北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 766-769. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.04.030

• 病例报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

双极雄激素序贯免疫检查点抑制剂治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌4例

刘圣杰,侯惠民,吕政通,丁鑫,王璐,张磊,刘明*()   

  1. 北京医院泌尿外科, 国家老年医学中心, 中国医学科学院老年医学研究院, 北京 100730
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-15 出版日期:2022-08-18 发布日期:2022-08-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘明 E-mail:liuming19731029@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81900700);北京医院临床研究启航专项(BJ-2022-157)

Bipolar androgen therapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: A report of 4 cases

Sheng-jie LIU,Hui-min HOU,Zheng-tong LV,Xin DING,Lu WANG,Lei ZHANG,Ming LIU*()   

  1. Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital; National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinses Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100070, China
  • Received:2022-03-15 Online:2022-08-18 Published:2022-08-11
  • Contact: Ming LIU E-mail:liuming19731029@163.com
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81900700);Beijing Hospital Clinical Research Sailing Project(BJ-2022-157)

RICH HTML

  

关键词: 前列腺癌, 双极雄激素, 免疫检查点抑制剂, 疗效, 安全性

Abstract:

The relationship between androgen and prostate cancer treatment has plagued the field of urologic oncology. To investigate the efficacy and safety of bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In August 2020, Beijing Hospital conducted an investigator-initiated study: Bipolar androgen therapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Up to now, the study has included 4 patients who completed the entire cycle of treatment. The mean age of the patients was 74.5 (68 to 82) years old, the mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 20.8 (9.9 to 8.36) μg/L, the mean testosterone was 0.50 (0.00 to 1.81) μg/L, and the Gleason score were 10 and 9, 7, 7 respectively. The pain scale score before treatment was 1.5 (1 to 2). In this study, 4 patients completed the entire cycle of treatment, and the treatment effect of the patients showed great heterogeneity. PSA in case 1 decreased from 24.0 μg/L to 0.47 μg/L, testosterone increased from 0.175 6 μg/L to 2.62 μg/L. PSA in case 2 increased from 9.939 μg/L to 168.536 μg/L, and testosterone increased from 0.0 μg/L increased to 2.85 μg/L. PSA increased from 13.31 μg/L to 39.278 μg/L in case 3, testosterone increased from 0.0 μg/L to 2.54 μg/L. and PSA increased from 36.0 μg/L to 350.2 μg/L in the case 4, testosterone increased from 1.81 μg/L to 3.85 μg/L. Except for one patient who showed significant PSA remission, the PSA levels of the remaining three patients remained high overall. There were no adverse reactions reported in 4 patients. In the follow-up, case 1 continued to use PD-1 monoclonal antibody (median progression free survival time was 10 months). Two patients who had previously been resistant to enzalutamide received enzalutamide again after the whole cycle of treatment, and their PSA decreased again, which indicated that the patient was sensitive to enzalutamide again. BAT had a certain therapeutic effect on mCRPC patients, and the safety was controllable. Its tumor control effect still needed long-term follow-up verification in large-sample clinical trials. BAT has a certain therapeutic effect on mCRPC patient, especially the resensitivity of tumors to enzalutamide can be restored. Immune checkpoint inhibitors may have therapeutic potential in patients with prostate cancer treated with BAT and enzalutamide.

Key words: Prostate cancer, Bipolar androgen therapy, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Efficacy, Safety

中图分类号: 

  • R737

图1

4例患者治疗后PSA和睾酮变化 a, base line; b, 3 days after the first course of treatment; c, 7 days after the first course of treatment; d, 14 days after the first course of treatment; e, the second course of treatment; f, 3 days after the second course of treatment; g, 7 days after the second course of treatment; h, 14 days after the second course of treatment; i, the third course of treatment; j, the fourth course of treatment; k, end of the trial. A, case 1; B, case 2; C, case 3; D, case 4."

1 毕学翠. 北京2022年冬奥会运动员医疗保障前瞻: 基于2010年、2014年冬奥会运动员损伤情况分析[J]. 中国学校体育(高等教育), 2018, 5 (12): 81- 86.
2 王古岩, 郭向阳. 抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情: 麻醉相关感染控制的改良[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2020, 40 (3): 257- 261.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20200213.00301
3 中华医学会麻醉学分会气道管理学组. 新型冠状病毒肺炎危重型患者气管插管术的专家建议(1.0版)[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2020, 40 (3): 287- 290.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20200218.00307
4 米卫东, 黄宇光, 孙立, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间常规手术麻醉管理和防控流程建议[J]. 麻醉安全与质控, 2020, 4 (1): 9- 11.
5 北京协和医院新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎诊治专家组. 北京协和医院关于"新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎"诊疗建议方案(V2.0)[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2020, 59 (3): 186- 188.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2020.03.003
6 李阳, 李占飞, 毛庆祥, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情期间严重创伤紧急手术及感染防护专家共识[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2020, 36 (2): 97- 103.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2020.02.001
7 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第八版)[J]. 中国医药, 2020, 15 (10): 1494- 1499.
8 兰星, 杨磊, 伍静, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎流行期间麻醉科的感染控制: 武汉协和医院的经验[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2020, 40 (3): 267- 270.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20200224.00303
9 郭莉, 高兴莲, 常后婵, 等. 疑似或确诊新型冠状病毒肺炎患者手术室感染防控专家共识[J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 2020, 19 (5): 385- 392.
10 北京市医院感染质量控制和改进中心, 北京市临床麻醉质量控制与改进中心, 北京护理学会. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间围手术期感染防控措施(试行)[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30 (17): 2592- 2594.
11 Davis E , Loiacono R , Summers RJ . The rush to adrenaline: drugs in sport acting on the beta-adrenergic system[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2008, 154 (3): 584- 597.
doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.164
12 武汉药学会《医疗机构含兴奋剂药品规范管理专家共识》编写组. 医疗机构含兴奋剂药品规范管理专家共识[J]. 医药导报, 2019, 38 (11): 1391- 1397.
13 Xuezhao C , Paul FW , Hong M . An update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting[J]. J Anesth, 2017, 31 (4): 617- 626.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-017-2363-x
14 Strzelecki A , Weafer J , Stoops WW . Human behavioral pharmacology of stimulant drugs: An update and narrative review[J]. Adv Pharmacol, 2022, 93, 77- 103.
[1] 步召德, 冯梦宇, 季科. 早期胃癌行前哨淋巴结导航手术的实践与思考[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 239-243.
[2] 刘友东, 吕亚军, 陈杰, 臧明德, 潘宏达, 刘晓文, 陆俊, 刘凤林. 全腹腔镜保留贲门胃底胃次全切除术治疗中上部胃癌的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 301-306.
[3] 魏竞尧, 叶菊香, 周美玲, 付伟伟, 刘鑫, 翟康乐, 石岩岩, 丁士刚, 张静. 原发性胃淋巴瘤的内镜特征分析及疗效预测[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 342-350.
[4] 杨小勇, 张帆, 马潞林, 刘承. 前列腺导管腺癌临床特征及腺外侵犯的影响因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(5): 956-960.
[5] 刘杰, 马茗微, 王庆安, 石明, 尹金鹏, 王占平, 申静涛, 高献书. 基于锥形束CT的前列腺癌放射治疗两种体位固定方式摆位误差比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 692-697.
[6] 杨源源, 张珊珊, 俞光岩, 杨辉俊, 杨宏宇. 部分下颌下腺切除术治疗下颌下腺良性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 334-339.
[7] 刘家骏, 刘国康, 朱玉虎. 免疫相关性重症肺炎1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(5): 932-937.
[8] 黄教悌,胡菁,韩博. 治疗相关神经内分泌前列腺癌机制研究与靶向治疗新进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 557-561.
[9] 邢念增,王明帅,杨飞亚,尹路,韩苏军. 前列腺免活检创新理念的临床实践及其应用前景[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 565-566.
[10] 颜野,李小龙,夏海缀,朱学华,张羽婷,张帆,刘可,刘承,马潞林. 前列腺癌根治术后远期膀胱过度活动症的危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 589-593.
[11] 于书慧,韩佳凝,钟丽君,陈聪语,肖云翔,黄燕波,杨洋,车新艳. 术前盆底肌电生理参数对前列腺癌根治性切除术后早期尿失禁的预测价值[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(4): 594-599.
[12] 刘佐相,陈晓薇,赵厚宇,詹思延,孙凤. 真实世界中2型糖尿病患者二甲双胍联用西格列汀的心血管安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(3): 424-430.
[13] 应沂岑,唐琦,杨恺惟,米悦,范宇,虞巍,宋毅,何志嵩,周利群,李学松. 泌尿肿瘤免疫检查点抑制剂相关性肌炎的临床特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 644-651.
[14] 秦彩朋,宋宇轩,丁梦婷,王飞,林佳兴,杨文博,杜依青,李清,刘士军,徐涛. 肾癌免疫治疗疗效评估突变预测模型的建立[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(4): 663-668.
[15] 顾阳春,刘颖,谢超,曹宝山. 程序性死亡蛋白-1抑制剂治疗晚期肺癌出现垂体免疫不良反应3例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(2): 369-375.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!