北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (6): 1047-1051. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.06.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

全自动EasyNAT核酸快速检测系统检测石蜡包埋组织诊断结核病的临床价值

车佳璐, 刘子臣, 李琨, 张晨, 车南颖*()   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院/北京市结核病胸部肿瘤研究所病理科,耐药结核病研究北京市重点实验室,北京 101149
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-13 出版日期:2024-12-18 发布日期:2024-12-18
  • 通讯作者: 车南颖 E-mail:cheny0448@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82072381);国家自然科学基金(31900098);北京市科技计划医药协同科技创新研究(Z181100001918027);北京市科技计划医药协同科技创新研究(Z191100006619079);通州区高层次人才发展支持计划(YHLD2018006)

Clinical value of automated EasyNAT system for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in paraffin-embedded tissues

Jialu CHE, Zichen LIU, Kun LI, Chen ZHANG, Nanying CHE*()   

  1. Department of Pathology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Research, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing 101149, China
  • Received:2022-10-13 Online:2024-12-18 Published:2024-12-18
  • Contact: Nanying CHE E-mail:cheny0448@163.com
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(82072381);the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31900098);the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project(Z181100001918027);the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project(Z191100006619079);the Tongzhou High-level Technique Talents Program(YHLD2018006)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 评估自动化EasyNAT核酸快速检测系统检测石蜡包埋组织诊断结核病的准确性。方法: 选择首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院2018年至2022年患者的病例资料进行回顾性分析,连续纳入134例患者,包括结核病确诊患者101例,非结核患者33例。以临床诊断结果为参考标准,分析EasyNAT核酸快速检测系统应用于石蜡包埋组织诊断结核病的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确率。结果: EasyNAT核酸快速检测系统应用于石蜡包埋组织诊断结核病的敏感性为87.1%(88/101,95% CI:79.2%~92.3%),特异性为100.0%(33/33,95%CI:89.6%~100.0%),阳性预测值为100.0%(88/88,95%CI:95.8%~100.0%),阴性预测值为71.7%(33/46,95%CI:57.5%~82.7%),准确率为90.3%(121/134,95%CI:84.1%~94.2%)。与实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction,qPCR)技术检测结果的一致性检验Kappa值为0.84。对肺结核的检出率为86.4%(38/44,95%CI:73.3%~ 93.6%),肺外结核的检出率为87.7%(50/57,95% CI:76.8%~93.9%),与qPCR对应的检测结果比较差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。而EasyNAT检测集核酸提取、扩增和分析于一体,与传统qPCR法相比,手工操作时间缩短了2 h,总检测时间缩短了3 h。结论: EasyNAT核酸快速检测系统可以快速、便捷、准确地检测出石蜡包埋组织中的结核分枝杆菌DNA,对于病理学诊断结核病具有良好的应用价值。

关键词: 结核病, 诊断, 石蜡包埋组织, 分子病理, 交叉引物恒温扩增技术

Abstract:

Objective: Assessing the accuracy of automated EasyNAT system for rapidly detecting paraffin-embedded tissue for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 134 patients, comprising 101 with confirmed tuberculosis and 33 without tuberculosis, treated at Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, between 2018 and 2022.The clinical diagnostic results served as the standard for assessing the diagnostic performance of the EasyNAT system in comparison to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for tuberculosis detection in paraffin-embedded tissues.The evaluation criteria included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate. Results: Based on the clinical diagnostic results, the EasyNAT assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 87.1%(88/101, 95%CI: 79.2%-92.3%)and a specificity of 100.0%(33/33, 95%CI: 89.6%-100.0%).The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate were 100% (88/88, 95%CI: 95.8%-100.0%), 71.7%(33/46, 95%CI: 57.5%-82.7%), and 90.3%(121/134, 95%CI: 84.1%-94.2%), respectively.In comparison, the qPCR assay exhibited a sensitivity of 96.0%(90.3%-98.5%)and a specificity of 100.0%(89.6%-100.0%).The positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate for qPCR were 100.0%(96.2%-100.0%), 89.2%(75.3%- 95.7%), and 97.0%(92.6%-98.8%).The Cohen's kappa value of 0.84 indicated substantial agreement between EasyNAT and qPCR.The detection rate of tuberculosis using this method was 86.4%(38/44, 95%CI: 73.3%-93.6%), while the detection rate for extrapulmonary tuberculosis was 87.7%(50/57, 95%CI: 76.8%-93.9%).In comparison, qPCR showed a detection rate of 97.7%(88.2%- 99.6%) for pulmonary tuberculosis and 94.7%(85.6%-98.6%)for extrapulmonary tuberculosis.There was no statistically significant difference in the detection results between the method and qPCR for both pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis(P>0.05).Importantly, the EasyNAT detection combined nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and analysis into one process.Compared with traditional qPCR methods, manual operation time was reduced by 2 hours, leading to an overall reduction in total testing time by 3 hours. Conclusion: The EasyNAT nucleic acid rapid detection system can quickly, conveniently, and accurately detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in paraffin-embedded tissues, demonstrating significant clinical utility in the pathological diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Diagnosis, Paraffin-embedded tissue, Molecular pathology, Cross-priming isothermal amplification technology

中图分类号: 

  • R52

图1

结核病组织病理学图片"

图2

qPCR和EasyNAT检测报告图"

图3

病例入组分析流程图"

表1

EasyNAT检测与qPCR方法应用于石蜡包埋组织检测效能比较"

Test assay Result TB Non-TB Sensitivity (95%CI) Specificity (95%CI) PPV (95%CI) NPV (95%CI) Accuracy (95%CI) Kappa
EasyNAT Positive 88 0 87.1 (79.2-92.3) 100.0 (89.6-100.0) 100.0(95.8-100.0) 71.7 (57.5-82.7) 90.3 (84.1-94.2)
Negative 13 33 0.8
qPCR Positive 97 0 96.0 (90.3-98.5) 100.0 (89.6-100.0) 100.0 (96.2-100.0) 89.2 (75.3-95.7) 97.0 (92.6-98.8)
Negative 4 33

表2

EasyNAT与qPCR方法对于肺结核和肺外结核的检出率比较"

Test assay Classification Positive Negative Total Positive rate (95%CI) P value
EasyNAT Pulmonary TB 38 6 44 86.4 (73.3-93.6) >0.05
Extrapulmonary TB 50 7 57 87.7 (76.8-93.9)
qPCR Pulmonary TB 43 1 44 97.7 (88.2-99.6)
Extrapulmonary TB 54 3 57 94.7 (85.6-98.6)

图4

EasyNAT快速检测系统检测流程"

1 Global tuberculosis report 2021(EB/OL). [2022-08-01]. https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/t-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2021.
2 中国结核病病理学诊断专家共识[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2017, 40(6): 419-425.
3 Suárez I , Fnger SM , Kröger S , et al.The diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis[J].Dtsch Arztebl Int,2019,116(43):729-735.
4 中华医学会结核病学分会临床检验专业委员会.结核病病原学分子诊断专家共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2018,41(9):8.
5 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会临床微生物与感染分会, 中华医学会检验医学分会临床微生物学组, 中华医学会微生物学和免疫学分会临床微生物学组.综合医院结核分枝杆菌感染实验室检查共识[J].中华检验医学杂志,2022,45(4):343-353.
6 罗春英, 王建东, 王璇, 等.荧光定量聚合酶链反应检测石蜡包埋组织结核杆菌的应用价值[J].中华病理学杂志,2012,41(8):562-563.
7 郝颖华, 罗森源, 汤显斌.即时荧光定量PCR法对石蜡包埋组织中结核杆菌的检测价值探究[J].中华病理学杂志,2020,49(10):1068-1070.
8 Zhang Z , Du J , Liu T , et al.EasyNAT MTC assay: A simple, rapid, and low-cost cross-priming amplification method for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis suitable for point-of-care testing[J].Emerg Microbes Infect,2021,10(1):1530-1535.
doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1959271
9 Fang R , Li X , Hu L , et al.Cross-priming amplification for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens[J].J Clin Microbiol,2009,47(3):845-847.
10 朱岩昆, 王宇, 靳晓伟, 等.交叉引物核酸恒温扩增技术在基层实验室诊断肺结核的应用价值[J].中国防痨杂志,2016,38(10):813-817.
11 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 结核病分类: WS196—2017[S/OL]. (2017-12-04)[2022-09-01]. http://www.sohu.com/a/208488734.771405.
12 肺结核诊断: WS 288—2017[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2018, 17(7): 642-652.
13 叶丰, 陈昱, 何度, 等.应用荧光定量聚合酶链反应对疑似结核组织的DNA分析[J].中华病理学杂志,2013,42(8):534-537.
14 方木通, 杨倩婷, 王仲元, 等.病理组织中的病原学检查对结核病的诊断价值[J].中华传染病杂志,2021,39(2):92-96.
[1] 陈心心, 唐哲, 乔艳春, 荣文笙. 北京市密云区4岁儿童患龋状况及其与龋活跃性检测的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 833-838.
[2] 钟华, 李原, 徐丽玲, 白明欣, 苏茵. 18F-FDG PET/CT在风湿免疫病中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 853-859.
[3] 李正芳,罗采南,武丽君,吴雪,孟新艳,陈晓梅,石亚妹,钟岩. 抗氨基甲酰化蛋白抗体在诊断类风湿关节炎中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 729-734.
[4] 姚海红,杨帆,唐素玫,张霞,何菁,贾园. 系统性红斑狼疮及成人Still病合并巨噬细胞活化综合征的临床特点及诊断指标[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 966-974.
[5] 李挺. 建设当代临床病理学科[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 197-200.
[6] 熊焰,李鑫,梁丽,李东,鄢丽敏,李雪迎,邸吉廷,李挺. 甲状腺粗针穿刺活检病理诊断的准确性评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 234-242.
[7] 哈雪梅,姚永正,孙莉华,辛春杨,熊焰. 实性肺胎盘样变形1例及文献复习[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 357-361.
[8] 宁博涵,张青霞,杨慧,董颖. 伴间质细胞增生、玻璃样变性及索状结构的子宫内膜样腺癌1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(2): 366-369.
[9] 陈适,刘田. 重视系统性血管炎的早期识别和个体化治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1065-1067.
[10] 曹瑞洁,姚中强,焦朋清,崔立刚. 不同分类标准对中国大动脉炎的诊断效能比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1128-1133.
[11] 徐朝焰,林长艺,叶达梅,吴培埕,宋明辉,刘有添,邓琼,黄雪艳,范忠晓,游雪兰. 感染性关节炎诊断分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1234-1237.
[12] 郝哲,岳蜀华,周利群. 拉曼技术在泌尿系统肿瘤检测中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 779-784.
[13] 于博,赵扬玉,张喆,王永清. 妊娠合并感染性心内膜炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 578-580.
[14] 孟广艳,张筠肖,张渝昕,刘燕鹰. IgG4相关性疾病中枢神经系统受累的临床特点分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1043-1048.
[15] 翟莉,邱楠,宋惠. 多中心网状组织细胞增生症1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(6): 1183-1187.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!