北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 753-755. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.05.001

• 工作综述 •    下一篇

周围神经缺损修复新方法——神经延长术

寇玉辉,姜保国△   

  1. (北京大学人民医院创伤骨科,北京大学交通医学中心, 北京100044)
  • 出版日期:2016-10-18 发布日期:2016-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 姜保国 E-mail:jiangbaoguo@vip.sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(31571236, 81372044)和北京大学人民医院研究与发展基金(RDB2015-11)资助

New treatment for peripheral nerve defects: nerve elongation

KOU Yu-hui, JIANG Bao-guo△   

  1. (Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Peking University People’s Hospital; Peking University Traffic Medicine Center, Beijing 100044, China)
  • Online:2016-10-18 Published:2016-10-18
  • Contact: JIANG Bao-guo E-mail:jiangbaoguo@vip.sina.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China (31571236, 81372044) and Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Funds (RDB2015-11)

摘要:

周围神经缺损在临床上常见,也是临床治疗的难点[1]。创伤性神经缺失、神经肿瘤医源性切除、神经延期修复时的神经短缩等均可导致不同程度的神经缺损[2-5],我国每年周围神经缺损患者高达30~50万例。对于小的周围神经缺损,可通过神经游离、转位、改变患肢体位和姿势等方法,将神经两断端接近后进行直接缝合[6]。对于较大的周围神经缺损,应用上述方法无法达到神经的无张力修复时,则需采用其他方法进行神经修复。目前临床上最常采用的是神经移植术[7-8],即采用自体神经段桥接缺损的神经,进而达到神经缺损修复的效果,但由于神经移植术的移植神经来源有一定的限制, 且通常还要以牺牲供区神经功能为代价[9-10],因此寻找其他修复方法和技术一直是周围神经缺损研究领域的热点。
我们从肢体延长手术中获得启示:周围神经的特殊组织结构及力学性质使得神经干具有一定限度的抗张性,一定范围内延长神经不会对神经造成损伤。经过延长神经可以使神经断端长度得到增加,从而达到缩短神经缺损距离的目的,使得缺损的神经能够直接缝合修复,因此我们开展了用周围神经延长技术修复周围神经缺损的系统研究:完成了周围神经延长器研发、周围神经延长极限、延长神经修复神经缺损效果等多个研究,现将此系统性研究成果报道如下。

关键词: 周围神经, 神经延长, 神经缺损, 修复

Abstract:

Peripheral nerve defects are still a major challenge in clinical practice, and the most commonly used method of treatment for peripheral nerve defects is nerve transplantation, which has certain limitations and shortcomings, so new repair methods and techniques are needed. The peripheral nerve is elongated in limb lengthening surgery without injury, from which we got inspirations and proposed a new method to repair peripheral nerve defects: peripheral nerve elongation. The peripheral nerve could beelongated by a certain percent, but the physiological change and the maximum elongation range were still unknown. This study discussed the endurance, the physiological and pathological change of peripheral nerve elongation in detail, and got a lot of useful data. First, we developed peripheral nerve extender which could match the slow and even extension of peripheral nerve. Then, our animal experiment result confirmed that the peripheral nerve had better endurance for chronic elongation than that of acute elongation and cleared the extensibility of peripheral nerve and the range of repair for peripheral nerve defects. Our result also revealed the histological basis and changed the rule for pathological physiology of peri-pheral nerve elongation: the most important structure foundation of peripheral nerve elongation was Fontana band, which was the coiling of nerve fibers under the epineurium, so peripheral nerve could be stretched for 8.5%-10.0% without injury because of the Fontana band. We confirmed that peripheral nerve extending technology could have the same repair effect as traditional nerve transplantation through animal experiments. Finally, we compared the clinical outcomes between nerve elongation and perfor-mance of the conventional method in the repair of short-distance transection injuries in human elbows, and the post-operative follow-up results demonstrated that early neurological function recovery was better in the nerve elongation group than in the conventional group. On the whole, all of these experimental results revealed the physiological phenomenon of peripheral nerve elongation, and described the physiological change and stretch range in detail. The systematic research results have filled the blank in this field, which is very helpful for clinical limb lengthening surgery, the design of elongation surgery and the evaluation of the peripheral nerve stretch injury. Peripheral nerve elongation will become an innovative treatment technology in repairing peripheral nerve defects.

Key words: Peripheral nerves, Nerve elongation, Nerve Defect, Repair

中图分类号: 

  • R651.3
[1] 应沂岑,杜毅聪,李志华,张一鸣,李新飞,王冰,张鹏,朱宏建,周利群,杨昆霖,李学松. 机器人辅助腹腔镜下颊黏膜补片输尿管成形术治疗复杂输尿管狭窄[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 640-645.
[2] 张晗,秦亦瑄,韦帝远,韩劼. 牙周炎患者种植修复维护治疗依从性的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 39-44.
[3] 赵菡,卫彦,张学慧,杨小平,蔡晴,宁成云,徐明明,刘雯雯,黄颖,何颖,郭亚茹,江圣杰,白云洋,吴宇佳,郭雨思,郑晓娜,李文静,邓旭亮. 口腔硬组织修复材料仿生设计制备和临床转化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 4-8.
[4] 李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[5] 马建勋,夏有辰,李比,赵红梅,雷玉涛,布希. 乳腺癌改良根治术后即刻乳房重建的方式选择[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 612-618.
[6] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[7] 吴思妤,李娅宁,张晓,吕珑薇,刘云松,叶红强,周永胜. 上颌中切牙全瓷冠牙体预备学习曲线的预测、分析与应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 108-113.
[8] 左炜,高菲,袁昌巍,熊盛炜,李志华,张雷,杨昆霖,李新飞,刘靓,魏来,张鹏,王冰,谷亚明,朱宏建,赵峥,李学松. 基于多中心数据库的10年上尿路修复手术术式及术型变化趋势[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 692-698.
[9] 罗昊,田福聪,王晓燕. 不同椅旁可切削修复材料序列抛光时间及表面粗糙度与光泽度的比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(3): 565-571.
[10] 蓝璘,贺洋,安金刚,张益. 颧骨缺损不同修复重建方法和预后的回顾性分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 356-362.
[11] 刘云松,周倜,叶红强. 前牙美学修复的整体策略及细节剖析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 1-6.
[12] 马珂楠,陈虎,沈妍汝,周永胜,王勇,孙玉春. 选择性激光熔化打印可摘局部义齿圆环形卡环固位力的有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 105-112.
[13] 王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 187-192.
[14] 孙玉春,郭雨晴,陈虎,邓珂慧,李伟伟. 口腔精准仿生修复技术的自主创新研发与转化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 7-12.
[15] 梁峰,吴敏节,邹立东. 后牙区单牙种植修复5年后的临床修复疗效观察[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 970-976.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!