北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 89-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.01.016

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同高血压分级患者急性牙髓炎开髓治疗的风险评估

陈红涛, 王文英, 王津, 梁亚平, 王小婷, 侯光敏, 姬爱平△   

  1. (北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院急诊科,北京100081)
  • 出版日期:2016-02-18 发布日期:2016-02-18
  • 通讯作者: 姬爱平 E-mail:ji_aiping@sina.com

Risk assessment of different grades of hypertension during the treatment of patients with acute pulpitis

CHEN Hong-tao, WANG Wen-ying, WANG Jin, LIANG Ya-ping, WANG Xiao-ting, HOU Guang-min, JI Ai-ping△   

  1. (Department of Oral Emergency, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
  • Online:2016-02-18 Published:2016-02-18
  • Contact: JI Ai-ping E-mail:ji_aiping@sina.com

摘要:

目的:评估不同高血压分级患者治疗急性牙髓炎过程中的生命体征变化和影响因素,以获得风险预防措施。方法:纳入2014年2月至2015年2月间就诊于北京大学口腔医院急诊科的不同高血压分级的急性牙髓炎患者90例,收集患者的全身健康状况、口腔治疗情况、生命体征的变化等信息,根据高血压患者的心脑血管风险评估分型,把纳入研究的患者分为牙髓炎治疗的低危组、中危组和高危组各30例。结果:(1)与术前相比,高危组术中收缩压升高、舒张压升高、心率增快的比例都在80%以上(分别为90%、80%、100%),中危组和低危组各项指标升高的比例明显低于高危组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);同时,高危组超过1/4(26.7%)的患者收缩压增幅大于20 mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),2/5的患者舒张压增幅大于10 mmHg,与中危组和低危组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(2)与术前相比,高危组术中收缩压和舒张压变化的最大峰值均增高,收缩压增高(18.0±1.5) mmHg,舒张压增高(8.0±1.7) mmHg,心率变化均值也增加了(7.0±0.3) 次/min,而低危组和中危组这两项指标均下降;高危组有6例在治疗过程中出现心电图改变,低危组和中危组则无明显改变。(3)术前初评、术后终评的风险评估对比发现,中危组患者在术后被评价为中等危险的有23例,6例被评价为低等危险,1例为高等危险(风险评级增加);高危组术后被评价为高等危险的有20例,7例被评价为极高危险,3例为中等危险(风险评级降低)。结论:口腔治疗对于高血压患者来说是非常安全的,但危险因素、靶器官受损及并发症也会增加高血压患者在治疗过程中出现心血管意外的风险,因此应该采取一定措施来规避风险。

关键词: 高血压, 牙髓炎, 危险性评估

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the vital signs changes, influence factors in different grades of hypertension patients during the treatment of acute pulpitis, in order to obtain the risk prevention measures. Methods: In this study, 90 different grades of hypertension patients with acute pulpitis were recruited from February 2014 to February 2015 in the Department of Oral Emergency, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. The information about the patients’ general health, oral treatment, life signs of change information was collected. Patients were divided into high risk group, middle risk group, and low risk group (30 patients for each group). Results: (1) Compared with the preoperative, systolic blood pressure (90%), diastolic blood pressure (80%), heart rate increase (100%) were increased in the high risk group. The increase rates of the middle risk group and the low risk group were significantly lower than those of the high risk group (P<0.01). At the same time, the systolic blood pressure of 1/4 (26.7%) patients in high risk group increased more than 20 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa), and the diastolic blood pressure of 2/5 patients in high risk group increased more than 10 mmHg, the difference was statistically significant compared with the other two groups (P<0.05). (2) Compared with the preoperative, the average increase of the maximum peak were increased [systolic blood pressure (18.0±1.5) mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (8.0±1.7) mmHg], the mean of heart rate changes [(7.0±0.3) beats per minute] was also increased in the high risk group, while these two indicators were decreased in the low risk group and the middle risk group. The electrocardiogram (ECG) was changed in 6 cases during the treatment in the high risk group. No significantly changed were observed in the low risk group and the middle risk group. (3) Compared the risk assessment in preoperative with that in postoperative, in the middle risk group, 23 cases were evaluated as medium risk in final evaluation, 6 as low risk, and 1 as high risk (risk assessment increased); in the high risk group, 20 cases were evaluated as high risk, 7 as very high risk, and 3 as medium risk (risk assessment decreased). Conclusion: Oral treatment is very safe for patients with hypertension, but the risk factor, target organ damage, and complications will also increase the risk of cardiovascular events in elderly patients during the acute pulpitis treatment. Dentist should take some measures to avoid the risks.

Key words: Hypertension, Pulpitis, Risk assessment

中图分类号: 

  • R781.31
[1] 陈楚云,孙蓬飞,赵静,贾佳,范芳芳,王春燕,李建平,姜一梦,霍勇,张岩. 北京社区人群促红细胞生成素相关因素及其与10年心血管疾病风险的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1068-1073.
[2] 张云静,乔丽颖,祁萌,严颖,亢伟伟,刘国臻,王明远,席云峰,王胜锋. 乳腺癌患者新发心血管疾病预测模型的建立与验证:基于内蒙古区域医疗数据[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 471-479.
[3] 王爽,彭楚芳,刘鹤. 新型生物陶瓷材料用于乳磨牙牙髓切断术的临床疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1196-1201.
[4] 梁喆,范芳芳,张岩,秦献辉,李建平,霍勇. 中国高血压人群中H型高血压的比率和特征及与美国人群的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1028-1037.
[5] 马麟,吴静依,李双成,李鹏飞,张路霞. 抗高血压药物对二氧化氮长期暴露与慢性肾脏病关联的修饰效应[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 1047-1055.
[6] 皇甫宇超,杜依青,于路平,徐涛. 原发性醛固酮增多症术后高血压未治愈的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 686-691.
[7] 李志胜,钱浩楠,范田园. 熔融沉积成型3D打印卡托普利与氢氯噻嗪复方片剂的制备与体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 572-577.
[8] 杨航,杨林承,张瑞涛,凌云鹏,葛庆岗. 合并高血压、冠心病、糖尿病的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者发生病死的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 420-424.
[9] 郑鸿尘,薛恩慈,王雪珩,陈曦,王斯悦,黄辉,江锦,叶莺,黄春兰,周筠,高文静,余灿清,吕筠,吴小玲,黄小明,曹卫华,严延生,吴涛,李立明. 基于大家系设计的静息心率与常见慢性病双表型遗传度估计[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 432-437.
[10] 孟文颖,黄琬桐,张杰,焦明远,金蕾,靳蕾. 孕早期血清维生素E水平与妊娠期高血压疾病发病风险的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 470-478.
[11] 陈颖怡,胡紫琪,惠甜倩,刘鹤. Zeste同源蛋白2增强子通过调节巨噬细胞趋化影响牙髓炎症反应[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 18-23.
[12] 刘颖,曾祥柱,王筝,张函,王希林,袁慧书. 三维动脉自旋标记技术评价抑郁合并高血压患者脑血流灌注[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(2): 260-264.
[13] 刘雪芹, 闫辉, 邱建星, 张春雨, 齐建光, 张欣, 肖慧捷, 杨艳玲, 陈永红, 杜军保. 甲基丙二酸尿症相关肺高血压临床特点与基因突变[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 768-777.
[14] 凌龙,赵玉鸣,葛立宏. 不同炎症状态下犬年轻恒牙牙髓干细胞增殖及成骨分化能力的改变[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 878-883.
[15] 单娇,李宏宇,刘国峰,杨玄,董伟,简伟研,邓芙蓉,郭新彪. 大气污染对中老年高血压和心脑血管疾病患者卫生服务需求的影响:基于 CHARLS数据的分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(3): 460-464.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!