北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 771-779. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.04.032

• 技术方法 • 上一篇    下一篇

机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复手术:单一术者108例经验总结

程嗣达1,李新飞1,熊盛炜1,樊书菠1,王杰1,朱伟杰1,李子奡1,丁光璞1,俞婷2,李万强3,孙永明4,杨昆霖1,张雷1,郝瀚1,(),李学松1,(),周利群1   

  1. 1.北京大学第一医院泌尿外科,北京大学泌尿外科研究所,国家泌尿、男性生殖系肿瘤研究中心,北京 100034
    2.三明市第二医院泌尿外科,福建三明 366000
    3.三峡大学第一临床医学院/宜昌市中心人民医院泌尿外科,湖北宜昌 443003
    4.南京鼓楼医院集团宿迁市人民医院泌尿外科,江苏宿迁 223800
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-20 出版日期:2020-08-18 发布日期:2020-08-06
  • 通讯作者: 郝瀚,李学松 E-mail:haohan1122@vip.sina.com;pineneedle@sina.com

Robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgery: A review of 108 cases by a single surgeon

Si-da CHENG1,Xin-fei LI1,Sheng-wei XIONG1,Shu-bo FAN1,Jie WANG1,Wei-jie ZHU1,Zi-ao LI1,Guang-pu DING1,Ting YU2,Wan-qiang LI3,Yong-ming SUN4,Kun-lin YANG1,Lei ZHANG1,Han HAO1,(),Xue-song LI1,(),Li-qun ZHOU1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Sanming, Sanming 366000, Fujian, China
    3. Department of Urology, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University/Yichang Central People’s Hospital, Yichang 443003, Hubei, China
    4. Department of Urology, Suqian People’s Hospital of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Group, Suqian 223800, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2020-04-20 Online:2020-08-18 Published:2020-08-06
  • Contact: Han HAO,Xue-song LI E-mail:haohan1122@vip.sina.com;pineneedle@sina.com

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 总结分析单一术者机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复手术的技术经验及治疗效果。方法: 回顾性分析2018年11月至2020年1月由单一术者完成的108例机器人辅助腹腔镜上尿路修复手术的临床资料,包括改良后离断肾盂成形术53例、肾盂瓣成形术11例、输尿管狭窄段切除再吻合术11例、输尿管狭窄切开自体舌黏膜修补术5例、输尿管狭窄切开阑尾补片修复术4例、输尿管膀胱再植术11例、术中精确测量法膀胱悬吊翻瓣术6例和改良回肠代输尿管术7例。手术成功定义为主观症状缓解且泌尿系超声提示肾积水缓解。结果: 108例手术均成功完成,无中转普通腹腔镜及开放手术。改良后离断肾盂成形术,中位手术时间141 min(74~368 min),中位出血量20 mL(10~350 mL),中位术后住院时间4 d(3~19 d),手术成功率为94.3%。肾盂瓣成形术,中位手术时间159 min(110~222 min),中位出血量50 mL(20~150 mL),中位术后住院时间5 d(3~8 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管狭窄段切除再吻合术,中位手术时间126 min(76~160 min),中位术中出血量20 mL(10~50 mL),中位术后住院时间5 d(4~9 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管狭窄切开自体舌黏膜补片修补术,中位手术时间204 min(154~250 min),中位出血量30 mL(10~100 mL),中位术后住院时间6 d(4~7 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管狭窄切开阑尾补片修复术,中位手术时间164 min(135~211 min),中位手术出血量75 mL(50~200 mL),中位术后住院日8.5 d(6~12 d),手术成功率为100%。输尿管膀胱再植术,中位手术时间149 min(100~218 min),中位术中出血量20 mL(10~50 mL),中位术后住院日7 d(5~10 d),手术成功率为90.9%。术中精确测量法膀胱悬吊翻瓣术,中位手术时间166 min(137~205 min),中位手术出血45 mL(20~100 mL),中位术后住院时间5 d(4~41 d),手术成功率为83.3%。改良回肠代输尿管手术,中位手术时间270 min(227~335 min),中位术中出血量100 mL(10~100 mL),中位术后住院时间7 d(5~26 d),手术成功率为85.7%。结论: 本研究中单一术者应用机器人辅助腹腔镜开展并改良了多种复杂上尿路修复手术术式,对进一步形成标准化、程序化上尿路修复手术方式提供了参考。

关键词: 机器人手术, 腹腔镜, 上尿路, 修复外科手术

Abstract:

Objective: To summarize the experiences and outcomes of 108 robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgeries conducted by a single surgeon. Methods: We consecutively and retrospectively reviewed 108 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction surgeries by a single surgeon from November 2018 to January 2020. The patient demographics, perioperative variables, postoperative complications and follow-up data were recorded. Fifty-three modified dismembered pyeloplasties (MDP), 11 spiral flap pyeloplasties (SFP), 11 ure-teroureterostomies (UUT), 4 lingual mucosal onlay graft ureteroplasties (LMU), 5 appendiceal onlay flap ureteroplasties (AU), 11 ureteral reimplantations (UR), 6 Boari flap-Psoas hitch surgeries (BPS) and 7 ileal ureter replacements (IUR) were enrolled finally. The success was defined as the improvement in subjective pain levels, and the improvement in the degree of hydronephrosis at ultrasound. Results: All the surgeries were successfully completed without open or laparoscopic conversion. The median operative time was 141 min (range: 74-368 min), median blood loss was 20 mL (range: 10-350 mL) and median hospital stay was 4 d (range: 3-19 d) in MDP group, with the success rate of 94.3%. The median operative time was 159 min (range: 110-222 min), median blood loss was 50 mL (range: 20-150 mL) and median hospital stay was 5 d (range: 3-8 d) in SFP group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 126 min (range: 76-160 d), median blood loss was 20 mL (range: 10-50 mL) and median hospital stay was 5 d (range: 4-9 d) in UUT group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 204 min (range: 154-250 min), median blood loss was 30 mL (range: 10-100 mL) and median hospital stay was 6 d (range: 4-7 d) in LMU group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 164 min (range: 135-211 min), median blood loss was 75 mL (range: 50-200 mL) and median hospital stay was 8.5 d (range: 6-12 d) in AU group, with the success rate of 100%. The median operative time was 149 min (range: 100-218 min), median blood loss was 20 mL (range: 10-50 mL) and median hospital stay was 7 d (range: 5-10 d) in UR group, with the success rate of 90.9%. The median operative time was 166 min (range: 137-205 min), median blood loss was 45 mL (range: 20-100 mL) and median hospital stay was 5 d (range: 4-41 d) in BPS group, with the success rate of 83.3%. The median operative time was 270 min (range: 227-335 min), median blood loss was 100 mL (range: 10-100 mL) and median hospital stay was 7 d (range: 5-26 d) in IUR group, with the success rate of 85.7%. Conclusion: The surgeon performed and modified numerous complicated upper urinary tract reconstruction surgeries by the robotic platform, which facilitated the development of the standardized upper urinary tract reconstruction surgical technique.

Key words: Robotic surgical procedures, Laparoscopy, Upper urinary tract, Reconstructive surgical procedures

中图分类号: 

  • R693.2

图1

肾盂瓣成形术(A~D)、舌黏膜补片修补术(E~H)及阑尾补片修补术(I~L)关键手术步骤"

图2

膀胱悬吊翻瓣术关键手术步骤(A~F)及大网膜包裹技术应用(G~I)"

表1

患者临床资料"

Items MDP (n=53) SFP (n=11) UUT (n=11) LMU (n=5)
Age/years, median (range) 30 (15-64) 29 (19-42) 35 (17-54) 37 (25-45)
Gender (Male/Female), n 30/23 7/4 6/5 3/2
Surgical side (Left/Right), n 24/29 7/4 6/5 5/0
Preoperative eGFR/[mL/(min·1.73 m2)],
median (range)
104.5
(59.7-130.5)
118.3
(84.1-136.0)
104.6
(60.8-118.0)
79.0
(61.0-128.0)
Preoperative degree of hydronephrosis
(Mild/Moderate/Severe/Nephrostomy or DJ stent), n
12/16/18/7 1/2/6/2 1/1/4/5 0/0/0/5
Items AU (n=4) UR (n=11) BP (n=6) IUR (n=7)
Age/years, median (range) 38 (36-41) 38 (18-65) 52.5 (29-67) 48 (30-53)
Gender (Male/Female), n 3/1 2/9 0/6 5/2
Surgical side (Left/Right), n 0/4 5/6 1/5 3/4
Preoperative eGFR/[mL/(min·1.73 m2)],
median (range)
100.6
(90.6-103.0)
99.3
(63.1-112.8)
77.1
(64.6-109.0)
74.6
(59.0-117.0)
Preoperative degree of hydronephrosis
(Mild/Moderate/Severe/Nephrostomy or DJ stent), n
0/0/0/4 5/3/1/2 2/1/1/2 1/1/0/5

表2

不同重建手术的围术期数据及随访数据"

Items MDP (n=53) SFP (n=11) UUT (n=11) LMU (n=5)
Overall operative time/min, median (range) 141 (74-368) 159 (110-222) 126 (76-160) 204 (154-250)
Estimated blood loss/mL, median (range) 20 (10-350) 50 (20-150) 20 (10-50) 30 (10-100)
Hospital stay/d, median (range) 4 (3-19) 5 (3-8) 5 (4-9) 6 (4-7)
Follow-up time/months, median (range) 8 (3-17) 7 (4-13) 7 (3-15) 7 (4-9)
Postoperative eGFR/[mL/(min·1.73 m2)],
median (range)
105.1
(58.3-139.6)
118.5
(89.8-130.2)
105.8
(59.2-125.3)
71.6
(66.7-121.4)
Postoperative degree of hydronephrosis
(None or Mild/Moderate/Severe), n
48/4/1 9/2/0 9/2/0 5/0/0
Overall success rate/% 94.3 100.0 100.0 100.0
Items AU (n=4) UR (n=11) BP (n=6) IUR (n=7)
Overall operative time/min, median (range) 164 (135-211) 149 (100-218) 166 (137-205) 270 (227-335)
Estimated blood loss/mL, median (range) 75 (50-200) 20 (10-50) 45 (20-100) 100 (10-100)
Hospital stay/d, median (range) 8.5 (6-12) 7 (5-10) 5 (4-41) 7 (5-26)
Follow-up time/months, median (range) 8 (4-10) 5 (3-17) 10 (6-12) 9 (5-12)
Postoperative eGFR/[mL/(min·1.73 m2)],
median (range)
105.8
(92.1-115.0)
101.8
(79.7-114.7)
87.4
(63.8-104.1)
77.1
(47.6-115.4)
Postoperative degree of hydronephrosis
(None or Mild/Moderate/Severe), n
4/0/0 11/0/0 6/0/0 6/0/1
Overall success rate/% 100.0 90.7 83.3 85.7
[1] Stief CG, Jonas U, Petry KU, et al. Ureteric reconstruction[J]. BJU Int, 2003,91(2):138-142.
[2] Mufarrij PW, Shah OD, Berger AD, et al. Robotic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract[J]. J Urol, 2007,178(5):2002-2005.
pmid: 17869303
[3] 赵海岳, 叶雄俊, 陈伟男, 等. 腹腔镜肾盂成型术中异位血管的处理方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019,51(4):660-664.
[4] Wang J, Xiong SW, Fan SB, et al. Appendiceal onlay flap ure-teroplasty for the treatment of complex ureteral strictures: Initial experience of nine patients [J/OL]. J Endourol, (2020-04-23)[2020-05-07]. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0176.
[5] Yang K, Yao L, Li X, et al. A modified suture technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty of pelviureteric junction obstruction[J]. Urology, 2015,85(1):263-267.
pmid: 25530399
[6] Hong P, Cai Y, Li Z, et al. Modified laparoscopic partial urete-rectomy for adult ureteral fibroepithelial polyp: Technique and initial experience[J]. Urol Int, 2019,102(1):13-19.
[7] Zhong W, Hong P, Ding G, et al. Technical considerations and outcomes for ileal ureter replacement: a retrospective study in China[J]. BMC Surg, 2019,19(1):9.
[8] 丁光璞, 程嗣达, 方冬, 等. 上尿路微创手术的技术改良[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019,51(4):610-614.
[9] Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a syste-matic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Urol, 2014,65(2):430-452.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053 pmid: 23856037
[10] Hong P, Li Z, Zhu D, et al. A simple modification for the usage of flexible cystoscope in modified laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ure-teropelvic junction obstruction with renal calculi: A flexible guiding tube[J]. Urol Int, 2019,102(3):262-268.
pmid: 30630187
[11] 丁光璞, 彭意吉, 杨昆霖, 等. 改良经腹腹腔镜肾盂成形术联合孙氏镜治疗UPJO合并肾结石的初步经验[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2019,40(9):680-684.
[12] 许小林, 徐月敏, 朱开常, 等. 采用旋转带蒂肾盂瓣输尿管扩大成形术治疗上段输尿管超长段狭窄[J]. 中华临床医师杂志: 电子版, 2011,5(24):7417-7418.
[13] 熊盛炜, 杨昆霖, 丁光璞, 等. 输尿管损伤外科修复治疗的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019,51(4):783-788.
[14] Sun G, Yan L, Ouyang W, et al. Management for ureteral stenosis: A comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy and conventional laparoscopic ureteroureterostomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019,29(9):1111-1115.
pmid: 31314664
[15] Lee Z, Simhan J, Parker DC, et al. Novel use of indocyanine green for intraoperative, real-time localization of ureteral stenosis during robot-assisted ureteroureterostomy[J]. Urology, 2013,82(3):729-733.
pmid: 23987169
[16] Tang ZY, Chen Z, He Y, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site ureteroureterostomy with intraoperative retrograde ureteroscopy-assisted technique for benign proximal and middle ureteral strictures: A single-center experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2014,24(7):493-496.
pmid: 24844653
[17] Eisenberg ML, Lee KL, Zumrutbas AE, et al. Long-term outcomes and late complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy with renal autotransplantation[J]. J Urol, 2008,179(1):240-243.
[18] Kocot A, Kalogirou C, Vergho D, et al. Long-term results of ileal ureteric replacement: A 25-year single-centre experience[J]. BJU Int, 2017,120(2):273-279.
pmid: 28220579
[19] Zhao LC, Weinberg AC, Lee Z, et al. Robotic ureteral reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts: A multi-institutional expe-rience[J]. Eur Urol, 2018,73(3):419-426.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.015 pmid: 29239749
[20] Dublin N, Stewart LH. Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty[J]. BJU Int, 2004,94(6):867-869.
pmid: 15476524
[21] Li B, Xu Y, Hai B, et al. Laparoscopic onlay lingual mucosal graft ureteroplasty for proximal ureteral stricture: initial experience and 9-month follow-up[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2016,48(8):1275-1279.
doi: 10.1007/s11255-016-1289-9 pmid: 27115158
[22] Duty BD, Kreshover JE, Richstone L, et al. Review of appendiceal onlay flap in the management of complex ureteric strictures in six patients[J]. BJU Int, 2015,115(2):282-287.
pmid: 24471943
[23] 王亮, 张国玺, 邹晓峰. 腹腔镜输尿管膀胱再植术的研究进展[J]. 赣南医学院学报, 2019,39(2):195-199.
[24] Stein R, Rubenwolf P, Ziesel C, et al. Psoas hitch and Boari flap ureteroneocystostomy[J]. BJU Int, 2013,112(1):137-155.
pmid: 23759011
[25] Zhong W, Du Y, Yang K, et al. Ileal ureter replacement combined with Boari flap-Psoas hitch to treat full-length ureteral defects: Technique and initial experience[J]. Urology, 2017(108):201-206.
[26] Stein RJ, Turna B, Patel NS, et al. Laparoscopic assisted ileal ureter: technique, outcomes and comparison to the open procedure[J]. J Urol, 2009,182(3):1032-1039.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.013 pmid: 19616806
[27] Ubrig B, Janusonis J, Paulics L, et al. Functional outcome of completely intracorporeal robotic ileal ureteric replacement[J]. Urology, 2018(114):193-197.
[1] 高加勒, 张忠涛. 局部进展期直肠癌精准治疗现状与展望[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 247-250.
[2] 李斌, 梁寒. 机器人胃癌根治术:研究进展与实践挑战[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 416-422.
[3] 李浙民, 季加孚, 李国新, 李子禹, 步召德, 高翔宇, 董迪, 唐磊, 邢晓芳, 贾淑芹, 郭婷, 张连海, 陕飞, 季鑫, 王安强. 胃癌精准诊疗技术的创建与推广[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 864-867.
[4] 李慎谟, 苏丹丹, 林己煜, 宋昊东, 马潞林, 侯小飞, 王国良, 张洪宪, 叶剑飞, 张树栋. 腹腔镜下膀胱癌根治术同期行肾输尿管全长切除术的预后分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 961-966.
[5] 李宗瀚, 黄洋阅, 李宁, 李明磊, 宋宏程, 张潍平, 刘超. 国产单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统在儿童肾盂成形术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 662-665.
[6] 张启鸣, 陈泽波, 田雨, 潘大猛, 刘磊, 张洪宪, 赵磊, 张树栋, 马潞林, 侯小飞. 机器人辅助腹腔镜移植肾切除术经验总结[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 666-669.
[7] 张铃福, 王港, 侯纯升, 崔龙, 王立新, 凌晓锋, 徐智. 腹腔镜下改良经胆囊管胆管引流术在胆石症治疗及胆道疾病诊断中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 748-752.
[8] 刘世豪, 徐丽清, 李新飞, 杨昆霖, 李兆莹, 张子博, 王祥, 傅炜骁, 李志华, 李学松. 国产模块化手术机器人系统辅助肾盂成形术的可行性和安全性评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 779-783.
[9] 王焕瑞, 赖世聪, 胡浩浦, 丁泽华, 徐涛, 胡浩. 腹腔镜与输尿管软镜联合定位治疗复杂输尿管狭窄的疗效分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 784-788.
[10] 黄万伟, 沙显燊, 张艺宝, 伍国豪, 骆峰, 陈智慧, 叶东明, 李学松, 赖彩永. 完全3D腹腔镜回肠代双侧输尿管联合膀胱扩大术修复放射治疗后双侧输尿管狭窄并膀胱挛缩[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 789-795.
[11] 刘帅, 刘茁, 管允鹤, 王国良, 田晓军, 张洪宪, 刘磊, 马潞林, 张树栋. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下腔静脉节段性切除术治疗肾肿瘤瘤栓侵犯血管壁[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 796-802.
[12] 陈思鹭, 王海菊, 吴宇财, 李志华, 黄燕波, 何宇辉, 许洋洋, 李学松, 贯华. 成人肾积水病因分析:一项单中心横断面研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 913-918.
[13] 张树栋,谢睿扬. 机器人手术时代的肾癌合并腔静脉瘤栓治疗策略[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 562-564.
[14] 应沂岑,杜毅聪,李志华,张一鸣,李新飞,王冰,张鹏,朱宏建,周利群,杨昆霖,李学松. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下颊黏膜补片输尿管成形术治疗复杂输尿管狭窄[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 640-645.
[15] 毛海,张帆,张展奕,颜野,郝一昌,黄毅,马潞林,褚红玲,张树栋. 基于MRI前列腺腺体相关参数构建腹腔镜前列腺癌术后尿失禁的预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 818-824.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!