北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1112-1116. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.06.021

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

以苄索氯胺和异丙醇为主要有效成分的消毒剂对牙科印模精度的影响

徐迪,魏冬豪,张亚池,邸萍(),林野   

  1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,种植科 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-12 出版日期:2020-12-18 发布日期:2020-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 邸萍 E-mail:diping@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展科研专项(2018-2-4102)

Effect of disinfectant with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients on the accuracy of dental impression

Di XU,Dong-hao WEI,Ya-chi ZHANG,Ping DI(),Ye LIN   

  1. Department of Oral Implatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2020-02-12 Online:2020-12-18 Published:2020-12-13
  • Contact: Ping DI E-mail:diping@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Capital Health Research and Development Special Project(2018-2-4102)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的:探究以苄素氯胺和异丙醇为主要有效成分的消毒剂(Cavicide)对于牙科印模精度的影响。方法:体外试验评价Cavicide消毒剂对藻酸盐、聚醚橡胶和硅橡胶3种印模材料消毒后对印模精度的影响。应用高精度模型扫描仪(IScan D103i, Imetric)将标准模型数字化,使用藻酸盐、聚醚橡胶和硅橡胶材料分别制取标准模型的印模各30个,并将每种印模材料的30个印模随机平均分为3组,每组10个印模。在印模制取完成后,3组分别采用仅清水冲洗15 s(空白对照组,BC组)、2%(质量分数)戊二醛溶液浸泡30 min(戊二醛组,GD组)、Cavicide溶液表面喷洒5 min(Cavicide组,CC组)。采用模型扫描仪扫描印模,获得印模的数字化模型。在三维分析软件中,将印模扫描图像与标准模型的数字化模型进行配准,采用RMS作为评价印模与标准模型间偏差的参数。采用单因素方差分析比较3组间偏差,保存偏差的色谱图进行可视化分析。结果:聚醚橡胶及硅橡胶印模材料,3组间差异均无统计学意义(P=0.933,P=0.827);藻酸盐印模材料,GD组与BC组、GD组与CC组间差异均具有统计学意义(GD与 BC,P=0.001,GD与CC,P=0.002), BC组与CC组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.854)。结论:Cavicide喷洒消毒对聚醚橡胶、硅橡胶和藻酸盐印模的精度均未见影响。

关键词: 牙科印模, 印模消毒剂, 精度, 三维

Abstract:

Objective: To assess the effect of disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients disinfectant on dental impression accuracy. Methods: The effect of Cavicide on three impression materials (alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane) were assessed using a standard model. The standard model was digitized by an extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric). For each kind of impression materials, thirty impressions were taken following the manufactures’ instruction in the same conditions. Subsequently, the impressions were randomly divided into three groups, with ten impressions in each group. After the impression taking was completed, the three groups underwent pure water rinse for 1 min (blank control, BC), 2% glutaraldehyde solution immersion disinfection for 30 min (glutaraldehyde, GD), and Cavicide solution spray disinfection for 5 min (Cavicide, CC), respectively. All the impressions were digitized by the extraoral scanner (IScan D103i, Imetric) after disinfection and exported to a dedicated three-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic Qualify 2014, Geomagic, USA). In the software, the digital models of the impressions were trimmed to teeth and then superimposed with the digitized standard model via best-fit alignment. Root mean square (RMS) was used to evaluate the deviations between the impression and the standard model. The deviation in the anterior and posterior regions was evaluated respectively. One-way ANOVA test and the LSD post-hoc test were used to compare the deviations between the three groups (P <0.05). The color map of each superimposition was saved for visual analysis. Results: For the polyether and vinylpolysiloxane materials, the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant (P=0.933, P=0.827). For the alginate material, the difference in posterior region between group GD and group BC, as well as group GD and group CC were statistically significant (GD vs. BC, P=0.001; GD vs. CC, P=0.002), while the difference between group BC and group CC was not statistically significant (P=0.854). The visual analysis showed an obvious deviation in the buccal-lingual direction in group GD. Conclusion: Disinfectant (Cavicide) with benzethon chloramine and isopropanol as main active ingredients using spray disinfection has no effect on the accuracy of the alginate, polyether and vinylpolysiloxane impressions.

Key words: Dental impression, Disinfection, Accuracy, Three-dimensional

中图分类号: 

  • R783

图1

标准模型的牙合面观(A)与唇面观(B)"

图2

数字化的标准模型"

表1

前牙区印模与标准参考模型间RMS偏差(x-±s)"

Group BC GD CC P value
VSE 21.6±4.9 20.4±6.9 24.1±3.7 0.220
POE 28.7±10.3 31.2±9.4 30.9±11.4 0.740
ALG 40.5±21.6 47.9±23.0 42.4±25.1 0.703

表2

后牙区印模与标准参考模型间RMS偏差(x-±s)"

Group BC GD CC P value
VSE 27.1±6.7 29.2±10.0 26.4±7.7 0.733
POE 43.0±20.9 40.2±24.2 45.4±19.4 0.827
ALG 43.3±23.2 60.9±20.4 47.2±21.4 0.037

图3

前牙区各组印模与标准模型间典型偏差分布模式(切端观)"

图4

后牙区各组印模与标准模型间典型偏差分布模式(牙合面观)"

图5

后牙区各组藻酸盐印模与标准模型间典型偏差分布模式(颊侧观)"

[1] Alzain S. Effect of chemical, microwave irradiation, steam autoclave, ultraviolet light radiation, ozone and electrolyzed oxidizing water disinfection on properties of impression materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis study[J]. Saudi Dent J, 2020,32(4):161-170.
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.12.003 pmid: 32405219
[2] Sehulster L, Chinn RY. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. recommendations of CDC and the healthcare infection control practices advisory committee (HICPAC)[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2003,52(10):1-42.
[3] 于明红, 姚美令, 韩晓鹏, 等. 卡瓦液Cavicide对口腔种植聚醚印模消毒效果的研究[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2016,21(3):111-112.
[4] 马旭东, 张颖, 盛美春, 等. 一种口腔印模专用消毒剂对乙肝病毒活性及免疫原性的影响[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2017,34(7):628-630.
[5] Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, et al. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(6):715-719.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12375 pmid: 24720423
[6] de Villaumbrosia G, Martinez-Rus PF, Garcia-Orejas A, et al. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016,116(4):543-550.
pmid: 27112413
[7] Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2005,8(4):283-294.
pmid: 16689029
[8] Jagger DC, Vowles RW, McNally L, et al. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy and stability of some impression materials[J]. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2007,15(1):23-28.
pmid: 17378455
[9] 武红梅, 李长春, 江浩, 等. 不同消毒剂消毒口腔印模效果检测及其对印模尺寸稳定性的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2017,21(2):171-176.
[10] 陆金星, 陈亚明, 章非敏, 等. 不同消毒方法对口腔琼脂藻酸钾印模精度的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2004,19(24):3-4.
[11] Ulgey M, Gorler O, Yesilyurt G. Importance of disinfection time and procedure with different alginate impression products to reduce dimensional instability[J]. Niger J Clin Pract, 2020,23(3):284-290.
doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_456_19 pmid: 32134024
[12] 陈树国, 李磊, 李长明, 等. 浸泡消毒藻酸钾印模对模型尺寸稳定性的影响[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 2006,20(6):591-593.
[13] Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wostmann B. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2007,20(6):573-575.
pmid: 18069363
[14] Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions: an in vitro study[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2011,14(1):11-21.
pmid: 21657122
[1] 唐祖南,胡耒豪,陈震,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 增强现实技术在口腔颌面颈部解剖识别中的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 541-545.
[2] 吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[3] 毛渤淳,田雅婧,王雪东,李晶,周彦恒. 骨性Ⅱ类高角患者拔牙矫治前后的面部软硬组织变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 111-119.
[4] 凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[5] 黄莹,吴志远,周行红,蔡志刚,张杰. 股前外侧皮瓣修复上颌骨缺损术后面部软组织对称性感观分级[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 708-715.
[6] 张雯,刘筱菁,李自力,张益. 基于解剖标志的鼻翼基底缩窄缝合术对正颌患者术后鼻唇部形态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 736-742.
[7] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[8] 温奥楠,刘微,柳大为,朱玉佳,萧宁,王勇,赵一姣. 5种椅旁三维颜面扫描技术正确度的初步评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 343-350.
[9] 熊士凯,史尉利,王安鸿,谢兴,郭秦炜. 腓骨远端撕脱骨折的影像学诊断:踝关节X线与CT三维重建的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 156-159.
[10] 高梓翔,王勇,温奥楠,朱玉佳,秦庆钊,张昀,王晶,赵一姣. 基于三维下颌骨平均模型的颌骨标志点自动确定方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 174-180.
[11] 邢海英,陈玉辉,许珂,黄点点,彭清,刘冉,孙葳,黄一宁. 三维超声血管斑块定量分析技术评估颈动脉粥样硬化斑块[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 991-999.
[12] 李志胜,钱浩楠,范田园. 熔融沉积成型3D打印卡托普利与氢氯噻嗪复方片剂的制备与体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 572-577.
[13] 刘思民,赵一姣,王晓燕,王祖华. 动态导航下不同深度环钻定位精确度的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 146-152.
[14] 王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[15] 邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!