北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 457-462. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.03.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力调查分析

徐小凤1,陈茜2,赵艺璞3,胡秀英1△   

  1. (1. 四川大学华西医院护理部,华西护理学院, 成都610041;2. 四川大学华西医院老年医学中心, 成都610041;3. 河南省人民医院睡眠呼吸障碍诊疗中心, 郑州450003)
  • 出版日期:2018-06-18 发布日期:2018-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 胡秀英 E-mail: xiuying.hu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
     四川省科技厅支撑计划项目(2015FZ0099-3)和中华护理学会(ZHKY201406)资助

Investigation and analysis of the activities of daily living of the aged at home in wes-tern China

XU Xiao-feng1, CHEN Qian2, ZHAO Yi-pu3, HU Xiu-ying1△   

  1. (1. Nursing Department, West China Hospital; West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 3. Henan Provincial Sleep-disordered Breathing Clinic Center, Zhengzhou 450003, China)
  • Online:2018-06-18 Published:2018-06-18
  • Contact: HU Xiu-ying E-mail: xiuying.hu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Support Plan of Sichuan Science and Technology Department (2015FZ0099-3) and Chinese Nursing Association (ZHKY201406)

摘要: 目的:调查我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力现状,并分析其影响因素,为提高居家老年人生活质量和养老服务提供参考依据。方法:对我国西部地区青海省、宁夏回族自治区、新疆维吾尔自治区、陕西省、贵州省、广西省、四川省、云南省以及重庆市这9个省、直辖市和自治区居家生活的老年人进行生活自理能力(activities of daily living,ADL)问卷调查,并应用Logistic回归分析探索影响其自理能力水平的因素。结果:此次共调查了我国西部地区7 175名居家生活的老年人,其中78.86%完全自理,12.32%轻度功能障碍,6.27%中度功能障碍,2.55%重度功能障碍。多因素Logistic回归分析提示,年龄、文化程度、经济收入、体重指数(body mass index,BMI)和疾病等都是影响我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力下降的重要因素。60~69岁、70~79岁居家老年人ADL下降的危险度分别为80岁以上者的0.221(0.190~0.258)和0.353(0.305~0.409)倍;小学、初中、中专或高中、大专或本科、研究生及以上的居家老年人ADL下降的风险分别为文盲者的0.299(0.140~0.637)、0.312(0.146~0.663)、0.238(0.112~0.510)、0.226(0.105~0.484)、0.238(0.110~0.514)倍;经济条件相当困难、略有困难、收支平衡的老年人ADL下降风险分别为经济充裕者的2.720(2.015~3.672)、2.344(1.816~3.027)、1.542(1.215~1.957)倍;与BMI≥28的老年人相比,BMI<18.5者ADL下降风险为1.577(1.142~2.179)倍;身体没有疾病的老年人ADL下降风险为有疾病者的0.685(0.602~0.779)倍。结论:我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力水平不高,且受年龄、文化程度、收入以及老年人身体情况等多种因素的影响。随着我国高龄老年人的日益增加,广大医务工作者和整个社会需要共同面临维持和提高其生活自理能力的难题和挑战。

关键词: 中国西部, 居家老年人, 日常生活活动, 危险因素

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the current situation of the activities of daily living (ADL) of the aged at home in western China, and to analyze its influencing factors so that we can improve the quality of life and pension services of elderly people. Methods: The elderly people who came from Qinghai Pro-vince, Ningxia Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Shanxi Province, Guizhou Pro-vince, Guangxi Province, Sichuan Province, Yunnan Province and Chongqing were surveyed by questionnaires. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of ADL. Results: A total of 7 175 aged people living in the western China were surveyed. In the study, 78.86% of the aged at home could independently live. 12.32% of the aged were of mild dysfunction. 6.27% of the aged had mode-rate dysfunction. And 2.55% of the aged suffered severe dysfunction. Multiple Logistic analyses indicated that age, educational level, economic income, body mass index and disease were the factors that affected their ADL. The risk of decreased ADL in the 60-69 and 70-79year-old groups were 0.221 (95%CI: 0.190-0.258) and 0.353 (95%CI: 0.305-0.409) times that of the elderly over the age of 80. Compared with illiterate seniors,the risks of decline in ADL of primary school, junior high school, secondary or high school, college or undergraduates, postgraduates or above were 0.299 (95%CI: 0.140-0.637), 0.312 (95%CI: 0.146-0.663), 0.238 (95%CI: 0.112-0.510), 0.226 (95%CI: 0.105-0.484), and 0.238 (95%CI: 0.110-0.514) times. The declines in the risk of ADL for elderly people with quite difficult economic conditions, slight difficulty and breaking even were 2.720 (95%CI: 2.015-3.672), 2.344 (95%CI: 1.816-3.027), and 1.542 (95%CI: 1.215-1.957) times of the economically abundant people. Compared with those with a body mass index (BMI)≥28, the risk of ADL reduction for BMI<18.5 was 1.577 (95%CI: 1.142-2.179) times. And the ADL of the elderly with no disease was at the risk of falling 0.685 (95%CI: 0.602-0.779) times that of an elderly person with the disease. Conclusion: The activities of daily living of age at home of western China are not high, and affected by many factors, such as age, educational level and so on. With the increasing of the elderly, maintaining and improving the ADL are the problems and challenges that we are faced with.

Key words: Western China, Aged at home, Activities of daily living, Risk , factors

中图分类号: 

  •  
[1] 李志存, 吴天俣, 梁磊, 范宇, 孟一森, 张骞. 穿刺活检单针阳性前列腺癌术后病理升级的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[2] 颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[3] 陈延,李况蒙,洪锴,张树栋,程建星,郑仲杰,唐文豪,赵连明,张海涛,姜辉,林浩成. 阴茎海绵体注射试验对阴茎血管功能影响的回顾性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 680-686.
[4] 庞博,郭桐君,陈曦,郭华棋,石嘉章,陈娟,王欣梅,李耀妍,单安琪,余恒意,黄婧,汤乃军,王艳,郭新彪,李国星,吴少伟. 天津与上海35岁以上人群氮氧化物个体暴露水平及其影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 700-707.
[5] 和静,房中则,杨颖,刘静,马文瑶,霍勇,高炜,武阳丰,谢高强. 血浆中脂质代谢分子与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块、传统心血管危险因素及膳食因素的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 722-728.
[6] 蔡珊,张依航,陈子玥,刘云飞,党佳佳,师嫡,李佳欣,黄天彧,马军,宋逸. 北京市中小学生身体活动时间现状及影响因素的路径[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 403-410.
[7] 张祖洪,陈天娇,马军. 中小学生青春发动时相与心血管代谢危险因素的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 418-423.
[8] 靖婷,江华,李婷,申倩倩,叶兰,曾银丹,梁文欣,冯罡,司徒文佑,张玉梅. 中国西部5城市中老年人血清25羟基维生素D与握力的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 448-455.
[9] 林郁婷,王华丽,田宇,巩俐彤,常春. 北京市老年人认知功能的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 456-461.
[10] 朱金荣,赵亚娜,黄巍,赵微微,王悦,王松,苏春燕. 感染新型冠状病毒的血液透析患者的临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 267-272.
[11] 赖展鸿,李嘉辰,贠泽霖,张永刚,张昊,邢晓燕,邵苗,金月波,王乃迪,李依敏,李玉慧,栗占国. 特发性炎性肌病完全临床应答相关因素的单中心真实世界研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 284-292.
[12] 司筱芊,赵秀娟,朱凤雪,王天兵. 创伤出血性休克后急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 307-312.
[13] 李洋洋,侯林,马紫君,黄山雅美,刘捷,曾超美,秦炯. 孕期因素与婴儿牛奶蛋白过敏的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 144-149.
[14] 刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[15] 罗靓,李云,王红彦,相晓红,赵静,孙峰,张晓盈,贾汝琳,李春. 抗内皮细胞抗体检测在早期流产中的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1039-1044.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!