北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 711-716. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.013

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

前列腺体积不同的患者经尿道光纤铥激光前列腺剜除术的有效性及安全性比较

左超1,2,*, 王国立1,*, 杨昆霖1, 车新艳1, 孟一森1,*(), 张凯1,*()   

  1. 1. 北京大学第一医院泌尿外科, 北京 100034
    2. 北京市密云区医院泌尿外科, 北京 101500
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-03 出版日期:2025-08-18 发布日期:2025-08-02
  • 通讯作者: 孟一森, 张凯
  • 作者简介:

    * These authors contributed equally to this work

  • 基金资助:
    研究型病房卓越临床研究计划(BRWEP2024W054070103); 中央高水平医院临床科研专项-北京大学第一医院科技成果转化孵育引导基金(2023CX01)

Comparison of efficacy and safety of transurethral thulium fiber laser enucleation of prostate in patients with different prostate volumes

Chao ZUO1,2, Guoli WANG1, Kunlin YANG1, Xinyan CHE1, Yisen MENG1,*(), Kai ZHANG1,*()   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
    2. Department of Urology, Beijing Miyun District Hospital, Beijing 101500, China
  • Received:2025-03-03 Online:2025-08-18 Published:2025-08-02
  • Contact: Yisen MENG, Kai ZHANG
  • Supported by:
    the Clinical Research Program for Researching Hospital Wards(BRWEP2024W054070103); the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding-Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation Incubation Guidance Fund Project of Peking University First Hospital(2023CX01)

RICH HTML

  

摘要:

目的: 评估采用光纤铥激光前列腺剜除术(thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate,ThuFLEP)治疗超大体积(>200 mL)前列腺的有效性和安全性。方法: 回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年5月,于北京大学第一医院由同一泌尿外科医师进行手术的485例良性前列腺增生(benign prostatic hyperplasia, BPH)患者的临床资料,患者均采用光纤铥激光,根据前列腺总体积(total volume of the prostate,TPV)将患者分为三组:A组TPV < 100 mL、B组100 mL≤TPV < 200 mL、C组TPV≥200 mL。三组患者的年龄[(69.38±7.79)岁、(69.64±8.69)岁、(70.32±7.44)岁]、国际前列腺症状评分(International Prostate Symptom Score,IPSS)[(22.7±1.9)分、(22.8±2.7)分、(25.8±3.7)分]、最大尿流率(maximum urinary flow rate,Qmax)[(7.9±2.7) mL/s、(9.3±4.3) mL/s、(9.9±3.3) mL/s]差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);三组患者的前列腺体积[(103.49±46.19) mL、(75.73±30.69) mL、(273.49±49.19) mL]、前列腺特异性抗原(prostate specific antigen, PSA)[3.52 (1.05, 8.76) μg/L、6.78 (1.61, 7.45) μg/L、8.52 (5.05, 12.76) μg/L]差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结果: 所有患者的手术均顺利完成,三组患者的剜除时间[30.0 (21.2, 44.5) min、41.6 (31.2, 52.5) min、45.1 (35.2, 50.0) min]、住院时间[(6.06±1.21) d、(6.15±1.50) d、(7.71±1.74) d]差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);而三组患者的术后留置导尿管时间[(4.0±1.4) d、(4.0±1.3) d、(6.6±1.1) d]、手术时间[61 (42, 89) min、82 (62, 105) min、115 (96, 142) min]、剜除效率[1.29 (0.71, 1.56) g/min、1.67 (1.23, 2.15) g/min、2.74 (2.20, 3.34) g/min]、血红蛋白下降值[12 (7, 19) g/L、17 (11, 24) g/L、27 (19, 35) g/L]差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。线性回归分析显示,剜除效率与剜除重量之间存在较强的正向线性相关(r=0.880,P < 0.001),剜除效率随着前列腺体积增加而提高。术后三组患者之间的IPSS[(6.6±1.7)分、(6.2±1.4)分、(4.6±1.1)分]、Qmax[(18.9±3.1) mL/s、(16.8±3.8) mL/s、(22.9±7.1) mL/s]差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后的IPSS、Qmax与术前比较差异均有统计学意义,但术后C组Qmax的提高明显高于其他两组(P < 0.05)。术后并发症以Clavien-Dindo并发症系统评分为标准,分为Clavien-Dindo Ⅰ (尿潴留、持续性血尿)、Clavien-Dindo Ⅱ (腺体残余、泌尿系感染、输血)和Clavien-Dindo Ⅲ (尿道狭窄、膀胱颈挛缩、出血并再次手术),三组患者术后均随访3个月,Clavien-Dindo的并发症发生率分别为5.2% (13例)、6.7% (12例)和12.1% (7例),组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),其中,泌尿系感染、输血及出血并再次手术的组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),其他并发症的组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论: 前列腺体积越大,输血及再次手术的风险增高,剜除效率随着前列腺体积的增加而提高,光纤铥激光前列腺剜除术治疗超大体积的BPH安全、有效。

关键词: 前列腺增生, 光纤铥激光, 剜除术, 手术后并发症

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) in the treatment of oversized (>200 mL) prostate. Methods: Clinical data of 475 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients operated by the same urologist at Peking University First Hospital from January 2022 to May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, all of whom were treated with thulium fiber laser, and the patients were divided into three groups according to the total volume of the prostate (TPV): group A (TPV < 100 mL), group B (100 mL≤TPV < 200 mL), and group C (TPV≥200 mL). The age of the patients in the three groups [(69.38±7.79) years, (69.64±8.69) years, (70.32±7.44) years], International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) [(22.7±1.9), (22.8±2.7), (25.8±3.7)], and the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) [(7.9±2.7) mL/s, (9.3±4.3) mL/s, (9.9±3.3) mL/s] were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The prostate volume in the three groups [(103.49±46.19) mL, (75.73±30.69) mL, (273.49±49.19) mL] and prostate specific antigen (PSA) [3.52 (1.05, 8.76) μg/L, 6.78 (1.61, 7.45) μg/L, 8.52 (5.05, 12.76) μg/L] were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Results: All surgeries were successfully completed. The dif-ferences in enucleation time [30.0 (21.2, 44.5) min, 41.6 (31.2, 52.5) min, 45.1 (35.2, 50.0) min] and hospitalization time [(6.06±1.21) d, (6.15±1.50) d, (7.71±1.74) d] among the three groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05); and the differences in the postoperative indwelling catheter time [(4.0±1.4) d, (4.0±1.3) d, (6.6±1.1) d], operative time [61 (42, 89) min, 82 (62, 105) min, 115 (96, 142) min], enucleation efficiency [1.29 (0.71, 1.56) g/min, 1.67 (1.23, 2.15) g/min, 2.74 (2.20, 3.34) g/min], and hemoglobin drop values [12 (7, 19) g/L, 17 (11, 24) g/L, 27 (19, 35) g/L] were statistically different (P < 0.05). Linear regression ana-lysis was used to show a strong positive linear correlation between enucleation efficiency and enucleation weight (r=0.880, P < 0.001), and the enucleation efficiency increased with the increase of prostate volume. The differences in IPSS [(6.6±1.7), (6.2±1.4), (4.6±1.1)] and Qmax [(18.9±3.1) mL/s, (16.8±3.8) mL/s, (22.9±7.1) mL/s] were not statistically significant among the three groups (P>0.05), and the differences in IPSS and Qmax were statistically significant compared with those before surgery. The differences were statistically significant in preoperative comparisons, but the postoperative urinary flow rate of group C increased significantly more than the remaining two groups in terms of Qmax (P < 0.05). The patients in the three groups were followed up for 3 months, and post-operative complications were categorized into Clavien-Dindo Ⅰ (urinary retention, persistent hematu-ria), Clavien-Dindo Ⅱ (glandular remnants, urinary tract infection, blood transfusion) and Clavien-Dindo Ⅲ (urethral stenosis, contracture of the bladder neck, and reoperation for hemorrhage) based on the Clavien-Dindo Complications System score, the incidence of Clavien-Dindo in the three groups was 5.2% (13 cases), 6.7% (12 cases) and 12.1% (7 cases), respectively, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05); among them, there were statistically significant differences in urinary infection, blood transfusion and bleeding reoperation (P < 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference in the remaining complications (P>0.05). Conclusion: The risk of blood transfusion and re-hemostasis increases with larger prostate volume, the efficiency of enucleation increases with the increase of prostate vo-lume, and thulium fiber laser prostate enucleation is safe and effective in the treatment of large-volume BPH.

Key words: Prostatic hyperplasia, Thulium fiber laser, Enucleation, Postoperative complications

中图分类号: 

  • R697.3

表1

BPH患者的一般资料"

Items Group A Group B Group C F/H P
Age/years, ${\bar x}$±s 69.38±7.79 69.64±8.69 70.32±7.44 1.48 0.231
Prostate volume/mL, ${\bar x}$±s 103.49±46.19 75.73±30.69 273.49±49.19 1.134 0.007
tPSA/(μg/L), M(P25, P75) 3.52 (1.05, 8.76) 6.78 (1.61, 7.45) 8.52 (5.05, 12.76) 0.981 0.012
IPSS, ${\bar x}$±s 22.7±1.9 22.8±2.7 25.8±3.7 1.897 0.543
Qmax/(mL/s), ${\bar x}$±s 7.9±2.7 9.3±4.3 9.9±3.3 1.008 0.238

表2

BPH患者围手术期资料"

Items Group A Group B Group C F/Z P
Operative time/min, M(P25, P75) 61 (42, 89) 82 (62, 105) 115 (96, 142) 1.917 0.004
Enucleation time/min, M(P25, P75) 30.0 (21.2, 44.5) 41.6 (31.2, 52.5) 45.1 (35.2, 50.0) 10.07 0.673
Hospitalization period/d, ${\bar x}$±s 6.06±1.21 6.15±1.50 7.71±1.74 23.05 0.165
Enucleation efficacy/(g/min), M(P25, P75) 1.29 (0.71, 1.56) 1.67 (1.23, 2.15) 2.74 (2.20, 3.34) 16.29 <0.001
Catheterization period/d, ${\bar x}$±s 4.0±1.4 4.0±1.3 6.6±1.1 2.178 0.045
Decrease in hemoglobin/(g/L), M(P25, P75) 12 (7, 19) 17 (11, 24) 27 (19, 35) 3.984 0.003

图1

前列腺体积与剜除效率的线性回归分析"

图2

不同体积前列腺剜除手术的时间(剜除时间+止血时间+粉碎取出时间)"

表3

术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo)"

Complications Group A Group B Group C P
Overall adverse events, n(%) 13 (5.2) 12 (6.7) 7 (12.1) 0.004
Clavien-Dindo Ⅰ, n 2 1 2
    Recatheterization 1 1 1 0.446
    Hematuresis 1 0 1 0.166
Clavien-Dindo Ⅱ, n 2 6 4
    Clot retention 0 2 0 0.213
    Urinary tract infection 1 1 2 0.041
    Transfusion 1 3 2 0.013
Clavien-Dindo Ⅲ, n 9 5 1
    Urethral stricture 4 1 0 0.420
    Bladder neck contracture 5 0 0 0.033
    Reoperation 0 4 1 0.034
1
Zhu C , Wang DQ , Zi H , et al. Epidemiological trends of urinary tract infections, urolithiasis and benign prostatic hyperplasia in 203 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019[J]. Mil Med Res, 2021, 8 (1): 64- 76.
2
Baboudjian M , Hashim H , Bhatt N , et al. Summary paper on underactive bladder from the European Association of Urology guidelines on non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms[J]. Eur Urol, 2024, 86 (3): 213- 220.
3
Tallè M , Giulioni C , Papaveri A , et al. Influence of preoperative indwelling urinary catheter on outcomes of high-power holmium laser enucleation for very large prostate (≥ 200 mL)[J]. World J Urol, 2025, 43 (1): 223- 229.
4
Gabrielson AT , Tanidir Y , Castellani D , et al. A global survey of ergonomics practice patterns and rates of musculoskeletal pain among urologists performing retrograde intrarenal surgery[J]. J Endourol, 2022, 36 (9): 1168- 1176.
5
Doizi S . Lasers for benign prostatic hyperplasia (hybrid, blue diode, TFL, Moses). Which one to choose?[J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2022, 32 (4): 438- 442.
6
Nunes RV , Manzano J , Truzzi JC , et al. Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992), 2017, 63 (2): 95- 99.
7
左超, 杨昆霖, 车新艳, 等. "U"形整叶法经尿道光纤铥激光前列腺剜切术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效和安全性[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 45 (7): 515- 520.
8
Sandhu JS , Bixler BR , Dahm P , et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): AUA guideline amendment 2023[J]. J Urol, 2024, 211 (1): 11- 19.
9
Bulai CA , Multescu RD , Geavlete PA , et al. The impact of transurethral enucleation therapeutic approach in all-size benign prostatic obstruction pathology: From contemporary technological advances to evidence-based clinical progresses[J]. Diagnostics (Basel), 2025, 15 (4): 416- 421.
10
中华医学会泌尿外科学分会激光学组, 微创学组, 尿控学组. 经尿道激光前列腺剜除术热点问题中国专家共识[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 45 (7): 489- 496.
11
Boxall NE , Georgiades F , Miah S , et al. A call for HoLEP: AEEP for mega-prostates (≥ 200 cc)[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39 (7): 2347- 2353.
12
Wang J , Wu S , Wang M . Role of thulium laser and holmium laser in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. Iran J Public Health, 2024, 53 (3): 495- 507.
13
左超, 杨昆霖, 李志存, 等. "双沟双环法"经尿道铥激光前列腺剜除术单一术者学习曲线分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2023, 103 (20): 1563- 1567.
14
Zell MA , Abdul-Muhsin H , Navaratnam A , et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for very large benign prostatic hyperplasia (≥ 200 cc)[J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39 (1): 129- 134.
15
Chen YZ , Lin WR , Chow YC , et al. Analysis of risk factors of bladder neck contracture following transurethral surgery of prostate[J]. BMC Urol, 2021, 21 (1): 59- 63.
[1] 赵兆, 张维宇, 杨文博, 张勇杰, 张晓鹏, 赵慧颖, 周刚, 王强. 低龄、低体重儿童肾移植2例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(4): 803-807.
[2] 刘宁, 满立波, 何峰, 黄广林, 翟建坡. 良性前列腺增生患者排尿中断症状与尿动力学指标的相关性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2025, 57(2): 328-333.
[3] 许素环,王蓓蓓,庞秋颖,钟丽君,丁炎明,黄燕波,车新艳. 等体温膀胱冲洗对经尿道前列腺电切术患者干预效果的meta分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 676-683.
[4] 李辉,高阳旭,王书磊,姚红新. 恶性肿瘤患儿完全植入式静脉输液港手术并发症[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(6): 1167-1171.
[5] 李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[6] 董文敏,王明瑞,胡浩,王起,许克新,徐涛. Allium覆膜金属输尿管支架长期留置治疗输尿管-回肠吻合口狭窄的初期临床经验及随访结果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 637-641.
[7] 高健,胡立宝,陈尘,郅新,徐涛. 经皮肾镜去石术后出血的介入治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(4): 667-671.
[8] 马凯,曲星珂,许清泉,熊六林,叶雄俊,安立哲,陈伟男,黄晓波. 肾移植术后移植肾输尿管膀胱吻合口狭窄的腔内治疗:13例报道[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1155-1158.
[9] 刘可,张帆,肖春雷,夏海缀,郝一昌,毕海,赵磊,刘余庆,卢剑,马潞林. 低功率钬激光“七步两叶法”前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(6): 1159-1164.
[10] 徐稼轩,王宏志,董军,陈小杰,杨勇,陈仁雄,王国栋. 食管癌术后急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 1057-1062.
[11] 李旭, 李奉龙, 鲁谊, 朱以明, 郭斯翊, 李屹钧, 姜春岩. 锁定钢板治疗非骨质疏松性复杂肱骨近端骨折的中期临床及影像学随访研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2017, 49(5): 855-860.
[12] 黄珺君,张红,章巍,王玺,龚玉红,王广发. 支气管镜下介入治疗早期并发症的独立危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2016, 48(6): 1006-1011.
[13] 葛娜,关明,李茜,李率,王恩博. 可弯曲喉罩在颌面外科日间手术的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(6): 1010-1014.
[14] 刘坤,徐宗源,孟峻嵩,傅广波,顾硕,顾民. 术前营养风险对根治性全膀胱切除术后并发症发生率的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(5): 800-803.
[15] 刘宁, 黄广林, 满立波, 何峰, 王海东, 王海, 李贵忠, 王建伟. 缩短钬激光前列腺剜除术学习曲线的方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(4): 720-723.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!