯芝恩，王琳，王衣祥，郭传瑸. 乏氧诱导因子-1α在口腔鳞状细胞癌颈淋巴转移中的作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(1): 26-32.
[6]	于尧, 章文博, 王洋, 刘筱菁, 郭传瑸, 俞光岩, 彭歆. iPlan CMF软件辅助下增强CT三维重建在头颈部肿瘤治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 878-882.
[7]	王威，郑磊，刘树铭，黄明伟，石妍，吕晓鸣，张杰，张建国. 单纯放射性粒子治疗后的头颈部腺源性癌远处转移[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 547-550.
[8]	郭福新，姜玉良，吉喆，彭冉，孙海涛，王俊杰. 3D打印非共面模板辅助CT引导125Ⅰ粒子植入治疗锁骨上复发转移癌的剂量学研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(3): 506-511.
[9]	江萍，周舜，王俊杰，杨瑞杰，刘子毅，姜树坤，王巍. 影像引导下放射治疗脊柱肿瘤六自由度摆位误差分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 952-956.
[10]	王庆国，李晓梅，张敏，李航，温冰，李洪振，高献书. 107例瘢痕疙瘩术后两种分割剂量放疗疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2014, 46(1): 169-172.
[11]	张杰, 郑磊, 刘树铭, 黄明伟, 高岩, 张祖燕, 张建国. 空心针穿刺活检在口腔颌面部肿瘤的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2012, 44(5): 801-803.
[12]	江萍, 马月, 王俊杰, 冉维强, 姜玉良, 曲昂. 超声引导放射性¹²⁵I粒子植入治疗头颈部复发肿瘤[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2012, 44(2): 291-294.
[13]	马长城, 王振宇, 于涛. C1-2哑铃型肿瘤的手术治疗[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(2): 301-303.
[14]	张杰, 郑磊, 黄明伟, 刘树铭, 贾凌飞, 石妍, 俞光岩, 张建国. 放射性粒子组织间植入治疗口腔颌面-头颈部腺源性恶性肿瘤近期疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2011, 43(2): 272-275.
[15]	武金玉, 陈敏华, 严昆, 张晖, 王惠莉, 霍苓, 杨薇, 宋一平. 超声引导射频消融术应用于治疗肝转移癌[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2001, 33(5): 449-451.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Project	X/cm	Y/cm	Z/cm	Rx/(°)	Ry/(°)	Rz/(°)
Before correction	0.18±0.16	0.22±0.19	0.25±0.25	0.82±0.70	1.11±0.83	0.73±0.64
After correction	0.01±0.01	0.01±0.01	0.01±0.01	0.04±0.04	0.06±0.04	0.04±0.03
t value	25.951	26.248	22.347	26.217	29.812	25.790
P value	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001