北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 555-561. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.03.031

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

Tweed-Merrifield技术矫治成人严重双颌前突的疗效评价

黄俊强1,2*, 刘施瑶1*, 江久汇1△   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院正畸科,北京100081;2. 广州医科大学附属第三医院口腔科,广州510000)
  • 出版日期:2016-06-18 发布日期:2016-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 江久汇 E-mail:drjiangw@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    首都临床特色应用研究专项基金(Z121107001012024) 资助

Therapeutic evaluation of the correction of the severe bi-maxillary protrusion cases by Tweed-Merrifield technique

HUANG Jun-qiang1,2*, LIU Shi-yao1*, JIANG Jiu-hui1△   

  1. (1.Department of Orthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Department of Stomatology, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 51000, China)
  • Online:2016-06-18 Published:2016-06-18
  • Contact: JIANG Jiu-hui E-mail:drjiangw@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the Grants from Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, China (Z121107001012024)

摘要:

目的:利用Johnston分析法评价Tweed-Merrifield技术矫治双颌严重前突成人患者牙性及骨性变化对治疗结果的影响。方法:应用回顾性自身对照方法,对12 例采用Tweed-Merrifield拔牙技术矫治的双颌前突成人患者采用Johnston分析法和华正测量软件对常规测量项目进行矫治前后的X线头影测量对比分析。结果:矢状方向上,上颌骨相对颅底后移1.30 mm,下颌骨相对颅底前移2.12 mm,上下颌骨相对位置变化了3.42 mm;上下切牙均明显后移并直立,上下磨牙略前移,矫治后磨牙关系及前牙覆盖分别改变了3.44 mm和4.23 mm。ANB、U1NA、U1/NA、U1/SN、L1NB、L1/NB、L1/MP值治疗后分别改变 -(1.98±1.55)°(P=0.012)、-(5.08±4.6) mm(P=0.002)、-(11.79±1.21)°(P=0.004)、-(13.55±6.32)°(P=0.047)、-(3.17±3.07) mm(P=0.010)、 -(6.84±2.55)°(P=0.038)、-(4.13±2.24)°(P=0.048),差异均有统计学意义。结论:TweedMerrifield技术通过定向力系统的施行,可以稳定支抗磨牙,内收前牙,显著改善双颌前突患者的软硬组织侧貌,且实现了较好的垂直向控制,适用于需要强支抗的双颌前突患者的拔牙矫治。

关键词:  双颌前突, 拔牙, 测颅法, 正畸学, 矫正, 治疗结果

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the influence of Tweed-Merrifield technique in correction of severe bimaxillary protrusion adult patients on the measurement of the dental and skeletal changes after orthodontic treatment by Johnston analysis and the regular cephalomatric analysis. Methods: Twelve adolescent patients with severe bimaxillary protrusion were included in this self-control retrospective study. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatments. All the radiographs were traced and analyzed by the method of Johnston analysis. Other measurements were evaluated using a series of 13 linear and angular measurements including SNA, SNB, ANB, U1-SN, U1-NA, U1/NA, L1-NB, U1/NB, L1/MP, U1-L1, (U1+L1)/2-AB, MP/SN and MP/FH from regular cephalomatric analysis. These measurements were also applied to compare the differences between pre-and post-treatments, which clarify the dental and skeletal changes by Johnston analysis. The effect of orthodontic correction was determined using the non-parameters test. Results: The maxillary moved backforward by 1.3 mm according to the stable skull base, while the mandible moved forward by 2.12 mm. The relative position between the maxillary and mandible (ABCH) changed 3.42 mm. The upper and lower incisors retracted significantly. The upper and lower molars moved slightly forward and the relative positions of upper and lower molars and anterior teeth after treatment were 3.44 mm and 4.23 mm respectively. After treatment, the parameters of ANB、U1NA、U1/NA、U1SN、L1NB、L1/NB and L1-M were reduced by -(1.98±1.55)°(P=0.012), -(5.08±4.6) mm (P=0.002), -(11.79±1.21)°(P=0.004), -(13.55±6.32)°(P=0.047), -(3.17±3.07) mm (P=0.010), -(6.84±2.55)°(P=0.038) and -(4.13±2.24)°(P=0.048) on average, whose changes had the statistically significant effects. Conclusion: Tweed-Merrifield technique (directional force technique) can stabilize anchorage molar, retract anterior teeth and significantly improve the hard and soft tissue profile for patients with bimaxillary protrusion, and make a good vertical control which means this technique is applicable to the patients who need strong anchorage. Even for the severe bimaxillary protrusion adult patients, the Tweed-Merrifield technique can control the anchoragewell and make the profiles improved greatly.

Key words: Bimaxillary protrusion, Tooth extraction, Cephalometry, Orthodontics, corrective, Treatment outcome

中图分类号: 

  • R782.23
[1] 李文菁,张保宙,李恒,赖良鹏,杜辉,孙宁,龚晓峰,李莹,王岩,武勇. 胫距跟融合治疗终末期踝和后足病变的中短期临床结果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2024, 56(2): 299-306.
[2] 邹雪,白小娟,张丽卿. 艾拉莫德联合托法替布治疗难治性中重度类风湿关节炎的疗效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(6): 1013-1021.
[3] 薛蔚,董樑,钱宏阳,费笑晨. 前列腺癌新辅助治疗与辅助治疗的现状及进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 775-780.
[4] 邱敏,宗有龙,王滨帅,杨斌,徐楚潇,孙争辉,陆敏,赵磊,卢剑,刘承,田晓军,马潞林. 腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗中高复杂程度肾肿瘤的效果[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(5): 833-837.
[5] 雷玥,杨颖婷,雷海华. 异位萌出诱导矫治器在第一恒磨牙异位萌出治疗中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(4): 766-封三.
[6] 王磊,韩天栋,江卫星,李钧,张道新,田野. 主动迁移技术与原位碎石技术在输尿管软镜治疗1~2 cm输尿管上段结石中的安全性和有效性比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2023, 55(3): 553-557.
[7] 李伟浩,李伟,张学民,李清乐,焦洋,张韬,蒋京军,张小明. 去分支杂交手术和传统手术治疗胸腹主动脉瘤的结果比较[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2022, 54(1): 177-181.
[8] 朱正达,高岩,何汶秀,方鑫,刘洋,魏攀,闫志敏,华红. 红色诺卡氏菌细胞壁骨架治疗糜烂型口腔扁平苔藓的疗效及安全性[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(5): 964-969.
[9] 王思雯,尤鹏越,刘玉华,王新知,唐琳,王梅. 两种可吸收生物膜联合去蛋白牛骨基质植入犬拔牙窝成骨的影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[10] 李潇,苏家增,张严妍,张丽琪,张亚琼,柳登高,俞光岩. 131I相关唾液腺炎的炎症分级及内镜治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2020, 52(3): 586-590.
[11] 王高南,焦剑,周彦恒,施捷. 正畸牙齿位置的移动对角化龈宽度的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(5): 931-936.
[12] 詹颖,杜祎甜,仰浈臻,张春丽,齐宪荣. 紫杉醇微球-原位凝胶的制备及其局部注射的抗肿瘤药效[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(3): 477-486.
[13] 杨泽川,刘朝旭,林阳,胡伟华,陈文坚,李锋,曾恒. 颈后路单开门椎管扩大成形术全钛板与交替钛板、缝线固定治疗颈椎病的对比研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 187-193.
[14] 游文喆,窦桂丽,夏斌. 乳牙间接牙髓治疗两年疗效观察及影响因素分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2019, 51(1): 65-69.
[15] 李欣艺,赵金霞,刘湘源. 抗磷脂抗体相关性复发性流产的诊治:附75例抗磷脂综合征患者妊娠期用药和结局分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2018, 50(6): 956-961.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!