北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 107-110.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

丙泊酚靶控输注联合芬太尼静脉镇静拔除下颌阻生智齿的效果评价

关明,王恩博,刘宇,张伟△   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院口腔颌面外科, 北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2014-02-18 发布日期:2014-02-18

Evaluation of propofol target controlled infusion with fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth

GUAN Ming, WANG En-bo, LIU Yu, ZHANG Wei△   

  1. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2014-02-18 Published:2014-02-18

摘要: 目的:评价丙泊酚靶控输注(target controlled infusion,TCI)联合小剂量芬太尼用于下颌阻生智齿拔除术的效果及安全性。方 法:选择拔除下颌阻生智齿的患者58例(18~45岁),均为美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiology,ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,按 用药的不同分为两组:对照组(n=26),40 mg利多卡因+丙泊酚TCI;实验组(n=32),0.8 μg/kg芬太尼+丙泊酚TCI,记录各项评价指标并进 行分析比较。结果:两组患者性别分布、年龄、体重、手术时间及镇静时间差异无统计学意义。除局部麻醉注射时实验组的心率及脑电双频普 指数明显低于对照组(P<0.05)外,术中同一时间点两组间的心率、平均动脉压、呼吸频率、脉搏氧饱和度、脑电双频普指数差异均无统计学 意义,且两组患者对局部麻醉注射、手术开始及牙钻的记忆差异亦无统计学意义。实验组的丙泊酚注射痛、局部麻醉注射体动、术中多语发生 率均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。回访两组患者均无恶心及呕吐发生,实验组19例(19/32)、对照组14例(14/26)患者 回家后再困倦。患者的满意度评分在两组间差异无统计学意义,但医师的满意度评分实验组明显高于对照组(P<0.05);同组患者的满意度评 分均明显高于医师(P<0.05)。结论:丙泊酚TCI联合小剂量芬太尼静脉镇静下拔除下颌阻生智齿舒适安全,患者及医生满意度较高。

关键词: 磨牙, 第三, 拔牙, 麻醉, 静脉, 丙泊酚, 芬太尼

Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the effect and safety of propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) with a small dosage of fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of the third impacted molar tooth. Methods: In the study, 58 ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) Ⅰ-Ⅱ patients with impacted wisdom tooth removal (age: 18-45 years), were divided into two groups: control group (n=26) received 40 mg lidocaine+propofol TCI; experimental group (n=32) received 0.8 μg/kg fentanyl+propofol TCI. The complete evaluating indexes were recorded, and the data compared and analyzed. Results: The differences of the gender, age, weight, operation time and sedation time were not significant. The heart rate and bispectral index of the experimental group on local anesthesia injection were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). Other differences on heart rate, mean blood pressure, pulse oxygen saturation, respiration rate and bispectral index between the two groups were not significant during operation. The differences on recall of local anesthesia injection, incision and drilling between the two groups were not significant. The pain caused by the propofol injection, and the body movement caused by local anesthesia injection and talkativeness during operation in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). No patient in the two groups had nausea and vomiting. After discharge, 19 patients in the experimental group (19/32), 14 patients in the control group (14/26) were sleepy after coming home. The difference of the patient’s satisfaction between the two group was not significant, but the patient’s satisfaction was significantly higher than the doctor’s (P<0.05), and the doctor’s satisfaction in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Propofol TCI with a small dosage of fentanyl intravenous sedation on the removal of impacted wisdom tooth is effective and safe. Both patients and doctors have high degree of satisfaction on it.

Key words: Molar, third, Tooth extraction, Anesthesia, intravenous, Propofol, Fentanyl

[1] 张树栋,谢睿扬. 机器人手术时代的肾癌合并腔静脉瘤栓治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 562-564.
[2] 王滨帅,邱敏,张前进,田茂锋,刘磊,王国良,陆敏,田晓军,张树栋. 6例肾尤文肉瘤伴静脉瘤栓的诊治[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 636-639.
[3] 何海龙,李清,徐涛,张晓威. 构建显微精索手术治疗精索疼痛的术后疼痛缓解预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 646-655.
[4] 汤晓菲,李永红,丁秋玲,孙卓,张阳,王育梅,田美伊,刘坚. 类风湿关节炎患者下肢深静脉血栓发病率及危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 279-283.
[5] 冯琦琛,盖铄,王昌明,李选. 经同侧大隐静脉入路髂静脉成型及支架植入术在日间治疗模式中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 322-325.
[6] 陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[7] 兰东,刘茁,李宇轩,王国良,田晓军,马潞林,张树栋,张洪宪. 根治性肾切除和静脉癌栓取出术大出血的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 825-832.
[8] 彭清,刘佳君,刘焱,尚华,唐果,韩雅欣,龙丽. Padua预测评分和血清白蛋白水平在评估风湿病住院患者静脉血栓栓塞中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 625-630.
[9] 田慈,白颐,马青变,葛洪霞. 7例肝门静脉积气的临床特征分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 743-747.
[10] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[11] 史成梅,周阳,杨宁,李正迁,陶一帆,邓莹,郭向阳. 丙泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜检查对患者术后精神活动的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 324-327.
[12] 王洁初,姚优修,郭向阳. 严重低钾血症致麻醉后潜在致命性心律失常1例的术中管理[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 186-189.
[13] 刘蕊,赵金霞,闫良. 类风湿关节炎合并下肢静脉血栓患者的临床特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1079-1085.
[14] 李辉,高阳旭,王书磊,姚红新. 恶性肿瘤患儿完全植入式静脉输液港手术并发症[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1167-1171.
[15] 康志宇,王磊磊,韩永正,郭向阳. 北京冬季奥林匹克运动会运动员手术的麻醉管理[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 770-773.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!