自酸蚀粘接剂系统对变形链球菌的抑制作用

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.010

北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 57-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.010

自酸蚀粘接剂系统对变形链球菌的抑制作用

张路，袁重阳，田福聪，王晓燕△，高学军

（北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙体牙髓科，北京100081）

出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18
通讯作者: 王晓燕 E-mail:wangxiaoyan@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
北京市科学技术委员会计划项目（Z14110000514016）资助

Antibacterial effect of self-etching adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans

ZHANG Lu, YUAN Chong-yang, TIAN Fu-cong, WANG Xiao-yan△, GAO Xue-jun

(Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)

Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18
Contact: WANG Xiao-yan E-mail:wangxiaoyan@pkuss.bjmu.edu.cn
Supported by:
Supported by Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Project (Z14110000514016)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的：研究不同自酸蚀粘接剂系统对变形链球菌（Streptococcus mutans，S. mutans）的抑制作用。方法：选用两步法自酸蚀粘接剂系统ClearfilTM SE Bond预处理剂（SP）/粘接剂（SA）和ClearfilTM Protect Bond预处理剂（PP）/粘接剂（PA），醋酸氯己定［chlorhexidine acetate，CHX，1%（质量分数）］设为阳性对照，磷酸盐缓冲液（phosphate buffer solution，PBS）设为阴性对照。将6种试剂与游离态S. mutan接触30 s后菌落计数；将6种试剂进行琼脂渗透实验，观察抑菌环；将CHX、PBS、SP和PP在生物人工龋坏牙本质盘上作用30 s，染色后使用激光共聚焦显微镜（confocal laser scanning microscope，CLSM）观察并计算活菌/死菌比例；在牙本质盘上使用两种自酸蚀粘接系统并固化，以空白牙本质盘作对照，滴加S. mutans培养2 h，菌落计数。使用非参数检验和单因素方差分析进行统计分析。结果：与PBS相比，SP、PP、SA、PA和CHX对游离态S. mutans均有抑制作用（P＜0.05），SP和PP较SA、PA和CHX抑菌作用强（P＜0.05)，CHX、SP和PP均可见明显抑菌环，PBS、SA和PA未见明显抑菌环。与PBS相比，CHX、SP和PP作用后人工龋坏牙本质表面S. mutans活菌/死菌比例更低（P＜0.05)，两种自酸蚀粘接系统固化后对游离态S. mutans无明显抑制作用，与空白对照差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论：自酸蚀粘接剂系统ClearfilTM SE Bond和ClearfilTM Protect Bond的预处理剂对游离态及黏附态S. mutans均具有显著抑制作用，其粘接剂在固化前对游离态S. mutans有抑制作用；两种自酸蚀粘接剂系统在牙本质表面使用并固化后，未能表现出明显抑菌性。

关键词: 酸蚀, 牙, 牙本质粘接剂, 变形链球菌, 微生物敏感性试验, 抑菌作用

Abstract:

Objective： To investigate the antibacterial effect of different self-etching adhesive systems against Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans). Methods: Six reagents ClearfilTM SE Bond primer (SP), ClearfilTM SE Bond adhesive (SA)，ClearfilTM Protect Bond primer (PP), which contained antibacterial monomer methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium bromide (MDPB), ClearfilTM Protect Bond adhesive (PA), positive control chlorhexidine acetate ［CHX，1% (mass fraction)］, and negative control phosphate buffer solution (PBS) were selected. They were mixed with S. mutans for 30 s respectively, then colony-forming units (CFU) were counted after incubated for 48 h on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar medium. The 6 reagents were applied to the sterile paper discs, and distributed onto the BHI agar medium with S. mutans and incubated for 24 h, then the inhibition zones were observed. CHX, PBS, PP, and SP were added on the dentin with artificial caries induced by S. mutans and kept for 30 s, then confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) was used to observe the live and dead bacteria after staining. The ratio of live to dead bacteria was calculated. PP+PA and SP+SA were applied on the dentin according to the manual and light cured. S. mutans were incubated on the samples for 2 h, ultrasonically treated and incubated on BHI agar medium for 48 h, then CFU was counted. The data were analyzed by non-parametric analysis and one-way ANOVA. Results: Compared with PBS, the PP, SP, PA, SA and CHX showed the antibacterial effect on free S. mutans (P＜0.05); SP and PP showed stronger antibacterial effect than PA, SA and CHX (P＜0.05). CHX, SP and PP presented inhibition zones, while PBS, SA and PA did not. Compared with PBS, the CHX, SP and PP could lower the ratio of the live to dead bacteria significantly (P＜0.05). Cured selfetching adhesive systems did not show any antibacterial effect on the free S. mutans. Conclusion:The primer of self-etching adhesives ClearfilTM SE Bond and ClearfilTM Protect Bond showed significant antibacterial effect on free and attached S. mutans. The adhesive only showed antibacterial effect on free S. mutans before light-cured polymerization. After being cured, the self-etching adhesive systems did not show antibacterial effect anymore.

Key words: Acid etching, dental, Dentin-bonding agents, Streptococcus mutans, Microbial sensitivity tests, Antibacterial activity

中图分类号:

R783.1

张路，袁重阳，田福聪，王晓燕，高学军. 自酸蚀粘接剂系统对变形链球菌的抑制作用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(1): 57-62.

ZHANG Lu, YUAN Chong-yang, TIAN Fu-cong, WANG Xiao-yan, GAO Xue-jun. Antibacterial effect of self-etching adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2016, 48(1): 57-62.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	薄士仕,高承志. 基于卷积神经网络实现锥形束CT牙齿分割及牙位标定[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 735-740.
[2]	胡玉如,刘娟,李文静,赵亦兵,李启强,路瑞芳,孟焕新. Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期牙周炎患者龈沟液中有机酸浓度与牙周炎的关系[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 332-337.
[3]	凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[4]	赵晓一,刘畅,钱锟,潘洁. 成熟恒牙牙髓切断术的疗效及影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 138-143.
[5]	郑佳佳,杨雪,温泉,付元,邵校,丁美丽. 生物活性陶瓷iRoot BP Plus^®在儿童年轻恒前牙复杂冠折牙髓切断术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 179-184.
[6]	陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[7]	张晗,秦亦瑄,韦帝远,韩劼. 牙周炎患者种植修复维护治疗依从性的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 39-44.
[8]	赵菡,卫彦,张学慧,杨小平,蔡晴,宁成云,徐明明,刘雯雯,黄颖,何颖,郭亚茹,江圣杰,白云洋,吴宇佳,郭雨思,郑晓娜,李文静,邓旭亮. 口腔硬组织修复材料仿生设计制备和临床转化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 4-8.
[9]	殳畅,韩烨,孙雨哲,杨再目,侯建霞. Ⅲ期牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗前后炎症性贫血相关指标的变化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 45-50.
[10]	王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[11]	李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[12]	吴美辰,许桐楷,安伟,刘中宁,姜婷. 后牙高嵌体和贴面修复的4年临床随访[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 88-92.
[13]	刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[14]	段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[15]	田雪丽,宋志强,索宝军,周丽雅,李彩玲,张雨欣. 比较Epsilometer试验法和琼脂稀释法检测幽门螺杆菌对甲硝唑的敏感性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(5): 934-938.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

自酸蚀粘接剂系统对变形链球菌的抑制作用

Antibacterial effect of self-etching adhesive systems on Streptococcus mutans

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0