北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1055-1059. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2017.06.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同浓度的碳二亚胺乙醇溶液处理对牙本质自酸蚀粘接剂粘接强度的影响

唐琳,张一,李皓,刘玉华△,周永胜,李博文,吴唯伊,王思雯   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,修复科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2017-12-18 发布日期:2017-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 刘玉华 E-mail: lyhdentist@163.com

Influence of EDC ethanol solution on dentin shear bond strength with a self-etch adhesive system

TANG Lin, ZHANG Yi, LI Hao, LIU Yu-hua△, ZHOU Yong-sheng, LI Bo-wen, WU Wei-yi, WANG Si-wen   

  1. (Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2017-12-18 Published:2017-12-18
  • Contact: LIU Yu-hua E-mail: lyhdentist@163.com

摘要: 目的:采用微剪切方法分析不同浓度碳二亚胺[1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide,EDC]乙醇溶液处理牙本质表面对自酸蚀粘接剂粘接强度和断裂模式的影响。方法: 收集离体健康智齿80颗,随机分为5组,每组16颗。低速切割机暴露牙合面中层牙本质后使用两步法自酸蚀粘接剂(Clearfil SE Bond)进行牙本质粘接,所有试件设计为粘接半径1 mm、高3 mm的树脂柱试件。粘接时除空白组按常规步骤完成粘接外, 其余4组在Ⅰ液(底涂剂)处理后,分别采用3种浓度(0.01 mol/L、0.3 mol/L、0.5 mol/L)的EDC乙醇溶液和乙醇溶剂对牙本质表面处理1 min 后涂布Ⅱ液(粘接剂)完成粘接。将所有试件放入含0.5%(质量分数)氯胺T生理盐水浸泡24 h后进行微剪切实验,并在体式显微镜下观察试件断裂模式。结果: 0.01 mol/L、0.3 mol/L、0.5 mol/L EDC处理组、乙醇溶剂处理组的即刻微剪切粘接强度分别为(35.29±8.97) MPa、(40.24±9.68) MPa、(37.38±9.66) MPa、(37.49±7.76) MPa,高于空白组(33.81±7.98) MPa,各组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);断裂模式在各组间差异也无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 不同浓度的EDC乙醇溶液处理对牙本质自酸蚀粘接剂的即刻粘接强度、断裂模式没有影响。

关键词: 酸蚀, 牙, 剪切强度, 牙粘接, 1-乙基-(3-二甲基氨基丙基)碳酰二亚胺

Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the bonding ability of one representative self-etch adhesive system by applying the micro-shear bond strength test method with different concentrations of carbodiimide [1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide, EDC] ethanol solution pretreatment. Methods:Extracted sound human third molars were collected from patients ranging 18 to 40 years. In the study, 80 molars were first sectioned to prepare a flat middle coronal dentin surface and then were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=16) according to without/with different surface treatments [blank control; 80% (volume fraction) ethanol control; EDC ethanol solution of three concentrations (0.01 mol/L, 0.3 mol/L and 0.5 mol/L)]. Each specimen underwent a micro-shear bond strength test and failure mode observation. The data collected were subjected to statistical analysis using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test to analyze the difference of the microshear bond strength, and chi-square test/Fisher’s exact test for the failure mode frequency of the micro-shear bond strength test specimens at a significance level of P=0.05. Results: The micro-shear bond strength of the three concentration EDC treatments were (35.29±8.97) MPa (0.01 mol/L EDC treatment group), (40.24±9.68) MPa (0.3 mol/L EDC treatment group), (37.38±9.66) MPa (0.5 mol/L EDC treatment group) separately; and that of the 80% ethanol group was (37.49±7.76) MPa. All micro-shear bond strength value of the above four groups was statistically higher than that of the blank control group [(33.81±7.98) MPa]. The immediate micro-shear bond strength and failure mode was of no statistically significant difference among all the groups. It was noticed that the immediate micro-shear bond strength of 0.3 mol/L was higher than that of all the other groups, especially higher than that of the 80% ethanol pretreatment group despite that there was no significant difference among all the groups. And the test of failure mode indicated that the cohesive failure was more common, while the frequency of adhesive failure was rare in each experimental group. Conclusion:EDC pretreatment had no adverse effect on the immediate microshear bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond. Meanwhile, EDC treatment did not cause more adhesive failure in immediate micro-shear test, which had further denoted what was said above. However, it needs more research to illustrate the anti-enzymatic role of EDC in dentin bonding.

Key words: Acid etching, dental, Shear strength, Dental bonding, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopro-pyl) carbodiimide

中图分类号: 

  • R781.05
[1] 薄士仕,高承志. 基于卷积神经网络实现锥形束CT牙齿分割及牙位标定[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 735-740.
[2] 胡玉如,刘娟,李文静,赵亦兵,李启强,路瑞芳,孟焕新. Ⅲ期或Ⅳ期牙周炎患者龈沟液中有机酸浓度与牙周炎的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 332-337.
[3] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[4] 赵晓一,刘畅,钱锟,潘洁. 成熟恒牙牙髓切断术的疗效及影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 138-143.
[5] 郑佳佳,杨雪,温泉,付元,邵校,丁美丽. 生物活性陶瓷iRoot BP Plus®在儿童年轻恒前牙复杂冠折牙髓切断术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 179-184.
[6] 陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[7] 张晗,秦亦瑄,韦帝远,韩劼. 牙周炎患者种植修复维护治疗依从性的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 39-44.
[8] 赵菡,卫彦,张学慧,杨小平,蔡晴,宁成云,徐明明,刘雯雯,黄颖,何颖,郭亚茹,江圣杰,白云洋,吴宇佳,郭雨思,郑晓娜,李文静,邓旭亮. 口腔硬组织修复材料仿生设计制备和临床转化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 4-8.
[9] 殳畅,韩烨,孙雨哲,杨再目,侯建霞. Ⅲ期牙周炎患者牙周基础治疗前后炎症性贫血相关指标的变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 45-50.
[10] 王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[11] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[12] 吴美辰,许桐楷,安伟,刘中宁,姜婷. 后牙高嵌体和贴面修复的4年临床随访[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 88-92.
[13] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[14] 段登辉,WANGHom-Lay,王恩博. 可吸收胶原膜在颊侧袋形瓣引导性骨再生手术中的作用: 一项回顾性影像学队列研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1097-1104.
[15] 叶雨阳,岳林,邹晓英,王晓燕. 成牙本质方向分化牙髓干细胞外泌体形态及微小RNA表达谱特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 689-696.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!