动态导航下不同深度环钻定位精确度的体外评价

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.023

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 通过3D打印的体外模型评价使用动态导航系统引导下环钻在不同深度定位的精确度。方法: 设计并使用3D打印技术以Veroclear树脂制作标准化模型,分别在距离模型外表面5、10、15 mm深度预留半球型空腔。拍摄锥形束CT(cone beam CT,CBCT)并将数据导入动态导航软件中(迪凯尔公司,中国),建立导航路径规划。在导航引导下使用直径4.5 mm的环钻完成入路操作,每个深度完成10例入路。拍摄术后模型的CBCT,重建导航下的入路轨迹,并与设计路径进行对比,计算实际动态导航路径与设计路径之间的二维距离偏差、深度偏差、三维距离偏差及角度偏差。结果: 5 mm深度下动态导航终点位置与目标位置的二维距离偏差为(0.37±0.06) mm、深度偏差为(0.06±0.05) mm、三维距离偏差为(0.38±0.07) mm、角度偏差为2.46°±0.54°;10 mm深度下动态导航终点位置与目标位置的4项偏差分别为(0.44±0.05) mm、(0.16±0.06) mm、(0.47±0.05) mm、2.45°±1.21°;15 mm深度下动态导航终点位置与目标位置的4项偏差分别为(0.52±0.14) mm、(0.16±0.07) mm、(0.55±0.15) mm、3.25°±1.22°。随着进入深度的增加,动态导航系统的三维及深度精确度均下降(P<0.01),定位角度偏差与进入深度无关(P>0.01)。结论: 动态导航技术在15 mm的深度范围内仍可以达到较高的定位精确度,但其偏差值随着进入深度的增加而增大。

关键词: 动态导航, 打印, 三维, 牙模型, 定位标记

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of trephine bur drilling at different depths guided by dynamic navigation system in 3D printing in vitro model. Methods: A model at the depth of 5 mm, 10 mm, and 15 mm from the outer surface of which hemispherical cavities was reserved and the 3D printing technology was used to make the standardized model with Veroclear resin. The cone beam CT (CBCT) was taken and the data were imported into the dynamic navigation software (DCARER, China) to establish navigation path programming. Under the guidance of dynamic navigation, a trephine bur with a diameter of 4.5 mm was used to complete the access operation. At each depth, 10 approaches were completed. The postoperative model CBCT was taken. The approach trajectory under navigation was reconstructed and compared with the designed path. The two-dimensional distance deviation, depth deviation, three-dimensional distance deviation, and angle deviation between the actually prepared path and the designed path were calculated. Results: At the depth of 5 mm, the two-dimensional distance deviation between the end position of the prepared path and the designed path was (0.37±0.06) mm, the depth deviation was (0.06±0.05) mm, the three-dimensional distance deviation was (0.38±0.07) mm, and the angle deviation was 2.46°±0.54°; At the depth of 10 mm, the four deviations between the end position of prepared path and the designed path were (0.44±0.05) mm, (0.16±0.06) mm, (0.47±0.05) mm, and 2.45°±1.21°, respectively; At the depth of 15 mm, the four deviations were (0.52±0.14) mm, (0.16±0.07) mm, (0.55±0.15) mm, and 3.25°±1.22°, respectively. With the increase of entry depth, the three-dimensional and depth accuracy of dynamic navigation system decreased (P<0.01), and the positioning angle deviation had no relation with the entry depth (P>0.01). Conclusion: Dynamic navigation technology can achieve high positioning accuracy in the depth range of 15 mm, but its deviation increases with the increase of entry depth.

Key words: Dynamic navigation, Printing, three-dimensional, Dental models, Fiducial markers

中图分类号:

R783.3

刘思民,赵一姣,王晓燕,王祖华. 动态导航下不同深度环钻定位精确度的体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 146-152.

LIU Si-min,ZHAO Yi-jiao,WANG Xiao-yan,WANG Zu-hua. In vitro evaluation of positioning accuracy of trephine bur at different depths by dynamic navigation[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 146-152.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

不同进入深度下导航终点的位置偏差与角度偏差"

Deviations	Overall data	Depth			F	P
Deviations	Overall data	5 mm	10 mm	15 mm	F	P
2D distance deviation/mm, $x ?$ ±s	0.44±0.12	0.37±0.06	0.44±0.05	0.52±0.14	5.751	0.008
Depth deviation/mm, $\bar{x}\pm s$	0.13±0.78	0.06±0.05	0.16±0.06	0.16±0.07	6.915	0.004
3D distance deviation/mm, $\bar{x}\pm s$	0.47±0.12	0.38±0.07	0.47±0.05	0.55±0.15	4.509	0.020
Angle deviation/(°), $\bar{x}\pm s$	2.72±1.12	2.46±0.54	2.45±1.21	3.25±1.22	1.780	0.188
Initial position deviation/mm, $\bar{x}\pm s$	0.62±1.73	0.57±0.10	0.55±0.11	0.74±0.20	7.662	0.002

表1

表2

参考文献 22

[1]	Bobek SL. Applications of navigation for orthognathic surgery[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2014, 26(4):587-598. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2014.08.003
[2]	Wadley J, Dorward N, Kitchen N, et al. Pre-operative planning and intra-operative guidance in modern neurosurgery: A review of 300 cases[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1999, 81(4):217-225.
[3]	Bell RB. Computer planning and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2011, 69(3):592-605. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.06.030
[4]	Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation for dental implant placement-model-based evaluation[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2016, 42(5):399-405. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025
[5]	Block MS, Emery RW, Cullum DR, et al. Implant placement is more accurate using dynamic navigation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 75(7):1377-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026
[6]	Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Muñoz AP, Deglow ER, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static procedure for endodontic access cavities: An in vitro study[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(1):129. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010129
[7]	Dianat O, Nosrat A, Mostoufi B, et al. Accuracy and efficiency of guided root-end resection using a dynamic navigation system: A human cadaver study[J]. Int Endodo J, 2021, 54(5):793-801. doi: 10.1111/iej.v54.5
[8]	Jain SD, Carrico CK, Bermanis I. 3-dimensional accuracy of dynamic navigation technology in locating calcified canals[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(6):839-845. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.014
[9]	Wu D, Zhou L, Yang J, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guide for dental implant placement[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020, 6(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00272-0
[10]	Wei SM, Zhu Y, Wei JX, et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2021, 32(4):383-393. doi: 10.1111/clr.v32.4
[11]	Gambarini G, Galli M, Morese A, et al. Precision of dynamic navigation to perform endodontic ultraconservative access cavities: A preliminary in vitro analysis[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(9):1286-1290. doi: S0099-2399(20)30385-X pmid: 32553875
[12]	Aydemir CA, Arısan V. Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth rando-mized controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2020, 31(3):255-263.
[13]	Mediavilla Guzmán A, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, et al. Accuracy of computer-aided dynamic navigation compared to computer-aided static navigation for dental implant placement: An in vitro study[J]. J Clin Med, 2019, 8(12):2123. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122123
[14]	Pellegrino G, Taraschi V, Andrea Z, et al. Dynamic navigation: A prospective clinical trial to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2019, 22(2):139-147. pmid: 31134220
[15]	Hawkins TK, Wealleans JA, Pratt AM, et al. Targeted endodontic microsurgery and endodontic microsurgery: A surgical simulation comparison[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(5):715-722. doi: 10.1111/iej.13243 pmid: 31674678
[16]	Christofzik D, Bartols A, Faheem MK, et al. Shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in simulated 3D-printed root canal models[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(8):e0201129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201129
[17]	Nagy E, Fráter M, Antal M. Guided modern endodontic microsurgery by use of a trephine bur[J]. Orv Hetil, 2020, 161(30):1260-1265. doi: 10.1556/650.2020.31778
[18]	Buniag AG, Pratt AM, Ray JJ. Targeted endodontic microsurgery: A retrospective outcomes assessment of 24 cases[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(5):762-769. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.01.007
[19]	Collyer J. Stereotactic navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 48(2):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.04.037 pmid: 20061072
[20]	Popowicz W, Palatyńska-Ulatowska A, Kohli MR. Targeted endodontic microsurgery: Computed tomography-based guided stent approach with platelet-rich fibrin graft: A report of 2 cases[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(12):1535-1542. doi: S0099-2399(19)30626-0 pmid: 31606146
[21]	Rismanchian M, Bajoghli F, Gholamreza T, et al. Dental implants: Early versus standard two-stage loading (animal study)[J]. J Oral Implant, 2014, 40(1):84-93. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00202
[22]	Gambarini G, Galli M, Stefanelli LV, et al. Endodontic microsurgery using dynamic navigation system: A case report[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(11):1397-1402. doi: S0099-2399(19)30544-8 pmid: 31515047

相关文章 15

[1]	唐祖南,胡耒豪,陈震,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 增强现实技术在口腔颌面颈部解剖识别中的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 541-545.
[2]	展新新,曹露露,项东,汤皓,夏丹丹,林红. 成型方向对3D打印口腔义齿基托树脂材料物理性能及力学性能的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 345-351.
[3]	吕梁,张铭津,温奧楠,赵一姣,王勇,李晶,杨庚辰,柳大为. 应用三维软组织空间线角模板法评价颏部对称性[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 106-110.
[4]	毛渤淳,田雅婧,王雪东,李晶,周彦恒. 骨性Ⅱ类高角患者拔牙矫治前后的面部软硬组织变化[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 111-119.
[5]	凌晓彤,屈留洋,郑丹妮,杨静,闫雪冰,柳登高,高岩. 牙源性钙化囊肿与牙源性钙化上皮瘤的三维影像特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 131-137.
[6]	胡攀攀,李彦,刘啸,唐彦超,李梓赫,刘忠军. 自稳式人工椎体在颈椎前路手术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 161-166.
[7]	黄莹,吴志远,周行红,蔡志刚,张杰. 股前外侧皮瓣修复上颌骨缺损术后面部软组织对称性感观分级[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 708-715.
[8]	张雯,刘筱菁,李自力,张益. 基于解剖标志的鼻翼基底缩窄缝合术对正颌患者术后鼻唇部形态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 736-742.
[9]	欧蒙恩,丁云,唐卫峰,周永胜. 基台边缘-牙冠的平台转移结构中粘接剂流动的三维有限元分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(3): 548-552.
[10]	温奥楠,刘微,柳大为,朱玉佳,萧宁,王勇,赵一姣. 5种椅旁三维颜面扫描技术正确度的初步评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(2): 343-350.
[11]	周华,王仁吉,刘忠军,刘晓光,吴奉梁,党礌,韦峰. 3D打印人工椎体在颈椎脊索瘤全脊椎切除术中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 144-148.
[12]	熊士凯,史尉利,王安鸿,谢兴,郭秦炜. 腓骨远端撕脱骨折的影像学诊断：踝关节X线与CT三维重建的比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 156-159.
[13]	高梓翔,王勇,温奥楠,朱玉佳,秦庆钊,张昀,王晶,赵一姣. 基于三维下颌骨平均模型的颌骨标志点自动确定方法[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(1): 174-180.
[14]	开地尔娅·阿不都热合曼,张荣赓,钱浩楠,邹振洋,丹尼娅·叶斯涛,范田园. 个性化剂量熔融沉积成型3D打印茶碱片剂的制备和体外评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(6): 1202-1207.
[15]	邢海英,陈玉辉,许珂,黄点点,彭清,刘冉,孙葳,黄一宁. 三维超声血管斑块定量分析技术评估颈动脉粥样硬化斑块[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(5): 991-999.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed