北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (3): 457-462. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2018.03.011

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力调查分析

徐小凤1,陈茜2,赵艺璞3,胡秀英1△   

  1. (1. 四川大学华西医院护理部,华西护理学院, 成都610041;2. 四川大学华西医院老年医学中心, 成都610041;3. 河南省人民医院睡眠呼吸障碍诊疗中心, 郑州450003)
  • 出版日期:2018-06-18 发布日期:2018-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 胡秀英 E-mail: xiuying.hu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
     四川省科技厅支撑计划项目(2015FZ0099-3)和中华护理学会(ZHKY201406)资助

Investigation and analysis of the activities of daily living of the aged at home in wes-tern China

XU Xiao-feng1, CHEN Qian2, ZHAO Yi-pu3, HU Xiu-ying1△   

  1. (1. Nursing Department, West China Hospital; West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 3. Henan Provincial Sleep-disordered Breathing Clinic Center, Zhengzhou 450003, China)
  • Online:2018-06-18 Published:2018-06-18
  • Contact: HU Xiu-ying E-mail: xiuying.hu@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Support Plan of Sichuan Science and Technology Department (2015FZ0099-3) and Chinese Nursing Association (ZHKY201406)

摘要: 目的:调查我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力现状,并分析其影响因素,为提高居家老年人生活质量和养老服务提供参考依据。方法:对我国西部地区青海省、宁夏回族自治区、新疆维吾尔自治区、陕西省、贵州省、广西省、四川省、云南省以及重庆市这9个省、直辖市和自治区居家生活的老年人进行生活自理能力(activities of daily living,ADL)问卷调查,并应用Logistic回归分析探索影响其自理能力水平的因素。结果:此次共调查了我国西部地区7 175名居家生活的老年人,其中78.86%完全自理,12.32%轻度功能障碍,6.27%中度功能障碍,2.55%重度功能障碍。多因素Logistic回归分析提示,年龄、文化程度、经济收入、体重指数(body mass index,BMI)和疾病等都是影响我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力下降的重要因素。60~69岁、70~79岁居家老年人ADL下降的危险度分别为80岁以上者的0.221(0.190~0.258)和0.353(0.305~0.409)倍;小学、初中、中专或高中、大专或本科、研究生及以上的居家老年人ADL下降的风险分别为文盲者的0.299(0.140~0.637)、0.312(0.146~0.663)、0.238(0.112~0.510)、0.226(0.105~0.484)、0.238(0.110~0.514)倍;经济条件相当困难、略有困难、收支平衡的老年人ADL下降风险分别为经济充裕者的2.720(2.015~3.672)、2.344(1.816~3.027)、1.542(1.215~1.957)倍;与BMI≥28的老年人相比,BMI<18.5者ADL下降风险为1.577(1.142~2.179)倍;身体没有疾病的老年人ADL下降风险为有疾病者的0.685(0.602~0.779)倍。结论:我国西部地区居家老年人生活自理能力水平不高,且受年龄、文化程度、收入以及老年人身体情况等多种因素的影响。随着我国高龄老年人的日益增加,广大医务工作者和整个社会需要共同面临维持和提高其生活自理能力的难题和挑战。

关键词: 中国西部, 居家老年人, 日常生活活动, 危险因素

Abstract: Objective: To investigate the current situation of the activities of daily living (ADL) of the aged at home in western China, and to analyze its influencing factors so that we can improve the quality of life and pension services of elderly people. Methods: The elderly people who came from Qinghai Pro-vince, Ningxia Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Shanxi Province, Guizhou Pro-vince, Guangxi Province, Sichuan Province, Yunnan Province and Chongqing were surveyed by questionnaires. Logistic regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of ADL. Results: A total of 7 175 aged people living in the western China were surveyed. In the study, 78.86% of the aged at home could independently live. 12.32% of the aged were of mild dysfunction. 6.27% of the aged had mode-rate dysfunction. And 2.55% of the aged suffered severe dysfunction. Multiple Logistic analyses indicated that age, educational level, economic income, body mass index and disease were the factors that affected their ADL. The risk of decreased ADL in the 60-69 and 70-79year-old groups were 0.221 (95%CI: 0.190-0.258) and 0.353 (95%CI: 0.305-0.409) times that of the elderly over the age of 80. Compared with illiterate seniors,the risks of decline in ADL of primary school, junior high school, secondary or high school, college or undergraduates, postgraduates or above were 0.299 (95%CI: 0.140-0.637), 0.312 (95%CI: 0.146-0.663), 0.238 (95%CI: 0.112-0.510), 0.226 (95%CI: 0.105-0.484), and 0.238 (95%CI: 0.110-0.514) times. The declines in the risk of ADL for elderly people with quite difficult economic conditions, slight difficulty and breaking even were 2.720 (95%CI: 2.015-3.672), 2.344 (95%CI: 1.816-3.027), and 1.542 (95%CI: 1.215-1.957) times of the economically abundant people. Compared with those with a body mass index (BMI)≥28, the risk of ADL reduction for BMI<18.5 was 1.577 (95%CI: 1.142-2.179) times. And the ADL of the elderly with no disease was at the risk of falling 0.685 (95%CI: 0.602-0.779) times that of an elderly person with the disease. Conclusion: The activities of daily living of age at home of western China are not high, and affected by many factors, such as age, educational level and so on. With the increasing of the elderly, maintaining and improving the ADL are the problems and challenges that we are faced with.

Key words: Western China, Aged at home, Activities of daily living, Risk , factors

中图分类号: 

  •  
[1] 魏慧, 张警丰, 姚中强, 赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎合并慢性病贫血患者的临床特征及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 307-312.
[2] 赵杰, 付春, 赵秀娟, 薛海岩, 李纾, 王振洲, 朱凤雪. 胸部创伤患者在重症监护病房内发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 351-358.
[3] 郭芷均, 俎明, 马超, 张贺军, 张静, 丁士刚. 同时性多发早期胃癌漏诊病灶的临床病理特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 410-415.
[4] 李博闻, 张强, 孙益鑫. 儿童及青年漏斗胸患者Nuss术后发生脊柱侧弯的风险预测模型建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 941-946.
[5] 杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[6] 刘伟, 郭稳, 过哲, 李春艳, 李云龙, 刘思奇, 张亮, 宋慧. 痛风患者放射学阴性骨侵蚀的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 735-739.
[7] 陆梦溪, 刘秋萍, 周恬静, 刘晓非, 孙烨祥, 沈鹏, 林鸿波, 唐迅, 高培. 基于社区人群队列的甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管病发病和死亡的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 430-435.
[8] 杨龙傲, 金旭, 黄文初, 何丽华, 陈娟. 视屏作业人员视疲劳及干眼的流行病学调查[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(3): 554-561.
[9] 郭华秋, 王哲, 杨雪, 白洁. 口腔急诊出血患者的临床特征与危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 142-147.
[10] 邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[11] 李钰锴, 王红彦, 罗靓, 李云, 李春. 抗磷脂抗体在白塞病合并血栓中的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1036-1040.
[12] 田杨, 韩永正, 李娇, 王明亚, 曲音音, 房景超, 金辉, 李民, 王军, 徐懋, 王圣林, 郭向阳. 颈椎前路手术后硬膜外血肿的发生率和危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1058-1064.
[13] 王明瑞, 赖金惠, 姬家祥, 唐鑫伟, 胡浩浦, 王起, 许克新, 徐涛, 胡浩. 使用中文版威斯康星结石生活质量问卷预测肾结石患者生活质量降低的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(6): 1069-1074.
[14] 李志存, 吴天俣, 梁磊, 范宇, 孟一森, 张骞. 穿刺活检单针阳性前列腺癌术后病理升级的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[15] 颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!