北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 915-918. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.05.031

• 病例报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

全腹腔镜胆囊肝管型皮下通道治疗肝内胆管结石11例

李涛*,崔龙,王港,凌晓锋,侯纯升,王立新,徐智△   

  1. (北京大学第三医院普外科, 北京, 100191)
  • 出版日期:2016-10-18 发布日期:2016-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 徐智 E-mail:xuzhi123456@sohu.com

Total laparoscopy to treat hepatolithiasis using gallbladder-hepatic duct subcutaneous tunnel

LI Tao*, CUI Long, WANG Gang, LING Xiao-feng, HOU Chun-sheng, WANG Li-xin, XU Zhi△   

  1. (Department of General Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China)
  • Online:2016-10-18 Published:2016-10-18
  • Contact: XU Zhi E-mail:xuzhi123456@sohu.com

摘要:

肝内胆管结石病情复杂多变、治愈率低、易复发等,一直困扰临床治疗,随着目前诊断技术的发展及精准外科理念的提出,对肝内胆管结石的外科治疗提出了更高的要求,尤其是微创治疗更是目前的治疗热点,近年来,随着腹腔镜外科技术不断成熟,手术安全性不断提高,在腹腔镜下完成肝内胆管结石的治疗已成为可能。现将北京大学第三医院普外科2010年1月至2014年10月采用完全腹腔镜下胆囊肝管型皮下通道治疗肝内胆管结石11例患者病例资料总结如下。

关键词: 胆管,肝内, 结石, 胆道外科手术, 腹腔镜

Abstract:

To investigate the effect and feasibility of total laparoscopy to treat hepatolithiasis using gallbladder-hepatic duct subcutaneous tunnel.Retrospective analysis was conducted of the case data of 11 patients with hepatolithiasis who underwent total laparoscopic treatment using gallbladder-hepatic duct subcutaneous tunnel from January 2010 to October 2014. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications and recurrence of stones were recorded.All the cases completed the operation.The average hospital-stay was 9.2 days (range: 3-29 d). The average operation time was 298 min (range: 225-480 min). The average blood loss was 253 mL (range: 50-700 mL), and the average blood loss of liver resection groups was 325 mL (range: 200-700 mL). The average discharge time was 3.3 days (range: 3-5 d). The rate of postoperative residual stones was 36.4% (4/11).We extracted stones with choledochofiberscope via T-tube sinus six weeks after operation. One case developed biliary leakage, and healed through adequate drainage and the T-tube was pulled out after one month. There was no perioperative mortality. All the cases were followed up and the mean follow-up was 22 months (range: 2-51 months). The anastomotic stenosis of gallbladder-hepatic duct was found in one case. But we got a good therapeutic result with performed gallbladder chemical ablation with 95% ethanol. No recurrence of hepatolithiasis was found. As a choice for minimally invasive method to hepatolithiasis using gallbladder-hepatic duct subcutaneous tunnel,total laparoscopy is a safe and feasible procedure.

Key words: Bileducts, intrahepatic, Calculi, Biliary tract surgical procedures, Laparoscopy

中图分类号: 

  • R575
[1] 王明瑞,刘军,熊六林,于路平,胡浩,许克新,徐涛. 经皮微通道-微电子肾镜-微超声探针碎石术治疗1.5~2.5 cm肾结石的疗效和安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 605-609.
[2] 郑生旗,花天池,殷桂草,张伟,姚曳,李一帆. 甘油三酯葡萄糖指数与男性肾结石风险的关联[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 610-616.
[3] 乔佳佳,田聪,黄晓波,刘军. 肾结石合并系统性红斑狼疮行经皮肾镜碎石取石术的安全性和有效性评估[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 745-749.
[4] 毛海,张帆,张展奕,颜野,郝一昌,黄毅,马潞林,褚红玲,张树栋. 基于MRI前列腺腺体相关参数构建腹腔镜前列腺癌术后尿失禁的预测模型[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 818-824.
[5] 邱敏,宗有龙,王滨帅,杨斌,徐楚潇,孙争辉,陆敏,赵磊,卢剑,刘承,田晓军,马潞林. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中高复杂程度肾肿瘤的效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[6] 刘慧丽,吕彦函,王晓晓,李民. 老年患者腹腔镜泌尿系肿瘤根治术后慢性疼痛的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 851-856.
[7] 秦彩朋,王飞,杜依青,张晓威,李清,刘士军,徐涛. 无症状无积水输尿管结石4例患者的诊治[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 939-942.
[8] 田聪,刘军,杨波,乔佳佳,黄晓波,许清泉. 经皮肾镜取石术中异常肾盂黏膜活检结果分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 948-952.
[9] 王磊,韩天栋,江卫星,李钧,张道新,田野. 主动迁移技术与原位碎石技术在输尿管软镜治疗1~2 cm输尿管上段结石中的安全性和有效性比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 553-557.
[10] 柳登高,郑丹妮,赵雅宁,张亚琼,叶欣,张丽琪,谢晓艳,张雷,张祖燕,俞光岩. 疑难唾液腺结石病的治疗研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(1): 8-12.
[11] 王昱,张慧敏,邓雪蓉,刘伟伟,陈璐,赵宁,张晓慧,宋志博,耿研,季兰岚,王玉,张卓莉. 尿枸橼酸定量检测在原发性痛风患者肾结石诊断中的应用价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1134-1140.
[12] 张铃福,侯纯升,徐智,王立新,凌晓锋,王港,崔龙,修典荣. 腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆管引流联合胆总管探查取石术治疗复杂胆管结石的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1185-1189.
[13] 俞光岩,苏家增,柳登高,吴立玲,丛馨. 下颌下腺保存治疗新技术体系的建立与应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 842-845.
[14] 安立哲,熊六林,陈亮,王焕瑞,陈伟男,黄晓波. 腹腔镜肾盂成形术联合肾盂镜超声碎石取石术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻合并肾结石[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 746-750.
[15] 张帆,陈曲,郝一昌,颜野,刘承,黄毅,马潞林. 术前及术后膜性尿道长度与腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后控尿功能恢复的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 299-303.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!