心肌梗死后室间隔穿孔:非选择性病例的外科临床结果

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.06.022

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨急性心肌梗死后室间隔穿孔患者的临床预后与外科治疗结果,分析相关危险因素及治疗方式与时机。方法自2006年1月至2019年2月,选取北京大学人民医院心外科连续非选择性收治的急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔病例23例,其中男性12例(52.2%),女性11例(47.8%),平均年龄(64.26±11.09)岁;接受手术18例,未行手术治疗5例。总结所有患者临床资料和手术相关情况,并进行随访。结果接受手术治疗的患者中,穿孔发生到手术平均时间为(19.39±13.67) d,其中穿孔1周内手术的共6例(33.3%), 2~4周内手术的共6例(33.3%), 4周以上手术的共6例(33.3%)。因血流动力学不稳定行急诊手术11例(61.1%), 择期手术7例(38.9%)。5例患者(27.8%)采用将室间隔穿孔用补片隔绝于左心室腔外,13例患者(72.2%)采用直接扩大补片修补穿孔。18例手术中同期行冠状动脉旁路移植12例(66.7%)。所有手术患者中,住院期间死亡7例(38.9%),相较于生存患者,围手术期死亡患者穿孔发生更早[(1.83±0.75) d vs.(5.22±4.66) d,P=0.019],有更高的急诊手术率(100.0% vs. 36.4%,P=0.009)和更低的同期旁路移植手术率(28.6% vs. 90.1%,P=0.008)。术后随访中位时间2年(3个月~10年),2例患者因心功能不全分别于术后2个月死亡,长期院外存活9例(50.0%)。未手术治疗的5例患者中, 2例在等待手术期间死亡,3例拒绝手术的患者均在出院后1周内死亡。结论外科手术是急性心肌梗死并发室间隔穿孔的患者有效治疗方式;最佳的手术时机需通过实时的评估与监测,结合患者情况综合决定;术中同期冠状动脉旁路移植术对于室间隔穿孔患者可能是有益的。

关键词: 急性心肌梗死, 室间隔穿孔, 危险因素, 手术时机

Abstract:

Objective: To observe the clinical prognosis and surgical treatment results in patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture, and to discuss the risk factors,methods & timing of treatment.Methods: From January 2006 to February 2019, 23 patients with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture were admitted to the department of cardiac surgery,Peking University People’s Hospital, including 12 males (52.2%) and 11 females (47.8%), aged (64.26 ±11.09) years. Among them, 18 cases underwent operation, and 5 cases did not receive surgical treatment. The clinical data and follow-up data were summarized retrospectively.Results: Among the patients treated with operation, the average time from perforation to operation was (19.39 ±13.67) d, including 6 cases (33.3%) of perforation within 1 week, 6 cases (33.3%) within 2 to 4 weeks and 6 cases (33.3%) more than 4 weeks. Emergency surgery was performed in 11 cases (61.1%) because of hemodynamic instability, and selective operation in 7 cases (38.9%). Direct enlarged patch was used in 13 cases (72.2%), and some infarct exclusion techniques were used in 5 patients (27.8%). In 18 cases, coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 12 cases (66.7%). Of all the surgical patients, 7 (38.9%) died during hospitalization. Compared with the survival patients, the perioperative death patients had earlier perforation [(1.83±0.75) d vs. (5.22 ±4.66) d, P=0.019] and higher emergency operation rate (100% vs. 36.4%, P=0.009) and lower simultaneous bypass grafting rate (28.6% vs. 90.1%, P=0.008). The median follow-up time was 2 years (3 months to 10 years). 2 patients died of heart failure in 2 months after operation, and 9 cases (50.0%) survived for a long time. Of the 5 patients who had not been treated, 2 died while waiting for operation, and 3 patients who refused surgery died within 1 week after discharge.Conclusion: Surgery is an effective treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with ventricular septum perforation. The best time for operation should be determined by real-time evaluation and monitoring, combined with the situation of patients. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting may be beneficial to these patients.

Key words: Acute myocardial infarction, Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture, Risk factors, Operation opportunity

中图分类号:

R654.2

高卿,陈彧,刘刚,陈生龙,董穗欣. 心肌梗死后室间隔穿孔:非选择性病例的外科临床结果[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2019, 51(6): 1103-1107.

Qing GAO,Yu CHEN,Gang LIU,Sheng-long CHEN,Sui-xin DONG. Clinical results after surgical treatment for non-selective case with postinfarction ventricular septal rupture[J]. Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences), 2019, 51(6): 1103-1107.

图/表 3

表1

围手术期死亡与生存患者比较"

	Death group(n=7)	Survival group(n=11)	Test value	P
Age/years, $x ?$ ±s	63.43±12.34	62.55±12.52	0.277	0.606
Gender,n(%)			-0.470	0.638
Male	3(42.9)	6(54.5)
Female	4(57.1)	5(45.5)
Time from infarction to perforation/d	1.83±0.75	5.22±4.66	7.236	0.019
Cardiogenic shock,n(%)	3(42.9)	4(36.4)	-0.464	0.643
Hypertension,n(%)	5(71.4)	7(63.6)	-0.332	0.740
Hyperlipidemia,n(%)	2(28.6)	3(27.3)	-0.058	0.954
Diabetes,n(%)	1(14.3)	3(27.3)	-0.991	0.322
LVED/cm	5.66±0.91	5.37±0.70	0.803	0.384
LVEF/%	55.60±10.10	55.30±14.60	1.713	0.210
Perforation size/cm	1.31±0.47	1.52±0.53	0.227	0.640
BNP/(ng/L)	1 285.00±946.30	1 490.50±818.00	0.094	0.767
Preoperative IABP,n(%)	6(85.7)	6(54.5)	-1.329	0.184
Preoperative mechanical ventilation,n(%)	0(0)	3(27.3)	-1.471	0.141
Preoperative CRRT,n(%)	0(0)	1(0.09)	-0.798	0.425
Time from perforation to operation/d	15.00±15.67	22.18±12.18	0.919	0.352
Emergency operation,n(%)	7(100.0)	4(36.4)	-2.624	0.009
Simultaneous CABG,n(%)	2(28.6)	10(90.1)	-2.658	0.008
Postoperative residual shunt,n(%)	2(28.6)	3(27.3)	-0.493	0.622

表1

图1

图2

参考文献 13

[1]	Asai T . Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture: Can we improve clinical outcome of surgical repair?[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016,64(3):121-130.
[2]	Crenshaw BS, Granger CB, Birnbaum Y , et al. Risk factors, angiographic patterns, and outcomes in patients with ventricular septal defect complicating acute myocardial infarction[J]. Circulation, 2000,101(1):27-32.
[3]	姜德田, 屈庆喜 . 30例急性心肌梗死并发室间隔穿孔的临床分析[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2018,6(27):41-42.
[4]	Arnaoutakis GJ, Zhao Y, George TJ , et al. Surgical repair of ventricular septal defect after myocardial infarction: outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2012,94(2):436-444.
[5]	倪宇晴, 唐建军, 台适 , 等. 急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔早期死亡相关因素分析[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2018,46(12):981-986.
[6]	王彩莲, 赵昕, 荆全民 , 等. 急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔临床特点及近、远期预后研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2017(6):617-621.
[7]	Cooley D . Surgical repair of ruptured interventricular septum following acute myocardial infarction[J]. Surgery, 1957,41:930.
[8]	Kamioka N, Block PC . Septal rupture closure: Still a challenge[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2018,92(6):1116-1117.
[9]	Kuwano H, Amano J, Yokomise H . Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2010: Annual report by the Japanese association for thoracic surgery[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012,60(10):680-708.
[10]	Amano J, Kuwano H, Yokomise H . Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2011: Annual report by the Japanese association for thoracic surgery[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013,61(10):578-607.
[11]	Masuda M, Kuwano H, Okumura M , et al. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2012: annual report by the Japanese association for thoracic surgery[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2014,62(12):734-764.
[12]	Takahashi H, Arif R, Almashhoor A , et al. Long-term results after surgical treatment of postinfarction ventricular septal rupture[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015,47(4):720-724.
[13]	张岩, 杨研, 杨克明 , 等. 急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔的近中期外科疗效分析[J]. 中国心血管病研究, 2019,17(6):547-550.

相关文章 15

[1]	魏慧, 张警丰, 姚中强, 赵金霞. 类风湿关节炎合并慢性病贫血患者的临床特征及相关因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 307-312.
[2]	赵杰, 付春, 赵秀娟, 薛海岩, 李纾, 王振洲, 朱凤雪. 胸部创伤患者在重症监护病房内发生呼吸机相关性肺炎的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 351-358.
[3]	郭芷均, 俎明, 马超, 张贺军, 张静, 丁士刚. 同时性多发早期胃癌漏诊病灶的临床病理特征[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2026, 58(2): 410-415.
[4]	李博闻, 张强, 孙益鑫. 儿童及青年漏斗胸患者Nuss术后发生脊柱侧弯的风险预测模型建立及验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 941-946.
[5]	杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[6]	刘伟, 郭稳, 过哲, 李春艳, 李云龙, 刘思奇, 张亮, 宋慧. 痛风患者放射学阴性骨侵蚀的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(4): 735-739.
[7]	陆梦溪, 刘秋萍, 周恬静, 刘晓非, 孙烨祥, 沈鹏, 林鸿波, 唐迅, 高培. 基于社区人群队列的甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数与心血管病发病和死亡的关联[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 430-435.
[8]	杨龙傲, 金旭, 黄文初, 何丽华, 陈娟. 视屏作业人员视疲劳及干眼的流行病学调查[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(3): 554-561.
[9]	郭华秋, 王哲, 杨雪, 白洁. 口腔急诊出血患者的临床特征与危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 142-147.
[10]	邓敏婷, 王楠, 夏斌, 赵玉鸣, 朱俊霞. 儿童及青少年挫入恒前牙自行再萌出的相关影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2025, 57(1): 148-153.
[11]	李钰锴, 王红彦, 罗靓, 李云, 李春. 抗磷脂抗体在白塞病合并血栓中的临床意义[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1036-1040.
[12]	田杨, 韩永正, 李娇, 王明亚, 曲音音, 房景超, 金辉, 李民, 王军, 徐懋, 王圣林, 郭向阳. 颈椎前路手术后硬膜外血肿的发生率和危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1058-1064.
[13]	王明瑞, 赖金惠, 姬家祥, 唐鑫伟, 胡浩浦, 王起, 许克新, 徐涛, 胡浩. 使用中文版威斯康星结石生活质量问卷预测肾结石患者生活质量降低的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(6): 1069-1074.
[14]	李志存, 吴天俣, 梁磊, 范宇, 孟一森, 张骞. 穿刺活检单针阳性前列腺癌术后病理升级的危险因素分析及列线图模型构建[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(5): 896-901.
[15]	颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(4): 589-593.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed