北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 474-482. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.03.020

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国未接受抗病毒治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合征(HIV/AIDS)人群HIV原发耐药的Meta分析

刘大锦,冯孟贤,刘民△   

  1. (北京大学公共卫生学院流行病与卫生统计学系,北京100191)
  • 出版日期:2015-06-18 发布日期:2015-06-18

Primary drug resistance of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)among the treatment-naive individuals with HIV in China: a meta-analysis

LIU Da-jin, FENG Meng-xian, LIU Min△   

  1. (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2015-06-18 Published:2015-06-18

摘要: 目的:了解中国未接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的人类免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合征(human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome,HIV/AIDS)人群HIV原发耐药水平。方法:检索5个数据库:《中国生物医学文献数据库》(Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, CBM)、《中国期刊全文数据库》(Chinese Journal Full-text Database, CNKI)、《中文科技期刊数据库-维普》(Chinese Science-Technology Journal Database, VIP)、万方数据知识服务平台及PubMed数据库,提取HIV耐药数据,使用随机效应模型对数据进行合并,对采样时间、采样地点、人群特征(平均年龄及感染状态)、样本量进行亚组分析。结果:共纳入76篇文献(中文46篇,英文30篇),中国未接受抗病毒治疗的HIV/AIDS人群HIV原发整体耐药率、非核苷类反转录酶抑制剂(non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor,NNRTI)耐药率、核苷类反转录酶抑制剂(nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor,NRTI)耐药率、蛋白酶抑制剂(protease inhibitor,PI)耐药率分别为4.7% (95%CI: 4.0%~5.4%)、2.3% (95%CI: 1.8%~2.8%)、1.8% (95%CI: 1.3%~2.3%)、1.4% (95%CI: 1.1%~1.8%)。上述4类耐药率均是2007年之前高于之后,且都存在显著地区差异(P<0.05),其中,中南及西南地区整体耐药率均高于5%。平均年龄、感染状态亚组中,组间差异较为复杂,其中小于25岁及新发、新确认组其整体耐药率低于25岁以上及非新发、新确认组。样本量<100的亚组,各耐药率均高于样本量≥100的亚组,且差异都有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中国HIV/AIDS人群HIV病毒原发总耐药率为4.7%,仍处于低流行状态,但已接近WHO提出的5%中度耐药警戒线,中南及西南地区整体耐药率已经超过该警戒线,应进一步加强监测。

关键词: 获得性免疫缺陷综合征, HIV感染, 抗HIV药, 抗药性, 病毒, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective:To estimate the prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance in treatment-naive individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in China. Methods: Five electronic databases [Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), Chinese ScienceTechnology Journal Database (VIP), Wanfang Data, and PubMed] were searched for studies of HIV drug resistance in untreated individuals. Drug resistance data were abstracted then pooled using the random effect model. Subgroup analysis was done across sampling time, location, study population (mean age and infection status), and sample size. Results: Seventy-six studies were included for our meta-analysis (46 in Chinese, 30 in English). The pooled rates of drug resistance to total, to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), and to protease inhibitor (PI) were 4.7% (95%CI:4.0%-5.4%), 2.3% (95%CI:1.8%-2.8%), 1.8% (95%CI:1.3%-2.3%), and 1.4% (95%CI:1.1%-1.8%), respectively. All the rates before 2007 were higher than those for 2008 or later. Meanwhile, significant differences were found in the sample areas (P<0.05), in which, the rates in South-central and Southwest were both higher than 5%. The difference was complex between mean age and infection status subgroup, and we found the total prevalence in the group under 25 years and the newly infected, and confirmed group was lower than in the others. For sample size, all the rates in the group under 100 samples were higher than in the others, and the difference was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The prevalence of HIV primary drug resistance in China was 4.7%, which stayed low, but was also close to the line set by WHO. Enhanced surveillance for drug resistance is necessary in high epidemic areas including the South-central and Southwest China whose prevalence has crossed the line.

Key words: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, HIV infections, Anti-HIV agents, Drug resistance,viral, Meta-analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R521.91

[1] 朱金荣,赵亚娜,黄巍,赵微微,王悦,王松,苏春燕. 感染新型冠状病毒的血液透析患者的临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 267-272.
[2] 刘鑫,石雪迎,李军. 新型冠状病毒感染相关缺血性结肠炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 362-365.
[3] 李建斌,吕梦娜,池强,彭一琳,刘鹏程,吴锐. 干燥综合征患者发生重症新型冠状病毒肺炎的早期预测[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1007-1012.
[4] 李辉,彭敏,武娇,张青霞,宁博涵,董颖. p16/Ki67细胞学双染在子宫颈癌前病变及宫颈癌筛查中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1144-1148.
[5] 赖金惠,王起,姬家祥,王明瑞,唐鑫伟,许克新,徐涛,胡浩. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间延迟拔除输尿管支架对泌尿系结石术后患者生活质量和心理状态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 857-864.
[6] 金银姬,孙琳,赵金霞,刘湘源. 血清IgA型抗鼠科肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B1抗体在类风湿关节炎中的意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 631-635.
[7] 林浩,李菁华,杨潇,陈晓婷,史宇晖,常春,郝元涛,曹望楠. 中国成都男男性行为人群HIV暴露前预防用药行为-认知偏差现状及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 511-520.
[8] 曹芳,钟明,刘从容. 宫体POLE突变型内膜样癌合并HPV感染相关性宫颈腺癌1例报道及文献回顾[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 370-374.
[9] 曹乐清,周婧睿,陈育红,陈欢,韩伟,陈瑶,张圆圆,闫晨华,程翼飞,莫晓冬,付海霞,韩婷婷,吕萌,孔军,孙于谦,王昱,许兰平,张晓辉,黄晓军. 异基因造血干细胞移植后晚发重症肺炎患者治疗与预后转归的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1013-1020.
[10] 周德敏,李海伟,肖苏龙. 中药抗病毒的物质基础:从五环三萜说开来[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 832-836.
[11] 尚展鹏,易阳,余蓉,范婧婧,黄昱曦,乔雪,叶敏. 荆防颗粒中抑制新型冠状病毒蛋白酶3CLpro及PLpro的活性成分[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 907-919.
[12] 康志宇,王磊磊,韩永正,郭向阳. 北京冬季奥林匹克运动会运动员手术的麻醉管理[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 770-773.
[13] 陈明隆,刘笑晗,郭静. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下儿童父母社会支持与养育倦怠的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 520-525.
[14] 戴菊华,孙新平,张捷,石连杰. 巨细胞病毒核酸和抗体检测在不同特征患者中的一致性分析及临床指导意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 267-271.
[15] 高鹏,雒艳萍,李俊峰,陈琳,毛小荣. 乙型肝炎病毒在不同丙氨酸氨基转移酶状态下对Th17、Treg细胞及其比率的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 272-277.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!