预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价

doi:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.01.030

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的: 比较传统夹板式印模和利用预成刚性连接杆系统进行无牙颌种植固定修复印模制取的操作复杂程度及精度差异。方法: 制备带有6颗种植体替代体的下颌无牙颌标准模型,种植体植入位置平齐骨面,在种植体替代体上连接多牙修复基台。对照组采用传统开窗夹板式印模技术制取印模,在多牙修复基台上连接转移杆,使用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯材料制作夹板,并制取开窗印模。试验组采用刚性连接杆系统制取开窗印模,在多牙修复基台上连接临时修复套筒,根据种植体间距,选择合适长度的预成刚性连接杆,使用少量聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯材料将套筒和预成刚性连接杆固定,制取开窗印模。实验组和对照组各重复6次印模制取,比较试验组和对照组的印模制取耗时差异。在制取的印模上连接基台替代体,灌制石膏模型,并使用模型扫描仪将石膏模型和标准模型转化为三角网格数据文件。将试验组和对照组模型分别与标准模型进行精度差异测量,比较两种印模方法获得模型的精度差异。结果: 在标准模型上进行印模制取,试验组用时显著低于对照组,两者差异有统计学意义[(984.5±63.3) s vs. (1 478.3±156.2) s, P<0.05]。与标准模型相比,在种植体基台处,试验组制取印模灌制模型均方根误差(root mean aquare,RMS)与对照组模型基本相同,两者差异无统计学意义[(16.9±5.5) μm vs. (20.2±8.0) μm, P>0.05]。结论: 预成刚性连接杆可以简化无牙颌种植即刻固定修复的印模流程,节约椅旁操作时间,获取的印模精度与传统印模技术无显著差异,值得在临床推广使用。

关键词: 牙种植, 颌, 无牙, 牙科印模技术, 牙修复体固位

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the operation complexity and accuracy of traditional splint impression technique and impression technique with prefabricated rigid connecting bar system for full-arch implants-supported fixed protheses in vitro. Methods: Standard mandibular edentulous model with six implant analogs was prepared. The implants were placed at the bone level and multiunit abutments screwed into the implants. Two impression techniques were performed: the traditional splint impression technique was used in the control group, and the rigid connecting bar system was used in the test group. In the control group, impression copings were screwed into the multiunit abutments and connected with autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Open tray impression was fabricated with custom tray and polyether. In the test group, cylinders were screwed into the multiunit abutments. Prefabricated rigid bars with suitable length were selected and connected to the cylinders with small amount of autopolymerizing acrylic resin, and open tray impression was obtained. Impression procedures were repeated 6 times in each group. The working time of the two impression methods were recorded and compared. Analogs were screws into the impressions and gypsum casts were poured. The gypsum casts and the standard model were transferred to stereolithography (STL) files with model scanner. Comparative analysis of the STL files of the gypsum casts and the standard model was carried out and the root mean square (RMS) error value of the gypsum casts of the control and test groups compared with the standard model was recorded. The trueness of the two impression techniques was compared. Results: The work time in the test group was significantly lower than that in the control group and the difference was statistically significant [(984.5±63.3) s vs. (1 478.3±156.2) s, P<0.05]. Compared with the standard model, the RMS error value of the implant abutments in the test group was (16.9±5.5) μm. The RMS value in the control group was (20.2±8.0) μm. The difference between the two groups was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: The prefabricated rigid connecting bar can save the chair-side work time in implants immediate loading of edentulous jaw and simplify the impression process. The impression accuracy is not significantly different from the traditional impression technology. The impression technique with prefabricated rigid connecting bar system is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Dental implantation, Jaw, edentulous, Dental impression technique, Dental prosthesis retention

中图分类号:

R783.6

王鹃,尉华杰,孙井德,邱立新. 预成刚性连接杆用于无牙颌种植即刻印模制取的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 54(1): 187-192.

WANG Juan,YU Hua-jie,SUN Jing-de,QIU Li-xin. Application evaluation of prefabricated rigid connecting bar in implants immediate impression preparation of edentulous jaw[J]. Journal of Peking University (Health Sciences), 2022, 54(1): 187-192.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

参考文献 18

[1]	Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A, et al. “All-on-4” imme-diate-function concept for completely edentulous maxillae: A clinical report on the medium (3 years) and long-term (5 years) outcomes[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012, 14(Suppl 1):e139-e150. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00395.x
[2]	Malo P, Lopes A, de Araujo Nobre M, et al. Immediate function dental implants inserted with less than 30N·cm of torque in full-arch maxillary rehabilitations using the all-on-4 concept: Retrospective study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 47(8):1079-1085.
[3]	Sahin S, Cehreli MC. The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: Current status[J]. Implant Dent, 2001, 10(2):85-92. pmid: 11450418
[4]	周立伟. 种植多单位修复中螺丝固位与粘接固位联合运用中机械并发症发生情况的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(1):63-66.
[5]	Liu X, Li M, Liu J, et al. Passively fitting implant-supported complete-arch interim restoration[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(5):733-736. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.018
[6]	Revilla-Leon M, Sanchez-Rubio JL, Oteo-Calatayud J, et al. Impression technique for a complete-arch prosjournal with multiple implants using additive manufacturing technologies[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(6):714-720. doi: S0022-3913(16)30511-X pmid: 27889076
[7]	Ma J, Rubenstein JE. Complete arch implant impression technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 107(6):405-410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60100-0
[8]	Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA, et al. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 123(1):96-104. doi: S0022-3913(19)30076-9 pmid: 31040026
[9]	Papaspyridakos P, Hirayama H, Chen CJ, et al. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: A comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2016, 27(9):1099-1105. doi: 10.1111/clr.2016.27.issue-9
[10]	Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2003, 89(2):186-192. pmid: 12616240
[11]	Liu Y, Di P, Zhao Y, et al. Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019, 34(4):1007-1014. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7049
[12]	Revilla-Leon M, Att W, Ozcan M, et al. Comparison of conventional, photogrammetry, and intraoral scanning accuracy of complete-arch implant impression procedures evaluated with a coordinate measuring machine[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(3):470-478. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.005 pmid: 32386912
[13]	陈江, 张思慧. 无牙颌种植修复的数字化临床诊疗流程[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2020, 36(3):193-198.
[14]	Ruttermann S, Alberts I, Raab WH, et al. Physical properties of self-, dual-, and light-cured direct core materials[J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2011, 15(4):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0405-y
[15]	Albiero AM, Benato R, Momic S, et al. Guided-welded approach planning using a computer-aided designed prosthetic shell for immediately loaded complete-arch rehabilitations supported by conometric abutments[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 122(6):510-515. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.002
[16]	Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, et al. Implant impression techniques for the edentulous jaw: A summary of three studies[J]. J Prosthodont, 2016, 25(2):146-150. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12305 pmid: 26032581
[17]	Gherlone EF, Sannino G, Rapanelli A, et al. Prefabricated bar system for immediate loading in edentulous patients: A 5-year follow-up prospective longitudinal study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018:7352125. doi: 10.1155/2018/7352125 pmid: 29682552
[18]	Hashemzadeh S, Yilmaz B, Zugaro F, et al. An alternative conversion technique for fabricating an interim fixed implant-supported complete arch prosjournal[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116(5):647-651. doi: S0022-3913(16)30147-0 pmid: 27460316

相关文章 15

[1]	唐祖南,胡耒豪,陈震,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 增强现实技术在口腔颌面颈部解剖识别中的应用评价[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(3): 541-545.
[2]	李红光,韩玮华,吴训,冯继玲,李刚,孟娟红. 关节腔冲洗联合液态浓缩生长因子注射治疗单侧颞下颌关节骨关节炎的初步研究[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(2): 338-344.
[3]	陈晨,梁宇红. 复杂根管上颌磨牙的根管治疗3例[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 190-195.
[4]	董佳芸,李雪芬,路瑞芳,胡文杰,孟焕新. 血管化骨瓣重建颌骨种植体周软组织病理学特点[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 25-31.
[5]	周颖,赵宁,黄竑远,李庆祥,郭传瑸,郭玉兴. 双层软组织缝合封闭技术在下颌骨中早期药物相关性颌骨骨坏死患者手术治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 51-56.
[6]	徐心雨,吴灵,宋凤岐,李自力,张益,刘筱菁. 基于下颌运动轨迹的正颌外科术中下颌骨髁突定位方法及初步精度验证[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 57-65.
[7]	王聪伟,高敏,于尧,章文博,彭歆. 游离腓骨瓣修复下颌骨缺损术后义齿修复的临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 66-73.
[8]	蔡安东,王晓霞,周文娟,柳忠豪. 下颌前突畸形患者上颌骨及髁突虚拟位置与术后现实位置的比较[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 74-80.
[9]	李穗,马雯洁,王时敏,丁茜,孙瑶,张磊. 上前牙种植单冠修复体切导的数字化设计正确度[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 81-87.
[10]	刘晓强,周寅. 牙种植同期植骨术围术期高血压的相关危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2024, 56(1): 93-98.
[11]	卢汉,张建运,杨榕,徐乐,李庆祥,郭玉兴,郭传瑸. 下颌牙龈鳞状细胞癌患者预后的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 702-707.
[12]	黄莹,吴志远,周行红,蔡志刚,张杰. 股前外侧皮瓣修复上颌骨缺损术后面部软组织对称性感观分级[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 708-715.
[13]	丁茜,李文锦,孙丰博,谷景华,林元华,张磊. 表面处理对氧化钇和氧化镁稳定的氧化锆种植体晶相及断裂强度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 721-728.
[14]	张雯,刘筱菁,李自力,张益. 基于解剖标志的鼻翼基底缩窄缝合术对正颌患者术后鼻唇部形态的影响[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(4): 736-742.
[15]	王哲,孙伟,杨雪,宋颖,姬爱平,白洁. 口腔急诊颌面部感染患者临床分析[J]. 北京大学学报（医学版）, 2023, 55(3): 543-547.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Groups	Impression work time/s	RMS value/μm
Traditional splint technique	1 478.3±156.2	16.9±5.5
Prefabricated rigid connecting bar technique	984.5±63.3	20.2±8.0
t	6.553	1.286
P	<0.001	0.210