北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 1130-1134. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.06.024

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

120例中国成年人上前牙美学比例分析

吴为良1,2,曾筱3,刘晓强1,(),谭建国1   

  1. 1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,修复科 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室 口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081
    2. 福建医科大学附属口腔医院种植二科,福州 350002
    3. 贵州医科大学附属口腔医院口腔修复种植科,贵阳 550002
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-05 出版日期:2020-12-18 发布日期:2020-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 刘晓强 E-mail:liuxiaoqiang@bjmu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学口腔医院临床新技术新疗法项目(PKUSSNCT-19A03);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合LH[2016]7258)

Esthetic proportions of maxillary anterior teeth of 120 Chinese adults

Wei-liang WU1,2,Xiao ZENG3,Xiao-qiang LIU1,(),Jian-guo TAN1   

  1. 1. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China
    2. Department of Oral Implantology Ⅱ, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    3. Department of Prosthodontics and Implant, Stomatological Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550002, China
  • Received:2019-04-05 Online:2020-12-18 Published:2020-12-13
  • Contact: Xiao-qiang LIU E-mail:liuxiaoqiang@bjmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Program for New Clinical Techniques and Therapies of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology(PKUSSNCT-19A03);Science and Technology Plan Project of Guizhou Province of China(LH[2016]7258)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的:评价120例中国成年人相邻上前牙的宽度比和上前牙临床冠的宽长比,为口腔美学诊疗提供依据。方法:分别在华北、东南、西南地区三家口腔医院的义齿加工中心按照纳入和排除标准收集上颌石膏模型,拍摄标准数码照片,以ImageJ软件测量相邻上前牙的宽度比和上前牙临床冠的宽长比,评价相邻上前牙的宽度比与黄金分割比例和Preston比例有无差异,上前牙临床冠的宽长比与理想值0.80有无差异,分析不同性别、左右两侧和不同地域中国成年人的上前牙美学比例有无差异。结果:侧切牙与中切牙的宽度比为0.724±0.047,尖牙与侧切牙的宽度比为0.814±0.092;中切牙、侧切牙和尖牙的临床冠宽长比分别为0.848±0.072、0.834±0.094、0.883±0.098;上述比例与既往理想值的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。不同性别、左右两侧和不同地域进行比较,侧切牙与中切牙的宽度比:右侧比左侧大(分别为0.730±0.044和0.718±0.050)、华北地区比西南地区小(分别为0.711±0.051和0.731±0.044);中切牙的临床冠宽长比:女性比男性大(分别为0.855±0.074和0.835±0.068)、右侧比左侧大(分别为0.855±0.073和0.842±0.072);侧切牙的临床冠宽长比:女性比男性大(分别为0.843±0.097和0.817±0.084);上述差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中国成年人上前牙美学比例具有自身特点,应用时需考虑性别和地域差异。

关键词: 牙科美学, 切牙, 成年人, 牙冠, 牙测量学

Abstract:

Objective: To analyze the esthetic proportions of maxillary anterior teeth in term of the apparent widths proportion of the adjacent teeth and width/height ratio of the clinical crown in 120 Chinese adults. Methods: Maxillary gypsum casts were obtained from the dental laboratories of stomatological hospitals in North China, Southeast China, and Southwest China, according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Standardized digital photographs of each cast were recorded. The apparent widths and actual widths and heights of the central incisors, lateral incisors and canines were determined by ImageJ software for the calculation of apparent widths proportion of the adjacent teeth and width/height ratio of the clinical crown. The ideal apparent widths proportion (Golden proportion and Preston proportion) and width/height ratio (0.80) were tested. The gender, arch side, and regional differences were investigated. Results: The apparent widths proportion of the lateral/central incisor was 0.724±0.047, of the canine/lateral incisor was 0.814±0.092. The width/height ratio of the central incisor was 0.848±0.072, of the lateral incisor was 0.834±0.094, of the canine was 0.883±0.098. The esthetic proportions were different from the predicted ideal ratio (P<0.001). The apparent widths proportion of lateral/central incisor was significantly larger in the right side than that in the left side (0.730± 0.044 vs. 0.718±0.050), and was significantly smaller in North China than that in Southwest China (0.711±0.051 vs. 0.731±0.044). The width/height ratio of the central incisor was significantly larger in the female than that in the male (0.855±0.074 vs. 0.835±0.068), and in the right side than that in the left side (0.855±0.073 vs. 0.842±0.072). The width/height ratio of the lateral incisor was significantly larger in the female than that in the male (0.843±0.097 vs. 0.817±0.084). Conclusion: The apparent widths proportion of adjacent teeth and the width/height ratio of the clinical crown in Chinese adults are different from the foreigner’s. The esthetic proportion parameters have significant population specificity, and the measurements cannot be generalized as well as it should be applied with caution.

Key words: Dental esthetics, Incisor, Adult, Tooth crown, Odontometry

中图分类号: 

  • R783

图1

数码照片及美学比例测量方法"

表1

相邻上前牙的宽度比(按性别、左右侧及地区分析)"

Items Lateral incisor/central incisor Canine/lateral incisor
x-±s P x-±s P
Average 0.724±0.047 0.814±0.092
Gender
Female 0.724±0.048a 0.878 0.817±0.093a 0.529
Male 0.725±0.046a 0.808±0.090a
Side
Right 0.730±0.044a 0.012 0.822±0.090a 0.089
Left 0.718±0.050b 0.806±0.094a
Region
North 0.711±0.051a 0.819±0.099a
Southeast 0.726±0.047a,b 0.044 0.805±0.098a 0.512
Southwest 0.731±0.044b 0.819±0.081a

表2

上前牙临床冠的宽长比(按性别、左右侧及地区分析)"

Items Central incisor Lateral incisor Canine
x-±s P x-±s P x-±s P
Average 0.848±0.072 0.834±0.094 0.883±0.098
Gender
Female 0.855±0.074a 0.047 0.843±0.097a 0.045 0.891±0.094a 0.067
Male 0.835±0.068b 0.817±0.084b 0.866±0.105a
Side
Right 0.855±0.073a 0.002 0.841±0.092a 0.076 0.887±0.092a 0.318
Left 0.842±0.072b 0.828±0.096a 0.879±0.104a
Region
North 0.838±0.072a 0.820±0.090a 0.894±0.095a
Southeast 0.858±0.079a 0.251 0.842±0.095a 0.347 0.897±0.103a 0.063
Southwest 0.847±0.066a 0.836±0.095a 0.862±0.092a
[1] 谭建国. 牙齿美学修复的美学分析与设计[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2011,4(8):449-450.
[2] Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1973,29(4):358-382.
doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(73)80013-7 pmid: 4570911
[3] Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1978,40(3):244-252.
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(78)90028-8 pmid: 279670
[4] Preston JD. The golden proportion revisited[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 1993,5(6):247-251.
doi: 10.1111/jerd.1993.5.issue-6
[5] Gürel G. The science and art of porcelain laminate veneers [M]. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd, 2003: 63-66.
[6] Sarver DM. Principles of cosmetic dentistry in orthodontics: Part 1. Shape and proportionality of anterior teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004,126(6):749-753.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.034 pmid: 15592225
[7] Al-Kaisy N, Garib BT. Analysis of the golden proportion and width/height ratios of maxillary anterior teeth in Arab and Kurdish populations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,119(6):981-986.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.017 pmid: 29153745
[8] Condon M, Bready M, Quinn F, et al. Maxillary anterior tooth dimensions and proportions in an Irish young adult population[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2011,38(7):501-508.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02181.x
[9] Ozdemir H, Koseoglu M, Bayindir F. An investigation of the esthetic indicators of maxillary anterior teeth in young Turkish people[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018,120(4):583-588.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.015 pmid: 29724547
[10] Orozco-Varo A, Arroyo-Cruz G, Martinez-de-Fuentes R, et al. Biometric analysis of the clinical crown and the width/length ratio in the maxillary anterior region [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(6):565-570.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.11.006 pmid: 25858215
[11] Song JW, Leesungbok R, Park SJ, et al. Analysis of crown size and morphology, and gingival shape in the maxillary anterior dentition in Korean young adults[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2017,9(4):315-320.
doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.315 pmid: 28875000
[12] 陈润, 杨舟, 吴千驹, 等. 对正常牙合者上颌前牙相互间牙冠宽度比例的计算机图像测量分析[J]. 福建医科大学学报, 2012,46(1):39-42.
[13] Sah SK, Zhang HD, Chang T, et al. Maxillary anterior teeth dimensions and proportions in a central mainland chinese population[J]. Chin J Dent Res, 2014,17(2):117-124.
pmid: 25531020
[14] 余挺, 杨希, 赵莉, 等. 中国汉族成年人的上前牙临床牙冠长度及宽长比分析[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018,34(9):1003-1006.
[15] 罗旭, 陈立, 谭建国. 上前牙美学比例喜好度的调查[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2015,16(4):232-236.
[16] Noroozi H, Nik TH, Saeeda R. The dental arch form revisited[J]. Angle Orthod, 2001,71(5):386-389.
doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0386:TDAFR>2.0.CO;2 pmid: 11605873
[17] Liu XQ, Chen L, Zhou JF, et al. An internet evaluation of Chinese public preferences for asymmetrically altered incisor angulations[J]. Chin J Dent Res, 2012,15(2):129-137.
pmid: 23509834
[18] 杨洋, 黄一平, 杜飞宇, 等. 北京海淀地区大学生对女性微笑时前牙美学参数认知及关注程度的调查[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2012,47(12):753-757.
[19] Cooper GE, Tredwin CJ, Cooper NT, et al. The influence of maxillary central incisor height-to-width ratio on perceived smile aesthetics[J]. Br Dent J, 2012,212(12):589-599.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.522 pmid: 22722122
[1] 王婷,李乔晟,刘皓冉,简伟研. 人格特征、城乡差异与抑郁症状变化的关系[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 385-391.
[2] 欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[3] 甄敏,孟焕新,胡文杰,武登诚,危伊萍. 改良牙冠延长术后组织愈合的动物实验研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(5): 927-935.
[4] 何海龙,李清,徐涛,张晓威. 耻骨上吸脂术联合改良Devine术治疗成人获得性隐匿性阴茎[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 741-745.
[5] 冯莎蔚,国慧,王勇,赵一姣,刘鹤. 乳牙数字化参考牙冠模型的初步构建[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 327-334.
[6] 邱淑婷,朱玉佳,王时敏,王飞龙,叶红强,赵一姣,刘云松,王勇,周永胜. 姿势微笑位口唇对称参考平面的数字化构建及初步应用验证[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 193-199.
[7] 刘晓强,杨洋,周建锋,刘明月,谭建国. 成年人后牙失去邻牙合接触后的三维位置变化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(3): 594-597.
[8] 陈小贤,钟洁,闫文娟,张红梅,姜霞,黄芊,薛世华,刘星纲. 树脂冠修复乳前牙的临床效果评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(5): 907-912.
[9] 王鹏,李大军,刘建彰. 上颌前牙宽度、前牙弓周长与前牙弓深度的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 124-128.
[10] 刘敏,章君荡,叶红强,赵一姣,赵旭斌,赵文艳,刘云松,周永胜. Smile Lite MDP便携摄影系统在前牙美学摄影中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(1): 187-192.
[11] 朱曚曚,李应龙,潘洁. 茶溶液着色离体牛切牙的着色效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 1083-1087.
[12] 赵一姣,刘怡,孙玉春,王勇. 一种基于曲率连续算法的冠、根三维数据融合方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(4): 719-723.
[13] 杨璇,乐迪,张艳玲,梁凌智,杨刚,胡文杰. 汉族青年上中切牙牙冠外形分类与龈乳头充满的相关性研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(5): 866-870.
[14] 王智,邹立东△. 锥形束CT对切牙管及其相对位置关系的测量分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 994-999.
[15] 甄敏,胡文杰,荣起国. 上颌中切牙冠根折行冠延长术并桩核冠修复的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 1015-1021.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!