北京大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 871-877. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2016.05.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

根管封闭剂对牙周膜细胞生物相容性的影响

胡佳1,2,邹晓英1,庄姮1△,高学军1   

  1. (1. 北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院,牙体牙髓科口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室, 北京100081; 2. 福建医科大学附属口腔医院牙体牙髓科, 福州350002)
  • 出版日期:2016-10-18 发布日期:2016-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 庄姮 E-mail:doctorzhuang@163.com

Effect of root canal sealers on biocompatibility of human periodontal ligament cells

HU Jia1,2,ZOU Xiao-ying1,ZHUANG Heng1△,GAO Xue-jun1   

  1. (1. Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Enginee-ring Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China; 2. School of Stomatology,Fujian Medical University,Fuzhou 350002, China)
  • Online:2016-10-18 Published:2016-10-18
  • Contact: ZHUANG Heng E-mail:doctorzhuang@163.com

摘要:

目的:研究氧化锌丁香油类(zinc oxide and eugenol based sealers,ZOE)、环氧树脂类(epoxy resin sealers,ERS)、硅酮基类(silicone based sealers,SBS)根管封闭剂对牙周膜细胞(human periodontal ligmant cells, hPDLCs)的增殖和矿化潜能的影响。方法:选用3颗不同人牙齿来源的hPDLCs进行重复实验,采用酶消化法+组织块培养法进行hPDLCs体外原代培养,按照培养基的不同成分分组:(1)ZOE固化 24 h 浸提液培养基组;(2)ZOE固化 1周浸提液培养基组;(3)ZOE固化 2周浸提液培养基组;(4)ERS固化 24 h 浸提液培养基组;(5)ERS固化 1周浸提液培养基组;(6)ERS固化 2周浸提液培养基组;(7)SBS固化 24 h 浸提液培养基组;(8)SBS固化 1周浸提液培养基组;(9)SBS固化 2周 浸提液培养基组;(10)不含浸提液培养基组(对照组)。采用倒置显微镜观察hPDLCs细胞形态的变化,3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑2)2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(methyl-thiazol-diphenyltetrazolium,MTT)法测定细胞增殖能力,试剂盒法测定碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphatase,ALP)活性。选取固化2周的各组材料制备矿化诱导浸提液,不含浸提液的矿化培养基为阳性对照组,采用茜素红染色法及氯化十六烷基吡啶半定量法分析矿化物形成情况。结果:比较相对增殖率( relative growth rate,RGR),ZOE固化2周内均具有中度或严重细胞毒性(RGR为13.6%~39.9%);ERS固化24 h具有轻微细胞毒性(RGR为63.6%~76.4%),固化1周后轻微或无细胞毒性(RGR为87.6%~95.3%);SBS固化后无明显细胞毒性(RGR为91.8%~106.7%)。比较ALP活性,SBS不同固化时间组间差异无统计学意义(F=3.397,P=0.053),且均高于ZOE和ERS组。半定量法检测数据显示,ZOE:D562 nm= 0.180±0.050,ERS:D562 nm= 2.968±0.201,SBS:D562 nm=3.623±0.039,对照组:D562 nm=3.477±0.102,即ZOE

关键词: 根管封闭剂, 牙周膜, 细胞, 培养的, 细胞增殖, 牙再矿化

Abstract:

Objective:To compare the effects of three root canal sealers with respect to time on biocompatibility of human periodontal ligament cells (hPDLCs).The sealers included zinc oxide and eugenol based sealers (ZOE), epoxy resin sealers (ERS) and silicone based sealers (SBS). Methods: hPDLCs were primarily cultured,with the method combining of tissue explant and enzymatic digestion. The cells were then exposed to different extract fluids:(1)ZOE extracted for 24 h group ;(2)ZOE extracted for 1 week group;(3)ZOE extracted for 2 weeks group;(4)ERS extracted after 24 h group;(5)ERS extracted after 1 week group;(6)ERS extracted after 2 weeks group;(7)SBS extracted after 24 h group;(8)SBS extracted after 1 week group;(9)SBS extracted after 2 weeks group;(10)Dulbecco modified Eagle’s medium/F12(DMEM/F12)as negative control group. Cell morphology was observed under an inverted microscope.Cell proliferation was measured by methyl-thiazol-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT)assay.ALP assay kit was used for measuring alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. Sealers of 2 weeks’ setting time were then immersed in an osteogenic medium for examination of mineral nodules and calcium deposits. Results: Considering the relative growth rate(RGR),ZOE was severely to moderately cytotoxic(RGR:13.6%-39.9%),while ERS was slightly or not cytotoxic (RGR: 87.6%-95.3%).Only SBS did not show any cytotoxicity after setting (RGR: 91.8%-106.7%). The setting time influenced the cytotoxicity of ERS which decreased after 1 week. Considering the ALP activity,there was no difference between SBS group and control group(F=3.397,P=0.053). According to the results of calcium deposits, ZOE:D562 nm= 0.180±0.050,ERS:D562 nm= 2.968±0.201,SBS:D562 nm= 3.623±0.039,Control:D562 nm= 3.477±0.102,the ranking of ALP activity and calcium deposits was as follows: ZOE

Key words: Root canal sealer, Periodontal ligament, Cells, cultured, Cell proliferation, Tooth remineralization

中图分类号: 

  • R783.1
[1] 王欧洋, 朱鹏磊, 林杰, 吴昊. LncRNA DANCR调节miR-656/BMPR1A轴对脑胶质瘤细胞恶性行为的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 616-623.
[2] 赵豆豆, 齐晅, 黄博, 高伟波, 裴源源, 金月波, 邵苗, 何菁. 感染性肺炎与免疫相关间质性肺病中淋巴细胞亚群的表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 624-630.
[3] 舒帆, 葛力源, 邓汉彰, 殷昊明, 欧俊永, 邓绍晖, 郝一昌, 陆敏, 张展奕, 段佩辰, 张树栋. 预后不良的肾细胞癌伴淋巴结转移的分子特征[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 631-640.
[4] 白晓强, 袁芷若, 周永胜, 吕珑薇. 动态牵张促进人骨髓间充质干细胞三维培养的成骨分化[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 641-649.
[5] 马小娟, 王好, 马学芹, 宋颖, 于佳卉, 孙艳, 李艳芳, 薛丽香, 李显龙, 杨建岭, 王艳. 高效和稳定提取原代成年小鼠心脏成纤维细胞的新方法[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 658-665.
[6] 马豆豆, 马晓彩, 常天静, 王丽芳, 丁艳, 石连杰. 临床表现似系统性红斑狼疮的大B细胞淋巴瘤骨髓受累1例[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 666-669.
[7] 高鹏, 刘燕玲, 李俊峰, 姚立琼. B/C基因型的乙型肝炎病毒在不同丙氨酸氨基转移酶状态下对Th17、Treg细胞及其比率的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(3): 674-677.
[8] 付浩, 申潞艳, 黄冰洋, 马少华. 免疫治疗背景下食管鳞状细胞癌围手术期治疗的临床思考[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 266-271.
[9] 李峥, 吕珑薇, 张晓, 夏丹丹, 张萍, 刘云松, 周永胜. 基于干细胞和生物材料调控的口腔颅颌面骨再生的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 272-277.
[10] 张晗, 杨馥嘉, 杨瑞莉. 干细胞功能调控在颅颌面组织再生修复中的研究进展[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 285-289.
[11] 温倩颖, 张丽卿, 秦安霖, 李小峰. 无症状高尿酸血症患者小肠细菌过度生长及炎症细胞因子表达水平[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 313-318.
[12] 殷昊明, 王子杰, 舒帆, 张展奕, 梁会, 张树栋. 肾透明细胞癌FABP6基因长转录本的表达及意义[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(2): 393-398.
[13] 曾立婷, 程凯远, 刘中宁, 李健, 杨静文, 姜婷. miR-488-5p促进大鼠骨髓间充质干细胞成神经、成骨分化及神经化骨再生[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 10-21.
[14] 初吉燕, 李萍, 田竞, 付笛语, 郭琳, 孙蕊, 李亚娣. 黑色素瘤缺乏因子2介导的细胞焦亡通路在特发性炎性肌病患者外周血单个核细胞中的表达[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 175-183.
[15] 赵业, 刁小莉, 熊焰. 细胞转移技术在微量细胞液病理诊断中的应用[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2026, 58(1): 208-213.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!